Go to National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa
Volume 52, 1920
This text is also available in PDF
(2 MB) Opens in new window
– 154 –

Art. XXIII.—Tertiary Geology of the Area between Wharekuri and the Otiake River, North Otago.

[Read before the Wellington Philosophical Society, 10th December, 1919; received by Editor, 31st December, 1919: issued separately, 15th June, 1920].

Contents.

I.

Introduction.

II.

General Description, of the Area.

III.

Geology of the Area.

(1.)

Wharekuri Basin.

(2.)

Awahokomo Basin.

(3.)

Awakino Basin.

(4.)

Kurow River to Otiake River.

IV.

General Succession and Palaeontological Notes on the Tertiary Rocks.

V.

General Remarks on the Physiography.

(1.)

Kurow Block.

(2.)

Awakino and Trig. G Blocks.

VI.

The Gravels.

VII.

Conclusion.

I. Introduction

The area described in this paper covers a narrow strip of country on the right bank of the Waitaki River, extending from Wharekuri Creek to the Otiake River. The adjacent strip of country south of the Otiake River has already been described in another paper in this volume. Although the exposures of Tertiary rocks are few and widely distant, being obscured over the greater part of the area by heavy gravel deposits, the general sequence of the beds is clear. McKay has dealt with the country in some detail, but various modifications of his interpretation of the succession are necessary. The writer's thanks are due to Mr. P. G. Morgan, Director of the New Zealand Geological Survey, for permission to examine the lists of fossils collected by McKay, and determined by the late Mr. Henry Suter. An examination of these lists serves to emphasize the truth of the writer's contention (refer to Thomson, 1915, p. 123) that the molluscan fauna below the limestone is similar to that above the limestone. The upper beds, however, contain a much greater number of species.

A full historical account of previous geological work in the Waitaki Valley has already been given in another paper in this volume (pp. 140143), and only a brief critical summary of the views of other writers is necessary here.

McKay's opinion that there is an unconformity in the Tertiary rocks at Wharekuri, and that the coal occurs at the top of the sequence, is untenable. McKay was right in his view that an horizon of fossiliferous beds occurs above the limestone at Wharekuri, and that they are at the Hutchinson Quarry horizon. These beds are the equivalent of the writer's Otiake beds (Hutchinsonian-Awamoan) at Otiake, Otekaike, and Duntroon. As the base of the limestone is not exposed at Wharekuri, Otiake, or Otekaike, McKay was right in not correlating the limestone exposed in these places with the basal part of the Maruwenua limestone, but with a higher part of that rock. The “Pareoran” characteristics of the fauna below the limestone at Wharekuri caused Park (1905, p. 527) to eorrelate

– 155 –
Picture icon

Fig. 1.—Geological map of the Waitaki Valley between Wharekuri and Otiake River North Otago.

– 156 –

the greensands below the limestone in that locality with the Hutchinsonian-Awamoan horizon at Oamaru, instead of correlating the fossiliferous beds above the limestone at Wharekuri with that horizon, as McKay had done (1882B, p. 103). A similar error was made by Hutton in correlating the greensands below the limestone at Waihoa with the Pareora (Awamoan) horizon. Park's correlation lent support to his view that the Ototara limestone and the Waitaki Valley limestone were at different horizons. The latter in a later work (1918, p. 110) still maintained that the Wharekuri greensands are Hutchinsonian in age, but the writer is in agreement with Marshall (1915, p. 386) that the greensands are pre-Ototaran.

The geological evidence clearly shows that the Waitaki Valley is a tectonic depression of post-Awamoan age, as affirmed by Cotton on geomorphological evidence, in opposition to the view of Park (1905, p. 523) that the depression was in existence before the deposition of the Tertiary sediments.

II. General Description of the Area

From the vicinity of the Wharekuri-Otekaike fault, which bounds the present area on the southwest to within half a mile of the Waitaki River, prominent ridges and hills, possibly composed almost entirely of heavy gravels and silts, form prominent features of the landscape between the lower middle course of the Awahokomo Creek and the Kurow River. These gravel uplands are in many places 800 ft. above the Waitaki valley-plain. From the Kurow River to the Otiake River a gravel-covered tableland sloping gently towards the Waitaki River forms a rather strong contrast to the pyramidal hills and ridges just mentioned. Several prominent salients stand above the general surface of this evenly sloping plain, and, where their flanks have been cut into, fossiliferous beds are exposed.

The southwestern portion of the area is bounded by the steeply rising foothills of the Kurow Mountains. Within a short distance of the fault-line the country rises rapidly to a height of 3,000 ft., or over 2,000 ft. above the valley-plain of the Waitaki River. To the northeast the area is flanked by the block mountains of South Canterbury, reaching to heights of 3,000 ft. not far from the Waitaki River, which now flows close to the almost undissected front of these mountains.

The average height of the Waitaki valley-plain is 650 ft. above sea-level. Kurow Hill (1,947 ft.), composed of Maitai sediments (greywacke), rises abruptly from the general level of the plain, and farther to the northwest the hill on which Trig. Station G is situated reaches a height of nearly 1,300 ft., these two prominences being separated by the depression known as the Little Awakino Valley.

The district is thus a relatively depressed area lying between the block mountains of North Otago and South Canterbury, drained by the Waitaki River, which is fed, from the Otago side, by a number of small streams, flowing in a northeasterly direction from the Kurow Mountains.

III. Geology of the Area.

(1.) Wharekuri Basin.

On both banks of the Waitaki River, a mile below the point where the Wharekuri Creek joins the main stream, there is an exposure of glauconitic greensands extending for two miles down the river. A list of fossils collected on the Canterbury side of the river has been published

– 157 –

by Marshall (1915, p. 382). The following forms were collected by the writer and determined by Mr. Suter. Recent species are indicated by an asterisk.

  • Ampullina suturalis (Hutt.)

  • Ancilla papillata (Tate)

  • *Anomia trigonopsis Hutt.

  • Bathytoma sulcata excavata Sut.

  • Borsonia rudis (Hutt.)

  • *Calyptraea maculata (Q. & G.)

  • Chione meridionalis (Sow.)

  • Corbula humerosa Hutt.

  • *Crassatellites obesus (A. Ad.)

  • Cucullaea attenuata Hutt.

  • Dentalium mantelli Zitt.

  • —— solidum Hutt.

  • *Dosinia greyi Zitt.

  • Epitonium lyratum (Zitt.)

  • Glycymeris cordata (?) Hutt.

  • *Limopsis aurita (Brocchi)

  • Limopsis zitteli Iher.

  • *Macrocallista multistriata (Sow.)

  • *Malletia australis (Q. & G.)

  • Miomelon corrugata (Hutt.)

  • *Ostrea tatei Sut.

  • Polinices gibbosus (Hutt.)

  • —— huttoni Iher.

  • *Psammobia lineolata Gray

  • Sinum cinctum (Hutt.)

  • Teredo heaphyi Zitt.

  • Turritella ambulacrum Sow.

  • *—— carlottae Wats.

  • —— concava Hutt.

  • *—— symmetrica Hutt.

  • Venericardia pseutes Sut.

In addition to the above, five new species have been described from the same locality by Mr. Suter. These are—

  • Borsonia mitromorphoides Sut.

  • Epitonium gracillimum Sut.

  • Euthria callimorpha Sut.

  • Niso neozelanica Sut.

  • Vexillum ligatum Sut.

The greensands from which these fossils were collected, are greyish-green in colour and very glauconitic, the glauconite occurring as foraminiferal casts. There is also a considerable quantity of microscopic, subangular, clear quartz. On the Canterbury side of the river these beds form a flat syncline, both limbs showing a dip of 3°, the axis of folding running north by east. Quartz-grits crop out on the bank of the river dipping below the greensands, and farther to the north coal occurs associated with the quartz-grits in a shallow depression on the Canterbury side of the river, this depression being hemmed in by the steep fronts of elevated blocks. On the Otago side of the river the greensands again prove fossiliferous. The following species were collected on the right bank of the river, near Trig. Station H:—

  • Ampullina suturalis (Hutt.)

  • *Ancilla australis (Sow.)

  • —— papillata (Tate.)

  • *Anomia trigonopsis Hutt.

  • Bathytoma sulcata excavata Sut.

  • Chione meridionalis (Sow.)

  • Cominella exsculpta Sut.

  • —— pulchra Sut.

  • *Crassatellites obesus (A. Ad.)

  • Cucullaea attenuata Hutt.

  • —— australis (Hutt.)

  • *Cytherea oblonga (Hanley)

  • Dentalium mantelli Zitt.

  • —— solidum Hutt.

  • Epitonium gracillimum Sut.

  • —— lyratum (Zitt.)

  • *Limopsis aurita (Brocchi)

  • —— zitteli Iher.

  • *Macrocallista multistriata (Sow.)

  • *Malletia australis (Q. & G.)

  • Miomelon corrugata (Hutt.)

  • Nucula sp.

  • Panope orbita Hutt.

  • Pecten chathamensis Hutt.

  • —— huttoni (Park).

  • —— yahliensis T. Woods

  • Polinices gibbosus (Hutt.)

  • —— huttoni Iher.

  • *Psammobia lineolata Gray

  • Sinum elegans Sut.

  • *Siphonalia nodosa (Mart.)

  • Teredo heaphyi Zitt.

  • Turbo approximatus Sut.

  • Turritella ambulacrum Sow.

  • *—— carlottae Wats.

  • —— cavershamensis Harris

  • —— concava Hutt.

– 158 –

Out of the thirty-seven species of Mollusca enumerated above, ten are Recent, giving a percentage of 27.

McKay's collections from the “Kekenodon beds” (Geol.' Surv. loc. No. 476) and from the Wharekuri greensands (Geol. Surv. loc. No. 486) contain in all thirty-one definitely determined species. If McKay's collections and the list given above are combined the percentage is still 27.

Corals are abundant in the greensands at this locality. The genera represented are Flabellum, and Trochocyathus. Aturia ziczac var. australis Hamilton and Kekenodon onomata Hector were also obtained here, by McKay and Hamilton. Pachymagas huttoni Thomson also occurred. These greensands, which are similar to the greensands on the opposite side of the the river, contain in their lower portions small quartz pebbles, well rounded; and occasional pieces of wood up to 18 in. in length, and completely carbonized, also occur. The lower part of the beds is very concretionary, and the fossils are difficult to remove. The oxide of iron which forms the concretionary masses has been derived from the decomposition of the glauconite.

At the Wharekuri Bridge greensands again crop out, but the fossils are not abundant. The following forms were recognized:—

  • Corbula canaliculata Hutt.

  • *Crassatellites obesus (A. Ad.)

  • Cucullaea attenuata Hutt.

  • Dentalium mantelli Zitt.

  • Dentalium solidum Hutt.

  • *Limopsis aurita (Brocchi)

  • Pecten huttoni (Park)

  • Polinices huttoni Iher.

Similar corals to those so abundant in the greensands on the banks of the Waitaki River also occur here.

McKay (1882A, p. 73) always considered that the greensands (Cretaceo-Tertiary) near the Wharekuri bridge lay unconformably below the “Kekenodon greensands” on the banks of the Waitaki River, but he saw no unconformable junction between these two beds. Hutton (1885, pp. 563–64) and Park (1905, p. 523) have shown clearly that McKay's unconformity had no justification, and was merely a deduction in the light of a preconceived theory (Cretaceo-Tertiary theory). The writer is satisfied that the greensands form one series of rocks lying immediately on the quartzose rocks of the coal series. As shown above, the greensands contain pebbles of quartz in their lower portions.

The coal-rocks crop out at Wharekuri a short distance above the bridge, where they are lying in close contact with the greensands. The line of junction is vertical, and is undoubtedly a faulted one, as Hamilton (1904, p. 465) has shown. This vertical fault strikes N. 20° W. The coal-rocks dip 26° to the west—that is, towards the mountains—which a short distance away rise abruptly from the, bed of the creek. McKay considered that the quartzgrits and sandstones associated with the coal in this locality were of Pareora (Awamoan) age, but in other places in the area, as shown above, they dip beneath the greensands, and are, undoubtedly at the base of the series. Beyond the coal-mine on the right bank of the creek the following section is exposed:—

Picture icon

Fig. 2.—Section, right bank of Wharekuri Creek. (a), (c), (e), gravels and sands; (d), fine micaceous sandy bed; (b) and (f), greenish-grey clay.

– 159 –

The beds dip 70° in a direction N. 10° E. Beds (a), (c), and (e) are gravel deposits, composed of pebbles up to the size of a cricket-ball, intermingled with fine sands. The pebbles consists of greywacke, sandstone, and quartz, all well water-worn. Bed (c) contained a piece of lignitized wood. Beds (b) and (f) are light-coloured greenish-grey unctuous clays. Bed (d) is a fine micaceous sandy bed. On the opposite side of Wharekuri Creek, not 20 yards away, a steep face of the Maitai rocks rises abruptly from the bed of the creek. Slickensided surfaces were noted, and much crush-breccia; and extensive faulting is everywhere indicated. The steeply dipping beds just described show no contact with the other Tertiary rocks in the area.

McKay's section (1882B, p. 101) certainly indicates the order in which the various rocks crop out, as the Wharekuri Creek is followed from its junction with the Waitaki River to the point past the coal-mine, where the tilted beds occur, except that the limestone does not occur in the section exposed in the creek. The tilted beds just described were said by McKay to be of Upper Pareora (Awamoan) age, and to contain, the coal deposits that are worked at Wharekuri. He observed no junction of these tilted beds, and the quartz, sandstone, and clays in which the coal-seam occurs are separated from them by slope deposits and heavy river-gravels. The composition of the beds is also quite different from the beds associated with the coal at Wharekuri Coal-mine. Park (1905, p. 524) stated that there was no evidence to show that the coal-rocks lie at the top of the sequence. The tilted beds, however, may lie conformably at the top of the Tertiary series, although this cannot be definitely affirmed, as no junction was observed. They have certainly been involved along with the Tertiaries in the tectonic movements of the district, the evidence for which is seen at many points in the Waitaki Valley. These tilted gravels appear to be widespread in the Upper Waitaki Valley and in the Waihao district, for McKay described another section in the former locality as follows: “In this section [Quail Burn] the lowest beds seen are soft sandstones, divided into thick bands by beds of greenish greasy clay. These beds dip northwest at an angle of 45°…. At two or three places along the southeast slopes of these hills pieces of lignite have been found and … having, as I consider, proved that the Wharekuri coal-seam farther down the Waitaki occurs in beds of this age, there is more than a possibility of coal being found near the mouth of the Quail Burn.” No other geologist would, agree with McKay in the inference drawn in the last part of this quotation, but the description of these gravel-beds indicates that they are similar to the tilted beds at Wharekuri.

In the Waihao district the gravels are also often tilted, and Hector refers to these in the following words: “With the Waitaki Valley as it now is these beds have no direct connection, since they abundantly show that movements of the lands involving a considerable, alteration of its surface configuration have taken place since their deposition; the beds being frequently tilted at high angles, especially in districts distant from the coastline” (1882, p. xxv), These tilted gravels in the Wharekuri locality are overlain unconformably by the high-level terrace - gravels (McKay 1882B, p. 102).

(2.) Awahokomo Basin

McKay (1882A, p. 66) states that the Otekaike limestone at Wharekuri “is traceable as a continuous line for three miles.” The exposure, however, has nothing like the extent ascribed to it by McKay; it crops out

– 160 –

on the foothills flanking the Awahokomo Creek on its northern bank. In its upper portion, which is almost inaccessible, as the cliffs are precipitous, two shell-bands were noticed, and, judging by talus strewing the slopes at the base of the cliff, they are glauconitic. The writer examined the limestone, and its main body appeared to be poorly fossiliferous. McKay (1882A, p. 67) states that in the limestone “fossil shells are most abundant… covering the whole ground with shells in a more or less perfect state of preservation.” As he comments on the fact that the limestone forms vertical, cliffs not less than 50 ft. in height, it is possible that the fossils were collected from the slopes and had come from the shell-bands higher in the section.

Suter determined seven forms said by McKay to have come from the Otekaike limestone, and five of these occur in the Otiake beds at Otiake, which lie above the main body of limestone, while the two remaining fossils are found in the Awamoan. McKay recognized the Hutchinson Quarry beds at Wharekuri, and he described them as “loose dirty greensands full of shells, followed by grey sands, and they follow the Otekaike limestone conformably.” In the list of fossils determined by Suter from these beds, ten occur in the Otiake beds at Otaike, three occur in the Awamoan at Oamaru, and one has not been reported elsewhere. The following note was appended to the manuscript list of fossils, evidently written by one of the staff of the Geological Survey: “According to McKay's MS., the beds collected from form the higher part of the ridge south of the coal-mine at Wharekuri.” This means that the collection came from beds lying immediately above the limestone, and these beds are undoubtedly at the same horizon as the fossiliferous beds that occur at the top of the section at Otiake, at Otekaike, and in bands at the top of the limestone near the Awahokomo Creek. Although only fourteen species were determined by Suter, Hector stated that “altogether, about a hundred species were collected from this horizon in the Wharekuri section” (1882, p. xxvii).

McKay himself reported the following forms (nom. mut.):–

  • Cucullaea alta (?) Sow.

  • Dentalium solidum Hutt.

  • Limopsis zitteli Iher.

  • Pecten hochstetteri Zitt.

  • Polinices huttoni Iher.

  • *Venericardia difficilis (Desh.)

  • Waldheimia triangulare Hutt.

The brachiopod is evidently, Pachymagas huttoni Thomson, and is said by McKay to be very abundant, as it always is at the horizon of the Otiake beds. At one locality on the ridge extending from Wharekuri to the Awahokomo the writer found an outcrop of ferruginous micaceous quartz sands at a higher elevation than the limestone. McKay writes that “in this locality the Otekaike limestone passes upwards into the Hutchinson Quarry greensands, which are here overlain by rusty quartzose gravels … not unlike the rocks met with at the base of the Cretaceo-Tertiary series … these quartzose gravels are followed by sandstones.” The beds observed by the writer appear to be conformable to the limestone, as the dip was the same, but no junction was seen. It is in these beds that McKay thought the Wharekuri coal occurred, and he correlates them with the tilted beds there. The limestone of the ridge on the left bank of the Awahokomo dips 10° in a direction N. 30° W. towards the Kurow Mountains.

The quartzgrits and sandstones at the base of the series crop out on both banks of the Awahokomo south of the limestone exposure, and farther up the stream the greensands are seen dipping 30° westerly towards

– 161 –

the Maitai rocks, which, at this point rise very steeply. From the green sands the following forms were obtained:—

  • Corbula canaliculata Hutt.

  • Cucullaea sp.

  • *Limopsis aurita (Brocchi)

  • Panope orbita Hutt.

  • Polinices gibbosus (Hutt.)

  • Ostrea sp.

  • Turritella cavershamensis Harris

Corals similar to the genera collected on the south, bank of the Waitaki River also occur here

Marshall (1915, p. 381) obtained several species from these greensands at an horizon lying 20.ft. above the quartzgrits. This writer recognized the fault in this locality, and traced the fault-breccia towards Wharekuri, and there can be no doubt that this fault is a continuation of that described above at Wharekuri.

(3.) Awakino Basin.

Traces of the quartzgrits are seen in many places in the basins of the Awahokomo and Little Awakino Streams. In the basin of the latter, about a mile and a half from the main road, these rocks are exposed on the right and left banks, and to the southwest the eroded surface of the Maitai rocks rises from beneath them, and slopes gently upwards towards the crest of Kurow Hill. The quartzgrits evidently formerly covered the whole of this “fossil plain,” which has now been partially stripped of its former cover. The plain forms the back slope of the tilted block figured by Cotton (1917B, p. 432). This block will be referred to later as the Awakino tilted block. Quartzgrits and greensands occur as mapped in several places in a southwesterly direction towards the Big Awakino River, and in many places close to the line of the Wharekuri-Otekaike fault, where the Maitai rocks rise very abruptly. A mile west of the trigonometrical station on Kurow Hill there is a small coal-mine, which supplies an inferior type of coal. It is being worked at present close up to the face of a steeply rising greywacke scarp. The coal-rocks dip away from the scarp at 45° in a direction S. 28° W. The scarp, which is almost undissected in this locality, extends in a northwesterly direction, gradually diminishing in height, and reaching the road-level about half a mile northwest of the point where the west branch of the Little Awakino crosses the road on the southwest side of Kurow Hill. The scarp is evidently a fault-scarp, determined by a fault of diminishing throw, which trends N. 60° W. to meet the main Wharekuri-Otekaike fault. The fault bounds the Awakino tilted block on the southwest. In the angle defined by these two faults the gravel deposits are of great thickness, but the basal quartzgrits and overlying greensands (McKay, 1882B, p. 102) crop out occasionally. The Tertiary rocks have evidently been extensively eroded, and their remnants are buried by the gravel deposits, which now form hills 2,000 ft. in height (loc. cit., p. 99). Cuttings show that the gravels are of at least two types—heavy greywacke and sandstone boulder deposits, and deposits composed of well-rounded sandstone pebbles and sands. At one place on the road between the basin of the Little Awakino and the Big-Awakino the soft unctuous bluish clay similar to that described at Wharekuri was observed in a cutting. McKay states that the latter (the so-called “Pareora gravels”) are highly tilted in the present locality, and he refers the coal deposits of the neighbourhood to the horizon of these rocks (1882B, p. 102). The gravels extend to the Kurow River, forming even-topped elongated ridges and pyramidal hills, which have been blocked out by the action of the numerous intermittent streams that drain the area. Across

– 162 –

this gravel-mass the Big Awakino flows, entrenched below the general surface of its former valley-plain, which in this portion of its course, over the area lying between the two faults referred to above, is about a quarter of a mile wide. At the coal-mine the stream enters a narrow gorge, which it has cut through the Awakino tilted block on its way to join the Waitaki River. The Big Awakino pursues a remarkably straight course from its source, near the crest-line of the Kurow Mountains, to its mouth, and this course is evidently consequent on the initial deformation; but, as the movements were probably not simultaneous over the whole of northern Otago, the uplift of the Awakino block may have commenced later. The course of the Big Awakino across the Awakino block in a narrow gorge-like channel must be considered as antecedent to the uplift of this block. Its lower course is therefore what Cotton (1917A, p. 253) has termed “anteconsequent.”

(4.) Kurow River to Otiake River.

On the left bank of the Kurow River, four miles above its junction with the Waitaki River, an outcrop of fossiliferous Tertiary rocks occurs. There is only a small exposure, extending along the bank for about 30 yards. The rocks dip at an angle of 46° towards the south-west, and the Maitai rocks rise steeply a short distance from these beds, The junction is again obscured by the gravel deposits, but it is undoubtedly a faulted one. The Tertiary exposure here consists of a hardened calcareous greensand containing Foraminifera, mainly in the form of glauconitic casts. Minute subangular grains of quartz also occur. The larger fossils are poorly preserved, and specific identifications could not be made. The following genera were found: Cucullaea, Malletia, Panope, Pecten. This outcrop is on the line of the Wharekuri-Otekaike fault.

The outcrops of Tertiary rocks are few and scattered between the Kurow River and the Otiake River. About three-quarters of a mile to the south-east of the last locality quartz-grits occur in places, and farther on there is a small exposure of a glauconitic calcareous rock. The only forms obtained were Dentalium solidum Hutt. and Limopsis aurita (Brocchi). Near the source of the most southerly tributary of Malcolm's Creek the quartz-grits again crop out, flanked to the south-west by the steeply rising foothills of the ranges. Traces of greyish-green glauconitic sandstones were found near Trig. Station N. In a cutting on the road that leads from Malcolm's Creek to the basin of the Otiake River there is a small outcrop of calcareous rock, from which the following fossils were obtained:—

  • Corbula canaliculata Hutt.

  • Cytherea chariessa Sut.

  • Dentalium solidum Hutt.

  • *Limopsis aurita (Brocchi)

  • *Malletia australis (Q. & G.)

  • Nucula saggitata Sut.

  • Panope sp.

  • Pecten huttoni (Park)

Traces of brachiopods were also found.

A mile from the railway-line the following section (fig. 3) is exposed on the right bank of the Otiake River:—

Picture icon

Fig. 3.—Section, right bank of Otiake River. (a), Limestone (Otekaike limestone); (b), glauconitic calcareous shell-bed; (c), calcareous sandy mudstone; (d), hardened calcareous glauconitic bed; (e), calcareous sandy mudstone.

– 163 –

The limestone (a) becomes glauconitic in its upper 8 ft., and is then capped by (b), a glauconitic calcareous shell-bed 18 in. in thickness and crowded with fossils. The band is concretionary in places, and similar to the beds at the top of the Otiake beds at Trig. Station Z, which is only a short distance from this exposure. From this band the following species were obtained:—

  • Ancilla papillata (Tate)

  • Bathytoma sulcata excavata Sut.

  • Corbula canaliculata Hutt.

  • —— Kaiparaensis Sut.

  • *Crassatellites obesus (A. Ad.)

  • Cucullaea australis (Hutt.)

  • Cytherea chariessa Sut.

  • Dentalium mantelli Zitt.

  • —— solidum Hutt.

  • *Divaricella cumingi (Ad. & Ang.)

  • Lima colorata Hutt.

  • Nucula saggitata Sut.

  • Pecten beethami Hutt.

  • —— chathamensis Hutt.

  • —— huttoni (Park)

  • Placunanomia incisura Hutt.

  • Polinices huttoni Iher.

  • Siphonalia turrita Sut.

  • *Tellina glabrella Desh.

  • Teredo heaphyi Zitt.

  • Turritella ambulacrum Sow.

  • —— cavershamensis Harris

  • —— semiconcava Sut.

  • Venericardia pseutes Sut.

The coral Balanophyllia hectori T. Woods and Pachymagas huttoni Thomson were also identified. The overlying bed (c) is less glauconitic, but is capped by another glauconitic hardened bed (d), and above this the rock, passes up into a poorly fossiliferous calcareous mudstone (e). From bed (c) were obtained many of the forms detailed above from bed (b). The following additional species occurred:—

  • Corbula humerosa Hutt.

  • Cucullaea attenuata Hutt.

  • Leucosyrinx alta (Harris)

  • *Limopsis aurita (Brocchi).

River-gravels and silts lie unconformably at the top of the section.

These fossiliferous beds lie above a limestone, of which about 40 ft. is exposed, and are certainly the equivalent of the Otiake beds at Trig Station Z and at Otekaike School. The beds dip 8° in a direction N. 30° W. Greensands crop out on the right bank of the stream about 12 chains farther up the river, dipping in such a way that they would pass beneath the limestone. They are similar to the greensands described, at Wharekuri, containing in places ferruginous nodules. Traces of lamellibranchs were seen, but, none could be identified. The rock is calcareous, and the glauconite in it occurs as foraminiferal casts. Still farther up the stream, at the point where the road crosses the river, intensely dark greensands crop out. These greensands are threaded with ferruginous veins. Farther up the stream the quartzgrits occur dipping towards the higher beds.

IV. General Succession and Palaeontological Notes.

The Tertiary rocks in the Waitaki Valley form a conformable sequence. The general succession is similar to that in the Waihao district of South Canterbury. Quartzgrits, often containing coal, are followed by micaceous quartzose, greensands with interbedded concretionary bands, usually fossiliferous; these are followed by calcareous glauconitic greensands (containing a little microscopic quartz and mica), which are often fossiliferous. In the basin of the Maruwenua River and at Black Point a few fossils have been determined, and these undoubtedly represent an horizon near the base of the greensands—Park's Bortonian. The looser glauconitic greensands lying above the Bortonian have not proved fossiliferous in the

– 164 –

Duntroon or Kurow districts, except at Wharekuri, where the fossils are abundant. No junction has been observed between the greensands and the underlying Ngaparan coal-rocks except at Black Point. There appears to be a very gradual transition from the quartz conglomerates and fine micaceous quartz sands into the overlying greensands, the glauconite of the latter becoming very abundant, and the quartz and mica gradually diminishing. In the Maruwenua cliffs near Duntroon the limestone overlying the greensands is very glauconitic, and at White Rocks and the “Earthquake” this glauconitic lower portion of the limestone increases greatly in thickness. In the Landon Creek area also this glauconitic portion of the limestone shows a thickness of 50 ft. below the Hutchinsonian horizon (refer to Park, 1918, p. 46). It is noticeable that where the limestone is very glauconitic the brachiopods are abundant. From the glauconitic portion of the limestone near Duntroon, as well as from a higher horizon in the limestone at White Rocks and the “Earthquake” in the Waitaki Valley, a brachiopod fauna similar to that occurring in the glauconitic portions of the limestone at Landon Creek, in the Oamaru district, has been found; and the evidence available strongly favours the view that both rocks are Ototaran. There is no evidence to show that the limestone of the Waitaki Valley is Hutchinsonian. The base of the Otekaike limestone at Wharekuri, Otiake, and Otekaike is not seen in any of the sections exposed. It is probable that if the base of the limestone were not hidden by the gravel deposits we should find the same brachiopod fauna that characterizes the base of the limestone at Maruwenua. The fossiliferous beds overlying the limestone at Wharekuri, at Otiake, at Otekaike, at Duntroon, and at Station Peak are at the same horizon, and represent the Hutchinsonian-Awamoan horizon of the Oamaru district. These rocks pass up into poorly fossiliferous calcareous mudstones.

In the Oamaru district the Ngaparan rocks are overlain by fossiliferous glauconitic calcareous greensands, which in turn are overlain by the Waiarekan tuffs, followed by interbedded tachylite tuffs and diatomaceous deposits, which are overlain by the Ototaran limestone, followed by the Hutchinsonian and Awamoan beds. In the Papakaio district the succession is similar, although the Awamoan beds have been denuded, except at Pukeuri, where all observers agree that they follow the Hutchinsonian. In the Waitaki Valley the succession is not complicated by the presence of volcanic rocks, nor are there diatomaceous beds; but all the evidence available goes to prove that the greensands below the limestone are of Waiarekan age, and that the limestone is Ototaran. The beds above the limestone contain a distinctly Awamoan fauna, and, as both Hutton and McKay believed that the Hutchinsonian and Awamoan were part and parcel of the same series (and the evidence of the molluscan fauna in the Oamaru district supports this view), these fossiliferous beds (Otiake beds) have been classed as Hutchinsonian-Awamoan. In the Oamaru district, however, the occurrence of a brachiopod fauna fully justifies the separation of the post-Ototaran rocks into two stages.

The greensands between the Ngaparan coal-rocks and the limestone in North Otago and South Canterbury will probably admit of subdivision in the future. The fossils have hitherto been “lumped,” but, judging from McKay's report on the Waihao district, several lithological divisions can be recognized; and, as the rocks are very fossiliferous, careful collecting and accurate determinations of fossils from each horizon would probably enable a subdivision of the Waiarekan to be made, as has been

– 165 –

done by Park in his latest work (1918, p. 26). Many of the species contained in these lower greensands occur also in the Awamoan, but the latter horizon contains a much greater variety of species, and a large number of these appear to be restricted to this horizon. In the Oamaru district the brachiopods have proved serviceable in differentiating several horizons, but some of these brachiopods are apparently restricted to this area, and detailed correlation with beds in the Waitaki Valley is not yet possible. This brachiopod fauna has been discussed in another paper in this volume (pp. 15253). Corals, Echinoderms, and Foraminifera occur abundantly in the Oamaruian of North Otago, but our knowledge of them is very incomplete, and useless for detailed stratigraphical work. A revision of all these groups is urgently needed.

Of the ninety-four species of Mollusca determined from the beds above the limestone in the Waitaki Valley (Otiake beds), seventy-three species occur in the typical Awamoan at Oamaru, four occur in the Hutchinsonian (of Thomson), twelve forms have apparently not been recorded elsewhere in North Otago, whilst only five species have not been previously recorded from post-Ototaran beds. Five of these not recorded elsewhere are new species, seventy-nine species have now been listed from the greensands below the limestone in the Waitaki Valley, and fifty-six of these occur in the Awamoan beds at Oamaru. Nearly three hundred species have been recorded from the Awamoan beds at Oamaru; but in the case of the beds of the Waitaki Valley the collections are few, and previously unrecorded species are continually turning up. The figures quoted above, in the absence of fairly exhaustive collections, do not give much ground for definite conclusions, but they do show that the Otiake beds contain a molluscan fauna of which 78 per cent. occurs in the typical Awamoan, beds of Oamaru. The fauna of the greensands below the limestone contains 70 per cent, of the fossils recorded from the Awamoan at Oamaru, showing that in the Waitaki Valley the fauna above and below the limestone has a strong resemblance to the typical Awamoan fauna (Hutton's Pareora).

V. Physiography of the Area.

(1.). Kurow Block.

From what has already been said it will be evident that Cotton's statement (1917A, p. 285) that the Waitaki River “follows a complex graben along the northern block-complex … which forms the northern highland of Otago” is amply justified by the geological evidence. This graben, is bounded on the southwest by the elevated block called the Kurow-Mount Mary Range (Kurow-block); on the northeast it is flanked by the block mountains of South Canterbury; on the southeast by a portion of the Kakanui block (loc. cit., p. 272). Towards the northwest the fault on the Canterbury side of the river and the Wharekuri-Otekaike fault approach each other, and probably coalesce farther up the Waitaki Valley; but this area lies beyond the scope of the present paper.

The Kurow-Mount Mary Range is an elevated, tilted block of probably complex structure; it is elongated in a northwesterly direction. It is bounded towards the west by a conspicuous fault-scarp (loc. cit., p. 278), and its rather steeply dipping back slope descends towards the Waitaki River, and is then intersected by the Wharekuri-Otekaike fault. A line of dislocation runs from the Otekaike River to Dansey's Pass to meet the great reentrant occupied by part of the Maniototo depression (loc. cit.,

– 166 –

p. 278). It has been shown in a former paper that a well-marked fault occurs on the right bank of the Otekaike River, and it probably extends in a south-westerly direction for some distance. The district maps show a marked depression beyond Ben Lomond, and it is probable that sharp folding or faulting has taken place on the same line. The back slope of the Kurow block is not simple, and signs of warping are not wanting, the general slope, however, is north-westerly, and the majority of the streams are consequent. As already pointed out, the Big Awakino in the lower part of its course is anteconsequent.

(2.) Awakino and Trig. G Blocks.

Kurow Hill is a tilted block, as shown by Cotton (1917b, p. 432), and, as the Big Awakino and the Little Awakino flow across it, it has been called the Awakino block. The geological evidence for the boundary faults has been already presented. It has been shown that the coal-rocks crop out on the south-west side of the block, near the base of a steep fault-scarp almost entirely undissected, and traceable for a distance of four miles. This north-westerly-trending fault meets the main Wharekuri-Otekaike fault in the basin of the Little Awakino Creek, where the scarp dies out and the stripped surface of the Awakino block is seen to dip below the Tertiary rocks. In the basin of the Little Awakino, about a mile from the main road, quartz-grits are exposed on both sides of the creek, “concealing the erosion-surface of the Awakino block, which has been stripped of its covering strata towards the south-east in the higher parts of Kurow Hill. These grits on the left bank of the creek crop out near the base of a prominent scarp which rises 200 ft. or 300 ft. above the quartz-grits, the attitude of the rocks clearly indicating faulting. From the top of the scarp the surface slopes towards the north, and the quartz-grits crop out in several places, but the surface has been almost completely stripped. The back slope of this small tilted block, on which the Trig. Station G is situated, descends towards the Waitaki River, where the Tertiary rocks are exposed on both banks. The fault-scarp of this block diminishes in height as the Little Awakino Creek is ascended, and the fault dies out towards the west, the erosion-surfaces of the/Awakino block and this small one evidently coalescing, and dipping beneath the Tertiary rocks in the Awahokomo basin. These two blocks are flanked on the east by the Waitaki River, which in this part of its course flows close to the steep scarp of the more elevated Canterbury mountains. The valley-plain of the Waitaki River from near Trig. Station G to Kurow is narrow and rock-bound, and the stream is now flowing close to the main fault-line on the southern side of these mountains.

VI. The Gravels (excluding Recent Deposits).

The terraces and gravels of the Waitaki Valley are well worthy of a detailed study, but good topographical maps are a prime necessity. Some remarks, however, should be made on the gravel deposits. McKay clearly recognized that the gravels were not all of the same origin. His descriptions are somewhat difficult to follow. He distinguishes three types of these deposits—(1) angular gravels, (2) well-rounded coarse gravels, (3) gravels and sands with lignite deposits. He notes that (1) and (2) contain fossiliferous Triassic and Permian boulders, and that (3) are often highly tilted. These three types can undoubtedly be recognized, but it will be

– 167 –

a difficult matter to trace their boundaries, and this has not been attempted in the present paper. The angular gravels are ascribed by McKay to the action of glaciers—that is, they are glacier-deposits that owe their origin to former glaciers from the neighbouring Kurow and Hakataramea Mountains. Not having discovered these Triassic and Permian fossiliferous rocks in the Kurow Mountains, McKay concluded that glaciers brought them from the Canterbury mountains which were known to contain these older fossiliferous rocks. There is, however, a total absence of the characteristics of glacial deposits, glacial striations being quite lacking. It is true that large masses of rock and fine silts and clays are mixed confusedly together in the deposits near Wharekuri. Marshall explained these angular deposits differently, and (1915, p. 381) stated that the Maitai rocks in the neighbourhood of the fault (Wharekuri-Otekaike fault) have been much shattered; that weathering has developed their shattered nature, and they break down into “a clayey material which still contains angular fragments of rock.” Park (1904, p. 448) traced the fossiliferous boulders to their source near the summit of Mount Mary. The rocks were found in situ at a height of 5,160 ft., at a point distant about three miles and a half from the Wharekuri-Otekaike fault-line. These deposits which occur close to this line were probably derived from the dissection of the fault-scarp as it rose, for deep aggradation would take place as the deformation proceeded. The sloping surface of the tilted block, to the west of the fault-line, would also undergo degradation by the numerous consequent streams, and the waste would be spread out on the floor of the depression, forming an alluvial gravel-plain. This plain appears to have been built up after the reduction of the valley lowland to somewhat low relief. The extensive aggradation would therefore imply a great increase in the supply of waste due to the increasing differential elevation. As the streams that deposited these gravels are now well entrenched, regional uplift has probably been the most recent movement. McKay believed that the tilted sandstone gravels at Wharekuri lay conformably above the higher fossiliferous beds. They may do so, but the writer was unable to satisfy himself on that point. There is no doubt, however, that they have been involved in the differential movements, and may possibly represent the period of emergence of the land.

VII. Summary and Conclusion.

(1.) The Maruwenua limestone is overlain directly by the Otiake beds (Hutchinsonian-Awamoan).

(2.) McKay's unconformity between the lower and upper parts of the limestone is non-existent, and all other observers agree that the rock is a unit.

(3.) McKay correlated the base of the limestone with the Ototaran limestone; the upper part (his Otekaike limestone) must, therefore be Upper Ototaran, -and the overlying beds (McKay's Hutchinson's Quarry beds) are the equivalent of the Hutchinsonian-Awamoan of the coastal district.

(4.) The upper part of the limestone at Landon Creek contains a number of brachiopods that are similar to the brachiopods from the lower portions of the Maruwenua limestone (so-called Waitaki stone). Some of these brachiopods do not rise above the Ototaran of the typical Oamaru district. The evidence points to the limestone of the Waitaki Valley being Ototaran.

– 168 –

(5.) The greensands at Wharekuri probably represent a slightly higher horizon than the Bortonian of Park, and from the evidence at present available they are probably the equivalents of the Waiarekan tuffs, yet the latter are practically unfossiliferous.

(6.) Volcanic rocks, as shown in a previous paper (Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. 50, pp. 106–17, 1918), occur in the Maruwenua district: they may be either lava-flows or sills—the evidence in the small exposure observed was neutral. These volcanic rocks, however, extend towards Tokarahi, and are interbedded with the greensands. If they are Waiarekan it would fix the age of the greensands overlying Park's Bortonian.

(7.) The Tertiary rocks of the Waitaki Valley above Duntroon occupy a tectonic depression. McKay has recorded Tertiary rocks from the Hakataramea Valley, which is also undoubtedly a tectonic depression. As post-Awamoan gravels have been involved in the differential movements in many localities in the Waitaki and Waihao Valleys, these “fiord-like depressions” manifestly did not exist in Tertiary or pre-Tertiary times, and the evidence to be gathered in north-east Otago points to the conclusion that the Tertiary rocks once formed a continuous cover on the denuded surface of the pre-Notocene oldermass. The mountain-building period of central and north-east Otago was post-Awamoan.

Bibliography.

Cotton, C. A., 1917a. Block Mountains in New Zealand, Am. Journ. Sci., vol. 44, pp. 249–93.

—— 1917b. The Fossil Plains of North Otago, Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. 49, pp. 429–32.

Hamilton, A., 1904. Notes on a Small Collection of Fossils from Wharekuri, Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. 36, pp. 465–67.

Hector, J., 1882. Waitaki Valley and Alps of North Otago, N.Z. Geol. Surv. Prog. Rep., 1881, pp. xxi-xxxii.

Hutton, F. W., 1885 On the Correlations of the “Curiosity Shop Bed” in Canterbury, N.Z., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 41, pp. 547–64.

McKay, A., 1882a. On the Waitaki Valley and Parts of Vincent and Lake Counties, Rep. Geol. Explor. during 1881, pp. 56–92.

—— 1882b. On the Younger Deposits of the Wharekuri Basin and the Lower Waitaki Valley, Rep. Geol. Explor. during 1881, pp. 98–105.

Marshall, P., 1915. Cainozoic Fossils from Oamaru, Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. 47, pp. 377–87.

Park, J., 1904. On the Discovery of Permo-Carboniferous Rocks at Mount Mary, North Otago, Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. 36, pp. 447–53.

—— 1905. On the Marine Tertiaries of Otago and South Canterbury, Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. 37, pp. 489–551.

—— 1918. The Geology of the Oamaru District, North Otago, N.Z. Geol. Surv. Bull. No. 20 (n.s.), pp. 1–124.

Thomson, J. A., 1915. Classification and Correlation of the Tertiary Rocks, 8th Ann. Rep. N.Z. Geol. Surv., pp. 123–24.