
If the wings of the various species of this genus, referred to below, be examined, it will be noticed that the 1st submarginal cell varies considerably in form where the 3rd longitudinal vem arises from the 2nd. This feature is due to the position of the anterior cross-vein, and I have indicated in such cases that this cross-vein has either a common origin with the 3rd longitudinal from the 2nd or arises independently from the 3rd The 3rd longitudinal vem is, according to the species, either strongly or slightly sinuated; accordingly the anterior branch, which may arise from the middle, before the middle, or beyond, is shorter or longer respectively Again, the distance from the posterior wing-margin of the confluence of the 5th and 6th (anal) longitudinal veins, as compared with the length of the anterior cross-vem, is a feature I consider of importance.
It will be noticed from the illustrations that in the wing of spiniger (the type of this genus) the alula is well developed, while in the other species this part of the wing is absent. Also, the general outline of the wings and the position of the discal cell vary considerably
Of the 4 posterior vems, characteristic of this genus, the 3rd varies considerably in length and may be rudimentary. On the right wing of

one male specimen of my new species seolforalis this 3rd posterior vein is totally absent, although present on the left wing. The right wing is shown in fig. 7. In all my other specimens of this form the 3rd posterior vein is present. When this vein is absent, as in the above case, one would probably be inclined to place the species in the genus Beris—that is to say, if only one specimen were available.
In most cases the antennae of the ♂ are considerably shorter than those of the ♀, and the eyes of the former are slightly closer than those of the latter.
This genus has a distribution throughout New Zealand, most of the species being found both in the North and the South Islands. Only one form, spiniger, is common to Australia and New Zealand, while seolforalis n. sp ranges from sea-level to 3,000 ft. altitude.
In his work on the Brachycera,* Hutton describes five species, of which his new form alpina I place in the genus Berismyia for reasons stated under that division. I also agree with Walker that E. opposita of Hutton belongs to the genus Actina.
The sexes may be distinguished mainly by the length of the antennae, proximity of the eyes, size of body, and form of the abdomen. In the ♂ the abdomen usually has parallel sides or sides restricted along the middle and is narrower than the thorax, while the ♀. although narrower at the base than the thorax, as a rule becomes wider beyond the middle.
Although both the genera Exaireta and Actina are very much alike in general appearance, they may be distinguished by the fact than the eyes of the former are bare and those of the latter pubescent, either densely or thinly so.
According to the venation of the wings, I have divided the species of this genus into two main groups—(1) those with the first submarginal cell obtuse, and (2) those with this cell acute. In the one species forming the first group the wing is not clouded or is only faintly coloured, while the anterior branch of the 3rd vein arises before the middle of this vein. The four species of the second group have the wings clouded and the anterior branch of the 3rd vein beyond the middle. This group is further divided into two subgroups by comparing the lengths of the anterior cross-vein and the vem between the discal and 5th posterior cells. To one of these subgroups three species belong, and are themselves distinguished mainly by their coloration
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| 1. First submarginal cell proximally obtuse; wings not clouded, almost clear; 1st abdominal segment deep purple, remainder with dense silvery pubescence | seolforalis n. sp. |
| First submarginal cell proximally acute; wings clouded; abdomen without dense pubescence | 2 |
| 2. Vem between discal and 5th posterior cells shorter, never longer, than the anterior cross-vein | 3 |
| Vem between discal and 5th posterior cells distinctly longer than anterior cross-vem | spiniger. |
| 3. Wmgs tinged with yellow proximally and brown distally, or also with a distinct transverse cloud | 4 |
| Wmgs clouded with brown both proximally and distally, and with clear interspaces | hoheria n. sp. |
| 4 Wmgs with a distinct transverse median cloud, the distal half lighter brown; abdomen of a uniform purplish-bronze (♀) | straznitzkii. |
| Wmgs without transverse cloud; abdomen tawny, with purple apex | apicalis. |
[Footnote] * F W Hutton, 1901, Synopsis of the Diptera brachycera of New Zealand, Trans. N Z. Inst, vol 33, pp 1–95
