
Plates IX. and X.
The existence of blind Amphipodous Crustacea in wells and caves of England and Europe, has been long known; in this paper I record the existence of similar animals in New Zealand. The Crustacea which form the subject of this paper were obtained from a well at Eyreton, about six miles from Kaiapoi, North Canterbury. The well was made about seventeen years ago, it is not more than twenty-five feet deep, and it is fitted with a common suction pump, through the medium of which these interesting animals were obtained.
From this well I got three species of Amphipoda and one of Isopoda. In none of these have I seen any trace of eyes, though I have examined living as well as preserved specimens. The most interesting species is the Isopod; the only other blind Isopod inhabiting wells or caves that I know of is the genus Cæddolea, a species of which is found in the Mammoth Cave of Kentucky, and another in the Wyandotte Cave.*
[Footnote] * See “Nature,” 1872, pp. 11, 445, and 484.

The Isopod that I have to describe is remarkable from the fact that it has only six pairs of legs, whilst the normal number is seven pairs. In many Isopoda the young have at first only six pairs of legs, the last thoracic segment being but slightly developed and destitute of appendages,* and hence it might, at first sight, be thought that the animal I have is only an immature form. This, however, I think can hardly be the case, for there is nothing embryonic about the appearance of the animal, and moreover, I have examined altogether twenty-two specimens, varying in length from .16 of an inch to .46 of an inch, and these all agree in wanting the last pair of thoracic legs. These specimens were obtained at various times from January up to October, 1881, and I think it is hardly possible that these can all be immature forms, and that during the whole time not one mature form should have been obtained. If it is, therefore, a mature form, the absence of the last pair of thoracic legs must I suppose be due to arrested development.
[Footnote] * “Facts and Arguments for Darwin,” Fritz Müller, pp. 70–72.
