
Paraleptamphopus subterraneus (Chilton).
Paraleptamphopus subterraneus Stebbing, 1906, p. 294; Chilton, 1909B, p. 54 (with synonyms).
This species is very widely distributed in New Zealand. It was first obtained in wells at Eyreton not far from the River Waimakariri; it has since been found in wells in Christchurch, Lincoln, Leeston, Ashburton, and Winchester. Later on I collected it in surface streams issuing from river-terraces near the River Porter, a tributary of the Waimakariri, and it is common in streams and ditches near Drummond and Otautau, Southland, where it is found associated with P. caeruleus, as already mentioned. Messrs. Lucas and Hodgkin took it in Lake Wakatipu, and in 1908 I found it in a small stream at Duck Cove, Doubtful Sound, in places where the stream was almost covered and shut out from the light by the overhanging rocks and trees. In the North Island it was taken by Lucas and Hodgkin in Lake Taupo at a depth of 700 ft., and in 1911 Mr. W. F. Howlett sent me numerous specimens from a well at Eketahuna. All these specimens are pale and colourless, with eyes imperfect or completely absent, and, though they show considerable differences in the exact shape of the telson, the third uropoda, and the gnathopoda, there is no difficulty in considering them as all belonging to the same species.
In 1914, however, Mr. T. Hall sent me specimens which he had collected at “Clippings,” on the range of mountains known as the Remarkables, near Lake Wakatipu, and from Mount Dick, in the same neighbourhood, the animals in the latter case being found at a height of 3,000 ft. above sea-level. These specimens were rather stouter in body than the forms obtained from wells, the third uropods were shorter and similar to those of P. caeruleus, and they showed the dark-blue colour characteristic of the latter species, though it was not quite so intense, and some of the specimens were much lighter than others; the telson, too, proved to differ distinctly from that of the type. At first I was inclined to consider them as a new species, but a careful comparison of the forms of P. subterraneus from the different localities mentioned has shown that numerous transitional forms exist as regards the individual characters, and that if a new name were given to the forms from “Clippings” and Mount Dick several new names would have to be established for the others. Though largely intermediate between the two species, the “Clippings” and Mount Dick specimens approach more nearly to P. subterraneus in the telson, and I therefore look upon them as a variety of that species.
The structure of P. subterraneus was somewhat fully dealt with by me in 1894 so far as the underground forms were concerned. It will only be necessary to mention now a few of the points in which differences occur in specimens from other localities. In all specimens the gnathopoda are of similar shape, the first stouter than the second; in the Eyreton specimens the palm of the first is minutely crenulate, but it is even in these from surface waters in Southland. The appearance of the third uropod varies when seen from the side or from above. Fig. 4 shows those of a specimen from Eketahuna, fig. urp3 being one of the pair seen from above, fig. urp3* the other from the side; the branches are not much longer than the base, on the latter there is usually a small tuft of setules at the upper distal angle, and two or three separately placed on each upper margin. In specimens from Southland streams the tuft at the distal

angle may be larger, and there is sometimes a smaller but distinct tuft about the middle of the upper outer margin (see fig. 6). The telson is a flat oblong plate with lateral margins nearly straight, posterior corners narrowly rounded, and each usually bearing a single small setule, the posterior margin slightly concave. All these characters, and especially the last, are subject to modification even in individuals from the same locality; thus one from wells at Ashburton has the posterior margin much more deeply concave, and one corner without a setule (fig. 7).
Fig. 4.—Paraleptamphopus subterraneus: female specimen from Eketahuna (in wells). urp3, third uropod, from above; urp3*, the same, side view; t, telson.
Fig. 5.—Paraleptamphopus subterraneus: female specimen, from surface stream, Castle Hill, urp3, third uropod; t, telson.
In the “Clippings” and Mount Dick specimens the telson differs markedly from the more typical forms. The lateral margins are distinctly convex, the telson itself shorter and broader, the posterior margin deeply concave, and there are three or four setules at each corner and two or three more anteriorly placed on the lateral margin (see figs. 8 and 9).
In 1894 I described from the Eyreton wells a form larger than the usual one, and differing very considerably in having the antennae stouter and plentifully supplied with calceoli, and the gnathopoda very large and

differently formed. The ordinary form is undoubtedly a female, being often found with eggs or young in the brood-pouch, and I looked upon the form with the large peculiar gnathopoda as the male. It differs so much, however, that it is not surprising that Stebbing says (1906, p. 295),
Fig. 6.—Paraleptamphopus subterraneus: female specimen, from surface stream, Drummond. urp1, first uropod; urp2, second uropod; urp3, third uropod; t, telson.
Fig. 7.—Paraleptamphopus subterraneus: specimen from a well at Ashburton. urp3, third uropod; t, telson.
“The supposed male is uncertain in respect to sex and to identity with the species.” Unfortunately I have seen very few specimens of the supposed male, and have now records of four only. One was dissected for use in drawing up the description I gave in 1894 and I have now

only its gnathopoda; another specimen was similar in size and structure, and I have all its appendages mounted as micro-slides; a third specimen which appears quite the same is in my collection, undissected; and the fourth, which was rather smaller, I have recently dissected and mounted in the hope that it would perhaps show intermediate characters in the
Fig. 8.—Paraleptamphopus subterraneus: specimen from surface stream, “Clippings,” The Remarkables. urp3, third uropod; t, telson.
Fig. 9.—Paraleptamphopus subterraneus: female specimen from Mount Dick. urp1, first uropod; urp2, second uropod; urp3, third uropod; t, telson.
gnathopods between those of the female and the fully developed male. Unfortunately this was not the case, for its gnathopoda, though smaller and less bountifully supplied with spinules (fig. 3, gn1 and gn2), are essentially the same as those figured in 1894.
I still feel convinced that the specimens in question are really males of P. subterraneus, for they are closely similar in all the characters except

those that may be looked upon as secondary male characters; none of them bears eggs, and it seems unlikely that there should be two species living in the underground waters drawn upon by the one well, that many dozens of specimens of one species, all females, have been obtained, but of the other only less than half a dozen and these all males. It must be mentioned, however, that among the numerous specimens of P. subterraneus examined from other localities I have seen no similar males; it is, of course, possible that some may have been overlooked, for the gnathopoda are more or less concealed by the deep side-plates.
I give figures of the telson and uropoda of P. subterraneus from different localities. It will be seen that there is considerable variation, just as there is in the subterranean forms of Niphargus in Europe, and that in consequence there is room for much difference of opinion as to the number of “species” into which they should be divided. In New Zealand the subterranean species is also found in surface waters, most of these specimens being still colourless and apparently blind; though some—viz., those from “Clippings” and Mount Dick—are found at great heights above sea-level, and in colour and other characters show distinct transitions leading to the true surface form, P. caeruleus, from which the subterranean forms may be presumed to have been descended.
References.
Barnard, K. H., 1916. Contributions to the Crustacean Fauna of South Africa: 5, Amphipoda, Ann. S. African Mus., vol. 15, pp. 195–301, pl. 26–28.
Chevreux, E., 1908. Mém. Soc. Zool. de France, 20, pp. 470–527.
—— 1913. Bull. Institut Oceanographique, No. 262.
Chilton, C., 1883. Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. 15, pp. 69–86.
—— 1885. Proc. Linn. Soc. N S.W., vol. 9, pp. 1035–44.
—— 1892. Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. 24, pp. 258–69.
—— 1906. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 17, pp. 569–73.
—— 1909A. Subant. Is. of N.Z., Crustacea, pp. 601–71.
—— 1909B. Trans. N.Z. Inst., vol. 41, pp. 53–58.
—— 1921. Results Fish. Exper. F.I.S. “Endeavour,” Amphipoda, vol. v, pp. 31–92.
—— 1923. Records Australian Museum, vol. 14, pp. 79–100.
Dana, J. D., 1853–55. U.S. Expl. Exped., vol. 13, Crustacea.
Della Valle, A., 1893. Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapoli, Monogr. 20, Gammarini.
Haswell, W. A., 1880. Proc. Linn. Soc., N.S.W., vol. 4, pp. 319–50.
Kunkel, B. W., 1910. Trans. Connecticut Acad. Arts and Sci., vol. 16, pp. 1–116.
Stebbing, T. R. R., 1888. Report “Challenger,” Amphipoda.
—— 1906. Das Tierreich, Amphipoda.
—— 1910. Crustacea, “Thetis” Exped., Austral. Mus. Mem. 4, pp. 567–658.
Walker, A. O., 1904. Pearl Oyster Fisheries, Supplementary Report, 17, Amphipoda.
—— 1910. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 38, pp. 621–22.
