Go to National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa
Volume 44, 1911
This text is also available in PDF
(1 MB) Opens in new window
– 221 –

Art XXIV.—A Preliminary Account of the Lower Waipara Gorge.

[Read before the Philosophical Institute of Canterbury, 6th December, 1911.]

Although the various localities of North Canterbury where Cretaceous and Tertiary rocks occur, such as the Middle Waipara, Weka Pass, Motunau, Omihi, and the Okuku, have received most careful attention, and have been fully dealt with on different occasions by the officers of the Geological Survey, by Haast, Hutton, and Park, and latterly by Marshall, Cotton, and the present writer, the district at the mouth of the Waipara River has hardly been noticed. Except the very brief mention of its structure by Hector (Geological Reports, 1868–69, p. x) and by Haast (“Geology of Canterbury and Westland,” pp. 316—17), the published matter dealing with it consists merely of the list of fossils collected by Buchanan and Haast, referred to by Hutton in his report on the “Geology of the Northeast Portion of the South Island” (Geological Survey Report, 1873–74, p. 52) and in his various publications dealing with our Tertiary series and its fossil-content, and the list given by Haast in his “Geology of

– 222 –

Canterbury and Westland,” pp. 319–22. This is, as far as I have been able to glean, the total reference in published reports to this interesting locality. The present account is necessarily imperfect, but it is based on work done on numerous visits, on two of which I was fortunate in having the advice and assistance of Dr. Marshall, to whom, as well as to Mr. Suter for valuable help in identifying the fossils, my sincere thanks are due.

General Description of the Locality.
(See map.)

The district referred to in this account lies, roughly, to the southeast of the point where the railway running north from Christchurch crosses the Waipara River, and for the purposes of more accurate definition the lower gorge of the river may be taken as that part of its course which lies between its junction with the Omihi Creek and the sea. The creek joins the river about two miles below the railway-crossing, and is historically important, since it flows from the swamp where Haast obtained his Glenmark collection of moa-remains. The actual length of the gorge is about four miles. Its sides are moderately steep, easily climbed in most places, but unscalable in parts, and rising to an average height of about 350 ft. above the river-bed. They are higher on the eastern side, whence they extend as a stretch of irregular downs towards the slopes of Mount Cass, which forms the south-western buttress of the Limestone Range. On the western side of the river the banks are not so high, and they form part of the low downs stretching to the south-west towards Amberley. The breadth of the gorge varies, but it usually presents a wide floor covered with shingle, on which the river wanders. At times, however, its breadth is reduced to about 100 yards, or even less, and then the river-channel is more definitely fixed. In some places the stream forms well-defined loops or meanders—a notable one occurs about half-way through the gorge—and it is now destroying the spurs which project laterally from the high banks into these loops. Although the stream has considerable fall, the large amount of detrital matter which it transports from higher levels, and specially from the banks of loose shingle bordering its course through the Waipara Plains, has so diminished its power of erosion that it has apparently reached a temporary base-level, and this in spite of the fact that within fairly recent times—certainly since the Pleistocene—the coast has experienced a distinct upward movement.

A recent upward movement of the coast-line to the north of the Waipara has been recorded by McKay at Amuri Bluff (Report of the Geological Survey, 1874–76, p. 177), where beaches with Recent shells are found at a height of 500 ft. Evidence of the same movement at the mouth of the Conway and at Motunau is given by Hutton (Report of the Geological Survey, 1873-74, p. 54), where the land has certainly risen 150 ft., and, judging from the features of the remarkable plain of marine denudation noted by Hutton and examined more recently by the present author, the elevation has in all probability been much greater. Remnants of this plain over a mile in breadth are to be found on both sides of the mouth of the Waipara River. A little way back from the present beach is an old sea-cliff about 50 ft. high extending along the coast for several miles, and from the summit of this the land slopes gently back for about a mile, the upturned edges of the beds forming the solid substratum of the country being planed off neatly by the former action of the sea and then covered with a thin veneer of loose shingle, some of it

– 223 –
– 224 –

of marine origin, and of material which closely resembles the loess of the south-eastern portion of the South Island. This plain slopes back to the base of the low downs near Amberley, where it reaches a height of about 150 ft. However, on looking up the coast to the north from the mouth of the Waipara, decided remnants of a shore platform can be seen at an estimated height of 250 ft. above the sea, and fronting the plain there are several small remnants at lower levels marking stationary periods during the prolonged elevation. It is therefore certain that a long stretch of coast-line has experienced the effect of this movement. That the rise is of recent date is very clear from the species of shells found at Motunau, and also from the forms of the stream-valleys that have been established on the elevated marine shelf. With few exceptions, the streams which run across it have very short courses, and are little more than extended gullies or washouts. Through the somewhat loose Motunau marls, which form the solid base of the land, they have eroded deep channels, at times over 100 ft. in depth, extremely narrow, and with sides so precipitous that they are absolutely impassable for long distances. The whole plain is dissected by them, and they render communication a matter of difficulty where roads and tracks do not exist. The district furnishes a most remarkable example of the effect of a recent upward land-movement on the gradient and cross-section of the stream-channels. The phenomenon is intensified by the uniform seaward dip at moderate angles of the beds under the plain, and the parallelism of the strike to the coast-line. A similar phenomenon is to be observed near the mouth of the Waipara, but the features are not quite so perfect.

This plain of marine denudation once extended much further seaward, and the small island at Motunau is a remnant of it, its flat top showing a marked alignment of its surface with that of the coast-line opposite. How far this plain extended seawards it is impossible to say at present, but at the mouth of the Waipara the river-terraces appear high above the present level of the water, and are terminated suddenly when they reach the edge of the old marine cliff which marks the edge of the coastal plain. At a former period the river must have extended much further seaward, and flowed on the top of the plain, the terraces with their shorn ends giving positive proof of its higher level and seaward extension at that level. As river erosion was proceeding the sea was eating back the margin of the plain, thus giving the streams a steeper gradient and increasing their erosive power, and the truncated ends of the terraces mark the limit to which the plain was destroyed. When one takes into account their perfect condition he must conclude that either terraces are stable land-forms or that marine erosion on this stretch of coast has been vary rapid and comparatively recent

There is also, evidence of a more recent land-movement still. Along the base of the old marine cliff, referred to previously as bordering the coastal plain, there is a strip of flat land consisting of shingle-beds, sanddunes, and swamp, half a mile wide and but slightly raised above the sea. It has, without doubt, been formed of detrital matter brought down by the rivers in the vicinity, such as the Ashley and Waipara, as well as by the small streams which flow directly into the sea, their load of waste being distributed by waves, tides, and currents along the base of the old cliff. These accumulations are several miles in length, and their size suggests that there has been either a remarkable increase in the supply of detritus or that there has been a small recent upward movement of the coast. There is no apparent reason why the streams should have been suddenly furnished with an increased load of detritus, although

– 225 –

it must be noted that they are fully charged at the present time, and at is quite conceivable that they could build up a shallow sea-bottom till it was above sea-level without any change in the level of the land. I cannot, however, think that this explanation is altogether satisfactory, and conclude that a small and probably continuous uplift has taken place after a comparatively long period of stability, during which the old-coastal plain was eaten back to the line of the former sea-cliff.

Judging from the profiles of the streams joining the Waipara from the flanks of the Deans Range and elsewhere, this movement has extended its effects some distance inland. The loops of the river in the gorge itself, placed as they are in a somewhat narrow trench, may owe their origin primarily to the fact that at a former period the river reached base-level, and that the gorge was cut down to its present depth during a subsequent period of elevation when the river had increased power to corrade, and that now it has again almost adjusted its grade to the load it carries, and all its erosive energy is devoted to destroying the loops that it previously formed. It is very difficult, however, to correlate these effects with certainty.

Origin of the Waipara Gorge.

The circumstances resulting in the formation of the Waipara Gorge furnish one of those interesting problems with respect to drainage directions for which the North Canterbury district is noted. When the river leaves the hills between Mount Brown and the Deans, and issues from the middle gorge, whose existence has been largely determined by the great Mid-Waipara fault, it pursues a course of about seven miles across the Waipara Plains, and, instead of taking the easy path to the sea past Amberley, it cuts a somewhat deep channel through the downs which stretch south-west from the termination of the Limestone Range. Here it runs practically along the strike of the beds which form this somewhat elevated ground. At times it breaks across the strike for a short distance; still, the coincidence is very marked, even when the strike swings round through a right angle. When the river leaves the downs and debouches on to the coastal plain it pursues a direct course to the sea, still following the strike approximately. There seems to be no reason from the present configuration of the ground why this difficult path should have been selected when an easy one was ready to hand, so that it is apparently one of the instances of the anomalous behaviour of rivers which the district furnishes.

The Waiau and Hurunui, a few miles further north, and even the Waipara itself in its upper portion, have cut gorges through mountains composed of hard greywackes and slaty shales of Mesozoic age when they might easily have avoided the obstructions. The only satisfactory explanation is based on the fact that they are instances of “superimposed” drainage. In late Cretaceous and early Tertiary times an archipelago of small islands formed of rocks of Lower Mesozoic age occupied the area now known as North Canterbury and the Amuri districts. In the straits and bays among these islands, greensands, solid limestones, marls, and loose incoherent calcareous sands and gravels were laid down, so that the original surface was completely masked. When the land was raised above the sea in late Tertiary times the course of the streams established upon it was largely determined by the form of the land as it emerged. While cutting down their channels the streams removed a large part of the veneer of loose and readily eroded material, encountered the hard underlying rocks, cut into them, and maintained their original directions.

– 226 –

As time went on more and more of the loose sediments was removed, and the original form of the land-surface completely altered.

The existing Tertiary deposits are in all probability but a small part of those originally laid down, for isolated fragments of these rocks are found in various places high above the present valley-floors, and in such positions that they may well have formed part of an extensive sheet. I think that this is the best explanation of the evolution of the land in the district, as well as of the anomalous courses of the rivers. A similar explanation was also indicated by Captain Hutton in a short paragraph contained in his paper on “The Formation of the Canterbury Plains” (Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. 37, 1905, p. 467).

It is quite possible, however, that the presence of the Lower Waipara Gorge in the peculiar situation in which it now occurs may be due to a small coastal stream cutting back its head through the escarpments of harder rocks, capturing the headwaters of other small streams, and finally tapping the Waipara itself; but the explanation based on the fact that it is a case of “superimposed” drainage fits the case best.

Stratigraphy.

The question of the stratigraphy can naturally be elucidated by a comparison with other known localities. Fortunately, the Mid-Waipara and the Weka Pass (in close proximity) have become classic in the history of New Zealand geology, having been reported on by nearly all those who have done field-work in this country. In these typical localities the following is a representative sequence, starting from the top, of the beds that have been recorded:—

8.

Motunau or Greta Beds.—Sands and conglomerates, mostly calcareous, with shells of Mollusca in varying states of preservation, but usually fragmentary. The beds are generally loose and incoherent, but at time concretionary.

7.

Mount Brown-Beds.—Rough calcareous sandstones with harder concretionary bands, markedly fossiliferous in places.

6.

Grey Marl.—Grey and greenish sandstones and blue sandy and calcareous clays.

5.

Weka Pass Stone.—Glauconitic and slightly arenaceous limestone.

4.

Amuri Limestone.—Foraminiferal and argillaceous limestone.

3.

Greensands.—Markedly glauconitic in the upper portions, and with concretions full of saurian remains in the lower part. These beds are often argillaceous, ferruginous, and calcareous, and at times exhibit marked efflorescence of sulphur.

2.

Oyster - beds, containing shells of Ostrea, Conchothyra parasitica, fragments of Belemnites, Inoceramus, and other shells.

1.

Sands and clays with brown coal and impure limonite.

The lower portion of this series is more completely developed further to the north-east, in the Omihi Creek and at Amuri Bluff. According to Hector, Haast, Hutton, Park, and perhaps McKay, the sequence is broken by unconformities, placed in different positions by the different authors, but it is very probable that it is quite conformable throughout. However, it is only the upper part of the sequence with which this paper is specially concerned—that is, with the Motunau and Mount Brown beds, and the Grey Marls and Weka Pass beds, which underlie them. The whole of the banks and terraces bordering the Waipara River as it passes through the lower gorge consist of the sands and conglomerates forming

– 227 –

the highest members of the sequence recorded above; the other beds are, however, in close proximity to the river on its eastern side. The former will be referred to hereafter as the Pareora series, seeing that their fossil fauna shows a close relationship to that of the typical Pareora locality.

Structure and Arrangement of the Beds in the Gorge.
(See map and section).

At the junction of the Omihi Creek with the Waipara River the beds consist of sands, sandy clays with concretionary bands, and conglomerates with shells. The strike is N. 5° W., with a westerly dip of about 22 ½°. A good exposure is to be seen where a recent flood has removed the surface covering of shingle, and laid bare the solid bank just opposite the mouth of the Omihi Creek. In the Omihi itself, just above the junction, the beds strike north-east and dip to the north-west at 450. It is evident that the strike here swings round somewhat, a feature which will be readily understood when the general structural features of the locality are considered later, this small movement being only a part of one of wide extent.

On following the river down from the junction, the high banks on the east are found to be obscured by soil and slip-material, but after going about 300 yards the dip observed at the junction changes to the south-east, with the same strike as before. The structure is thus anticlinal, and the same anticline can be distinctly traced for over a

Picture icon

Fig. 2.—Section from Omihi: Creek Through Bill's Hill to Sea (Five Miles).

mile to the north-east along the bank of Limestone Creek, a tributary of the Omihi coming from the northern slopes of Mount Cass, the stream having eroded a deep channel for some distance along the axis of the anticline. On going still further in that direction the underlying limestones are exposed, with what has all the appearance of an anticlinal arrangement.

Following the banks of the Waipara further down, the south-easterly dip is maintained till the second gully below the Omihi is reached. At the head of this a well-marked syncline is exposed, the western side being chiefly composed of thick beds of fine gravel, but overlying them is a bed of coarse gravel with numerous molluscan remains. These include Fulguraria arabica, Ostrea nelsoniana, O. ingens, O. angasi, Siphonalia dilatata, Paphia curta, Crepidula gregaria Mactra elongata, Ancilla hebera, Ancilla australis, and Chione intermedia. The syncline here exposed can be traced to the north-east, parallel to the anticline running up Limestone Creek.

On going still further down-stream the beds dip to the west, and an angle of about 60° is maintained for a distance down the river of about two miles, the strike being between N. 25° E. and N. 35° E. The beds are well exposed in the bluff just below the point where the road from Glasnevin Railway-station meets the river. They consist of sands

– 228 –

calcareous sands with concretionary bands, and gravel - beds more or less cemented, and are highly fossiliferous. The chief genera to be collected are Mactra, Chione, Ostrea, Pecten, Crepidula, and also Bryozoa. Some beds are almost wholly formed of the remains of Crepidula, but they are usually in a poor state of preservation. A characteristic feature of the beds at this point are the massive bands of coarse cemented gravels, dipping to the west at an angle of 60°. For a long distance one of these beds forms one bank of the river, and it can be traced some distance to the north-east on the north side of Mount Cass. Here it dips at a steeper angle, and on going further it is apparently lost under the covering of soil. In all possibility it will reappear in the creeks which flow from the northern side of the Limestone Range.

The same direction of dip and strike is approximately maintained on following down the river to the immediate neighbourhood of a pronounced meander of the stream. The strike here begins to swing round in a positive direction, so that, while just above the loop it is N. 5° E., at the loop itself it is N. 5° W., with a westerly dip, several hard bands of cemented gravel occurring at this point rendering an accurate determination easy. Just past the loop, on the eastern side of the river, and also on the flank of the high escarpment a little further down-stream, the beds consist of sand and concretionary bands full of shell-remains in excellent state of preservation. This is one of the best localities that I know of for the collection of Tertiary fossils, and when thoroughly exhausted will be found to yield a very rich harvest. A list of species collected by Dr. Marshall and myself is given later in this article, and it will be found to show a marked agreement with those collected at the typical Pareora locality, in South Canterbury.

The structure of the beds becomes at this point somewhat complicated, and its unravelment is an interesting problem. On following down the western side of the river below the loop the strike is observed to swing round in the same direction as higher up the river. Just at the mouth of the gorge proper the strike is N. 15° W., with a westerly dip, and just below the Teviotdale Bridge, half a mile further on, it becomes N. 55° W.

In passing through the gorge the strike has thus swung round through a right angle, and its effect is to be seen in the shape of the ridges of the downs towards Amberley, which are found to circle round with it, the outward slope of the downs being generally towards the dip of the beds. At a point about 600 yards above the bridge, at the mouth of a small gully, there has been a marked dislocation of the beds. They have been apparently folded down in an acute isocline, so that the two limbs are approximately parallel; but the beds immediately on either side of it do not appear to be affected, and they do not change their proper level or alter their dip or strike. The disturbance appears to be quite local, and it is not strongly in evidence on the opposite bank of the river. This is the only marked dislocation to be observed throughout the whole length of the gorge, and I have not been able to find any sign of the fault mentioned by Hector (loc. cit.).

If we now consider the arrangement of the beds on the eastern side of the river, the structure on the western side can be readily understood Below the loop mentioned previously, on the slope of the high escarpment which fronts the river to the west and north-west of the Teviotdale Station, the beds dip to the south-east, but an open anticline is clearly visible at the point which projects into the river half a mile below. The axis of this anticline is not horizontal, but pitches to

– 229 –

the south-west, and thus the gradual swing-round of the strike of the beds to the west of the river, is easily explained. The amount of pitch must be considerable, for the lowest beds actually exposed in, the gorge, at a height of about 100 ft. above sea-level, are the Grey Marls, whereas the limestones which underlie the marls are exposed on Mount Cass, about three miles to the north-east, at an elevation of 1,700 ft. It is possible, also, that the anticline not only pitches, but dies out as well. It is certain, However, that it is distinctly unsymmetrical, and the western limb dips down at a steeper angle than the eastern limb.

The direction of the strike observed in the river near the axis of the anticline changes on following the escarpment towards Mount Cass. It is at first parallel with the river, but, on being followed further, strikes north-east with a dip to the south-east, and the beds forming it lie in just the same relation to the limestones of Mount Cass and the Limestone Range as the Mount Brown beds in the Weka Pass do to the limestones occurring there. The similarity of the arrangement is most marked. If the creeks between the escarpment and Mount Cass be examined, the “Grey Marl” of the Survey is found in its proper position and with characteristic development; but only the upper sandy beds of these marls are visible in the gorge itself in the immediate vicinity of the loop of the river and in the reach below it. The axis of the anticline which runs out in the Waipara continues to the north-east, the limestone of the Mount Cass ridge forming the limb dipping to the south-east, while the north-east limb is represented by isolated blocks to the north of the Limestone Range. At the core of the anticline, immediately to the north of Mount Cass, lies a prominent hill, formed of the underlying greywackes of Mesozoic age. This arrangement is exactly what might have been expected from a consideration of the structure and relationship of the beds in the Weka Pass and the Mid-Waipara

As the anticline is traced to the north-east from the river it appears to change to one of increasing asymmetry, so that some of the hard concretionary bands on reaching to the inland side of Mount Cass become nearly vertical. It is possible that on being followed further north-east still it grades into a fault with a downthrow to the north-west, since the limestones near the southern edge of the Omihi Valley, in the neighbourhood of Limestone Creek, show a marked discordance in level between those forming the crest of the ridge of Mount Cass, although they dip in the same direction. More accurate examination of this part of the country is necessary before a satisfactory conclusion can be arrived at.

The apparent bend in the axis of the anticline near the Waipara River is perhaps due to this asymmetrical character, associated with the pitch of the axis; it may, however, be due to a disturbance caused by folding of the beds to the east of the mouth of the river in the neighbourhood of the Teviotdale Station.

On all the stretch of country forming the triangular area between the Waipara River and the Teviotdale Creek the strike of the beds is uniformly N. 55° W., with a southerly dip. They consist of sands, sandy marls, loose gravels, and hard bands of conglomerate, composed of large pebbles of greywacke and full of fossil-fragments. The beds are so hard, however, that they rarely yield good specimens. One of the hard bands forms the escarpment to the south-west of the Teviotdale Station; another forms a low indistinct parallel ridge to the north of this: but the most

– 230 –

prominent is a massive and solid bed on the north of the station, which runs out to the coast at a prominent rocky point to the east of the river-mouth. The immediate coast-line at this point consists of large blocks derived from this bed, and its continuation seaward is marked by a line of submerged reef. Fossil remains are very common in this bed, specially remains of Mollusca, and notably a flat sea-urchin (Arachnoides placenta), but the rock is so firmly cemented that it is almost impossible to obtain good specimens.

This hard bed is primarily responsible for the shape of the ridge known as Bill's Hill, which lies to the north-east of the Teviotdale Station. Its peculiar position presents a somewhat difficult problem till it is recognized that the hill is an anticline, and that it is flanked on the north by a small syncline now coinciding approximately with the upper valley of the Teviotdale Creek. The northern side of this creek is formed of beds dipping to the south-east and rising to the north-west till they form the prominent escarpment facing Mount Cass on its southern side. The Bill's Hill anticline owes its preservation from denuding agents to the protection of its upper surface by the layers of hard conglomerate which covers it almost continuously, although individual layers are somewhat discontinuous in their extension, one band being frequently replaced by a slightly lower and parallel one on frequent occasions. Nevertheless, the total effect is to cover the hill and protect it from active denudation.

The axes of both the anticline and its accompanying syncline run approximately N.E.–S.W., but they peter out between the Teviotdale Station and the river. It is possible, however, that they have exerted some disturbing effect on the main structural anticline, which runs from Mount Cass towards the river; and perhaps the curvature of its axis is due to the coalescence of the two lines of folding as they are followed to the south-west. A very complete examination of the locality is, however, necessary before the precise effect of each fold on its neighbour can be determined.

It will be observed that all the axes of folding enumerated above are approximately parallel, and they are also parallel to the folds which the Cretaceous and Tertiary series at Amuri Bluff and Kaikoura exhibit so markedly. These folding movements have therefore extended well into North Canterbury. Their presence in that locality, and also in the Trelissick basin, described by McKay and confirmed by examination by the present writer, suggest strongly that earth-movements connected with the folding of the great alpine chain had probably not ceased even late in the Tertiary era, although they were certainly more acute in the Kaikoura district than further south, and were, besides, of a different order of intensity and character from those primarily responsible for the formation of the great mountain-range.

The thickness of the beds exposed in the gorge certainly exceeds 1,800 ft., and all through them, as well as in the underlying Grey Marls and limestones, there is no sign of any discordance or dislocation other than folding, with the exception of the local disturbance referred to on page 228. The special importance of the absence of any evidence for a physical break will be understood when the fossil content of the beds has been considered.

In many parts of the area the solid strata are covered with a veneer, of greater or less thickness, of what are evidently river-gravels, in addition to the covering of recent marine shingle on the coastal plain. These may have been derived from rivers which flowed over the country at higher levels than now, of which there is abundant evidence in the downs

– 231 –

to the south-east of Mount Grey, but in many cases the pebbles have been weathered out of the conglomerates which form a fairly large percentage of the feeds of Pareora age in the vicinity of the gorge.

List of Fossils Collected.

The following is a list of the fossils collected by Dr. Marshall and myself on various visits, the determinations in nearly all cases being made by Mr. Suter:—

  • Anomia sp.

  • Cardium patulum Hutt.

  • — Hutt.

  • — Zitt.

  • Chione meridionalis Sow.

  • stuchburyi Gray.

  • — sp. Near C. chiloensis, but distinct, and probably new.

  • — sp. nov.

  • — sp. nov.

  • Crassatellites amplus Zitt.

  • Cucullaea alta* Sow.

  • Diplodonta zelandica Gray.

  • magna Hutt.

  • subrosea Gray.

  • greyi Zitt.

  • lambata Gld.

  • Glycimeris globosa Hutt.

  • laticostatus Hutt.

  • Lima paleata Hutt.

  • bullata Tate.

  • Lutraria solida Hutt.

  • Macrocallista multistriata Sow.

  • Mactra elongata Quoy & Gaim.

  • chrydaea Sut.

  • Mesodesma grande Hutt.

  • — sp.

  • Mytilus caniculus Mart.

  • Ostrea nelsoniana Zitt.

  • ingens Zitt.

  • angasi Sow.

  • edulis Linn.

  • Panopaea orbita Hutt.

  • zelandica Quoy & Gaim.

  • Paphia curia Hutt.

  • Pecten crawfurdi Hutt.

  • hillii Hutt.

  • williamsoni Zitt.

  • Spicula aequilateralis Desh.

  • Tellina sp. Near disculus Desh.

  • Venericardia australis Lam.

  • — sp. Probably new.

  • Ancilla australis Sow.

  • Ancilla depressa Sow.

  • hebera Hutt.

  • — sp. Near australis.

  • — sp. nov.

  • Bathytoma sulcata Hutt.

  • Bela robusta Hutt.

  • Calyptraea scutum Less:

  • Cerithidea sp.

  • Crepidula gregaria Sow.

  • Cylichnella enysi Hutt.

  • Epitonium rugulosum lyratum Zitt.

  • Galeodea seneæ Hutt.

  • sulcata Hutt.

  • — sp Small variety; probably distinct.

  • Fulguraria arabica Mart.

  • Polinices callosa Hutt.

  • huttoni von Ihering.

  • ovatus Hutt.

  • ovatus New var. imperforatus Suter non ed.

  • hamiltonensis Tate.

  • Olivella zealandica Hutt.

  • Trochus tiaratus Quoy & Gaim.

  • Struthiolaria cincta Hutt.

  • cingulata Hutt.

  • tuberculata Hutt.

  • coniculata Zitt.

  • Terebra biplex Hutt.

  • — sp. Near biplex Hutt.

  • — sp. nov.

  • Trochus tiaratus Quoy & Gaim.

  • Turbo sp.

  • Turritella sp.

  • Volutospina (Athleta) huttoni Sut. (= V. kirki Hutt and Kirki kirki).

  • Dentalium solidum Hutt.

  • Balanus sp.

  • Arachnoides placenta sp. (?).

  • Meandropora.

  • Myliobatis sp. (?). Teeth.

  • Ribs of cetaceans.

[Footnote] * This species was collected in February at the Lower Waipara by Dr. Allan Thomson and Mr. C. A. Cotton, and a specimen given to the author.

– 232 –
  • In addition to the above, the following species are recorded by Haast as occurring at the Lower Waipara Gorge (“Geology of Canterbury and Westland,” p. 321):—

  • Cytheria enysi Hutt.

  • Venericardia intermedia Hutt.

  • Modiola albicosta Lam.

  • Modiola sp.

  • Lima crassa Hutt.

A careful comparison of this list with the list of present species of Mollusca found fossil given by Suter (Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. 42, 1910, p. 8) shows that more than 30 per cent. of the species given above are now living in New Zealand seas. Although the list of Waipara fossils will no doubt be greatly amplified by more careful search, the relative proportion of species to those existing now is not likely to be much altered. Judging from this percentage, the beds should be classified as Upper Miocene or Lower Pliocene.

A further comparison with the list of fossils found at the typical Pareora locality, in South Canterbury, shows that of sixty-four named species given in the Waipara list thirty-two are to be found in the lists of species collected at Pareora given in Haast's “Geology of Canterbury and Westland,” in Park's paper “On the Marine Tertiaries of Otago and Canterbury” (Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. 37, 1905, p. 530), and among the fossils exhibited in the Canterbury Museum. This is at first sight a somewhat small proportion, but the forms common to both include a very large number of characteristic species, and it is possible that further collection may bring about further accordance. In any case, the number of characteristic genera common to both localities renders it a matter of certainty that the beds in the Lower Waipara are contemporaneous with those in the typical locality at Pareora.

A further comparison with the list of the fossils collected by Park on the Mount Donald escarpment (loc. cit., p. 540), and with the lists of Mount Brown fossils given by Haast (“Geology of Canterbury and Westland,” pp. 306–11), and also by Hutton in his paper on the “Railway-cuttings in the Weka Pass” (Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. 20, 1888, pp. 261–62), shows a certain amount of agreement of the Lower Waipara fossils with those collected in the typical Mount Brown localities. There are, however, some differences, notably the absence of Brachiopods from the Lower Waipara, in marked contrast to their extraordinary numbers at Mount Brown. This may be due either to the fact that the proper horizons for these fossils have not been discovered in the Waipara, or that the conditions for their existence or for their entombment were not favourable in that locality when the beds were laid down. The accordance of the fossil content is, however, sufficiently close to assign both sets of beds to the same age; especially when the associated fossil species from other localities of the same age are taken into consideration. The stratigraphical relations also strongly support this conclusion.

Since by far the greater number of the fossils enumerated in the list can be collected on one horizon in the gorge—i.e., just above the Grey Marls—it is reasonable to consider that the lowest beds intersected by the river are of the same age as the Mount Brown beds, while the upper members are probably of the same age as the Motunau or Greta beds, and the conformity of the sequence in the gorge supports the opinion of Hutton that the Mount Brown beds are the base of the Pareora system, and the absence of any unconformity in the gorge also supports his contention

– 233 –

that there is no stratigraphical break between the base of the Mount Brown beds and the top of the Greta beds.*

The circumstances are also favourable to the position maintained by Marshall, Speight, and Cotton in the paper on the Tertiary series published in last year's “Transactions of the New Zealand Institute”—that there is no stratigraphical break in North Canterbury between beds at the base of the Waipara system characterized by the presence of saurian remains, Belemnites, Conchothyra parasitica, and various species of Trigonia, and beds which have a fauna which must be assigned to the Miocene or even the Lower Pliocene period. This statement does not, however, negative the existence of a palaeontological break.

Conclusion.

For the purpose of aiding people who wish to examine this interesting locality, I make the following suggestions as to the means of visiting it. The lower portion of the gorge is best worked from Amberley, which is distant about three miles, with a good road suitable for driving or bicycle. The upper part can be reached most conveniently from Waipara, whence a walk or ride of about two miles will bring one on to the upper entrance to the gorge. If time is limited, and only one day is available for the visit, the Glasnevin Railway-station affords the shortest and readiest access to the middle part of the gorge. There is a good road leading from this station to within a short distance of the place where abundant fossils are to be found. At either Amberley or Waipara there are hotels at which accommodation can be obtained.

Explanation of Plates.

In considering the map and section accompanying this paper it must be noted that recent alluvial and marine deposits have not been marked. It was found impossible to do this accurately without examining almost every acre of the country; only the underlying solid beds are, therefore, represented.

[Footnote] * In Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. 37, 1905, p. 538, Park says, “The Motunau beds lie on a denuded surface of the Mount Brown beds, and the section is so clear that no doubt can be entertained as to the unconformable relations of the two formations”; but in a recent paper published in the “Geological Magazine” (5th December, vol. 8, p. 548) he admits the physical conformity of the Mount Brown and Motunau beds. His exact words are, “The unconformity which I thought I recognized at Waipara between the Mount Brown and Motunau beds may not exist, or, if it does, it may be purely local. In my classification of the Jamger formations adopted in my ‘Geology of New Zealand’ I have recognized only one physical break [in the Tertiary succession]—namely, one between the Oamaru and Waipara series. Nothing I have seen since the publication of that work has led me to alter the opinion I then expressed.” The author is therefore glad to know that his position as to the conformity of the Motunau and Mount Brown beds is quite in agreement with the most recently expressed opinion of Professor Park on a somewhat important point in our Tertiary stratigraphy.