Go to National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa
Volume 14, 1881
This text is also available in PDF
(527 KB) Opens in new window
– 173 –

Microdentopus maculatus, G. M. Thomson (Ann. & Mag. N.H., ser. v., vol. iv., p. 331).

This species was described by Mr. Thomson, from a single specimen, a female. It appears to be moderately common amongst seaweed in the rock-pools at Lyttelton. Amongst some specimens answering very well to his description I took one which also agreed with that description in every particular except as regards the gnathopoda. These (plate VIII., fig. 3) are very peculiar, the meros is produced inferiorly into a long acute spine reaching slightly beyond the extremity of the succeeding joint, the carpus; this spine bears a small tuft of setæ about one-third of its length from its extremity. The carpus is large, and is rather more than twice as long as broad. The propodos is much smaller; its inner edge is fringed with numerous setæ. The last joint forms a strong finger slightly curved at the end, its inner edge is smooth; numerous long setæ arise at its base. The second pair of gnathopoda are of more normal shape, the meros not being produced into a spine.

The first pair of gnathopoda closely resemble those of Aora gracilis and Aora typica,* though slightly different from both of them. Mr. Thomson has taken Aora typica in Dunedin Harbour, and he speaks of its resemblance to Microdentopus maculatus, and hints that they may possibly be male and female of the same species. The animal I have, though distinct

[Footnote] * “Brit. Mus. Cat. Amphip. Crust.,” pp. 160–2, pl. xxix., figs. 7 and 8.

[Footnote] † “Trans. N.Z. Inst.,” vol. xiii., p. 218.

– 174 –

from Aora typica, is, however, so very like Microdentopus maculatus in every part except the gnathopoda that I have little doubt that it, and not Aora typica, is really the male. This is also confirmed by the fact that the two were found together.