
Amphipoda.
Genus Cyamus, Lamarck.
(Bate's and Westwood's “British Sessile-eyed Crustacea,” vol. ii., p. 80.)
The following is the generic character as given by Bate and Westwood:—
“Head and first segment of the body fused into a pear-shaped mass. Eyes small and vertical. Segments of the pereion with the sides horizontally dilated; the legs attached to the postero-lateral margins; five pairs of strongly cheliform legs, wanting in the third and fourth segments, which are furnished with two pairs of branchial appendages, long and filiform. Pleon rudimental.”
Cyamus ceti, Martens, l.c., p. 85.
Specific description:—“Body depressed, elliptical, segments gaping at the sides (male narrower?). Third and fourth segments of the body with one long branchia on each side; armed at the base with two short appendages; second pair of hands armed beneath with two obtuse teeth, between which is a lunate incision. Length nearly half an inch.”
I received three specimens of this species from Professor Julius von Haast. In answer to my question as to the name of the whale on which they were found, he writes:—“The parasitic Crustacea were found on Euphysetes potsii, which, as it appears now from careful examination of further specimens, is identical with Viagia breviceps of the northern hemisphere.” With regard to its occurrence in European seas, Bate and Westwood say,—“We have no precise details of the locality and notice of capture of this species, beyond the general statement of its being found on the whale in British seas.”
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
Of the three specimens which Professor Haast kindly handed over to me, two appear to be males, one 17/30 inch in length of body, the other 16/30.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
The third specimen is a female with a great many young in the pouch beneath the body. It is smaller than the others; body 12/30 inch in length; it also has the body broader, and the segments do not gape so much at the sides.
I can find no important character by which these specimens can be distinguished from Cyamus ceti, as described and figured by Bate and Westwood. The penultimate joints of the last three pairs of legs are not quite so stout as shown in their figure, but this is evidently a character liable to variation according to age, etc. The young taken from the pouch of the female closely resemble those figured by Bate and Westwood on page 90.
