Go to National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa
Volume 25, 1892
This text is also available in PDF
(7 MB) Opens in new window
– 201 –

Art. XXVI.—Further Coccid Notes: with Descriptions of New Species from Australia, India, Sandwich Islands, Demerara, and South Pacific.

[Read before the Wellington Philosophical Society, 18th January, 1893.]

Plates XI.–Plate XVIII.

The widely-separated localities from which come the insects referred to in the following pages are evidence of the increased interest taken nowadays in Coccids all over the world. I was once told by an entomological friend, as an excuse for his not attempting to collect or study this family, that there were so few species in it and so little was known about them. Apart from the fact that, to most people, rarity and want of information would be rather incentives to study than reasons for neglect, the first statement is scarcely accurate, and the second becomes less so every year. I do not myself think that the multiplication of species tends to render a family either more interesting or more important; and probably some judicious pruning amongst the many thousands of species of Coleoptera or Lepidoptera would bring about a most useful reduction of their numbers, as some naturalists seem to

– 202 –

have a craze for the making of species on the slightest provocation. Still, any one who would imagine the Homoptera to be a small or unimportant order would be much mistaken. Coccids are but one family of that order, and have only been really studied for some thirty years; but of that alone nearly seven hundred species are now known (1892), and scores of others are sure to be discovered every year. The Aphids, Psyllids, and Aleurodids have as yet been scarcely touched; the Cicadids and other families are constantly receiving additions. It would probably not be an exaggeration to estimate that there are from twenty to thirty thousand species of Homoptera existing in various countries, not more than a seventh of which, perhaps, have been made known to science up to the present day.

There would seem to be a quite sufficient field here for the entomological student. As regards New Zealand, I have myself described eighty species of Coccids, four of Psyllids, and five of Aleurodids, all of which may be considered as indigenous, besides several exotic introduced species. Certainly the two last families, and probably the first, are still more largely represented in this country, and nobody has yet made any investigation of the Aphids. I hope therefore that ere long the New Zealand Homoptera will receive the attention to which their importance clearly entitles them.

It is satisfactory to note that since 1870 the number of homopterologists has been steadily increasing. At that time, with the exception of Signoret, Lichtenstein, Bouché, and Fitch, scarcely anybody studied the order. Now the workers are numerous, either as collectors or describers, and they are spread all over the world. In Europe excellent work has been done by Douglas, Morgan, Löw, Newstead, Buckton, Targioni; in America, by Riley, Howard, Koebele, Comstock, Coquillett, &c.; in India, by Atkinson, Cotes, Nietner, Green; in Australia, by French, Olliff, Tepper; and in New Zealand I have received great help from Messrs. Raithby, Smith, and others. Some of these have turned their attention chiefly to that very important branch, the economic relations of the Homoptera to agriculture; others confine themselves to the purely scientific side of entomology. But the result is that the order is being better studied every year, and I look forward to the time when it will receive its due share of attention in New Zealand also.

The following pages contain notes upon several insects already described, and also descriptions of more than thirty new species. The majority I owe to an occurrence which deserves particular mention. It will be remembered that after my publication in 1878 of an account of Icerya purchasi that pest became so obnoxious in various countries that uni-

– 203 –

versal attention was drawn to it. My late friend Mr. Crawford, of Adelaide, was the first to discover the “natural enemy,” in the shape of a rather large parasitic fly, which he called Lestophonus iceryœ. The pest having become exceedingly injurious in California, the United States Agricultural Department at Washington, which is presided over by scientific experts, determined to leave no stone unturned to put a stop to the damage, which was being done to the extent of millions of dollars, and threatened to increase. An officer of the department, Mr. Albert Koebele, was sent to Australia in 1888 to procure supplies of the Lestophonus from Mr. Crawford, for the purpose of introducing them into California. Calling on his way at New Zealand, where, in the North, Icerya, was dreadfully prevalent, Mr. Koebele was fortunate enough to find a much better enemy to Icerya, in the form of Vedalia cardinalis, one of the Coccinellidœ (ladybirds), and, recognising at once the full importance of this insect, he carried away with him to California a large number of Vedalia, with the result that in two or three years' time that State was practically cleared of Icerya, and its fruit industry saved. Since then Vedalia has been sent about the world wherever Icerya prevails, with a similar good result in every case.

The foregoing is perhaps only a “twice-told tale,” known to many people, although even so it cannot be too often repeated. The public of New Zealand are not so well acquainted with the sequel. The Washington Department, finding that Mr. Koebele's first trip had been so successful, despatched him on a second journey to Australia and New Zealand, “on a search for beneficial insects.” The State of California appropriated 5,000 dollars towards his expenses; the department supplemented the sum as required. The object this time was not to fight against Icerya, but to obtain the natural enemies of other insect pests very injurious to fruit and other trees, such as Aspidiotus aurantii on orange and lemon, or Lecanium oleœ on various plants. Mr. Koebele reached New Zealand in October, 1891, spent a day or two with Mr. Wight and Mr. Cheeseman in Auckland, stayed also a day or two with me in Wellington, passed on to Australia, where he remained till July, 1892, and then returned to California. During this time he was successful in discovering a large number of parasitic insects and in despatching supplies of them to America. I have not yet heard what is the final result of his journey. We can only hope that it will be as useful as in 1888.

As far as regards myself, I am indebted to Mr. Koebele for, as stated just now, a large number of the insects referred to in this paper, whether new species or known insects from

– 204 –

new localities; and I am greatly obliged to him for permission to describe them here. But the people of New Zealand owe to him and to the Agricultural Department of Washington a greater debt. For, on this his second journey, recognising perhaps that he received Vedalia practically from New Zealand, he attempted to repay us as far as possible by introducing into this country some of the insects known to be very useful in America. His first port of call being Auckland, he at once came into communication with Mr. R. Allan Wight, so well known in the colony as an excellent economic entomologist, and immediately placed in his charge, or, rather, liberated in conjunction with him, several parasitic insects. Of course, these being let loose, it is not possible yet awhile to say positively whether they have made much impression against our various pests; yet I understand from both Mr. Koebele and Mr. Wight that they very quickly set to work, and seemed quite ready to acclimatise themselves, and that in all probability their introduction will be, as far as it goes, successful. The importance of this fact will be readily recognised when it is stated that they included some ladybirds, which are special enemies to what we call the “American apple-blight” (Schizoneura), some Syrphidœ, and some Neuroptera (lacewings), enemies to all sorts of aphides and blights, and some larvæ of Raphidia, which feed greedily on codlin-moth. Surely, as I said just now, the people of New Zealand owe a debt to the American scientists who have thus tried to help them.

The introduction of these insect friends is, as I said, satisfactory as far as it goes. I mean by this that, of course, Mr. Koebele on this occasion could not bring a sufficiently large supply; and perhaps it may be a very long time (even with the experience of Vedalia before us) ere any beneficial results are visible. But, besides the kindly feeling which prompted Professor Riley and his colleagues in America to send us these things, they have taught us a lesson which I fear will be thrown away. The appropriation, mentioned above, of the Californian State Legislature is surely an example which the Parliament of New Zealand might profitably follow. And the visit of Mr. Koebele, and his well-meant gift, point out to us the necessity (if, indeed, some of us had not seen it before) of some real and practical work being done in New Zealand to help the farmer and the fruit-grower. From every part of the colony come frequently-repeated complaints. Hessian-flies, bot-flies, codlin-moths, wireworrns, grass-grubs, snails, aphis blights, scale-insects, all sorts of pests riot and flourish in every district and in every orchard; and they do so because those who have most at stake make no thorough efforts to prevent them. What is required is an Agricultural Depart-

– 205 –

ment, organized like that of the United States of America. We might then hope for some good result. I might multiply instances; but, to confine the question to one point now, Mr. Koebele should never have been allowed to leave New Zealand without making arrangements for further supplies of insect friends to man. He showed by his first consignment that the thing is possible. Had there been here an expert scientist managing a proper department, he would have seen the full value of the experiment, and would have taken care to have it repeated. Our debt to our American friends is, as I said, large; the lesson they have tried to teach us is a good one: all that we want is some man of common-sense and right feeling to acquit the first and learn the second.

This is a matter on which, as this Society knows, I have for a long time endeavoured to induce the rulers of the colony to be reasonable, and to establish a properly-equipped Agricultural Department (or “Bureau,” if the term is preferred), under the charge of a properly-qualified scientific expert. Constant dropping of water, they say, will in time wear away a stone, Let me still hope for final success at some future time.

I have also to record my thanks to Messrs. French, Olliff, and Tepper for their Australian insects; to Mr. Cotes for those from India; and to Messrs. Douglas, Cockerell, and others for help, and specimens from different countries. Lastly, I must acknowledge the very friendly terms in which many correspondents have referred to the work on Homoptera contained in my papers of the last fifteen years.

Group Diaspidinæ.

Genus Aspidiotus, Bouché.

Aspidiotus cladii, Maskell. N.Z. Trans., vol. xxiii., 1890, p. 3.

This species has been sent to me by Mr. Koebele from Semaphore, South Australia, on Lepidosperma. The specimens are much finer, larger, and darker-coloured than those originally described by me from Victoria, but I cannot otherwise separate them.

Aspidiotus acaciæ, Morgan. Ent. Mo. Mag., Aug., 1889, p. 353.

Mr. Koebele has sent me specimens which are so near to this species that I will not separate them: they occur on Eucalyptus sp. at Whitton, New South Wales.

Aspidiotus acaciæ, Morgan, var. propinqua.

On Acacia sp. at Mount Victoria, New South Wales, occurs an insect very near to A. acaciœ, differing only in the deeper

– 206 –

red colour of the pellicles, and in the fact that the puparium is almost always very brittle, falling off in the centre, and leaving only a ring with the pellicles exposed. Mr. Olliff has sent me the same insect on Hakea saligna, Sydney.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Mr. Morgan did not describe the male of his species. I have the male of var. propinqua, which is dark-red, pupating under a white elliptical non-carinated puparium. Length of the insect, exclusive of the spike, about 1/50in. The feet are rather thick; the ten-jointed antenna is normal.

Aspidiotus aurantii, Maskell. N.Z. Trans., 1878, p. 199. Asp. coccineus (Gennad.), Maskell; Scale-Ins. of N.Z., p. 42.

This species is not confined to the orange. I have received it from Australia on Eucalyptus, on pear and plum, and on Laurus nobilis and Buxus sempervirens. Mr. Cockerell has sent me specimens from Jamaica on Lignum vitœ, and informs me that in that island it does not seem to attack citrus trees. Mr. D. W. Coquillett states that in California it is found on many plants, the most important of which seem to be rose, pear, grape, and Eucalyptus.

In my experience the puparia of A. aurantii differ slightly according to the food-plant. On orange and lemon there is a rich, fat, juicy appearance about the puparium, which is reddish-brown. On Eucalyptus, Laurus, Buxus, and Lignum vitœ the puparia are lighter-coloured and more solid. Mr. Coquillett, who, like all the American observers, refers to the species as the “red scale,” mentions (U.S. Dept. of Agric. Entom. Bulletin No. 23, p. 36, 1891) an insect to which he gives the name “yellow scale (Aspidiotus citrinus)” occurring on orange-trees in California. I do not know where the description of this species is to be found, or in what the species differs from A. aurantii.

Aspidiotus eucalypti, Maskell. Trans. Roy. Soc. South Australia, 1887–88, p. 102. Plate XI., figs. 1, 2.

I have received specimens of this species from New South Wales (Mr. Koebele) on Casuarina sp. Although the puparia were covered with much black fungus, the characteristic deep groove of the female insect was clearly present. I regret that in the illustration of this insect in the South Australian Transactions (pl. xii., fig. d) this feature is not properly shown, and I have thought it well to give a fresh figure with this paper. A similar groove, though deeper, occurs in A. articulatus, Morgan, 1889; but that species differs sufficiently in other respects.

The epidermis of A. eucalypti is very distinctly marked with great numbers of minute lines which resemble closely

– 207 –

the marks made on paper by the wetted human finger-tip. In many Aspidioti the abdominal segment presents a sort of velvety appearance, from very faint and numerous fine striæ which may be detected upon it; but I do not know any species which exhibits all over the body such conspicuous striations as in A. eucalypti, with the exception perhaps of A. theœ, as noticed presently.

Aspidiotus rossi (Crawford), Maskell. N.Z. Trans., vol. xxiv., 1891, p. 11.

Mr. Tepper informs me that the specific name of this insect was given by Mr. Crawford in honour of Sir A. Ross, Speaker of the House of Assembly, Adelaide, who first collected it. I have received specimens from Mr. Olliff on Xanthorrhœa.

Aspidiotus subrubescens, Maskell. N.Z. Trans., vol. xxiv., 1891, p. 9.

The adult male of this species does not present any remarkable features, except that a fair proportion of the specimens which I have examined this year have been apterous. I have preserved a specimen of the male pupa which shows in a very interesting manner the transformation of the insect. The general form is elongated-oval, with a projection at the posterior extremity simulating the abdominal segment and pygidium of the female; at the cephalic end a commencement may be detected of the separation of the head from the thorax, and at the sides the rudiments of wings can also be made out; the eyes are distinctly being formed: but there is not yet any trace of antennæ or feet; and in the middle the larval rostrum still remains attached.

These male specimens were sent by Mr. Koebele, on Banksia sp., Sydney.

Aspidiotus theæ, Maskell. Indian Museum Notes, vol. ii., 1891, p. 59. Plate XI., fig. 3.

I give a figure illustrative of the “lattice-work” pattern visible on the dorsal abdominal surface of this insect; the smaller spaces making up the whole patch may differ slightly in arrangement in various specimens.

This insect exhibits conspicuous fine transverse striations of the epidermis, as in A. eucalypti. Also, in many specimens, though not in all which I have seen, there is a deepish groove nearer to the cephalic than to the abdominal extremity: as this is not absolutely constant I did not include it in the specific characters.

– 208 –

Genus Diaspis, Costa.

Diaspis pinnulifera, Maskell. N.Z. Trans., vol. xxiii., 1890, p. 4.

Mr. J. W. Douglas has sent me some insects, clearly belonging to this species, on Croton sp., from Demerara. They agree closely with my specimens from Fiji in the very small number of orifices in the groups of spinnerets, and in the two feathery processes on the abdominal margin immediately beyond the lobes.

Diaspis (?) fimbriata, sp. nov. Plate XI., figs. 46.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Female puparium circular, flat, very thin and papery, whitish or grey or brownish; pellicles subcentral, yellow or greenish. Diameter of puparium averaging about 1/13in.

Male puparium unknown.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female yellow, elongated; the cephalic region rather large, separated from the rest by a distinct groove; the abdominal segments tapering posteriorly, and conspicuously segmented. Length of female, about 1/17in. Abdomen ending in six small lobes, not adjacent, the two median ones being rather larger than the rest. Margin of abdomen without any median depression, minutely crenulated, and bearing conspicuous broad, scaly hairs with serrated extremities, forming a fringe; two of these are between the median lobes, two on each side between the median and the next lobes, three between the second and third lobes, and about ten beyond. Between the fringe and the last distinct abdominal segment there are a few spines. The pygidium exhibits four groups of spinnerets; in each group there are from ten to fourteen orifices; a large number of single spinnerets.

Adult male unknown.

Hab. In Australia, on Eugenia smithii. My specimens were sent by Mr. Koebele from Sydney.

I believe that this insect is here correctly assigned to the genus Diaspis, although, in the absence of the male puparium, I do not positively assert it. I know of no Aspidiotus which has such an elongated form; and, indeed, the insect in its general shape resembles very much Diaspis rosœ, Sandberg, though it differs entirely from that species not only in colour, but principally in the absence of a medial terminal depression, in the six abdominal lobes, and in the scaly fringe. As for Parlatoria, the case is different, and the fringe might possibly make it approach that genus. But here, again, the form is much more elongated than that of any Parlatoria known to me. P. proteus, Curtis, varies somewhat, but never seems to get beyond an oval form, and all the specimens which I have seen of it agree with Signoret's statement that it is “widest pos-

Picture icon

Coccididae

– 209 –

teriorly”; whereas D. fimbriata, like D. rosœ, tapers posteriorly. Further, in Parlatoria the fringe extends not only over all the pygidial region, but also to the anterior abdominal segments, while in D. fimbriata it is very short. I observe, also, that in Löw's description of D. visci, Schrank (according to Comstock, Second Cornell Report, 1883), the scaly hairs in that species are “unusually numerous—seventeen on one side and twenty on the other”: evidently a terminal fringe. I must remark that no species of Diaspis hitherto described has less than five groups of spinnerets, except D. zamiœ, Morgan (Ent. Mo. Mag., Feb., 1890), which has none at all. Parlatoria appears to have always four. On the whole, I shall leave this insect at present in the genus Diaspis, subject to future correction.

Genus Mytilaspis, Targioni-Tozzetti.

Mytilaspis casuarinæ, sp. nov. Plate XI., fig. 7.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Female puparium snowy-white, convex, elongated, narrow; length, about 1/11in. Pellicles terminal, orange-red.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Male puparium narrow, elongated, flatter than that of the female, but with no sign of carination; colour greyish, pellicle yellow. Length about 1/20in.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female brown, elongated; length about 1/20in. before gestation. Abdomen exhibiting a median depression, the median lobes being represented by thickening of the margin; margin on each side much crenulated, and bearing four or five short hairs far apart. The spinnerets are very numerous, both single and in groups; but I have not been able to make out clearly whether there are five groups or an arch.

Adult male unknown.

Hab. In Australia, on Casuarina sp. Specimens from Mr. Koebele.

The non-carinated male puparium separates this species from Chionaspis, and the absence of a terminal fringe from Leucaspis.

Genus Leucaspis, Targioni-Tozzetti.

This genus resembles Mytilaspis very closely as far as the form of the puparium is concerned, and the only distinguishing character of the female insect is the presence of a fringe of spines on the abdominal extremity. As a similar fringe is considered sufficient to separate Parlatoria from Aspidiotus, I presume that it must be sufficient also in this case, and I shall not attempt to disturb Targioni's arrangement.

Leucaspis cordylinidis, sp. nov. Plate XI., figs. 8, 9.

Female puparium rather convex, narrow, elongated, and straight; colour white; pellicles terminal, small, greenish-

– 210 –

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

brown. Length of puparium about 1/13in. Frequently covering the leaves of the plant in immense numbers.

Male puparium similar, but smaller.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female brown, elongated; length about 1/26in. Abdomen ending in a single median lobe, which is broader than long, and minutely crenulated on the posterior edge; at each side of this are two small conical lobules. Margin of abdomen divided into numerous minute teeth, some of which have single points, while others appear to be double; all bear short hairs, forming a fringe. Spinnerets in a continuous arch with very numerous orifices (more than a hundred); and some scattered single circular spinnerets.

Adult male unknown.

Hab. In Australia, on Cordyline sp. Mr. Olliff has sent me specimens from Sydney.

The only other Diaspid exhibiting a broad median terminal lobe is, I think, Chionaspis quercûs, Comstock (Agric. Rept., 1880, p. 319). The two European species of Leucaspis, L. signoreti and L. pini, have no terminal lobes at all. This Australian insect is not to be confounded with Mytilaspis cordylinidis, Mask., a New Zealand species, which it resembles somewhat in outward appearance. Not only do the greenish-brown pellicles distinguish it, but also the abdominal extremity of the female. The male puparium of Fiorinia stricta, Mask., is also similar in outward appearance, but of course the female of that species is entirely distinct.

Genus Chionaspis, Signoret.

Chionaspis brasiliensis, Signoret. Essai, p. 126. Plate XI., figs. 1013.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Female puparium reddish-brown, flat, thin, broadly pyriform; length about 1/20in. Pellicles terminal, yellowish-brown; small in comparison with the rest of the puparium.

Male puparium white, narrow, very distinctly carinated, much smaller than that of the female; length three or four times the breadth.

Adult female brown, distinctly segmented, the two last distinct abdominal segments bearing a few spiny hairs. Abdomen ending in two very minute and inconspicuous lobes; the margin is crenulated, and bears at each side three or four spines. Five groups of spinnerets; upper group with 6 to 10 orifices, lateral groups with 14 to 20.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult male very small, yellow; length, exclusive of the spike, about 1/60in.; the spike is about as long as the abdomen. Antennæ of ten joints, with longish hairs. Feet also rather pubescent; there seem to be only two digitules, one on the claw and one on the tarsus.

– 211 –

Hab. In Australia, on Orchid sp., Tweed River; specimens sent by Mr. Koebele and Mr. Olliff. In Ceylon, on “cultivated fern”; specimens from Mr. E. E. Green, through the Indian Museum, Calcutta.

The resemblance between this and Signoret's species is so close that I do not hesitate to identify it as such. The characteristic features of the female are the reddish-brown puparium, the extreme smallness of the two abdominal lobes and the smallness of the pellicles. The male (now for the first time discovered) is remarkable for its small size and for the two digitules of the foot: I am obliged to Mr. Green for drawing my attention to this character. The species is very near to C. theœ, Mask. (Indian Museum Notes, vol. ii., p. 60), differing chiefly by the greater proportional length and more solid texture of the male puparium.

Chionaspis citri, Comstock. 2nd Cornell Report, 1883, p. 100. Maskell, N.Z. Trans., vol. xvii., 1884, p. 23.

Mr. Koebele brought to me from the Island of Tonga, South Pacific, some twigs of Citrus thickly covered with this species. I had already reported it as occurring in New Zealand. I observe that the aborted antennæ of the adult female of C. citri are rather more conspicuous than in other Diaspidinœ, and each of them bears two rather strong, curved, short setæ. The “ridge” on the puparium mentioned by Comstock is not well marked in these Tongan specimens; nevertheless, as the pygidium of the female (a much more important character) is identical, I do not hesitate as to the species. Mr. Olliff has sent me a twig of “mandarin orange” from Sydney covered with hundreds of males and a much smaller number of females; and in these last the ridge is conspicuous.

Chionaspis eugeniæ, Maskell. N.Z. Trans., vol. xxiv., 1891, p. 14.

I have received from Mr. French some insects which I consider as only a variety of this species. They resemble the type in all characters, except that the abdominal margin bears more spines—seven or eight at each side instead of four, and in one specimen examined ten on each side. Possibly also the pellicles are of a deeper orange colour, but that is of no importance.

Hab. On Eucalyptus, var. sp., Goulburn, Victoria.

Genus Fiorinia, Targioni-Tozzetti.

Fiorinia camelliæ, Comstock, 1880. Uhleria camelliœ, Comstock, 1883.

I reported this insect last year (vol. xxiv., p. 16) as occurring on palms in Australia. Since then I have obtained

– 212 –

several males, and subjoin their description, which is not given by Comstock.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Male puparium white, narrow, flattish, indistinctly carinated; length about 1/30in.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult male yellow, of the normal Diaspid form; length of body about 1/50in. Antennæ of ten joints. The abdominal spike is almost as long as the body of the insect.

My specimens are from Mr. Koebele, on palm, Australia, and also on Leptospermum sp., growing apparently close to the palms.

Fiorinia syncarpiæ, sp. nov. Plate XI., figs. 14, 15.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Females not excreting any definite and separate puparium, but congregated in numbers under a general mass of thin, whitish, curling, cottony threads, in which the yellow oval pellicles appear scattered. The two pellicles form an elliptical, somewhat convex, scale; length of second pellicle about 1/50in. When viewed by transmitted light it is seen that at each end of the oval scale there are antennæ and a rostrum; it would seem, therefore, that in the metamorphosis from the larval stage the insect becomes reversed, and also that the second-stage female preserves her antennæ. No abdominal lobes are to be made out on the second pellicle.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Male puparium rather more definitely formed than that of the female; form subcircular, flattish, consisting of loose white cottony fibres; average diameter about 1/30in. Pellicle of larva central, yellow.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female brownish-yellow, elongated; length about 1/70in. Abdominal margin deeply serrated and irregular, terminating in two conspicuous median lobes separated by a depression, with one smaller lobe on each side. The median lobes are prolonged into scaly processes with deeply-serrated extremities, and on the other lobes, and here and there on the margin, are smaller similar scales, and also a few spiny hairs; the whole abdominal region has thus a very irregular and jagged outline. No groups of spinnerets, but a few scattered single ones. The rostral setæ are very long, and consist of six separate tubes.

Male pupa elongated-oval, the abdomen terminating in two median rectangular lobes with foliated extremities, and one very small lobule at each side; several scaly hairs on the margin. Towards the end of the pupal stage the rudimentary eyes, antennæ, and wings may be detected in process of formation.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult male brown, presenting no special features; length of body about 1/40in. The abdominal spike is rather more than half as long as the body.

– 213 –

Hab. In Australia, on Syncarpia laurifolia. Sent by Mr. Koebele.

I attach this insect to the genus Fiorinia because the second female pellicle is so much larger than the adult; at the same time, if the female puparium is to be considered as probably similar to that of the male, or subcircular, it would rather be an Aonidia. It presents some curious characters, notably the “double-ended” pellicles and the peculiar abdominal extremity of the female, and the loose cottony threads in which the insect lives, instead of under a puparium. I do not know any other species which exhibits so many tubes in the rostral setæ.

Genus Parlatoria, Targioni-Tozzetti.

Parlatoria proteus, Curtis.

This species occurs plentifully on some twigs of apple sent to me from Brisbane, Queensland, by Mr. Koebele. Although there is much difficulty in separating the species of this genus, yet I think my identifications are correct, as I have made careful comparison of all those hitherto described. Parlatoria appears to be chiefly found in hot countries—at least, out-of-doors, the insects belonging to it in cold climates being always mentioned as under glass or on tropical plants.

Group Lecanidinæ.
Subdivision Lecanodiaspidæ.

Genus Inglisia, Maskell.

Inglisia foraminifer, sp. nov. Plate XII., figs. 15.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Test of adult female very convex, elliptical; reddish-brown at the base, fading to yellowish towards the apex; glassy and brittle; conspicuously striated from apex to base with aircells; length averaging 1/13in. but one specimen seen reached ⅛in. A slightly-elevated ridge runs longitudinally from each end, widening a little towards the apex, where there is a deep transverse depression, with often an orifice at the centre through which the body of the insect can be seen. Frequently the interrupted median ends of the ridge project slightly over this depression. The test is very apt to split in two along the line of the longitudinal ridge. There is often visible a whitish fringe of short irregularly-semicircular segments, not set close together, along the basal margin, but this fringe is by no means constant.

Test of male glassy, yellow, convex, brittle; form irregularly elliptical, tapering slightly posteriorly, but cut off rather abruptly at the abdominal extremity by a flat hinged plate which the insect lifts up for egress. The apex consists of a subrectangular region, which is sometimes smooth, sometimes

– 214 –

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

transversely striated, and separated by a shallow depression from the sides, which are conspicuously striated to the base. Length of test about 1/17in.

Adult female filling the test. Colour a rich dark-brown, fading to orange towards the edges. At gestation the undersurface becomes concave. On the dorsal region there is a central depression corresponding with that of the test, and a longitudinal ridge whose median ends project over the depression. Antennæ, thick, conical, with six short joints, the first and sixth being rather longer than the others. Feet very small and inconspicuous, almost atrophied, the femur, tibia, and tarsus apparently confused, with a very small short claw. Mentum doubtfully dimerous. Along the basal margin is a row of short thick conical spines, with four rather longer spines opposite the thoracic spiracles; and a similar row of short spines runs longitudinally along the middle of the dorsum. Abdominal cleft conspicuous; the lobes large, acuminate, setiferous; anogenital ring with many hairs.

Larva not observed; but under some of the females were, eggshells, so that the insect is probably not viviparous.

Adult male unknown.

Hab. In Australia, on Santalum acuminatum. Mr. Tepper has sent me a number of specimens from Semaphore, near Adelaide.

This is an extremely pretty little species, and the forms and colours of the male and female tests are very elegant. It is the first of the genus which I have had from anywhere outside New Zealand; the Lecanid characters and the glassy striated test fix its position quite clearly. I am unable to conjecture what may be the meaning or use of the peculiar depression both in the female insect itself and in the test; the male test shows no sign of it, but the depression is constant in all the females observed—perhaps nearly a hundred.

Genus Ceroplastes, Gray.

Female insects covered with waxy tests, which present, in the adult state, no radiating marginal processes or marginal fringe, but exhibiting in the earlier stages tuberosities or projections which usually coalesce at maturity.

Male unknown.

Ceroplastes rubens, sp. nov. Plate XII., figs. 610.

Test of adult female waxy, rather thick, dull-red or pinkish throughout; form subcircular, quite flat beneath, with an orifice for attachment to the plant, the upper surface with irregular sloping sides and flattish top, in the centre of which there is sometimes a minute indistinct orifice; from the orifice very faint lines may be made out in some specimens, radiating

– 215 –

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

to the margin; and the lateral irregularities may sometimes be resolved into seven or eight indistinct tuberosities. Diameter of test variable: specimens observed range from 1/11in.

The test of the second stage appears to be similar to that of the adult, but smaller; it is very difficult to make out the lateral tuberosities, which sometimes seem to be only five.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Test of the larva in its latest period before the first metamorphosis whitish, waxy, stelliform, having usually eight lateral radiating processes and a dorsal convex mass of wax: average length of the whole about 1/40in.

Adult female extracted from the test yellowish-brown or dark-brown; subcircular, convex above and concave beneath; form normally Lecanid; anal cleft small, lobes triangular, each bearing a short seta; anal ring with six strong hairs. At the cephalic extremity there is a dorsal elevation or tuberosity, which bears several small subconical papillæ. Antennæ of six joints, of which the third is much the longest. Feet nearly atrophied, short, thick; tarsus very short, claw small, digitules slender knobbed hairs. Rostrum rather large; mentum monomerous. On the margin, near the four spiracles, is on each side a patch containing one large thick conical spine and about twenty other smaller ones. Dorsal epidermis bearing some small circular spinneret-orifices.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva dark-yellow, flattish, elongated, distinctly Lecanid. Eyes large, brown. Antennæ of apparently six joints, but the fourth and fifth are not easily separable. Length of insect in this stage about 1/80in. at first, increasing to about 1/50in. with age.

Male unknown.

Hab. On Mangifera indica (mango), and on Ficus (F. macrophylla ?), the Moreton Bay fig, Brisbane, Australia. Mr. Koebele sent me several specimens.

I have ventured to consider this as a new species, although I am not sure that it is not at least closely allied to C. myricœ, Linn., a species originally from the Cape of Good Hope on Myrica cerifera; and, indeed, my first idea was to attach it to that species, the latest description of which (as far as I know) is given by Fabricius (Ent. Syst., 1794, iv., 227). But, after careful consideration, I find that C. myricœ is not only white in colour towards the edges (the centre being reddish), but also convex—“vertice obtuse acuminatus”—and that the margin bears seven distinct tuberosities. The flat vertex and agglomerated margin of C. rubens do not answer to such a description, and I therefore place it as a separate species, subject of course to future correction.

The wax of C. rubens dissolves readily in potash: on cooling it recoalesces, and I have always found it lose its red colour and become white.

– 216 –

Ceroplastes ceriferus, Anderson. Plate XII., figs. 1116.

Test of adult female white or yellowish-white, waxy, convex, thick; frequently agglomerated in large masses covering the twigs of the food-plant. Separate individuals may range in size from ⅕in. to ½in. Marginal tuberosities not distinguishable, though the margin is sometimes slightly flattened and irregular. The apex of the test is sometimes produced in a short pointed horn, not erect, but bent over the test. The wax is rather soft and greasy.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Test of the second stage slightly convex, elliptical; colour greyish-white; median dorsal region usually smooth, separated by a shallow depression from the marginal region, which exhibits eight tuberosities, three on each side and two terminal. Average length of test about 1/7in.

Adult female brown, very convex, elliptical, hollow beneath. Form Lecanid; but the anal cleft and lobes are not easily made out, being contained in a conspicuous cylindrical “tail,” or prolongation of the abdomen. Antennæ of six joints, of which the third is much the longest. Feet rather thick, but not at all atrophied; tibia scarcely longer than the tarsus; upper, or tarsal, digitules slender knobbed hairs, lower pair on the claw rather long, thick, and expanded at the end. Rostrum rather large; mentum doubtfully dimerous. Near the spiracles, on each margin, is a group containing eight large conical spines and about twenty-four smaller ones. Epidermis bearing many circular spinneret-orifices. When the “tail” is subjected to the action of potash and subsequent pressure it is seen to contain at its extremity the abdominal lobes and the anogenital ring, which has six rather strong hairs.

Female of the second stage brown, elliptical, slightly convex. Form Lecanid, exhibiting the normal cleft and lobes; there is no “tail,” but the region surrounding the lobes is thickened. Antennæ and feet as in the adult, but the feet are more slender. The margin bears a row of fine spiny hairs, and four spiracular groups of large conical spines. There are many small circular spinnerets on the epidermis.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva yellow, elliptical, flattish; length about 1/70in. Form normally Lecanid, the anal lobes bearing long setæ. Antennæ thick, with six rather confused joints.

Male unknown.

Hab. In Australia, on Melaleuca hypericifolia, Myrica cerifera, and other plants; in India, on Celastrus ceriferus, and on the Assam tea-plant, Kangra Valley. My Australian specimens were sent to me by Mr. Koebele and Mr. Olliff; the Indian ones are from Mr. Cotes.

I have given a detailed description here of this insect

Picture icon

Coccididæ

Picture icon

Coccididæ

– 217 –

because, although it was first made known by Dr. Anderson in 1790–91, and mentioned since that time by several writers—including Westwood, 1853, and Signoret, 1872—all of these appear to have confined their attention to the waxy tests, and I am not aware that the insect itself has ever yet been fully described. Signoret merely says that it is subglobular, and slightly prolonged posteriorly. Fourteen species of Ceroplastes from different countries have received names, but probably several of these are really identical: e.g., C. chilensis, Gray, and C. vinsonii, Sign., and others, may all be really C. ceriferus. The only species in which the adult females have been reported hitherto as exhibiting a prolongation of the abdomen are C. ceriferus, C. psidii, Chav., C. cassiœ, Chav., C. fairmairei, Sign., and C. cirripediformis, Comstock (an American insect), and all these also have nearly similar conical spiracular spines. I am not sure whether all the last-named species may be really distinct or not.

Mr. Cotes, in the “Indian Museum Notes,” vol. ii., No. 3, 1891, gives an excellent account of the wax of this species, and seems to think that the insect is not very common in India. It may, however, be an inhabitant of many tropical or subtropical countries. From Mr. Cotes's account I gather that the wax is not likely to have much commercial value, even if it could be produced in large quantities.

Since writing the foregoing I have more carefully studied Signoret's description of C. fairmairei, Targioni (1858), a species from Montevideo, and also his figures, especially of the spiracular spines, and I have come to the conclusion that this species is identical with C. ceriferus. The dermal spots and markings shown in Signoret's plate ix., fig. 7, may be faintly detected in some of my Australian insects—early adults—and the other characters also agree. On the whole it seems probable that several species of Ceroplastes may be considered as synonyms of Anderson's insect, which was first described in 1791.

Subdivision Lecanidæ.

Genus Lecanium, Illiger.

Lecanium baccatum, Maskell. N.Z. Trans., vol. xxiv., 1891, p. 20.

Mr. J. G. O. Tepper, in a letter to me, says, “In South Australia these insects in a young state, yet nearly full-grown, are always of a pure bluish-white, which with advancing age becomes yellowish. The species, though not exactly rare, has been always local, and the various colonies, affecting a single branch or bush, are usually at considerable distances apart.”

– 218 –

Lecanium hesperidum, auctorum.

Mr. Douglas and Mr. Newstead, in the Ent. Mo. Magazine for September, 1891, p. 244, make some observations regarding this species and its distinction from L. lauri, Boisduval. They give a comparison between the two, based on certain differences observed in the feet, for, as they remark, “the antennæ in both kinds do not appreciably differ.” Dr. Signoret (Essai, p. 230) expressed doubts whether the two were not really identical, but the conclusion of Messrs. Douglas and Newstead is that the characters of the feet are sufficiently distinct to separate the two species.

In one of the numbers of “Insect Life” (I cannot just now mention the particular number) Professor Riley asked the question whether the true L. hesperidum exists in New Zealand. The question only came in incidentally, if I recollect aright; but presumably its meaning was that probably our New Zealand form might be L. lauri; and, considering that it occurs here upon a large number of plants, notably ivy, holly, and the different kinds of Laurus, and that citrus trees are uncommon in the colony except in the North, the question was a very natural one.

Mr. Koebele sent to me from Sydney, early in the present year, some leaves of orange infested by a scale very closely resembling L. hesperidum, but larger and lighter-coloured than our New Zealand form; and Mr. Olliff later on sent twigs of the same plant infested by the same scale. I have taken the opportunity of comparing carefully the Australian and the New Zealand forms, and the result is that I am unable to establish a sufficient specific difference between L. hesperidum and L. lauri. I take no account of size or colour in the two—the rich juices of citrus naturally, as I think, induce the insects feeding thereon to be larger and handsomer than those on the hard food of holly or ivy—but I have confined myself to the characters of the feet. I find that the characters as tabulated by Mr. Newstead (Ent. Mo. Mag., Sept., 1891, p. 245) are indiscriminately noticeable both in my specimens (five) examined on citrus, and in the specimens (eight) examined on holly, laurel, &c. Thus, the Australian specimens have short tarsal digitules, two fine terminal tarsal hairs, two coxal hairs—characters of L. lauri; and one very long hair on the trochanter—a character of L. hesperidum. The New Zealand specimens have long tarsal digitules, a long trochanter hair, and coxa hairless—characters of L. hesperidum; and two terminal tarsal hairs—a character of L. lauri.

The conclusion, therefore, would seem to be that either L. hesperidum lives on laurel, ivy, holly, and other plants in New Zealand, whilst L. lauri attacks citrus in Australia—thus

– 219 –

reversing the European arrangement—or else the two species are identical. The latter alternative is that which induced me to report L. hesperidum alone in 1878 and 1887 in New Zealand, and which seems to me still to be correct.

Lecanium tessellatum, Signoret. Sign., Essai, p. 231. Plate XIII., fig. 1.

This insect, which, from its flatness and viviparous habit, belongs to Signoret's first series of the genus, is characterized especially by “a marquetry pattern on the epidermis, in which each separate section is unlike the one next to it, but quite similar to the similarly-situated section on the opposite side.” Each side, therefore, of the body seems quite irregularly marked, but the two sides are symmetrical. The insect is reddish-brown, flat, rather acuminate anteriorly and broadly rounded posteriorly. The markings are not to be clearly made out until after treatment with reagents. Length about ⅛in.

Hab. In Australia, on Laurus nobilis, Sydney. My specimens are from Mr. Koebele. Signoret reports the insect as on palms in hothouses in Europe.

Lecanium acuminatum, Signoret. Sign., Essai, p. 227. Plate XIII., figs. 2, 3.

Adult female yellowish-brown, flat, acuminate at the cephalic extremity and very broadly rounded posteriorly. Length about ⅛in. Antennæ of seven joints, of which the fourth is the longest, the fifth and sixth the shortest. Tarsus about half as long as the tibia. The epidermis bears a large number of circular marks, each with a central clear space.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Female of second stage broadly elliptical, flat, yellowish; length about 1/30in. Antennæ of six joints.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva yellowish-brown, flat, broadly elliptical; length about 1/30in.

Male unknown.

Hab. In the Sandwich Islands, on guava (Psidium sp.). Sent by Mr. Koebele.

I do not doubt my identification of this species. Signoret (whose specimens were on hothouse orchids in Paris) does not mention the dermal markings.

Lecanium anthurii, Boisduval. Signoret, Essai, p. 265.

I have received from Mr. French specimens of an insect on Asparagus sp., Melbourne, which appear to me to belong to this species, which belongs to Signoret's fourth series, being very convex, with a dermal pattern of oval marks, not conjoined, and with a median clear space in each. The colour is brown. The original species occurred in Europe on a hothouse orchid.

– 220 –

Lecanium filicum, Boisduval. Signoret, Essai, p. 436. Plate XIII., fig. 4.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female semiglobular, with a flattened margin; colour reddish-brown; diameter about 1/13in. Epidermis exhibiting regular oval markings. Antennæ of eight joints. Tarsus showing a distinct articulation with the tibia. Body frequently carinated.

Female of the second stage flattish, elongated-elliptical.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva yellowish, flat, elliptical. Length about 1/70in.

Hab. In Australia, on a fern, probably Lomaria sp., Tweed River. Sent by Mr. Koebele.

Signoret (and after him Douglas) separates this species from L. hemisphœricum, which it very closely resembles, by the carinations of the dorsum. I am not sure, however, that the distinction is quite satisfactory. The frond of fern which I received was covered with great numbers of individuals, and whilst some of them exhibited carinations others did not. It is not likely that the two species are mingled on the plant, and, as about half the specimens were not quite smooth, I have felt compelled to place them as L. filicum.

Lecanium depressum, Signoret. Sign., Essai, p. 269.

Adult female reddish-brown, darkening with age to nearly black; form elliptical, more or less convex; length variable from ⅛in. to ¼in. Antennæ of eight joints, of which the third is the longest. Feet rather long; tarsus almost as long as the tibia. Epidermis marked with many cells of irregular shape, closely conjoined and forming a “marquetry pattern”; in the middle of each cell is a small oval clear spot. At the very latest stage, when the insect is darkest in colour, the cells cannot be seen until after treatment with potash.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Female of the second stage light-brown, flattish, elliptical; length about 1/16in. Antennæ of six joints. Dorsum frequently, but not always, exhibiting one longitudinal and two transverse carinæ.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva brown, flat, elliptical; length about 1/50in. Antennæ of six joints.

Hab. In New Zealand, not common, on various greenhouse plants; in Australia, on Hakea sp., on “cultivated vine,” and on an unnamed plant, Sydney and Tweed River; and in the Sandwich Islands, on Psidium (guava) and Bambusa (bamboo). Mr. Olliff sent it to me on Hakea; my other exotic specimens are from Mr. Koebele.

I reported this insect in New Zealand in 1878, and after examination, and comparison with the Australian and Sandwich Islands specimens, I have no doubt of its identity. Signoret was the first to describe it in detail, although Targioni had previously given it its name. In Signoret's description he

– 221 –

says that, whereas his specimens in hothouses at Paris exhibited dorsal carinæ, those from hothouses in Italy had dorsal depressions. It is clear that in this respect the insect varies, and the dorsal marquetry is really the distinguishing character of it. Targioni's name—L. depressum—must, of course, be retained, though the feature to which it refers is of no value. Mr. Douglas reports the species (Ent. Mo. Mag., 1887, p. 28) in England on Ficus. The second stage and larva have not been described hitherto.

Lecanium longulum, Douglas; Lecanium chirimoliœ, Maskell, 1889.

This insect occurs in the Sandwich Islands, and is there apparently common; for Mr. Koebele brought me thence several plants upon which I found it plentiful—e.g., Psidium, Bambusa, Acacia, Citrus, and several unnamed.

I mentioned in 1890 my conviction of the identity of this species with mine from Fiji; and comparison with these specimens from Honolulu confirms that opinion.

Lecanium scrobiculatum, sp. nov.Plate XIII., figs. 57.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female brownish-yellow, elliptical; very convex in the median region and slightly flattened towards the margins, having thus a sort of dorsal “hump”; length about 1/13in. Epidermis rough, with a network of minute wrinkles on the flatter portions, forming small cell-like divisions; smoother on the dorsal convexity, but marked there with many very minute pit-like depressions. Antennæ of seven joints, of which the third and fourth are the longest, and about equal to each other. Feet rather thick; tarsus as long as the tibia; claw very small; all the digitules appear to be very short. On the margin of the body is a row of small spiny hairs, not set close together. At each of the four spiracular depressions of the margin is a chitinous semicircular band, which bears some short club-shaped spines. Abdominal cleft small; lobes large, conical, setiferous; anogenital ring with many hairs.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Female of the second stage yellow, elliptical, flattish, but with a raised median longitudinal ridge; length about 1/18in. Epidermis wrinkled as in the adult, but the pits on the median region are not noticeable. Antennæ of six slender joints; the third and fourth joints in the specimens observed were very long and thin. Feet normal. Spiracular spines long. A row of spiny hairs runs round the margin of the body.

Larva not observed.

Male pupa covered with a white, thin, glassy, elongated test, very shiny and brittle. Many of the specimens observed enclosed hymenopterous parasites, the pupæ of which, showing

– 222 –

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

through the nearly transparent test, made the latter look almost black. Length of test about 1/18in.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult male dark-orange or red in colour; length, exclusive of spike, about 1/30in. Antennæ of ten joints. Dorsal eyes four, ventral eyes two, ocelli two. Wings brightly iridescent, with strong red nervures. Abdominal spike rather thick at the báse, slightly curved, and nearly as long as the abdomen.

Hab. In Australia, on Acacia sp., Whitton, New South Wales. Specimens from Mr. Koebele.

This insect belongs to Signoret's second series of the genus, being convex, with (at least, in the second stage) a dorsal longitudinal carina, I cannot identify it with any known species. The male, with its bright wings and their red nervures, is an elegant little insect.

Genus Pulvinaria, Targioni.

Pulvinaria dodonææ, sp. nov. Plate XIII., figs. 8, 9.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female reddish-brown, darkening with age. Before gestation the form is regularly elliptical, flattish or slightly convex, and has the appearance of a full-grown Lecanium; as the white cottony ovisac is formed the insect shrivels, becoming corrugated and irregular in outline, and at the last appears only as a small brown speck at the end of the white cottony sac. The size therefore varies, some individuals observed before gestation reaching ⅛in., while the females after gestation average only 1/20in. The ovisac averages about 1/9in. in length, and is of the normal subcylindrical form. Antennæ of eight joints, of which the third is the longest, the last four the shortest and equal to each other. Feet rather long and slender; the tibia is about twice as long as the tarsus, which is slightly curved; the tibia is somewhat expanded at its end; lower digitules long and expanded, upper pair fine hairs. There is a row of spiny hairs round the margin of the body, set rather close together. Abdominal cleft narrow; lobes rather long; anogenital ring with several hairs. Mentum monomerous. Epidermis with great numbers of spinneret-orifices, principally on the abdominal region.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Female of the second stage regularly elliptical, very slightly convex, smooth; colour greenish-yellow; length about 1/12in. Antennæ of six joints. Feet as in the adult. This stage is frequently parasitized.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva yellowish-brown; flattish, elliptical; length about 1/70in. Antennæ of six joints, subequal except the last, which is a little longer, and bears some hairs of which two are rather long. Abdominal setæ long.

Male pupa covered with a white, glassy, elongated test, with sides and ends sloping, and the top covered with a flat

– 223 –

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

plate of secretion. Length of test about 1/13in. The insect escapes by lifting up the posterior end.

Adult male unknown.

Hab. In Australia, on Dodonœa bursarifolia and Myoporum sp. My specimens are from Mr. Tepper.

The variations in size and colour of this insect render it difficult to identify. Not only is the adult before gestation lighter in colour and much larger than the adult after gestation, but the greenish second stage is not at first sight much like either, and, indeed, has sometimes rather the appearance of some species of Planchonia. However, when a number of individuals are observed in which the commencement of the ovisac can be detected behind the large adults, and when the anatomical characters given above are constant in all stages, the adults and the younger individuals being all mingled together on the plant, it is evident that all are really the same species.

Pulvinaria psidii, sp. nov. Plate XIII., figs. 10, 11.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female yellow, or yellowish-brown, sometimes with a greenish tinge; size variable, reaching 1/12in. before the ovisac is formed, but shrivelling at gestation. The ovisacs cover the twig or leaf with masses of dirty-white cotton, usually accompanied by black fungus. Antennæ rather long and slender, of eight joints, of which the third is the longest, the eighth next, the rest shorter and subequal. Feet also rather long; the trochanter is large and bears a very long hair; tarsus curved and about half as long as the tibia; upper digitules fine hairs, lower pair long and dilated at the end. Abdominal cleft moderate; anogenital ring with several hairs. The margin of the body bears a row of spiny hairs.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Female of the second stage yellow, flattish, elliptical; length about 1/20in. Antennæ of six joints.

Larva yellow, flat, elliptical. Antennæ of six joints.

Male unknown.

Hab. In the Sandwich Islands, on Psidium (guava). My specimens are from Mr. Koebele.

This species appears to differ in the feet and antennæ from any of those hitherto described. From the look of the twigs and leaves which have been furnished to me I should imagine that the insect must be rather damaging; at all events, the masses of greyish ovisacs are very unsightly.

Genus Signoretia, Targioni.

Signoretia luzulæ, Dufour. Signoret, Essai, p. 181. Plate XIII., figs. 12, 13.

I have received from Mr. Olliff some specimens which I propose to attach to this species. The adult females are

– 224 –

yellowish-brown, enclosed in a narrow elongated convex sac of pure-white cotton so closely felted as to seem rather solid; and this sac is quite identical (except in size) with my type-specimens of S. luzulœ from Europe. In size it is about twice as large as the type, but I do not consider that as important. The enclosed female is, before gestation, of the normal length, about ⅛in.; but shrivels considerably at gestatión. The antennæ have eight joints, of which the third and fourth are the longest. Signoret makes the fourth and fifth longer than the rest, but Mr. Newstead shows (Ent. Mo. Mag., May, 1892) that this is an error. The digitules of the claw are very large and widely dilated. The margin of the body bears some small spines, and the epidermis is covered with a great number of tubular spinnerets.

Hab. In Australia, on grass, Nevertire, New South Wales.

At first sight I thought that this would turn out to be a Dactylopid, probably D. herbicola or D. graminis, Mask.; but it is very clearly a Lecanid in all its characters. It would have been easy for me to erect it into a new species on the size of the sac and on some very minute differences which may be detected in the antennæ both of the adult and the larva; but I greatly prefer, wherever it is at all possible, to avoid the multiplication of species. Perhaps a character mentioned by Signoret, and apparent also in this Australian form, may also be conclusive as to the identity: it is that the sac has a small orifice at one end, which is closed by the body of the insect.

Genus Prosopophora, Douglas. Ent. Mo. Mag., Aug., 1892, p. 207.

Adult female covered with a test which is either waxy or so closely felted as to appear almost homogeneous. Margin of test without fringe. Antennæ of not more than eight joints. Anal tubercles present, but in the species observed very small. Anogenital ring with more than eight hairs. Feet usually atrophied. Mentum usually monomerous. There is generally a small terminal orifice in the test.

Male pupa covered with a test of similar material to that of the female; antennæ of adult with ten joints.

Larva exhibiting anal tubercles; abdomen not cleft.

In the foregoing diagnosis I have somewhat extended and less definitely fixed some of the generic characters originally laid down by Mr. Douglas, in order to attach to this genus two Australian species which, with these alterations, will sufficiently agree with it. I have been in great doubt as to the genus to which they might belong, and, although in a few respects they approach Planchonia, yet in others they differ from it. If, on the other hand, I left Mr. Douglas's charac-

Picture icon

Coccididæ.

Picture icon

Coccididæ.

Picture icon

Coccididæ.

– 225 –

ters exactly as he stated them, my species would not come quite into Prosopophora: for example, he says, “Surface with granulose raised lines; no anal cleft or tubercles.” But the first of these is of no generic importance whatsoever; it may be a fair specific character: the second is manifestly not quite correct, as in his fig. 1f he shows two distinct tubercles. It is therefore not only convenient, but even necessary, to somewhat amend the generic characters; and this being done I can avoid the danger of overloading the study of Coccids with a new genus founded upon insufficient distinctions.

Mr. Douglas, having seen only one species, expresses much doubt as to the group in which Prosopophora should be placed. My two Australian species (or varieties) clearly show it to be Acanthococcid, and not far removed from Planchonia: indeed, I have hesitated long before separating it from that genus. There seems, indeed, to be no marginal fringe on the test or sac; but the adult female exhibits figure-of-eight orifices which, though much smaller, resemble those of Planchonia epacridis.

Prosopophora acaciæ, sp. nov. Plate XIV., figs. 17.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female covered by a waxy test; test elliptical, slightly convex, smooth, yellowish-brown; length about 1/7in.; margin irregular, but without fringe; there is a small orifice at the posterior extremity. When the test is lifted up the portion of the twig immediately beneath is seen to be depressed and concave, and the space so formed is usually filled with eggs or eggshells.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Male pupa covered by a white, waxy, elliptical test; length of test about 1/23in. Anterior portion of test smooth, the posterior region transversely corrugated.

Adult female brown, filling the test, but shrivelling at gestation. Antennæ very short, rather thick, with apparently only four joints, but the joints are much confused, and there may be six; the last joint bears a few hairs. Feet atrophied, very small and thick, the tibia and femur confused, the tarsus very small and very short, followed by a minute claw; digitules probably absent. Anal tubercles moderate, each bearing two or three spiny hairs. The epidermis bears a great number of tubular cylindrical spinnerets, and many very minute figure-of-eight orifices. On the margin there are a few conical spines and a double row of very small figure-of-eight orifices.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Female of the second stage brown, flattish, elliptical; length about 1/30in. Antennæ of six rather thick joints. Anal tubercles large, converging at the extremity so as almost to exhibit an abdominal cleft, but close examination shows that there are no dorsal lobes, and that the abdomen is not Lecanid; on each tubercle there is a long terminal seta.

– 226 –

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva brown, flattish, elliptical; length about 1/60in. Antennæ of six joints. Anal tubercles distinct.

Adult male unknown.

Hab. In Australia, on Acacia calamifolia. My specimens are from Mr. Tepper.

In the Ent. Mo. Mag., November, 1890, I asked the question, How do Coccids produce cavities in plants? And amongst other instances I mentioned a New Zealand species, Ctenochiton viridis, which formed beneath it on its leaf a depression. That insect does its work on soft leaves; Prosopophora acaciœ (as well as the next species to be described) lives on twigs of very hard wood; yet it hollows them out somehow, and I cannot discover how the process is effected; for there is no swelling of the bark, or distortion of the twig, or wound of the tissues noticeable in the vicinity.

Prosopophora eucalypti, sp. nov. Plate XIV., figs. 811.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female covered by a test which is very closely felted, but which is seen, on careful examination, to be not perfectly homogeneous wax; colour of test yellowish-brown, but frequently covered with black fungus; form subcircular, flattish at the top, rather thick; there is a small orifice in the posterior region. There is a depression in the twig beneath, as in the last species, filled with eggs. Diameter of test about 1/25in.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Test of male pupa white, or grey, or yellowish; texture more waxy than that of the female, but not solid; anterior portion smooth, posterior region transversely corrugated. Length about 1/25in.

Adult female brown or red, filling the test, but shrivelling at gestation. Antennæ moderately long, of six joints, which sometimes appears to be eight, as there are “false joints” in the third and the sixth; these two joints are consequently rather the longest. Feet completely atrophied. Anal tubercles small. Epidermis bearing great numbers of tubular spinnerets and of minute figure-of-eight orifices.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Female of the second stage brown, flattish, elliptical. Length about 1/85in. Antennæ of six rather thick joints. Anal tubercles large and converging, as in the last species, thus simulating an abdominal cleft.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva light-brown, flattish, elliptical. Length about 1/80in. Antennæ of six joints. Anal tubercles large and converging.

Adult male unknown.

Hab. In Australia, on Eucalyptus sp. My specimens were sent by Mr. Koebele from Whitton, New South Wales.

The differences in the feet and antennæ are sufficient to separate this from the last species.

– 227 –

Genus Gossyparia, Signoret.

Adult females lying on a cushion of cotton, the dorsum exposed. Characters of Acanthococcidœ; retaining feet and antennæ.

Gossyparia casuarinæ, sp. nov. Plate XIV., figs. 12, 13.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female brown, varying from light to dark, elongated, convex, elliptical, resting on a cushion of grey cotton which leaves almost the whole insect exposed. Length about 1/12in. Antennæ of six joints, of which the third is the longest, the fourth and fifth the shortest. Feet with the tarsus longer than the tibia (a frequent character in Acanthococcidœ); all the digitules are fine hairs. Anal tubercles conspicuous. Mentum dimerous. On the margin of the body a row of slender spines, not very close together.

Female of second stage not observed.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva brown, flattish, elliptical. Length about 1/60in. Antennæ of six joints. Anal tubercles large and conspicuous. Margin of the body bearing a row of strong spines, slender, with tubercular bases. These spines are smaller on the thoracic than on the abdominal segments, and increase in length as they approach the extremity.

Male unknown.

Hab. In Australia, on Casuarina sp. Specimens from Mr. Koebele, from Sydney.

The cushion of grey cotton in this species is more scanty than is usual in the genus, almost the whole insect being exposed instead of only the dorsum, as is ordinary. A distinctive character of the larva appears to be the varying length of the marginal spines from the cephalic to the abdominal regions.

Gossyparia confluens, sp. nov. Plate XIV., fig. 14.

Adult females excreting a quantity of white cotton, with sometimes a yellowish tinge, aggregated in a mass on the twigs of the plant, and not entirely covering each insect, so that the twig looks as if covered with a honeycombed incrustation, in the interstices of which the bodies of the insects can be perceived. Insect dark-red in colour, subelliptical, convex. Antennæ of six joints, the first three of which are the longest and subequal, the last three short and subequal. Feet rather long; tarsus nearly one and a half times the length of the tibia. Anal tubercles conspicuous. Body covered with numerous slender spines. Mentum dimerous. Anal ring with eight hairs.

Larva and male not observed.

Hab. In Australia, on Eucalyptus sp. Specimens from Mr. Koebele, from Sydney.

– 228 –

The appearance of the mass of cotton in which this species is imbedded is rather curious. The insects seem to drop out easily.

Genus Eriococcus, Targioni-Tozzetti.

Eriococcus turgipes, sp. nov. Plate XIV., figs. 1520.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Sac of adult female white, rather solid, very tough and leathery; form globular, but several sacs are frequently aggregated in a mass. There is in most cases an orifice on the dorsal region, but sometimes the sac is closed. Diameter about 1/10 in.

Sac of male pupa not certainly observed, but probably of the same material as that of the female, but smaller and more elongated; usually open at the top.

In both female and male sacs there is a small quantity of white loose cotton covering the dorsum of the insect inside the sac, and separated from it.

Adult female yellowish-brown, becoming nearly black at gestation. From subglobular, but slightly flattened dorsally, and the median dorsal region is darker in colour than the rest. Antennæ of six joints, of which the third and the sixth are much longer than the other four. Mentum large, dimerous. Feet very thick, swollen, and partly atrophied; the coxa and femur very large; the tibia, tarsus, and claw fused into one and very small, so that when viewed from below they form a single straight subconical joint, whilst if viewed from the side they are irregular and curved; digitules absent. Anal tubercles very small, each bearing one moderate seta and a great num ber of short conical spines. Anogenital ring compound, with six hairs. Epidermis bearing great numbers of short fine hairs, interspersed with circular orifices and with short conical spines; the spines and the orifices are most numerous on the median dorsal region. There are also several short spines on the femur.

Female of the second stage not observed.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva brown, flattish; form elliptical, but only slightly elongated, so that it has a rather squat appearance; length about 1/90 in. Antennæ long, with six joints, of which the sixth is very long and fusiform, the second being the next longest. Anal tubercles very small, convergent, and only bearing short terminal spines instead of setæ. The rostral setæ are very long. Feet normal; lower digitules fine hairs; the tarsal pair are absent.

Adult male unknown.

Hab. In Australia, on Casuarina sp. Specimens sent by Mr. Koebele from New South Wales.

This is a very peculiar species, which possibly I might have rather placed in the genus Gossyparia, on account of the

– 229 –

dorsal opening in the sac; but this opening is not, I think, constant, and in no case does it reduce the sac to anything like a mere cushion. The insect is practically enclosed. The six hairs of the anogenital ring are abnormal, the generic number being eight; but, as I remarked in my paper of 1890 (vol. xxiii., p. 32), the student of Coccids must be prepared to look on any character as elastic and variable. The distinctive specific feature of E. turgipes is the peculiar form of the feet; and I have found in preparing a number of specimens for microscopic examination that in all cases they assumed the position shown in my figure—they radiate like spokes of a wheel, whereas in other Coccids they are naturally bent downwards. The outline of the insect being circular, the six feet are placed at equal distances, so that the anterior pair are in front of the rostrum, the posterior pair very far towards the anal tubercles. Perhaps, also, the very long sixth joint of the larval antennæ may be looked on as an exceptional character.

Eriococcus coriaceus, sp. nov. Plate XV., figs. 13.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Sac of adult female varying in colour from light-yellow or buff to dark-orange or red; form elliptical; sometimes single, sometimes aggregated in masses on a twig. Texture very leathery and tough. There is a small orifice at the posterior extremity. Length about 1/15 in.

Sac of male pupa of similar material and colours, but smaller.

Adult female dark-red, filling the sac. Antennæ of seven subequal joints, which in a few specimens seen appear like eight. Feet normal, the tibia about half as long as the tarsus. Anal tubercles moderate; anogenital ring with eight hairs. Epidermis bearing many fine short hairs and short slender spines. Mentum dimerous.

Female of the second stage not observed.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva red, flattish, elliptical; length about 1/15 in. Form normal; antennæ of six joints; anal tubercles conspicuous.

Adult male unknown.

Hab. In Australia, on Eucalyptus sp. Specimens from Mr. Olliff, New South Wales.

This species, in the form of its sac and in the antenna, approaches E. eucalypti, Mask.; but the sac has no glassy tubes on it, and the body of the insect has slender hairs instead of the thick conical spines of that species. It is viviparous, and several specimens seen were so full of lively larvæ that it seemed a wonder how these could find room.

Eriococcus coriaceus, sp. nov. Plate XV., figs. 46.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Sac of adult female yellow, not closely felted, subglobular;diameter about 1/10in.

– 230 –

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Sac of male pupa white, cylindrical; length about 1/40 in.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female brown; form normal; length about 1/25 in. Antennæ of six joints, of which the third is much longer than the rest. Feet normal; tibia about three-fourths the length of the tarsus. Anal tubercles conspicuous and large. Epidermis covered very thickly on the dorsal surface with small irregularly oval markings, which are most numerous near the margin, and with some circular spinneret-orifices.

Female of second stage not observed.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva brown, flattish, elliptical; length about 1/50 in. Antennæ of six joints.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult male dark-brown; length about 1/50 in. Antennæ of ten joints. The anal “tails” are rather long.

Hab. In Australia, on Casuarina sp. Specimens sent by. Mr. Koebele, from Harwood, New South. Wales.

The minutely-speckled epidermis of this species, which is not properly observable until properly prepared, sufficiently distinguishes it from others of the genus.

Genus Rhizococcus, Signoret.

Rhizococcus grandis, Maskell, var. spinosior.

Adult female of the same colour and form as the type (N.Z. Trans., vol. xxiv., p. 29), but smaller; length about ⅛ in. It resembles R. grandis in the antennæ, in the smallness of the anal tubercles, and in the characters of the larva. The principal difference is in the dorsal spines, which are more numerous; prehaps, also, the lower pair of digitules are less dilated. It would be easy, no doubt, to make a new species of it: I prefer to consider it merely as a variety, especially as the food-plants of the two belong to the same genus.

Hab. In Australia, on Acacia implexa. Specimens sent by Mr. J. Lidgett, of Myrniong, Victoria.

Rhizococcus casuarinæ, sp. nov. Plate XV., fig. 7.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female varying in colour from yellow to dark-red; form normal, but the segments are scarcely noticeable. Length about 1/9in. Antennæ of six joints, of which the third is nearly as long as all the rest together. Feet normal; tibia about half as long as the tarsus. Anal tubercles moderate, but not observable in the natural state, being hidden by the convexity of the abdomen. Dorsum bearing some slender spines, some of which are very long.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva red, flattish, elliptical; length about 1/45in. Antennæ of six joints. On the dorsum are four median longitudinal rows of very strong and long spines, and four other rows of smaller spines, two of which are marginal.

Male unknown.

– 231 –

Hab. In Australia, on Casuarina suberosa. Specimens sent by Mr. Lidgett.

This is another species allied to R. grandis; but it appears to differ from that sufficiently in the antenna, and principally in the rows of very strong spines on the dorsum of the larva.

Rhizococcus pustulatus, sp. nov. Plate XV., figs. 8, 9.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female dark-red in colour, convex, subelliptical and tapering somewhat posteriorly; the dorsum exhibits two longitudinal grooves on the supper surface and two others more shallow near the margins, and in these grooves are some rather large shallow depressions or pits; the epidermis is rough with great numbers of very minute pustules. Length of insect about 1/15in. Anal tubercles small, but conspicuous. Antennæ short, with six joints, of which the fourth and fifth are the shortest. Feet absent. Anogenital ring with eight hairs. Mentum dimerous. The dorsal pustules are very noticeable after treatment with potash.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Female of the second stage red, subelliptical, tapering posteriorly, slightly convex; length about 1/40in. Antennæ of six joints, of which the sixth is the longest. Feet normal, the tibia a little shorter than the tarsus. Anal tubercles conspicuous, with long setæ. Epidermis rough with minute pustules. Margin irregular, and bearing many slender spines.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva yellowish-red, subelliptical, tapering; length about 1/70in. Anal tubercles moderate. Antennæ of six joints. The dorsal epidermis is profusely marked with very minute wrinkles, and these are also seen in fewer numbers on the ventral surface. The margin bears a row of small slender spines.

Male unknown.

Hab. In Australia, on Casuarina sp. My specimens are from Mr. J. Lidgett, of Myrniong, Victoria.

At first sight this insect might be taken for R. casuarinœ, or for a small form of R. grandis; but it is apodous, and moreover distinguishable by the dorsal corrugations, shallow pits, and minute pustules.

Subdivision Dactylopidæ.

Genus Dactylopius, Costa.

Dactylopius arecæ, Maskell. N.Z. Trans., vol. xxii., p. 150.

I have received from Mr. W. W. Smith, of Ashburton, specimens of this insect found amongst roots of gooseberry, red-clover, grass, dock, and other plants, underground. My original specimens were amongst roots of Areca sapida. It would appear, therefore, that the insect is not uncommon, and is not confined to any particular plant. My Ashburton speci-

– 232 –

mens have antennæ of seven joints, but otherwise agree with the type, and the antennal difference is not important. The buff-coloured meal covering the dorsum readily distinguishes the species at first sight.

Dactylopius ericicola, sp. nov. Plate XV., figs. 10, 11.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female varying in colour from dark-brown to red; subglobular, with the ventral surface concave at gestation; accompanied, but not covered, by grey or dirty-white cotton, which is frequently aggregated in masses; length of insect about 1/20in. Antennæ of seven joints, all subequal except the last, which is as long as any two others. Feet moderate; digitules fine hairs. Anal tubercles very minute and inconspicuous; anogenital ring with six hairs. Epidermis very minutely wrinkled, and bearing some circular spinneret-orifices and some conical spines.

Female of the second stage not observed.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva brown, rather elongated and slender; length about 1/80in. Antennæ rather thick, with six joints, subequal except the last, which is longer than any two others. Feet also thick. Mentum dimerous.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult male dark reddish-brown; length about 1/20in. Antennæ of ten joints, all rather thick and subequal. Feet rather long and slender. Abdominal spike very short; setæ very long.

There is usually much black fungus accompanying this insect, and it is also much infested by a minute yellow hymenopterous parasite.

Hab. In Australia, on Erica autumnalis. My specimens are from Mr. French.

I am under the impression that Erica autumnalis is not a native of Australia, and consequently the insect here described may not be Australian, but perhaps imported there from the Cape of Good Hope. I cannot identify it with any known species, though it comes nearest to D. globosus, Mask., from which it differs by not being covered by its cotton, and in the characters of the epidermis.

Dactylopius nipæ, sp. nov. Plate XV., figs. 1215.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female dark-red in colour, flattish, subcircular; diameter about 1/30in. exclusive of the cotton; excreting on the dorsum whitish or yellowish cottony meal, and all round the margin subcylindrical tassels of yellowish cotton, which are sometimes equally long all round, sometimes longer posteriorly; the dorsal meal is often arranged in rows in little granular masses. Antennæ of either seven or eight joints, of which the last is much the longest, the third and the penulti-

– 233 –

mate slightly longer than the rest. Feet rather long, of normal form; lower digitules very slightly dilated. Anal tubercles very minute and inconspicuous; anogenital ring with six hairs. Mentum trimerous. Epidermis with many very minute circular spinneret-orifices. Margin bearing some conical spines not set close together; and some more of these spines are scattered on the cephalic region.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Female of the second stage purplish-red, elongated, flattish; length about 1/40in.; not covered with cotton, but with sparse white meal on the dorsum and a few cottony tassels at the posterior extremity. Antennæ of six joints.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva purplish-red, flattish, elliptical; length about 1/50in. Antennæ of six rather thick joints, the last much the longest, the rest subequal. Anal tubercles very small, convergent, bearing moderate setæ.

Male pupa enclosed in white cotton; usually aggregated in masses on the leaf.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult male brownish-red; length about 1/40in. Wings not iridescent. Antennæ of ten joints, the third, fourth, and tenth longer than the rest. Dorsal eyes two, ventral eyes two, ocelli two. Abdominal spike short and very broad at the base, having the appearance of two basal lobes with a conical process. Feet moderate; at the extremity of the tibia are several strong spines.

Hab. In Demerara, on an aquatic palm, Nipa fruticans. My specimens were sent to me by Mr. J. W. Douglas, who has allowed me to describe the insect here.

In outward appearance this resembles rather a Ripersia, from the character of the cottony processes of the adult female; but, some specimens showing seven and others eight joints in the antennæ, I attach it to Dactylopius. I believe it to be quite distinct.

Dactylopius eucalypti, Maskell. N.Z. Trans., vol. xxiv., p. 35.

The specimens of this insect which Mr. Crawford sent to me a few years ago were clustered between sheets of bark in a mass of cotton, mingled with larvæ and males. I have lately received from Mr. W. W. Froggatt, of Sydney, a large number on leaves of Eucalyptus robusta. These specimens agree entirely with my South Australian types as far as regards the anatomical characters of the antennæ, feet, and anogenital ring, and also the feathery fringe of the larva; but instead of secreting cotton they are naked, each resting in a pit or depression in the leaf which exactly corresponds to its outline. As these specimens were sent to me in alcohol I am unable to say whether in nature they would have any cotton or not; but in any case the point is not important in view of the ana-

– 234 –

tomical characters, and probably the modes of growth on the leaves or under the bark may differ to that extent.

On account of this difference it is necessary to be rather more precise than I was in 1891 in detailing the organic characters of this species. The most important of these is the anogenital ring, which departs entirely from the type of Dactylopius, having more than six (usually twenty) hairs. This character, as far as experience goes at present, is sufficient to determine the species at once. With regard to the mentum, I was in doubt last year whether it is monomerous or not: further examination leads me to think it is not, and it would therefore not be exceptional; but certainty as to the mentum is by no means easy. The antenna has seven joints as mentioned in 1891; it may be recognised by two very long hairs, one on the first and the other on the second joint (with, of course, other shorter hairs). The four digitules are all much longer than the claw.

I shall still leave this species in Dactylopius, in spite of the exceptional anal ring. Perhaps some day somebody may find out how it constructs the pit on the leaf in which it lives.

Genus Pseudococcus, Westwood.

Pseudococcus nivalis, sp. nov. Plate XVI., figs. 14.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female covered with a quantity of white cotton, and excreting also a white cottony ovisac of less dense texture than that on the dorsum. This ovisac is frequently prolonged posteriorly as in the Lecanid genus Pulvinaria. Insect yellowish - brown, elliptical, slightly convex; length about 1/12in. Antennæ of nine joints, the first short, the second the longest, the rest gradually diminishing to the eighth, the last as long as the fourth; the fourth, fifth, and sixth are more slender than the others. Feet rather long and slender; tarsal digitules fine hairs; there are no digitules on the claw. Anal tubercles very minute and inconspicuous, setiferous; the anogenital ring has six hairs. Margin bearing on each segment a group at each side of large circular spinnerets, and these are also numerously scattered on the dorsal abdominal region. On the cephalic region are groups of conical spines.

Female of the second stage, and larva, not observed.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult male dark-yellow or orange; length about 1/30in. Antennæ of ten joints, diminishing gradually from the third to the tenth. Abdominal spike short; there are two very long “tails” and two shorter median setæ. Dorsal eyes two, ventral eyes two, ocelli two.

Hab. In Australia, on Acacia sp. My specimens are from Mr. Koebele; the locality either Sydney or Brisbane.

– 235 –

The form of the antenna of the female, nine-jointed, and more slender in the middle than at either end, is characteristic of the genus. The species differs slightly from any hitherto reported.

Pseudococcus casuarinæ, sp. nov. Plate XVI., fig. 5.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female covered with a quantity of white cotton, which has normally a globular form, but is often aggregated in masses; there seems to be no posterior ovisac. Insect yellowish-brown, elliptical, slightly convex; length about 1/5in., but shrivelling at gestation. Antennæ of nine joints, of which the second is much the longest (as long as any two others), the rest gradually diminishing to the eighth, the ninth as long as the sixth. The fourth, fifth, and sixth are the most slender. Feet rather long and strong; tarsal digitules fine hairs. There is no lower pair on the claw. Anal tubercles very small; anogenital ring with six hairs. Epidermis bearing large numbers of small circular spinnerets and short fine hairs, and on the margin of each segment at each side is a group of orifices mingled with conical spines.

Female of the second stage not observed.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva brown, flattish, elliptical; length about 1/60in. Antennæ of six rather thick joints, the sixth much the longest, the rest subequal. Anal tubercles small, setiferous.

Male unknown.

Hab. In Australia, on Casuarina sp. Specimens from Mr. Lidgett, of Myrniong, Victoria.

Genus Ripersia, Signoret.

Ripersia leptospermi, Maskell. Trans. Roy. Soc. South Australia, 1887–88, p. 106. Plate XVII., fig. 6.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Female of the second stage dark-red, with white cotton and meal; form flattish, elongated, broadest posteriorly; conspicuously segmented; length about 1/40in. Antennæ of six joints, of which the third is as long as all the rest together. Feet long; the tibia is longer than the tarsus. Anal tubercles rather small, convergent, setiferous. Margin of body rough with numbers of thick tubular spinherets with wide bases and slightly tapering, as in the adult, and others similar are scattered on the dorsum.

Male pupa covered with white cotton.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult male red; wings grey; length of body about 1/40in. Antennæ of ten joints, the last four rather thick and short. Dorsal eyes two, ventral eyes two, ocelli two.

Hab. In Australia, on Leptospermum sp. The specimens here described were sent by Mr. Koebele from Sydney.

When I described, in 1887, the adult female and the larva of this species, I had not seen the second stage or the male.

– 236 –

Subdivision Idiococcidæ, Subd. Nov.

Last year I had to report two genera as to which I was then unable to decide their proper position. One of these, Sphœrococcus, included only one species; the other, Cylindrococcus, had two, and possibly three. Since then I have received specimens of three species which I propose to place in Sphœrococcus, and I have been able to fix definitely the affinities of the third species of Cylindrococcus. Under these circumstances not only can I maintain the genera established last year, but I find it advisable to erect a new subdivision to include both of them, for it is not possible to attach them to any hitherto known. As for their group affinities, I shall leave them amongst the Coccidinœ, because they certainly are more nearly related to the members of that group than to the Lecanids; but, even so, their characters are so strange that I have thought it best to indicate the fact by the name of my new subdivision. Moreover, having decided thus much, I propose to characterize the Idiococcidœ by such wide and comprehensive features as will permit the future inclusion therein of other genera which may hereafter be discovered: in fact, I mean the subdivision to serve as a receptacle for, perhaps, many insects which cannot possibly enter into the others, and so we may avoid, as far as possible, multiplication of names.

Idiococcidæ.

Adult females active or stationary; gall-making, or naked, or producing cotton or wax. Anal tubercles entirely absent; anal ring hairless. Antennæ with usually less than seven joints. Body not prolonged posteriorly.

The insects belonging to this subdivision are separated from the Monophlebidœ by the absence of anal tubercles and by the antennæ; from the Brachyscelidœ by the absence of any abdominal prolongation or “tail”; from the Acanthococcidœ and the Dactylopidœ by the absence of anal tubercles, and the hairless anogenital ring. They come nearest, perhaps, to the subdivision Coccidœ, which includes only the single genus Coccus (cochineal), and in which the anogenital ring is also hairless. But Coccus cacti possesses (though very small and inconspicuous) the usual anal tubercles. Moreover, although I do not lay much stress upon external similarity or dissimilarity, I cannot bring myself to consider Coccus as really closely allied to either Sphœrococcus or Cylindrococcus. This question has given me an amount of trouble and study which anybody except a systematic entomologist would probably consider excessive; and it is only after several months of hesitation and frequent changes of

– 237 –

mind that I have decided upon erecting this new subdivision, and placing therein the new species discovered during the past year.

Genus Sphærococcus, Maskell. N.Z. Trans., vol. xxiv., 1891, p. 39.

Adult females naked, or producing cotton or wax. Anal tubercles absent; anogenital ring hairless. Antennæ of usually less than seven joints, sometimes atrophied. Feet sometimes absent, sometimes atrophied, sometimes deformed.

Adult male unknown.

Last year I was not prepared to attach any definite characters to this genus. Even now, though I am including three more species in it, I am compelled to leave the characters thus vague and general, in order to avoid erecting a new genus to suit each one.

Sphærococcus acaciæ, sp. nov. Plate XVI., figs. 611.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female covered with white cotton, which singly is globular, but may be aggregated in masses. Insect globular, dark-brown; diameter about 1/9in. Antennæ and feet absent. Anogenital ring very small and difficult to detect, simple, hairless; anal tubercles absent. Epidermis bearing numbers of minute tubular spinnerets; and on the median dorsal region a great many small clear oval markings. Spiracles large.

Female of the second stage not observed.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva brown, flattish, elliptical; length about 1/65in. When observed within the body of the mother it is seen to have antennæ of four moderately long subequal joints, on the last of which are two long hairs; after emergence the joints become shorter and rather confused, but the joints and hairs may still be made out. Feet thick and clumsy, the joints swollen; claw very small; the digitules seem to be all fine hairs. Margin bearing some very slender spines. Anal tubercles absent or atrophied, but there are the usual two terminal setæ.

Male unknown.

Hab. In Australia, on Acacia sp. Specimens sent by Mr. A. S. Olliff, from Queanbeyan, New South Wales.

This insect is allied to S. casuarinœ, Mask., reported last year, but differs quite sufficiently for specific separation.

Sphærococcus bambusæ, sp. nov. Plate XVI., figs. 1219.

Adult female producing white cotton, which forms a cushion under it and sometimes partially covers it; this cotton frequently appears quite hard and solid. Insect dark-brown, elongated, slightly convex, usually tapering somewhat posteriorly; the cephalic region is very large, the abdominal

– 238 –

segments short and compressed. Length about ⅕in. The epidermis is very hard and solid, and resists the action of potash even after prolonged boiling. The antennæ are almost completely atrophied, and are exceedingly difficult to detect, being placed close to the anterior margin, where the skin is darkest and hardest, so that it is only by very careful search that they can be seen at all; they are roundly conical, composed of apparently three or four joints much confused; there are a few terminal hairs. Feet entirely absent. Anal tubercles absent; the anogenital ring is difficult to examine owing to the hardness of the epidermis; it is simple and hairless. The abdominal extremity is truncate. Epidermis bearing great numbers of minute fine hairs dorsally, and on the ventral surface on each segment at each side is a group of small elliptical orifices placed close together

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Female of the second stage brown, slightly convex and elongated; length about 1/12in.; the cephalic region large and the abdominal segments small, as in the adult; posterior extremity truncate. Antennæ close to the cephalic margin, small, conical, atrophied as in the adult, with three or four confused joints. Feet absent. The anogenital ring seems to have six slender hairs. Epidermis bearing great numbers of circular spinneret-orifices. Margin having a few slender spines, which are more numerous on the abdominal segments.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva red, with white cottony meal; elongated, flattish; length about 1/40in. The form is narrow and looks disproportionately long. Antennæ rather long, with six joints, of which the sixth is much the longest and largest, the third, fourth, and fifth the shortest and subequal. Feet moderately long; the tibia and tarsus are about equal; the digitules are fine hairs. Abdominal extremity slightly truncate; anal tubercles very small or absent; terminal setæ normal; anal ring with six hairs. Margin with a few cephalic slender spines and one on each side of each abdominal segment. Mentum dimerous.

Male unknown.

Hab. In Sandwich Islands, on bamboo. Specimens sent from Honolulu by Mr. Koebele.

This is a very peculiar and striking insect, which I cannot place elsewhere than in this genus. It is one of the most difficult with which I have had to deal, as regards the various organs, on account of the excessive hardness of the epidermis. Yet I believe that the account here given of it is sufficiently correct.

Sphærococcus inflatipes, sp. nov. Plate XVII., figs. 15.

Adult female covered by a waxy test, which is open beneath, convex above; the dorsal region of the test is elevated in a more or less conical manner, sometimes smoothly

– 239 –

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

rounded, sometimes with the sides corrugated as if with radiating buttresses; the marginal region is spread out rather flat, but often wrinkled, and the margin itself is usually slightly thickened. The normal outline of a test is subcircular or elliptical, but sometimes three or four have the margins conjoined and as if forming one mass. At the dorsal apex there is a small orifice. Colour of the test yellowish- or reddish-brown; the external diameter averages about 1/20in. When the test and the insect are removed a small slightly-depressed scar is left in the bark, covered with very thin white meal. Between the test and the dorsum of the insect, and not closely attached to either, there is a small, circular, thin, white, waxy indusium, which covers the central portion of the dorsum. The female insect is reddish-brown, filling the test; diameter about 1/30in.; the dorsal region is rather darker than the ventral; the body is rather thick, subcircular, and slightly depressed. Antennæ slightly tapering, of six short subequal joints, on the last of which are some longish hairs. At first sight there seem to be only two feet, but on examination it is found that the four anterior ones are much smaller and shorter than the posterior pair, which thus appear abnormally large. The four anterior feet are themselves rather swollen, the joints rather thick and wrinkled; the claws are not large, and I can only make out the tarsal digitules; on the trochanter is a long hair. The posterior feet, though large, have not entirely the swollen appearance of the others, and the joints are less wrinkled, but the claw is atrophied and can only be made out with difficulty; tarsal digitules rather long fine hairs, the lower pair absent. The dorsal region bears a very large number of irregularly-elliptical cells, amongst which are some fine spiny hairs; and round the margin is a ring of subconical rather thick spines, those at the posterior extremity being the longest and largest. The ventral epidermis bears fine spiny hairs interspersed with some small circular orifices. The mentum appears to be dimerous. Anogenital ring rather large, simple, hairless; close to it there seem to be two very short setæ.

Female of second stage and larva not observed.

Male unknown.

Hab. In Australia, on Eucalyptus sp. Specimens sent by Mr. French from Myrniong, Victoria. The pieces of bark forwarded are covered with numbers of the little brown tests. I think the normal appearance of the bark would be smooth and light-grey, but the Coccids look like an eruption of pustules on the surface. Mr. French tells me that the insect does much damage to the trees.

I cannot put this insect into any other genus than Sphœrococcus at present. Only one Coccid is known to me so far

– 240 –

which exhibits anything like the excessive development of the posterior feet*—that is Opisthoscelis gracilis, Schrader, one of the Brachyscelid group. But I cannot put S. inflatipes among the Brachyscelidœ. Moreover, after examination of several specimens of O. gracilis, I am by no means quite sure that the very long and slender organs noticeable in that insect are really feet; they are very peculiar and abnormal. However, I cannot discuss that question until my friend Mr. Olliff has published his observations on the Brachyscelidœ. Mean-while, S. inflatipes is certainly a strange and abnormal insect.

Genus Cylindrococcus, Maskell. N.Z. Trans., vol. xxiv., 1891, p. 41.

Cylindrococcus amplior, sp. nov. N.Z. Trans., vol. xxiv., 1891, p. 44.

Last year, having only a photograph of some galls on a twig, I could not decide upon their specific position, even if (as I thought probable) they belonged to Coccids at all. Since then Mr. Tepper has been kind enough to send me more specimens, and I have ascertained clearly that they contain Cylindrococcus. Examination of the enclosed females shows that they are very closely allied to C. casuarinœ, Mask. Indeed, I cannot positively point to any feature of the insect itself by which it may be definitely separated from that species; and it is equally difficult to differentiate the larva. Still, the form of the gall, which is evidently intermediate between that of C. casuarinœ and that of C. spiniferus, may be sufficient excuse for my venturing to consider the species as distinct. I am confirmed in this view by some remarks of Professor Riley, who, in “Insect Life,” vol. iv., p. 377, says, “A hundred larvæ, of Braconidœ, indistinguishable from one another structurally, will construct a hundred distinctive cocoons, each characteristic of its own species.” If the cocoon of a Hymenopter is considered sufficient for specific separation, the gall of a Coccid may have equal importance. But I should not like to extend this proposition very far; exceptionally it may pass, but all through my Coccid studies, from 1876 till now (whatever may be their value), I have laid stress (as regards species) chiefly on the organic characters of the insects themselves, and only secondarily on the nature of their coverings and excretions.

Hab. In Australia, on Casuarina quadrivalvis. Specimens from Mr. Tepper.

[Footnote] * I do not here take notice of Capulinia sallei, Sign., as only the larval stage of that species has been described.

Picture icon

Coccidiæ

Picture icon

Coccidiæ

– 241 –

Subdivision Monophlebidæ.

Hitherto a distinctive character of this subdivision has been a ten- or eleven-jointed antenna in the adult female. One of the insects about to be described shows only seven joints, and yet is certainly adult. It will therefore be necessary to modify the foregoing character, and to say “antennæ of usually eleven joints.”

Genus Cœlostoma, Maskell.

It has been pointed out to me that the name Cœlostoma was appropriated by others before I used it for a Coccid genus in 1879—first, by McLeay, in “Annulosa Javanica,” 1825, and again by Brullé in 1835. The number of names required nowadays for genera and species is so great that no little ingenuity is necessary to invent one which nobody has ever used before. Duplication is, of course, to be avoided as much as possible. Still, when one considers that not much confusion is likely to result supposing that the same name were taken, say, for a genus of fishes and for a genus of insects, it would not seem necessary for an entomologist to alter his work in order not to collide with an ichthyologist. Certainly it would not do to cumber entomology with duplicate names; and in a paper of mine in 1884 (Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. xvii., p. 17) I drew attention to the necessity of removing the name “Chermes” or “Kermes” from the Aphididœ, and confining it to its proper family, the Coccids, and I proposed for the former the name Kermaphis. Consequently, if there is any certainty as to the priority, the name of Cœlostoma must be given up as regards Coccids.

However, I find, in the first place, that McLeay's name (which I suppose must have been given to some Coleopter) is not Cœlostoma, but Cœlostomus. So, at least, Mr. T. D. Cockerell informs me in a letter. If this be so I do not feel inclined to abandon a name which is not only quite expressive and apt, but has been undisturbed for thirteen years; the difference of termination is sufficient for clearness, and might easily be paralleled in other instances. As regards Brullé's name, which seems clearly to have been Cœlostoma, I find that it was attached to a Coleopterous genus which subsequently was merged in Cyclonotum (see the synopsis of genera in Westwood, Introd. to Mod. Class. of Insects, vol. ii.); consequently no further notice need be taken of it. Under these circumstances I venture to think that less confusion will arise for students of Coccids, and even for other entomologists, if my name Cœlastoma be still retained.

Cœlostoma immane, Maskell. N.Z. Trans., vol. xxiv., 1891, p. 49.

Mr. A. S. Olliff informs me that he has seen specimens of

– 242 –

this “at least half as big again” as those described by me last year. Those in my own cabinet are sufficiently startling, especially when one compares them with some of the minute, almost invisible, Diaspids. The insects alive in their native locality must be worth seeing; and I should greatly like to investigate them there, and to see the males.

Cœlostoma australe, Maskell. Trans. of Linnæan Soc. of New South Wales, 1890, p. 280.

A characteristic feature of the male of this species is the long brush of white glassy filaments springing from the abdominal extremity. Having received from Mr. Koebele a large number of pupæ, each enclosed in a mass of white cotton, “found on the ground amongst Eucalypts, between leaves, and under pieces of stick, bark, &c.,” I have been enabled to watch the process of hatching, and the growth of the caudal “brush.” The pupa itself is light-red, elongated and somewhat slender, showing rudimentary wings and feet. On emergence therefrom the adult male is also light-red, the body very soft, and the wings flabby and weak. The colour deepens gradually, and the wings expand and become strong; it appears to be a couple of days before the insect acquires its full deep-red colour of the body and nervures. At first there is no sign of the caudal brush, the filaments of which commence to grow after five or six hours, and take two or three days before they reach their full development. Sometimes, when fully grown, the brush forms quite a wide fan of filaments; at other times the filaments are more parallel. I have kept twenty or more of these males in a glass-covered box for more than a fortnight before they died.

This is not the only Coccid male which exhibits a caudal “brush”—a similar feature exists in Orthezia urticœ, Linn., and in Callipappus westwoodii, Guérin, both of them European insects. But the females of these differ from Cœlostoma in possessing rostra, and Orthezia also has only eight joints in the antennæ, and belongs therefore to the Dactylopidœ.

Cœlostoma rubiginosum, sp. nov. Plate XVII., figs. 7–11.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female dark reddish-brown in colour, but covered with great numbers of short, slender, semi-waxy filaments of lighter colour, the whole producing an effect like rusty iron. Body elongated, thick, much wrinkled but not distinctly segmented, and the margin shows as a ridge running round the insect. Length variable, specimens seen from 1/3in. to 2/3in. Antennæ of eleven joints, subequal and tapering; each joint has some short spiny hairs. Feet rather long; the tibia and tarsus are both much curved; the claw is slender, and the articulation with the tarsus not apparent; digitules absent;

– 243 –

many short spiny hairs on each joint. Rostrum and mentum absent. Anogenital ring simple, hairless; anal tubercles absent, but there are two short caudal setæ. Although the short filaments on the dorsum look like hairs, they are not so, as they dissolve in potash, and the epidermis bears great numbers of irregularly oval cells, each with a central small orifice from which evidently the semi-waxy filaments spring.

Female of the second stage, larva, and male not observed.

Hab. In Australia, on Banksia integrifolia. Mr. French sent me specimens first from Melbourne, stating that they were “on dead twigs”; later he sent me two on leaves. Afterwards Mr. Koebele sent me two from Semaphore, South Australia, on the same plant.

This is a peculiar species, which is clearly not far removed from C. immane, Mask., the gigantic Coccid from central Australia. It is quite distinct from any others of the genus, and I should be glad to obtain a male. The skin of the antennæ and feet seems to be much less chitinous and hard than usual, and it was only after several attempts that I succeeded in preparing specimens for examination.

Genus Monophlebus, Leach.

Monophlebus crawfordi, Maskell. Trans. Roy. Soc. South Australia, 1887, p. 108; N.Z. Trans., vol. xxiv., 1891, p. 51. Plate XVII., figs. 12–20.

Mr. Koebele has at different times during his second exploration in Australia sent me specimens which he refers to in his letters as M. crawfordi. For some time I also considered them to belong strictly to that species; but on careful examination I have come to the conclusion that they differ somewhat; and, although I am not yet prepared to consider them all as specifically distinct, yet I consider two as varieties, and a third quite separate. In outward appearance there is scarcely anything at all to distinguish them, except that the “long white anal seta” mentioned by Mr. Koebele in 1889, and which I have never seen on the type of M. crawfordi, is visible on the insect which I name in this paper var. pilosior.

The following, therefore, is a synopsis of this species and its varieties as known to me at present:—

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Monophlebus crawfordi, type: Female varying in length from 1/5in. to 1/3in.; colour yellowish-red, with longitudinal bands of purple; antennæ of nine joints, equal in length except the last, which is rather longer than any of the others; feet moderately spinous; epidermis clothed with short fine hairs interspersed with very large numbers of circular spinneret - orifices; no long anal seta.

– 244 –

Monophlebus crawfordi, var. levis: Female varying in length, from ¼in. to ½in.; colour yellowish-red, with longitudinal bands of purple; antennæ of nine joints, of which the last is rather longer than any of the others; feet only scantily spinous; epidermis bearing only very few short fine hairs, many circular spinneret-orifices, and great numbers of short subconical spinneret-tubes; no long anal seta.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Monophlebus crawfordi, var. pilosior: Female varying in length from 1/3in. to 2/3in.; colour brick-red, with longitudinal and transverse bands of brown, giving it a trellis-like appearance dorsally; antennæ of nine joints, the last rather longer than any of the others; feet strongly spinous; epidermis very thickly clothed with strong hairs, and having only a few circular spinnerets; a long white seta protrudes from the abdominal extremity.

I do not lay any stress upon the differences of size in these varieties; nor do I think that the variation in colour of the last is sufficient to be specific. Possibly, when the males of var. levis and pilosior may be discovered they may differ so much from the type as to be quite separate; but they are not as yet known.

Monophlebus fuscus, sp. nov. Plate XVIII., figs. 1–4.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female brown in colour, elongated, active, distinctly segmented; length averaging in the specimens seen about 1/5in. Antennæ short, rather thick, not conical, of seven joints, of which the third is the longest, the rest subequal. Feet with several hairs, but only moderately spinous; two very short fine digitules. Epidermis bearing many slender hairs, many circular spinneret-orifices, and some short subconical spinnerettubes.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva brown, elongated-oval, flattish, active; length about 1/25in. Body covered with numbers of rather thick spiny hairs; on the margin is a row of short thick tubular spinnerets, each terminating with a thickened edge (probably twelve on each side), and from these spring very long, radiating, slender, glassy threads, which are exceedingly brittle. Antennæ slender, of five joints, the last forming a large fusiform club; all the joints bear hairs, but none of these are very long. Anal tubercles small, setiferous.

Male unknown.

Hab. In Australia, on Eucalyptus sp. My specimens were sent by Mr. Koebele from New South Wales.

I should have hesitated a long time to consider this as a distinct species, on account of the seven-jointed antenna, which suggested an immature condition, had it not been that

– 245 –

one of my specimens produced a great number of larvæ. All my specimens (about a dozen) are small; but Monophlebus varies greatly in size. The larva resembles generally that of M. crawfordi, but has no very long hair on the antenna. The excessively long hyaline threads springing from the margin are so brittle that they can only be seen in a newly-hatched larva; even the contact of two larvæ meeting each other in their travels causes them to break off.

Westwood (Arc. Ent., i., 22, 3) describes, under the name of M. illigeri, a male of this genus said to come from “Van Diemen's Land”; and Signoret remarks that it is the smallest of the genus. I do not know whether this may possibly be M. fuscus. I note also a form which Signoret (Essai, p. 400) considers to be a larva of M. leachii, Westw., from India, with seven-jointed antennæ, but which may be an adult female.

Monophlebus sp.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

I have received from Mr. Cotes, of the Indian Museum, two specimens of females which appear to belong to this genus, but I should like more material for full identification. Each is about 2/3in. long, and therefore above the average, and the body is thicker than usual. As the specimens were sent in alcohol, I am unable to say whether they excrete cotton or not; but the epidermis is very slightly hairy, with numerous spinnerets, the antennæ have nine joints of which the last is the longest, and the feet are moderately spinous. Possibly they may be identical with Monophlebus (Drosicha) contrahens, Walker; an insect in Ceylon which has not yet been properly described. M. contrahens produces a good deal of cotton.

Genus Icerya, Signoret.

Icerya koebelei, sp. nov. Plate XVIII., figs. 5–11.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult female generally of a rather bright red colour, which seems to darken somewhat with age; covered with dots and patches of cottony meal which are often so thick as to hide the body, and make the insect appear to the naked eye quite white. Length of the insect reaching 1/10in., but no specimen observed exceeded that length. Form generally resembling that of I. purchasi, Mask., being elliptical, flattish beneath, the dorsum elevated, and presenting the appearance of an irregularly-raised ridge; body corrugated, but the segments are not clearly distinct. Epidermis bearing numbers of rather long densely-black hairs, irregularly scattered and not arranged in tufts, though they are most numerous on the margin. From the centre of the dorsal region springs a rather thick subcylindrical column of white cotton, forming a pencil which is sometimes nearly as long as the whole body; this column

– 246 –

is more solid than the dorsal cotton, and is quite conspicuous. At gestation the insect forms beneath it an ovisac of usually rather yellow cotton, the abdominal region becoming raised up; this ovisac in all the specimens observed was very short, scarcely extending beyond the abdomen, yet it was clearly complete and mature, for larvæ emerged from it during three weeks that the insects were under observation, and its dimensions did not increase; the cotton exhibits slight longitudinal corrugations. The antennæ are of ten joints, very slightly tapering; the three first and the last are the longest and subequal, the others rather short and subequal. The feet are rather strong and thick, but present no special features. Epidermis bearing numbers of large circular multilocular spinneret-orifices interspersed amongst the long black hairs; but observation of several specimens did not show any tubular spinnerets or glassy tubes. Observation has also failed to show from what special organs or orifices on the dorsum the columnar pencil of cotton is produced. The mentum is trimerous.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Female of the second stage red, rather darker than the adult, covered with patches of yellowish cotton; form elliptical, slightly convex; length about 1/18in. Antennæ of eight subequal joints, slightly tapering. Epidermis covered with long black hairs and multilocular spinnerets, as in the adult; the marginal hairs form little tufts, one on each side of each segment. At the abdominal extremity are six rather long setæ.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Larva red, with dorsal and marginal rows of small tufts of yellow cotton. Length about 1/30in. Form subelliptical, tapering posteriorly. Antennæ of six joints, subequal except the last, which is a large elongated club, and bears four very long hairs. Abdominal extremity without anal tubercles, but bearing six very long setæ with tubercular bases. Feet long and slender. Dorsal epidermis bearing four longitudinal rows of circular spinnerets, also a row on each margin, and similar rows of fine black hairs.

Male pupa not observed.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult male dark-red, the feet and antennæ black. Length of body about 1/15in., expanse of wings about 1/9in. Antennæ of ten joints, of which the first two are short and tubercular, the rest long and slender, and each constricted in the middle; on each joint after the second are two rings of long hairs. Eyes prominent, semiglobular, numerously facetted. Abdomen terminating in a short, straight, conical spike, and with two long cylindrical processes, on the ends of which are several long setæ. Wings dark-grey, the nervures red; and there are two longitudinal whitish narrow bands.

Hab. In Australia, on Leptospermum lœvigatum. Mr.

– 247 –

Koebele, who has sent me several specimens (and to whom I dedicate the species with great pleasure), tells me that he found the insect only on that tree, at Sydney and Brisbane, and not in great numbers.

I believe this to be a distinct species, although evidently closely allied to I. purchasi. The difference of size is not of any importance, though the dimensions in every case observed are as given above, and are much less than those of I. purchasi. But the dorsal pencil and the ten-jointed antenna, and the very small ovisac of the adult female, are clearly important distictions. I cannot say that the larva and the male exhibit any special differences except size and the colour of the cotton, but the second-stage female differs in the antenna. None of the other known Iceryœ is at all like it, except that some specimens of I. montserratensis, Riley and Howard (“Insect Life,” vol. iii., p. 99), exhibited ten joints in the female antenna. This character was constant in all the specimens (nine) of I. koebelei which I examined. The formation of the dorsal column of cotton is not clear to me; as mentioned above, I have failed to find any special organs, or even any orifice or group of orifices, which might be taken as its source; perhaps somebody else may be more fortunate.

The species of Icerya now known to science are as follows:—

  • I. seychellarum, Westwood, 1855 (= I. sacchari, Guérin, 1867); Mauritius, on sugar-cane.

  • I. purchasi, Maskell, 1878; originally Australia, now many countries, on almost everything.

  • I. œgyptiaca, Douglas, 1890; Egypt, on Ficus.

  • I. montserratensis, Riley and Howard, 1890; Montserrat, West Indies, on various plants.

  • I. palmeri, Riley and Howard, 1890; Mexico, on grapevine. Only the larva and second stage observed.

  • I. rosœ, Riley and Howard, 1890; Key West, Florida, on rose.

  • I. koebelei, Maskell, 1892; Australia, on Leptospermum lœvigatum.

There is no reason for thinking that this new species of the genus will be as mischievous as I. purchasi, although, indeed, the latter is less troublesome perhaps in its native country than it has been in the others to which it has migrated.

Group Brachyscelidæ, Schrader.

Genus Carteria, Signoret.

Carteria decorella, sp. nov. Plate XVIII., figs. 12–20.

Adult female covered by a waxy test, which, at first single and separate, becomes later on aggregated in masses on the

– 248 –

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

twig. The normal form of a test is subcircular, rather convex; the colour is yellowish-brown; the diameter would average about 1/6in. if separated at full growth. The centre of the dorsal portion is occupied by a small elongated narrow red or purple lamina of wax transversely corrugated, and evidently the remains of the test of the early second stage; from this to the margin radiate a number of narrow ridges and depressions which give a corrugated appearance to the whole test; at the posterior extremity of the small central lamina there is a minute orifice. When detached from the twig the underside of the test is seen to be nearly solid, with a small orifice in the middle, so that the insect is almost entirely enclosed. The female insect is dark-red, of the normal globular form of the genus prolonged posteriorly in a short subcylindrical “tail.” Antennæ and feet absent. The usual large spine is present just above the abdominal process. The lac-tubes are, as usual, situated on the thoracic region; they are prominent, subcylindrical, and bearing groups of excretory glands. The body of the insect is very inconspicuously segmented, and on each margin of a segment is a group of very small subcircular spinneret-orifices.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Female of the second stage covered by a waxy test which at first is elliptical and very slightly convex, but later becomes subcircular, with a central small elongated and narrow corrugated lamina from which depressions radiate to the margin; these depressions are comparatively more conspicuous than in the adult test, producing a more deeply corrugated appearance. Usually the median region is reddish or orange-coloured, the marginal corrugations whitish or yellowish; but the difference between a late second test and an early adult are not easy to make out. These second-stage tests average about 1/25in. in diameter in the early stage. The enclosed insect is at first elongated-elliptical, gradually assuming a subglobular form; colour red. I have not been able to satisfy myself as to the antennæ or feet; but probably both are absent.

I have not observed any larvæ after emergence; but in some adult specimens examined there were a great number of embryonic larvæ; these were red, elliptical, tapering posteriorly, the abdomen ending in two divergent and conspicuous anal tubercles, each bearing a long seta and some short hairs. The antennæ and feet were not sufficiently developed for observation.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Male pupa covered by a test of red or yellowish-red wax. The form of the test is elongated-elliptical, convex above, the median region moderately rough and frequently simulating the form of the elliptical segmented enclosed pupa; the margin is corrugated as in the case of the female. Length of the test about 1/20in. At the posterior extremity there is a flat hinged

– 249 –

plate, on lifting up which the adult escapes. The enclosed pupa is dark-red.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]

Adult male dark-red, the wings hyaline with red nervures. Length of the body about 1/30in. exclusive of the spike. Antennæ of ten joints, the first two short and tubercular, the next five long and slender but diminishing somewhat to the seventh, the eighth and ninth shorter and thicker, the tenth as long as the fifth, very thick and subelliptical; all the joints bear several hairs. Feet long and slender, but with no special characters. The abdominal spike is straight and rather long, being nearly as long as the abdomen. The terminal abdominal tubercles bear each two setæ, from which spring moderately long cottony “tails.”

Hab. In Australia. Mr. Koebele sent me specimens of the males and the second-stage females on Myrica cerifera, from Sydney. Mr. Olliff later on sent me two parcels of the adults at different times on a “native shrub,” the bark of which appears to me not to be the same as that of Myrica. The first of these two parcels was so much parasitized that I could make nothing of it; and in the second there were so many parasitic larvæ enclosed in the masses of wax that it was with great difficulty I extracted a few uninjured specimens of Carteria. These parasites seemed to burrow through the waxy tests and feed at leisure on the imprisoned insects, and the whole space was filled with their excretions.

This, in the form of the tests, especially those of the male and the second-stage female, is a very pretty species. It may be very easily mistaken at first sight for a Ceroplastes, from the corrugations of the tests; indeed, Mr. Koebele originally sent it to me under that name. As usual with Carteria, a great deal of care is necessary to ascertain the real shape of the body, and the epidermis is so tender that the ordinary processes for diagnosis must be undertaken with much caution. The pupal tests both of male and female form pretty microscopic objects.

Carteria melaleucæ, Maskell. N.Z. Trans., 1891, vol. xxiv., p. 54.

The waxy tests of several specimens of this species which I have received from Mr. Koebele and Mr. Olliff during the past year have presented a number of small knobs and excrescences which were not noticeable on those sent me in 1891 by Mr. French. These later specimens were on Leptospermum, Sydney, and, as the enclosed insects were identical with C. melaleucœ, I would not attempt to separate them simply on account of the small differences in the tests.

The second-stage female resembles nearly that of C. acaciœ, Mask., 1891, but the test is much darker in colour.

– 250 –

Index to Plates XI.-XVIII.

Plate XI.

  • Fig. 1. Aspidiotus eucalypti, female, showing groove.

  • Fig. 2. "" markings of epidermis.

  • Fig. 3. " theœ, lattice-work of pygidium.

  • Fig. 4. Diaspis (?) fimbriata, insects on leaf.

  • Fig. 5. " adult female.

  • Fig. 6. " pygidium of female.

  • Fig. 7. Mytilaspis casuarinœ, insects on twig.

  • Fig. 8.Leucaspis cordylinidis, insects on leaf.

  • Fig. 9."pygidium of female.

  • Fig. 10. Chionaspis brasiliensis, insects on leaf.

  • Fig. 11. "puparia, male and female.

  • Fig. 12. "pygidium of female.

  • Fig. 13. " foot of male.

  • Fig. 14. Fiorinia syncarpiœ, insects on leaf.

  • Fig. 15. " pygidium of female.

Plate XII.

  • Fig. 1. Inglisia foraminifer, insects on twig.

  • Fig. 2. " test of female.

  • Fig. 3. " test of male.

  • Fig. 4. " antenna of female.

  • Fig. 5. " foot of female.

  • Fig. 6. Ceroplastesrubens, insects on leaf.

  • Fig. 7. " " test of female.

  • Fig. 8. " " test of larva.

  • Fig. 9. " " antenna of female.

  • Fig. 10." " foot of female.

  • Fig. 11. "ceriferus, insects on twig in wax.

  • Fig. 12.""test of female, second stage.

  • Fig. 13. ""adult female, side view.

  • Fig. 14. ""antenna of female.

  • Fig. 15. ""“tail,” after treatment with potash.

  • Fig. 16. ""spiracular spines.

Plate XIII.

  • Fig. 1. Lecanium tessellatum, markings of epidermis.

  • Fig. 2. "acuminatum"", adult female.

  • Fig. 3. ""markings of epidermis.

  • Fig. 4. "filicum, insects on frond of fern.

  • Fig. 5. "scrobicuatum, adult female.

  • Fig. 6. "" spiracular spines.

  • Fig. 7. "" antenna of female.

  • Fig. 8. Pulvinariadodonœœ", insects on twig.

  • Fig. 9. "" adult female and ovisac.

  • Fig. 10. "psidii, insects on leaf.

  • Fig. 11. "" antenna of female.

  • Fig. 12. "Signoretia luzulœ, insects in sacs on grass.

  • Fig. 13. " foot of female.

Plate XIV.

– 251 –
  • Fig. 7. Prosopophora acaciœ, spinnerets of female.

  • Fig. 8. " eucalypti, insects on twig.

  • Fig. 9. "" test of female.

  • Fig. 10. "" test of male.

  • Fig. 11. "" antenna of female.

  • Fig. 12. Gossyparia casuarinœ, insects on twig.

  • Fig. 13. "" adult female.

  • Fig. 14. "confluens, insects on twig.

  • Fig. 15. Eriococcus turgipes, insects on twig.

  • Fig. 16. " adult female, ventral view.

  • Fig. 17. " antenna of female.

  • Fig. 18. " foot of female, viewed from below.

  • Fig. 19. " foot of female, side view.

  • Fig. 20. " anogenital ring.

Plate XV.

  • Fig. 1. Eriococcus coriaceus, insects on twig.

  • Fig. 2. "" adult female.

  • Fig. 3. "" antenna of female.

  • Fig. 4. "conspersus, insects on twig.

  • Fig. 5. "" antenna of female.

  • Fig. 6. "" markings of epidermis.

  • Fig. 7. Rhizococcus casuarinœ, larva, dorsal view.

  • Fig. 8. " pustulatus, antenna of female.

  • Fig. 9. "" markings of epidermis.

  • Fig. 10. Dactylopius ericicola, insects on twig.

  • Fig. 11. "" adult female.

  • Fig. 12. " nipœ, insects on leaf.

  • Fig. 13. "" adult female.

  • Fig. 14. "" antenna of female.

  • Fig. 15. "" antenna of male.

Plate XVI.

  • Fig. 1. Pseudococcus nivalis, insects on leaf.

  • Fig. 2. "" insects on leaf, enlarged.

  • Fig. 3. "" antenna of female.

  • Fig. 4. "" foot of female.

  • Fig. 5. " casuarinœ, antenna of female.

  • Fig. 6. Sphœrococcus acaciœ, insects on twig.

  • Fig. 7. ""adult female.

  • Fig. 8. "" markings of epidermis.

  • Fig. 9. ""larva, ventral view.

  • Fig. 10. ""antenna of larva.

  • Fig. 11. ""foot of larva.

  • Fig. 12. ""bambusœ, insects on bamboo.

  • Fig. 13. "adult female.

  • Fig. 14. "antenna and epidermis of female.

  • Fig. 15. "abdominal extremity of female.

  • Fig. 16. "group of oval glands.

  • Fig. 17. "female of second stage.

  • Fig. 18. "larva.

  • Fig. 19. "antenna of larva.

Plate XVII.

  • Fig. 1. Sphœrococcus inflatipes, insects on bark.

  • Fig. 2. " tests of female.

  • Fig. 3. " adult female, dorsal view.

  • Fig. 4. " antenna of female.

  • Fig. 5. " markings and hairs of epidermis.

– 252 –
  • Fig. 6. Ripersia leptospermi, female of second stage.

  • Fig. 7. Cœlostoma rubiginosum, insects on twig.

  • Fig. 8. " antenna of female.

  • Fig. 9. " foot of female.

  • Fig. 10. " epidermis, showing waxy processes.

  • Fig. 11. " epidermis after treatment with potash.

  • Fig. 12. Monophlebus crawfordi, type, adult female.

  • Fig. 13. " type, epidermis.

  • Fig. 14. " type, foot.

  • Fig. 15. " var. levis, adult female.

  • Fig. 16. " " epidermis.

  • Fig. 17. " " foot.

  • Fig. 18. " var. pilosior, adult female.

  • Fig. 19. " " epidermis.

  • Fig. 20. " " foot.

Plate XVIII.
  • Fig. 1. Monophlebus fuscus, adult female.

  • Fig. 2. " antenna of female.

  • Fig. 3. " foot of female.

  • Fig. 4. " larva, dorsal view.

  • Fig. 5. Icerya koebelei, insects on twig.

  • Fig. 6. " female, enlarged.

  • Fig. 7. " apex of dorsum, side view.

  • Fig. 8. " antenna of female.

  • Fig. 9. " foot of female.

  • Fig. 10. " antenna of larva.

  • Fig. 11. " abdominal extremity of larva.

  • Fig. 12. Carteria decorella, adult females in tests on twig.

  • Fig. 13. " tests of second-stage females and males on twig.

  • Fig. 14. " tests of adult females.

  • Fig. 15. " tests of second-stage females.

  • Fig. 16. " test of male.

  • Fig. 17. " adult female, dorsal view.

  • Fig. 18. " lac-tube of female.

  • Fig. 19. " adult male.

  • Fig. 20. " antenna of male.