
Iais pubescens, Dana.
1852. Jæra pubescens, Dana, United States Exploring Expedition, Crustacea, vol. ii., p. 744, pl. xlix., figs. 9a-9d.
1883. Jæra novæ-zealandiæ, Chilton, Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. xv., p. 189.
1886. Jæra neo-zelanica, Thomson and Chilton, Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. xviii., p. 157.
1886. Iais pubescens, Bovallius, “Notes on the Family Asellidæ,” Bihang till K. Svenska Vet.-Akad. Handlingar, band xi., No. 15, p. 50.
1886. Jæra pubescens, Beddard, “Report on the ‘C hallenger’ Isopoda,” part ii., p. 19, pl. ii., figs. 6–10.
1888. Iais neo-zelanica, Thomson, Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. xxi., p. 265.
I have little doubt that my Jæra novæ-zealandiæ is the same as Jæra pubescens, Dana. When I described it I was not acquainted with Dana's species, but subsequently I saw his figure in the copy of his atlas in the library of the Canterbury Museum; and, as there is no copy of the text in that library, Mr. Alexander Morton, of the Tasmanian Museum, Hobart, was good enough to copy out the description for me from the copy in the library of the Royal Society of Tasmania. From these I judged that the two species would most likely have to be united, and this conclusion was confirmed by the fuller description given by Beddard in the “Report of the ‘C hallenger’ Isopoda.” My specimens agree very closely with Beddard's description, but his figure does not appear altogether satisfactory, and in some points does not correspond with his description. Thus, there appears no warrant for the notches shown on the sides of the head, and apparently also on the bases of the antennæ; the first segment of the pereion is not shown longer than the succeeding, as it is described, and as it really is; and the lateral margins of the segments do not show the division into lobes mentioned, nor the arrangement of setæ thereon as described.
Dana's specimens of Jæra pubescens were taken in a semiparasitic condition on Sphæroma lanceolatum at Patagonia; and specimens, which Beddard identifies with Dana's species, were obtained during the “Challenger” Expedition at Kerguelen Island in a similar condition on a Sphæromid, which Beddard identifies as Sphæroma gigas, a species which is, he says, hardly distinguishable from Sphæroma lanccolatum.
My original specimen of Jæra novæ-zealandiæ was not taken directly from a Sphæromid, but was found in a bottle with other Crustacea from Lyttelton Harbour, though I do not know the exact circumstances of its capture. Since then I have taken specimens of the same species at Akaroa, creeping

freely on seaweed. However, in July, 1889, I found two small specimens, which evidently belong to the same species, on a large Sphæroma (probably S. obtusa, Dana) in Port Chalmers. They were on the under-surface of the body, between the ventral surface and the bases of the legs, not attached to the body, but creeping about freely. They are small, and evidently immature. The discovery of these specimens living in a semi-parasitic condition, in the same way as Dana's specimens, tends to confirm the conclusion previously arrived at as to the identity of the two species.
Mr. Thomson's specimens were taken at Auckland between tide-marks; but whether they were on Sphæromids or not is not now known.
From Akaroa I have altogether six specimens: two of them are mature females, each bearing six eggs in the broodpouch. Even these mature specimens are small, only about 2.5mm. long. The others are smaller, two of them very nearly as small as those taken from the Sphæroma in Port Chalmers—i.e., only 1.25mm. long. They all agree closely both with my type specimen and with Beddard's description of Jæra pubescens, Dana.
This species is therefore now known from Patagonia, Kerguelen Island, and New Zealand, and it appears that it may be semi-parasitic (commensal) on Sphæromids, or may live freely on seaweed, &c. Perhaps it is semi-parasitic only when young.
I leave the species in the new genus Iais, established by Bovallius for those species with tri-unguiculate dactyla to the pereiopoda.
