Go to National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa
Volume 14, 1881
This text is also available in PDF
(178 KB) Opens in new window
– 364 –

Art. LII.—Notes on Epacris microphylla in New Zealand.

[Read before the Auckland Institute, 5th September, 1881.]

In comparing the flora of New Zealand with that of Australia, the striking fact presents itself to us, that nearly all the species which are identical, and peculiar to the two countries, are plants bearing seeds specially adapted for dispersal by wind. Any evidence bearing on the interchange of species, by natural means, between Australia and New Zealand in the past, and more especially the present time, is of some value in assisting us in solving the problem of insular floras. In a partially occupied country positive evidence can hardly be expected; however, as the placing on record the time when a new species was first observed, independently of its possible mode of introduction, will be of great assistance to future botanists, my friend Mr. T. F. Oheeseman, F.L.S., suggested I should send a few notes on the discovery I made, about six years ago, of three plants of Epacris on the southern side of Manukau Harbour; which have since been determined by him as the Australian E. microphylla. It differs from any of our described species.

Shrub 2–3 feet in height, with virgate slender branches, stem often much branched. Leaves cordate, broadly ovate, shortly acuminate, tip slightly recurved, concave spreading, 3 millimètres long. Flowers small, white, numerous, often one in each axil, almost sessile, or on peduncles 1 mm. long. Bracts and sepals obtuse, or almost acute, sepals 1½ mm. long. Corolla tube shorter than the calyx; lobes 5, as long as the tube. Anthers wholly included. Hypogynous scales short. Style short. Seeds indefinite, extremely minute. Commences flowering in February, and attains its maximum of bloom in July.

The spikes are visited by the bee (Apis mellifica) and a number of small insects (Colaspis). As some of the plants are now growing under slightly changed conditions, it is not improbable their visits are beneficial. It is a shrub of great fertility and constitutional vigour. Considering it has had

– 365 –

to compete against a hardy indigenous vegetation, its increase has certainly, been rapid, especially within the last two years. It now forms a dense mass sixty years in circumference; the intermediate vegetation, Leptospernum, Pteris, and Pomaderris, is almost completely destroyed. From the main-mass seeds are being disseminated in a line with the prevailing winds.

Probably the reason that E. microphylla has become so firmly established in its new habitat is that when the seeds (or seed) fell they met with favourable conditions; that is, they germinated in a moist loamy hollow, and being unpalatable to all kinds of stock escaped destruction.

As to how it was introduced, I can only satisfactorily account for it on the hypothesis that the seeds were carried over from Australia by aerial currents; it is not improbable that was the was E. purpurascens (discovered nearly forty years ago by the late Dr. Sinclair) reached Manurewa, four miles N.E. of the present station of E. microphylla. Upwards of 1,300 miles may seem an enormous distance for seeds to be transported across the sea, independent of oceanic currents; and I would have hesitated in asserting that that was the way E. microphylla was introduced, only that I cannot account for its having reached so isolated a district except by natural means.

It may be of interest to mention that there are two plants of E. purpurascens established on the southern side of the river Pahurehure, about 5 and 7 miles southwest of Manurewa.