
Art. LI.—On an Olivine-andesite of Banks Peninsula.
[Read before the Philosophical Institute of Canterbury, 2nd June, 1892.]
Plate XLVII.
Varieties of this rock are found in several places on Banks Peninsula, either as dykes or as sheets of lava (vide “Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South. Wales, 1889,” page 142), but the particular rock under question occurs on the Port Hills, about three miles from Christchurch. It forms the main part of one of the spurs of the hills which stretch out into the plain in a north-westerly direction. As there are no clear-cut faces, the only place where a good section can be obtained is at a small quarry on the west side of the spur, where stone has been obtained for building parts of the Canterbury Museum and Canterbury College. As this quarry is of small extent it does not give much evidence to determine from a section whether the rock is a dyke or a lava-sheet. There appears nowhere a parting which might mark the wall of a dyke, but there is positive evidence which is almost conclusive that it is a lava-sheet.
1. The size of the spur, which is several hundred yards across, capped all round by this rock, renders it probable that it is not a dyke.
2. The vesicular nature of the rock shows it was a subaërial flow, since, if it had consolidated between the walls of a fissure, vesicles would be absent.
3. The rudely prismatic manner in which the rocks are jointed, with the axes of the prisms vertical and not horizontal, is additional proof that it is not a dyke.
Included in the rock are numerous rounded fragments of a

hard black andesite. These have consolidated at an earlier period, and have been caught up by the liquid lava as it ascended the pipe of the volcano. These blocks look as if they had been rounded by water, and have almost the appearance of concretions. They are in most cases surrounded by concentric layers of decomposed rock. Probably this is due to the interaction of the fluid lava on the inclusions, and this has produced a rock which has weathered in concentric layers, the junction of the two rocks affording a weak place where atmospheric water might readily promote decomposition.
The rock is of a dark-grey colour, but very often shows a tint of red, which disappears on long exposure to the air, as can be seen in the stone in the buildings above mentioned, where the newer parts can easily be distinguished from the older by the peculiar tint of the stone. The rock is full of cavities and steam-holes, but none of these were noticed to be filled with infiltration products. This rendered an accurate determination of the specific gravity almost impossible. On weighing pieces in distilled water the following results were obtained:—
I., 2.621. II., 2.619. Average, 2.620.
On grinding to a fine powder, and using a specific-gravity bottle, a number of different weighings gave results between 2.67 and 2.68.
The rock appears to the eye to be composed of a glassy or finely crystalline ground-mass in which crystals of felspar are porphyritically distributed. Some of these are over half an inch long, but as they crumble readily it is impossible to detach more than mere fragments for examination. They show at times a fine striation and glistening surfaces, but the cleavage is not well marked.
The examination of the rock was conducted in two ways:—
A. A chemical analysis of the rock as a whole, and of the felspar separately.
B. A microscopic examination by means of thin sections.
A. Chemical Analysis.
Portions of the rock were taken and ground up, so that a perfectly general sample might be obtained, and were analysed a number of times. Since the rock was roughly examined first under the microscope a qualitative chemical analysis was unnecessary. I show all the results obtained, with the exception of those in No. III., as they were completely wrong, from known reasons. The last analysis is the most trustworthy, for reasons which I shall point out:—

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| I. | II. | III. | IV. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss on ignition | 2.97 | 3.16 | 3.13 | 3.13 |
| Silica, SiO2 | 55.70 | 54.99 | 55.10 | 55.12 |
| Alumina, Al2O3 | 21.10 | 26.96 | 20.41 | |
| Ferrous and ferric oxide | 8.47 | 8.75 | 7.74 | |
| Lime, CaO | 5.39 | 5.38 | 5.38 | 5.35 |
| Magnesia, MgO | 1.29 | 1.45 | 2.75 | |
| Soda, Na2O | 3.72 | 3.94 | 4.03 | 3.80 |
| Potash, K2O | 2.66 | 2.66 | 2.17 | 2.50 |
| 101.30 | 101.29 | 100.80 |
It will be noticed that the loss on ignition in No. I. is less than in the other cases. This was due to the fact that the mineral was heated in an open crucible, and so the iron present in the ferrous state was oxidized to the ferric state; in the succeeding analysis the powdered rock was heated in a closed crucible, so that there might be no oxidization. After determination of the loss on ignition, the mineral was fused with fusion-mixture, and on extraction with HCl the silica was determined. The result obtained was high in the first case, owing to an error in weighing, care not being taken to prevent absorption of water during the process; but in the succeeding cases this was provided for.
The alumina and iron-oxide were determined by precipitation with ammonic hydrate, and reckoned as Al2O3 and Fe2O8, and the amount of iron present was determined from another part of the solution by titration with permanganate of potash. This was reckoned as ferric oxide, and subtracted from the combined weight of the Al2O3 and Fe2O3. This gave the Al2O3, and the iron was estimated as ferrous oxide, since on testing with sulphocyanate of ammonia only a very faint coloration was obtained in a part of the original solution. Some Fe2O3 was undoubtedly present, as microscopic examination showed. It will be noticed that in analysis No. I. the amount of the Al2O3 and FeO is high. This was due to the fact that insufficient ammonic chloride was added, and the magnesia came down with it. This made the reading for magnesia low. It will be noticed in No. IV. that the alumina is lower and the magnesia higher. In estimating the FeO by titration in the first cases the ordinary decinormal solution of permanganate was used, and, on account of the small quantity of iron present in the solution tested, the readings were not sufficiently accurate. In the last determination the permanganate was diluted to a known amount, and greater accuracy obtained. The lime was precipitated with ammonic oxalate, and estimated as oxide.
The magnesia was precipitated with sodic phosphate and

estimated as pyrophosphate. The variation in the results obtained in this case has been explained.
The alkalies were determined by the Lawrence-Smith method, and were determined separately, by titration with silver-nitrate in the first two cases, and by precipitation with platinic chloride in the last two.
The presence of manganese and phosphorus was also tested for, but with no result. The absence of the last would show that apatite was absent.
For reasons given above, it will be seen that the last analysis is the most trustworthy.
The porphyritic felspar was analysed separately, but I will give the results when treating of it microscopically.
B. Microscopical Examination.
Sections of the rock were made by grinding down thin fragments till they were semi-transparent, care being taken to get specimens from rock which was weathered as little as possible. These were examined under the microscope by means of polarised light. The rock then appeared to consist of a semi-crystalline ground-mass in which crystals of plagioclase, augite, and olivine were porphyritically distributed. All through the rock were traces of weathering, as limonite showed nearly everywhere in the ground-mass.
I. Ground-mass.
The ground-mass was semi-crystalline, but the amount of interstitial glass was comparatively small, nearly the whole of the space between the felspar and olivine being taken up with an interlacing network of felspar microliths. These were probably oligoclase, as in almost every ease the direction of the extinction was nearly in a line with the length of the microlith; but, on attempting to determine what kind of felspar it was, by means of the extinction of twin lamellæ, results were obtained not at all in agreement with this. In some cases the angle of extinction was so high as to make it anorthite. Besides, in many cases, the microliths exhibited undulose extinction, and the determination of the true angle was impossible. Since the occurrence of a more basic felspar than the porphyritic felspar (I shall afterwards show that this is labradorite) is unusual, I conclude that the majority of the felspar is oligoclase, as determined by the first method.
In some cases the amount of glass was so very small that it hardly appeared in the section at all, but in other cases it occupied a, comparatively speaking, large space. It was full of crystallites, which had no effect on the polarised light. The glass, besides, was coloured brown, owing to the presence of

small quantities of limonite, evidently due to the action of atmospheric agencies or percolating water.
II. Porphyritic Minerals.
1. Felspar.—This is by far the most prominent porphyritic mineral, as it can easily be distinguished by the naked eye, while the other minerals can only be distinguished microscopically. It is of all sizes, from almost microscopic dimensions to crystals half an inch in length. The felspar is almost wholly labradorite, but oligoclase is present to a small amount. The evidence for the species of felspar is as follows:—
(i.) Chemical Analysis.
Portions of the rock were taken and broken in order to obtain pieces of the felspar. These were tested chemically,—
-
(a.) With the flame, showing well-marked calcium, obscuring the sodium to a certain extent, but a trace of potassium appeared when the flame was observed through blue glass.
-
(b.) The presence of CaO was shown by precipitation with ammonium oxalate, when a decided precipitate appeared.
-
(c.) By the action of strong hydrochloric acid the mineral was partly dissolved.
-
(d.) By quantitative analysis the following results were obtained:—
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| I. | II. | |
|---|---|---|
| Loss on ignition | ||
| Silica | 55.3 | 55.3 |
| Alumina | 26.8 | 26.3 |
| Ferric oxide | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Lime | 12.5 | 11.4 |
| Soda | 5.5 | 5.3 |
| Potash | Trace | Trace |
| 101.9 | 100.1 |
The amount of ferric-oxide is probably accounted for by the presence of minute inclusions of limonite.
The large value of the CaO in No. I. is probably due to incorrect weighing, as the calcium was estimated as CaO after ignition. As this analysis was almost qualitative, extreme care was not taken. The second determination is probably exact. All the alkali present was estimated as soda, since the flametest gave such a slight amount of potash. By this analysis the felspar appears to be labradorite, but the amount of CaO is slightly too low for a typical specimen. This may be due to the presence of a small quantity of oligoclase, which subsequent determination shows to be present.

(ii.) Determination of Specific Gravity.
The specific gravity was determined by crushing up fragments of the felspar and weighing them in a specific-gravity bottle. The result obtained on several trials was 2.719. This is slightly too high for a typical labradorite, but the inclusions of limonite may contribute to this.
(iii.) By Optical Methods.
a. By determination of the angles of extinction of adjacent twin lamellæ when they extinguish symmetrically about the brachypinacoid. The following is a series of determinations:—
| 1. | 173°—156°—121° |
| 17° + 35° = 52° | |
| 2. | 47°—79°—109° |
| 32° + 30° = 62° | |
| 3. | 135°—118°—108° |
| 17° + 10° = 27° | |
| 4. | 51°—71°—98° |
| 20° + 27° = 47° | |
| 5. | 50°—77°—103° |
| 27° + 26° = 53° | |
| 6. | 61°—96°—124° |
| 35° + 28° = 63° | |
| 7. | 53°—69°—83° |
| 16° + 14° = 30° | |
| 8. | 25°—48°—72° |
| 23° + 24° = 47° | |
| 9. | 159°—145°—130° |
| 14° + 15° = 29° | |
| 10. | 135°—114°—84° |
| 21° + 30° = 51° | |
| 11. | 43°—61°—76° |
| 18° + 15° = 33° | |
| 12. | 103°—135°—163° |
| 32° + 28° = 60° |
The results given show that the angle of extinction extends from 0° up to 63°. This corresponds almost exactly with what is required for labradorite. There may be other species of felspar present, but the great number that are above 37°, which is the maximum angle for oligoclase, shows that the greater proportion must be labradorite. Anorthite may be present, but the other determinations show that it is scarcely possible.

β By Examination of Cleavage-flakes.—Since the crystals of plagioclase were not large, the only way to obtain cleavageflakes was by breaking the rock up and looking over the crushed fragments. The following which were obtained furnish further evidence. They were examined by convergent light and also with ordinary polarised light, to determine the extinction-angles:—
(1.) From the brachypinacoid. In convergent light gave an axis just out of the field, with a revolving axial shadow. Angle of extinction —9°.
(2.) Also from the brachypinacoid. Gave results similar to (1), but the angle of extinction was —4°.
(3.) From the basal pinacoid. Gave an axial shadow and optic axis just out of the field. Angle of extinction was —5°.
In this cleavage-flake the twin lamination appeared as alternate bands, but one set were so fine that they became mere striæ, while the other were broad. This gave an interference figure produced from the broad bands, and also afforded a definite line for determination of the extinction-angle. In the other cases this line was not so satisfactory, as straight edges, which were taken to be lines of cleavage, were used.
(4.) From the brachypinacoid. This gave an interference figure in which an oblique bisectrix was clearly visible. The shape of the figure showed it to be oligoclase. In parallel polarised light the angle of extinction was 18°.
The felspar has thus been almost conclusively shown to be labradorite, with the occasional occurrence of oligoclase. It is marked with well-defined polysynthetic twinning. Some of the bands are extremely delicate, while in some cases binary twins were noticed.
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
A well-defined zonal structure appeared in many crystals. This may be due to successive accretion under different conditions of temperature and pressure, or it may be produced by strain. There is positive evidence that the rock has suffered strain. A large number of felspar crystals show undulose extinction, and this has been shown to be common to the ground-mass as well. In one section a small vein of rock occurred about 1/16in. long. It was composed of crushed fragments of labradorite, and some of these showed twinning, but others only a delicate striation, so fine as hardly to be noticed. This may be evidence that polysynthetic twinning is due to pressure, as we are led to believe from experiment. This vein was produced during the process of cooling, when the rock had almost consolidated. In another case a crystal exhibited a fine striation perpendicular to the general banding. This was perhaps a twin on the pericline type, but the marking was very faint.

In one of the felspar crystals a remarkable structure was observed. What appeared to be an ordinary narrow band was crossed at small intervals by black marks, so that the whole appearance was like the rungs of a ladder. On examining it with a higher power no difference was observed in the structure. The bars were black throughoutthe revolution of the stage, whether the nicols were crossed or not, so that it was probably some alteration product produced in a rather curious way. (See Pl. XLVII., fig. i.)
2. Olivine.—The olivine occurs in rounded crystals, which are crossed by irregular cracks. Some of these are so much corroded that they show no trace of their original form (see Pl. XLVII., figs. iii., iv., and v.); but in a few cases faces were seen remaining, as in fig. iv., in which the extinction bisected the angle between the straight edges. The alteration which marks nearly all the olivine present is most strongly observed near the periphery and along the cracks. The alteration product is limonite. It is shown in the figures by the dark shading. Sometimes unaltered fragments are seen, and they show the brilliant polarisation colours and rough surface of olivine. Considering the amount of olivine which has been present, the percentage of magnesia (2.75) is rather low, but nearly all the magnesia has been taken away by weathering action, and there is left an aggregate of limonite.
3. Augite.—The amount of augite in this rock is very small compared with the amount of olivine, and the lastmentioned mineral is the most prominent ferro-magnesian mineral. Only a few crystals of augite were observed in the sections made, and these were a pale greenish-brown by ordinary light. They showed no pleochroism, but moderately brilliant colours under polarised light. They were distinguished from the unaltered olivine by their smooth surface and by the absence of irregular cracks. Some showed a banding, evidently due to polysynthetic twinning (fig. ii.).
As this is parallel to ∝ P 1/∝, it gave a means of determination by extinction when an angle of 39° was obtained. In fig. ii. the longer lines represent bandings which also corresponded to cleavage-cracks, while the shorter irregular eracks were parallel to the prism.
4. Magnetite.—The presence of this mineral was shown by examination with reflected light, when numerous black grains appeared, with the blue metallic lustre of magnetite. The presence of this mineral will account for the ferric oxide, which was shown to be present by means of chemical analysis. No other porphyritic minerals were noticed.

General Conclusions.
The description of the mineral constituents of the rock shows that it belongs to the andesite group. However, the large amount of olivine present points to the fact that it ought to be placed in the basic series, if the analysis did not show so large a percentage of silica. This renders it necessary that it shall be classed as an intermediate rock. Since the amount of olivine is so large, while the augite is comparatively scarce, it ought to be called an olivine-andesite rather than an augite-andesite, and it would form a link between the olivine-basalts and the augite-andesites.

