Go to National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa
Volume 43, 1910
This text is also available in PDF
(424 KB) Opens in new window

Art. I.—The Chemical Composition of Meat-extract.

[Read before the Philosophical Institute of Canterbury, 2nd November, 1910.]

In spite of the fact that meat-extract has been in use as an article of diet since the time of Hippocrates, comparatively little has been known until recently of the chemical composition of this material. A review of the earlier literature on meat-extract shows that the methods of analysis used have been so varied, and in some cases so unreliable, that it is not possible to satisfactorily compare many of the results obtained. The greatest obstacle in the way of a thorough and careful study of meat-extracts has been the unsatisfactory condition of the analytical methods for determining the nitrogenous constituents upon which much of the value of a meat-extract depends. Recently, however, more exact and uniform analytical procedure has been adopted, and serves as a basis for obtaining data of the composition of this complex material, and for determining the comparative values of this product.

The object of this investigation was to determine as far as possible the complete chemical composition of meat-extract, and to ascertain which constituents increased and which decreased the commercial value of this material, it having been found that the earlier methods of analysis used in this laboratory did not satisfactorily reveal the differences in composition which could account for the varied value placed upon the extract in the London market, where a consideration of its colour, odour, and taste largely determines the price offered.

The fact that the complete analyses of New Zealand meat-preparations are not available makes the publication of the results obtained in this investigation desirable.

In an earlier paper* the author described the methods of analysis used in the study of the composition of a number of extracts, and in the course of this investigation the methods therein described for the determination of moisture, organic matter, mineral salts, chlorine, fat, and total nitrogen were used. The separation of the nitrogen and substances precipitated by 50, 60, and 80 per cent. alcohol has been discarded, as it is now found

[Footnote] * Journ. Soc. Chem. Ind., 1907, p. 1229.

– 2 –

that the results so obtained give no indication of the commercial value of the extract.

The following additional methods were used in this investigation :—

Acidity.—Titrate a solution of 0·5 gram in 800 c.c. of water with deci-normal potassium-hydrate, using phenolphthalein as indicator; the result is then calculated and expressed in terms of acidity as lactic acid.

Insoluble and Coaguable Proteids.—For these determinations the provisional methods of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists for meatfibre and coaguable proteids were used.*

Proteoses were determined by the zinc-sulphate method.

Peptone-like bodies and polypeptides were precipitated together with the proteoses by the tannin-salt reagent, the amount of peptone-like bodies and polypeptides being found by difference.

Total Meat Bases.—From the nitrogen found in the tannin-salt filtrate deduct the nitrogen found as ammonia, the difference being the nitrogen as meat bases.

Ammonia was determined by the magnesium-oxide method.§

Purin bases were determined by Schittenhelm's method.

Kreatin and kreatinin were determined by Follin's colorimetric method.

Phosphoric acid and potash were estimated in the residue from the ashdetermination.*

The following table shows the composition of the extract examined.—

1 per Cent. 2 per Cent. 3 per Cent. 4 per Cent. 5 per Cent. 6 per Cent.
Moisture 16·95 14·49 15·34 17·39 15·71 17·54
Organic matter 66·48 66·50 65·15 61·31 62·76 62·43
Mineral salts 16·57 19·01 19·51 21·30 21·53 20·03
Acidity, as lactic acid 11·20 12·60 11·10 10·90 11·60 11·00
Fat 0·33 0·40 0·42 0·41 0·35 0·45
Total nitrogen 8·47 8·87 8·12 7·88 8·05 8·31
Insoluble proteids 1·17 1·23 1·23 1·02 0·98 1·12
Coaguable proteids 0·38 0·68 0·64 0·42 0·47 0·46
Proteoses 11·41 15·49 14·39 11·81 11·49 10·21
Peptone-like bodies and polypeptides 9·80 5·40 6·27 10·69 10·99 10·45
Total meat bases 12·98 14·00 12·40 11·17 11·21 13·48
Kreatin and kreatinin 5·52 6·60 3·90 4·16 3·97 5·40
Purin bases 0·86 1·24 0·46 1·26 1·84 1·03
Other meat bases 7·60 6·16 8·04 5·75 5·40 7·05
Ammonia 0·82 0·90 0·66 0·64 0·75 0·52
Chlorine 1·87 2·52 3·07 2·68 3·05 2·71
Phosphoric acid 5·54 6·24 5·29 5·24 5·58 4·60
Potash 6·76 7·60 7·80 8·14 7·92 8·32

[Footnote] * U.S. Dept. of Agric., Bureau of Chem., Bull. 107, p. 115.

[Footnote] † Ibid.

[Footnote] ‡ Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1906, vol. 28, p. 1485.

[Footnote] § U.S. Dept. of Agric., Bureau of Chem., Bull. 107, p. 9.

[Footnote] ∥ U.S. Dept. of Agric., Bureau of Chem., Bull. 90, p. 129.

[Footnote] ¶ Zeit. Physiol. Chem., 1904, vol. 41, p. 223.

[Footnote] * U.S. Dept. of Agric., Bureau of Chem., Bull. 107, pp. 3, 4, and 11.

– 3 –

The following table shows the composition of the mineral salts of the extract examined :—

1 per Cent. 2 per Cent. 3 per Cent. 4 per Cent. 5 per Cent. 6 per Cent.
Insoluble matter 1·32 1·02 0·88 1·12 0·24 0·82
Iron-oxide 0·24 0·30 0·28 0·41 0·22 0·19
Calcium-oxide. 1·24 0·28 1·12 1·37 0·94 0·82
Magnesia 0·27 1·34 0·76 0·88 1·04 1·13
Potash 40·81 39·98 39·98 38·21 36·74 41·53
Soda 6·52 7·24 8·10 12·12 9·25 10·32
Sulphur-trioxide 2·24 2·76 1·92 3·04 2·08 2·40
Phosphoric acid 33·48 32·82 27·11 24·60 25·91 22·96
Chlorine 11·27 13·25 15·73 12·54 14·16 13·52

The moisture-content as laid down by Liebig should not exceed 21 per cent. The total mineral salts, according to the same authority, should vary from 15 to 25 per cent. The mineral salts found in true meat-extracts are potassium-dihydrogen-phosphate, potassium-monohydrogen-phosphate, and the sulphates of calcium, potassium, and sodium, and the chlorides of sodium and potassium. Chloride of sodium is a minor constituent of meat-extract, the chlorine being present almost entirely as the potassium-salt. Salt is sometimes added to extract of meat in order, it is stated, to preserve the product, but the fact that it increases the profit is probably the greater incentive to its use.

In the extracts examined under the chemical control of this laboratory no added salt is found, and experience shows that non-salted extracts keep quite as well as those to which large amounts have been added. Since added salt is not necessary to keep extracts from decomposition, the addition of such can only be regarded as an adulteration.

Konig* states that the mineral salts, especially the potassium-salts, present in the meat-extract are valuable on account of their action on the nervous system.

Chittenden finds that the content of potash-salts causes a quicker and stronger heart-beat.

The acidity of meat-extract, determined by using phenolphthalein as indicator, is calculated to lactic acid as a matter of convenience, and for the sake of comparison with other investigators.

It is recognized that the acidity of meat-extract is due to various constituents, but sarcolactic acid is the predominating acid. It has been suggested that a part of the acidity is due to the phosphates present, but it is probable that the principal salt of phosphoric acid is the secondary potassium compound, which is neutral to phenolphthalein.

Fat is a detrimental ingredient in a meat-extract, and if present in large amounts indicates an imperfect method of manufacture, and affects the keeping-quality of the extract.

[Footnote] * “Chemische Zusammensetzung Nahrungs-und Genussmittel,” p. 236.

[Footnote] † Med. News, 1891, vol. 58, p. 716.

[Footnote] ‡ Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1908, vol. 30, p. 1563.

– 4 –

The total nitrogen in meat-extract varies from 6 to 9 per cent. However, in judging the value of an extract it is of importance to consider the forms in which the nitrogen exists rather than its total amount: it has been found by Chittenden* that while the nitrogen-content is high it is not available for the body's use as a food.

Insoluble proteids should not be present in large amounts: their presence in quantity indicates either the addition of meat-fibre or imperfect methods of manufacture. To add meat-fibre or other pretein to a meat-extract only reduces the proportion of meat bases to which the extract owes much of its true value, and merely adds small amounts of nutriment at an unreasonable price.

Coaguable proteids are also found in small amounts in all meat-extracts. It is impracticable to prepare a meat-extract containing more than a very small amount of coaguable proteids, for the reason that in the process of evaporation the temperature necessary coagulates the proteid.

Proteoses include the albumoses and certain gelatinoids. Most of the nitrogen attributed to proteoses in meat-extract is due to gelatin or gelatoses, and, as these bodies have a very low nutritive value, it is apparent that the claim of a high nutritive value for meat-extract rests upon very unconvincing evidence. It is certainly incorrect to suppose that because proteoses are present there must be considerable nutrient property in meat-extract.

Peptone-like bodies and polypeptides so described in this paper correspond with the nitrogen usually determined as and attributed to peptones, but, as the filtrate from the zinc-sulphate precipitate furnished negative results when submitted to the biuret test, it is apparent that no natural peptones are present in the meat-extracts examined. Other investigators have reported a similar experience, and for that reason the absence of peptones in meat-extracts has met with a more or less general acceptance.

While natural peptones are excluded, it is probable that the nitrogen found in this determination is largely due to the non-biuret-reacting polypeptides of Fischer, these substances being intermediate between the peptones and amido acids.

Fischer has pointed out that the commercial product is very closely related to the natural peptones, and that peptones are essentially a mixture of polypeptides, and he has further pointed out§ that many of the polypeptides fail to give the biuret reaction.

As no true peptones are found in most meat-extracts, it is seen that the claims made concerning the nutrient value of meat-extracts on account of the presence of peptones cannot be substantiated.

It is to the mineral salts and meat bases that a meat-extract owes its true value. The mineral salts have already been discussed, but it is the meat bases that give meat-extracts their chief value. Their chemistry is most complex; physiologically the most important are kreatin and kreatinin, and the purin bases. The purin bases usually found are xanthin, hypoxanthin, adenin, and guanin. A considerable number of other meat

[Footnote] * Med. News, 1891, vol. 58, p. 716.

[Footnote] † Amer. Journ. Physiol., 1907, vol. 19, p. 287.

[Footnote] ‡ “Untersuchungen über Aminosauren Polypeptides und Proteine,” p. 23.

[Footnote] § Ibid., p. 50.

– 5 –

bases have been isolated from meat-extract in recent years—namely, ignotin, oblitin, methylguanidin, carnomuscarin, neosin, novain, alanin, leucin, and glycocoll;* these are present in extremely small quantities, and it is impossible with our present knowledge to determine all of the meat bases in meat-extracts.

The meat bases are the products of the breaking-down of proteins in the vital processes of the body, and are excreted for the most part unchanged, and have little use as tissue-builders; neither do they produce heat or energy; they are therefore not foods.

Recent experiments show that meat bases furnish relief to fatigued muscle, and are powerful exciters of gastric secretion. They are thus most valuable, in that they create an appetite and prepare the system for food and aid its digestion. The custom of preceding a meal with soup which contains these bases has therefore a strong physiological warranty.

Ammonia when in quantity indicates some degree of putrefaction. Probably some of the ammonia present is in combination with acids of the fatty series.

Recently preparations made from yeast have been placed on the market as substitutes for and adulterants of meat-extracts. While as far as the taste and appearance are concerned they resemble meat-extracts, they show marked chemical differences, and are in no sense true substitutes, since they lack the valuable constituents and stimulating properties of meat-extracts, and their salts and bases.

Yeast on hydrolysis yields extractives somewhat similar to those obtained from meat, and when evaporated by the open-pan process darkens and looks like extract of meat. Caramel is sometimes added to darken the colour.

The following is the analysis of a sample of this class of product sold in this country :—

Per Cent.
Moisture 27·80
Organic matter 50·56
Mineral salts 21·64
Acidity, as lactic acid 7·60
Fat 0·20
Total nitrogen 4·98
Insoluble and coaguable proteid 1·18
Proteoses 1·75
Peptone-like bodies and polypeptides 10·00
Total nitrogenous bases 3·11
Kreatin and kreatinin 0·32
Purin bases 2·51
Other nitrogenous bases 5·28
Ammonia 0·26
Chlorine 4·25

As in the case of the meat-extracts examined, no natural peptones were found.

[Footnote] * Zts. Nahr. Genusam., 1902, p. 193; 1905, p. 528. Zts. Physiol. Chem., 1906, p. 412.

[Footnote] † Journ. Physiol., 1907, p. 163; Medicin-chir. Centrbl., 1893, p. 653: “The Work of the Digestive Glands,” Pawlow, trans. by W. H. Thompson, 1902.

– 6 –

The low content of kreatin and kreatinin and the presence of the purin bases are characteristic of yeast-extracts.

Another characteristic is that the filtrate from the zinc-sulphate precipitate is cloudy in the presence of yeast-extract, whereas with true meat-extract the filtrate is clear.*

According to Micko the distribution of the purin bases is different in meat and in yeast extracts: in meat-extracts xanthin and hypoxanthin predominate, while in yeast-extracts adenin and guanin predominate.

Formerly it was supposed that meat-extracts represented the whole nutritive value of the meat from which they were prepared, but from a consideration of their chemical composition as shown by more exact analytical procedure it is difficult to see whence their food-value could come.

Liebig's views are clearly stated by himself, as follows: “Neither tea nor extract of meat is nutriment in the ordinary sense; they possess a far higher importance by certain medicinal properties of a peculiar kind…. It is surely a grave offence against all the laws of physiology to compare tea, coffee, and extract of meat with the more common articles of food, and, because they are not that, to draw the inference that they are nothing at all.”

It is thus clear that extract of meat was never intended by Liebig to be regarded as a concentrated food, having but comparatively little nutritive value. It is only fair to state, however, that many manufacturers make no claim as to its food-value.

There is little doubt that extract of meat is most valuable as a dietary adjunct, in that it arouses appetite and aids the digestion of any food with which it is taken, by acting as an excitant of gastric secretion; it further acts as a rapid and powerful restorative in condition of muscular fatigue. These are its true functions both in health and in disease.

For permission to publish these results the author desires to express his thanks to the Christchurch Meat Company (Limited), in whose chemical laboratory most of the work in connection with this investigation was carried out.

[Footnote] * Arah. Pharm., 1904, vol. 242, p. 537.

[Footnote] † Ber. deut. Chem. Ges., 1894, vol. 27, p. 499.

[Footnote] ‡ The Times, 1st October, 1872.