Go to National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa
Volume 7, 1874
This text is also available in PDF
(368 KB) Opens in new window
– 349 –

Art. L.—On the Fertilisation of Acianthus and Cyrtostilis.

[Read before the Auckland Institute, 1st June, 1874.]

1. Acianthus sinclairii.

In examining the fertilisation of this plant, we do not find contrivances so remarkable and unique as those that obtain in Pterostylis, or in other of the New Zealand Orchids; on the contrary, the mode employed is simple, and presents few features of interest. Yet, if the completeness of any method of fertilisation is to be judged of by the results obtained, as undoubtedly it should be, we must regard that of Acianthus as one of the most perfect of the many different modes in use among our Orchids.

The flowers, varying in number from one to twelve, are minute, and of an inconspicuous appearance. The lip, which is horizontally spread out in front of the flower, or slightly deflexed, is ovate-lanceolate in outline, and greatly concave, so as to form a kind of bucket. At its base it is furnished with two large glands, and the margins and point are also plentifully studded with minute fleshy papillæ. The column is somewhat curiously shaped. At first it is erect, but towards the summit suddenly arches over the lip, and is much thickened and expanded. The anther is terminal, two-celled, each cell possessing two pollinia, which are deeply bilobed, so as to resemble a horse shoe in shape. The stigma is a deep circular hollow situated just below the anther; and, by the arching of the upper part of the column, hangs directly over the lip. The rostellum is placed on its upper margin. It consists of two triangular projections, which at first are cellular, but ultimately resolve into masses of viscid matter, covered with an extremely delicate membrane. As the flower expands, the connection of these projections with the rest of the column becomes very slender, so that at last they can be detached by a comparatively slight touch, leaving the upper margin of the stigmatic chamber quite plane.

Long before the flower opens, each lobe of the anther splits gradually from base to apex, allowing the included pollinia almost to touch the upper part of the rostellate points. The pollinia then emit a number of excessively delicate thread-like projections, which reach the rostellum, and become firmly attached to it. So that, in a fully expanded flower, each set of pollen-masses is quite free from its anther cells, but they are firmly attached by their bases to their respective rostella, neither of which can be removed without bringing away the pollinia.

The glands at the base of the lip secrete nectar, which is stored up in the cavity just in front of them. From this circumstance alone we might surmise

– 350 –

that the flowers would be frequently visited by insects, and a little observation soon shows this to be a fact. On a warm sunny day it is almost impossible to watch a bed of this Orchid for any length of time without seeing numerous Diptera flitting from flower to flower, busily engaged in robbing them of their sweets.

If we now call to mind the manner in which the column arches over the lip, we can easily see that an insect crawling into the flower to get at the supply of nectar can hardly avoid touching one of the points of the rostellum, ranging almost directly over it; if it did so, the delicate exterior membrane would be at once ruptured, and the viscid mass firmly glued to the insect's back. Thus, on withdrawing from the flower, the visitor would carry away with it not only the portion of the rostellum which it had touched, but also the attached pair of pollinia. These (from each pollinium being nearly subdivided into two) would form four little projections standing rigidly erect on the back of the insect; and consequently, when conveyed to another flower, can hardly fail to strike the overhanging stigmatic chamber, which is sufficiently viscid to detach a portion, at least, of the pollinia from the body of the insect, thus ensuring the fertilisation of the flower.

As I have several times seen insects remove the pollinia, and on one occasion also seen a pollen-mass left on the stigma, there can be little doubt that fertilisation is conducted on this plan. That insect aid is absolutely required is proved by the fact that the pollinia remain in their cells, and never reach the stigma, when the plant is covered up or allowed to expand its flowers in a room. But, under natural conditions, the flowers are so frequently visited that the pollinia are generally removed directly after the opening of the blossoms; while the large proportion of capsules produced is good evidence of the completeness with which the visitors perform their duties. Out of eighty-seven flowers, borne on fourteen plants, no less than seventy-one matured capsules, and of those that had failed to do so, many were imperfect ones situated at the summit of the panicle, and probably incapable of producing seed. Another set, from a different locality, had borne forty-seven flowers, of which no less than forty-four had ripened capsules.

The fact that almost every perfect flower produces a capsule, is in remarkable contrast to what occurs in several other genera of our Orchids. For instance, Pterostylis is fertilised on a plan much more complex, and the co-adaptation of the various parts of the flower is so complete that almost every insect that fairly enters the flower must remove the pollinia, which is not the case in Acianthus. Yet, from some reason, probably from the want of sufficient attraction, the flowers are comparatively seldom visited, and consequently few capsules produced. In my account of the fertilisation of this genus, (Transactions of the N. Z. Institute, Vol. V, p. 356.) I have

– 351 –

estimated that about one quarter of the flowers produce capsules; but from subsequent observations I am now convinced that the number is much less. Corysanthes offers a case of imperfect fertilisation even more singular. In all the species the proportion of capsules produced is very small, and large patches can often be found that have failed to mature a single one. As an illustration, a bed of Corysanthes triloba, in a favourable situation for the visits of insects, expanded, during the last season, over two hundred flowers: yet of this large number only five succeeded in ripening capsules. We must be cautious, though, in assuming that the imperfect fertilisation of these plants is of much real disadvantage to them. In many districts Pterostylis trullifolia is quite as abundant as Acianthus; while the less general distribution of the species of Corysanthes is probably due to their organization not being so well adapted to a variety of conditions and habitats, rather than to the scarcity of seed produced. In their special localities they are often abundant.

2. Cyrtostylis oblonga.

The great resemblance that this plant bears to Acianthus, induced me to suppose that its fertilisation would be conducted on the same plan, and this appears to be the case. We find in Cyrtostylis, as in Acianthus, the lip horizontally spread out, secreting abundance of nectar; the column arching over it; the points of the rostellum hanging downwards, with the pollinia firmly fastened to their upper margins; together with other contrivances, all apparently co-ordinated, so that an insect, having once entered the flower, can hardly avoid attaching itself to the pollen-masses, and removing them on its departure.

On comparing the flowers of the two plants, we at once find a difference in the structure of the lip. In Acianthus this organ is concave, for the purpose of storing up nectar to serve as an attraction for insects: in Cyrtostylis it is narrow, and quite plain; but the same end is attained by allowing the nectar slowly to trickle down each side of the midrib. The secreting glands at the base of the lip are much smaller than in the former species, while the papillæ on the margins and points are totally wanting. The column agrees with that of Acianthus in most features, but is broadly winged on each side. This may be of use as a protection to the stigma, or perhaps the projections serve as guides for the proper withdrawal and insertion of the pollen-masses, No difference worth mention is found in the stigma, or rostellum; and the mode of attachment of the pollinia to the latter organ appears to be precisely the same in both plants. In the shape of the pollen-masses themselves, however, we find a marked divergence, for instead of being nearly subdivided, as in Acianthus, they are simply falcate in shape. They are laterally much compressed, and extremely friable.

– 352 –

Notwithstanding the minuteness of the flowers, they are frequently visited by insects, chiefly minute species of Diptera. The pollinia, however, are not removed with the same regularity and precision as in Acianthus, nor is such a large proportion of capsules produced. I find, though, that specimens from some localities give very discordant results in this respect, although as a rule there can be no doubt that the proportionate number of capsules matured is much less thon in Acianthus.

I have made no observations on the fertilisation of the only other species of Cyrtostylis (C. rotundifolia) native to New Zealand. The difference between the two plants is so slight (if indeed it is sufficient to allow a specific distinction being maintained) that I can entertain no doubt but that, on investigation, the mode of fertilisation will be found to be the same for both species.