Go to National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa
Volume 38, 1905
This text is also available in PDF
(392 KB) Opens in new window
– 15 –

Eruptive Processes.

The importance of the role played by igneous rocks in the formation of ore-deposits has been specially urged in late years by Professor Vogt,* of Christiania; Professor Kemp, of New York; Professor Suess, of Vienna; and more recently by Waldemar Lindgren§ and W. H. Weed, of the United States Geological Staff.

Vogt directs renewed attention to the close relationship existing between ore-deposits and eruptive processes. Ore-deposits which are generally connected with eruptive magmas are grouped by him into two principal classes, as under:—


Ore-deposits formed by magmatic segregation.


re-deposits formed by eruptive after-actions.

Ore-deposits belonging to the first group are infrequent, and therefore economically subordinate in importance to those of the second group. They include, according to Vogt,—


The occurrences of titanic-iron ores in basic and semi-basic eruptives;


Chromite in peridotite;


Sulphide deposits, including the nickeliferous pyrrhotite of Sudbury, in Canada;


Platinum metals in highly basic eruptive rocks;


Copper and metallic nickel-iron in serpentinised peridotite.

[Footnote] * Prof. J. H. L. Vogt, “Problems in the Origin of Ore-deposits,” “The Genesis of Ore-deposits,” 1901,p. 636.

[Footnote] † J. F. Kemp, “The Rôle of the Igneous Rocks in the Formation of Veins,” loc. cit., p. 681; also Trans. Amer. Inst. M.E., vol. xxxix, 1902, p. 681.

[Footnote] ‡ Prof. Edward Suess, Lecture, “Royal Geographical Journal,” vol. xx, 1902, p. 520.

[Footnote] § Waldemar Lindgren, “Character and Genesis of certain Contact Deposits,” “Genesis of Ore-deposits,” 1901, p. 716.

[Footnote] ¶ W. H. Weed, “Ore-deposits near Igneous Contacts,” Trans. Amer. Inst. M.E., vol. xxxiii, 1903.

– 16 –

That sulphides can be segregated from eruptive magmas in the first concentration has yet to be proved; and it is still doubtful how far Vogt's conclusions respecting the occurrence of sulphide ore as products of primary segregation from molten magmas are admissible.