Go to National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa
Volume 64, 1935
– 235 –

External and Internal Anatomy Last Nymphal Instar.

The Last Nymphal Instar (Pl. 38, Fig. 25) resembles the nymph in every respect, except that its average length is about 3.3 cm. and that external wing-buds are present. Its internal anatomy reveals similar organs. The gonads, however, are mature, but will be dealt with under the imago.

The Respiratory System.

The respiratory system very closely resembles that of the nymph, but differs in two respects. The first of these is that the longitudinal trunk in the prothorax soon after the junction of the dorsal and ventral head trunks, gives off a short spiracular branch laterally to the first thoracic spiracle, which is simple, has a small atrium, and is closed. It is situated on the intersegmental region between proand mesothorax. Posteriorly in a similar position between mesoand metathorax, the trunk gives off another spiracular branch to the second thoracic spiracle, which is associated with the posterior trunk to the meta-thoracic leg. At this stage no abdominal spiracles are visible nor are any branches to be seen coming off the main longitudinal trunk; stigmatic cords, however, are traceable between the latter and the sides of the body, but only in freshly killed insects.

The second difference is the presence of wing-pads, which, at this stage, have reached their maximum development as such. These, of course, necessarily have special tracheae associated with them (Pl. 35, Fig. 17). The basal connections of the wing-pad tracheae very closely resemble the typical condition as figured by Comstock (1918), and approximate nearer the generalised condition than Pteronarcys, where these connections are complicated by the presence of thoracic gills. The typical Y-shaped leg tracheae are present, each arm derived from its corresponding spiracular trunk, of which the

– 236 –

first contributes one branch to the mesothoracic leg, the second one to this appendage and a posterior branch to the metathoracic leg; whilst the last branch of this latter is derived from the trunk to the first tracheal gill. The posterior stem of the first spiracular trunk gives off a branch to the forewing-pad, the costo-radial, which supplies the following veins:—C. Sc. R. and M. together with their cross-veins.

The anterior stem of the second spiracular trunk gives off the cubito-anal trachea to the forewing-pad, and supplies the Cu and A. veins of this structure. In this way the wing-pad receives tracheae from two sources, each in direct communication with a spiracle, and hence is assured of a rich oxygen supply.

In a like manner the hindwing-pad is supplied from two sources, the costo-radial arising from the posterior stem of the second spiracular trunk, and the cubito-anal from the posterior leg stem which arises from the trunk to the first tracheal gill.

As has been stated by Comstock (1918), etc., there is no connection between the radio-costal and cubito-anal tracheae, and the median is still in the primitive condition attached to the former. There is no fusion of the two wing tracheae as found by Tillyard (1917) in Dragonflies, where he states that this condition is the combined result of three interacting forces, one of which being that of relying almost wholly on an oxygen supply coming from the anal end of the alar trunk, owing to the larval gills being situated in this region. Another authority has disputed this point, and it must be stated here that, on the one hand, no support for Tillyard's view can be deduced from the condition of the alar trunks, whilst, on the other, there is the reduction of the costal vein which Tillyard uses to support his theory. This latter vein is lost in the adult, resembling the condition Tillyard found in Dragonflies.

The Wing-Pads.

These are about 0.3 cm. in length, lie with their dorsal surfaces uppermost, and project postero-laterally on the tergum.

The Forewing Pad (Pl. 38, Fig. 26) has a thick margin well provided with large, stout macrotrichia, and shows quite clearly the fusion of the veins at their bases to form the costo-radial and cubitoanal tracheae, which according to Tillyard (1921) are characteristic of the order as a whole.

The costo-radial trachea on entering the wing-pad splits into three, the anterior branch forming Sc. which runs two-thirds of the length of the pad where it bifurcates into Sc.1 and Sc.2, the latter of which bends down and almost touches R, or else fuses with it for a short distance, afterwards curving back to the margin of the wing. Just after Sc. leaves the costo-radial a very small costa, which ends before the margin is reached, may or may not be given off. The humeral veinlet is the next branch and is constant in position; following the humeral are a variable number, usually 3 to 4, of cross-veins across the costal space between Sc. and the margin. These are provided with macrotrichia, and there is always a large

– 237 –

space between the first of these and the humeral veinlet. The second branch constitutes R, which runs some distance before branching into a straight, unbranched R1, and into Rs. This latter branches into R2 + 3 and R4 + 5, the former again bifurcating into R2 and R3. The third branch of the costo-radial is M, which runs some distance before bifurcating into M1 + 2 and M3 + 4.

A small cross-vein between M and Cu1 is regarded by Tillyard (1919), as M5 a basal concave vein connecting M with Cu1, based on the study of the fossil Belmontia. It is a characteristic feature of the orders forming the Panorpoid complex. In 1925, after further study, he decided that it was merely a convex strut which has secondarily developed providing rigidity to the base of Cu1.

In 1921, this author figures the tracheation of Stenoperla prasina, but shows no trachea between M and Cu1. In 1923, he figures the venation, naming M5 as a small cross-vein between M and Cu1, but gives no reason for doing so. Now this author (1919) also holds that only in special cases do cross-veins bear macrotrichia and that these are more characteristic of main-veins. An examination of the wing-pads and venation by the present author revealed the fact that macrotrichia occur on many cross-veins, especially those between M and Cu1, including Tillyard's M5, and between Cu1 and Cu2. A similar condition was found to exist in the venation of Austroperla cyrene and two species of Zealandoperla.

Now, main-veins are preceded by tracheae except in orders where the venation is highly specialised as in Hymenoptera, Mecoptera, Diptera, and Trichoptera, so that if these veins possess tracheae in the wing-pads we might expect them to be rudiments of the archedictyon and so explain the anomaly. If not, then they must be merely cross-veins, and the presence or absence of macrotrichia is not an infallible criterion for main-veins.

The present author examined a large number of wing-pads of S. prasina and found that not one of these veins, including Tillyard's M5, is preceded by tracheae (Pl. 35, Fig. 18). The wing-pads of Zealandoperla sp. and Austroperla cyrene were also examined, and again no tracheae were found. From these facts it is concluded that in stone-flies M is primitively four-branched.

Again, Comstock's M is a concave vein, and hence must be homologous with Lameere's (1922) MP, which is primitively four-branched. MA likewise is four-branched and, being the anterior branch of M, is convex. According to both these authors then, MP is four-branched, and according to Lameere so also is MA, and as stone-flies are primitive, one would expect a similar condition to exist in this order.

Sections of the wings of S. prasina and Megaleptoperla grandis were cut, revealing the fact that M was convex, hence it must be homologous with Lameere's MA and not with Comstock's M. After studying the Proto-perlaria, Tillyard (1928) found that MP was already becoming obsolete basally, and that in true Perlaria has entirely disappeared. This it is seen is in agreement with the condition in recent forms and resembles the condition in Odonata.

– 238 –

From the foregoing it is concluded that M in stone-flies is primitively four-branched as postulated by Lameere and Comstock; that it is homologous with Lameere's MA; and that MP is lost entirely in existing forms.

The cubito-anal splits into three branches, the first of which is the cubital. This, shortly after leaving the main trachea, bifurcates into Cu1 and Cu2, the former developing a variable number of accessory veins. The second branch is 1A, a straight, unbranched vein, whilst the third by bifurcation gives rise to 2A.

The Hindwing-pad (Pl. 38, Fig. 27) closely resembles the fore-wing, but differs from that figured by Tillyard (1921), in that the costo-radial is always only two branched and not three. A large number of wing-pads have been examined, but this feature appears to be constant. A second difference lies in that M is fused basally for a short distance with Rs as found in the venation. This again is in disagreement with Comstock (1918), who gives as a constant feature the fact that Rs is a branch of R and that it is not switched over to M in the nymphs. This can now no longer be regarded as a true constant, since it is variable in Stenoperla.

The costa is a small and weak vein and does not reach the margin of the wing. R is unbranched, Rs divides into R2, R3, and R4 + 5, but M, as stated above, is fused with R and sometimes with Rs for a short distance. M bifurcates into M1 + 2 and M3 + 4; Cu divides into Cu1 and Cu2, but the former has no accessory veins; 1A is unbranched, this feature being constant throughout, and joins the third branch of the cubito-anal which curves round forming a loop from which 2A and 3A and their accessory veins arise, the latter of which are variable in number.

External Anatomy of Imago.

The imago (Pl. 39, Fig. 28) varies in size, but is on the average about 3.3 cm. in length, and in general shape and appearance resembles the nymph. It is a very swift runner, but a poor flier, is olive green in colour, and is covered with a pubescence of hairs which prevents it from becoming wet when in contact with water. When at rest, the wings are folded flat over the back, the right wing over the left in both cases, so that only the basal portion of the left forewing is visible.

The Head.

This is similar in every respect to that of the nymph, showing the same sclerites and arrangement, but is attached directly to the thorax, the cervicum being reduced.

The Mouth Parts.

These resemble the nymphal structures, but are reduced in size. The mandibles are less heavily chitinised than those of the nymph. All parts exhibit the full number of sclerites. The two lobes of the hypopharynx have lost their suture and appear as one structure.

– 239 –

The Thorax.

The thorax differs only in the distal extremities of its appendages, the legs, in that the meso- and metathorax bear wings, and that the thoracic spiracles are now open. The tibia (Pl. 35, Fig. 19) bears a tibial spur, but the aquatic adaptations of the nymph are now lost and replaced by tarsal pads, and the distitarsus has developed an empodium. The terminal ungues persist, but there are no pulvilli.

The Abdomen.

The only difference in this region is the development of the external genitalia. The five abdominal gills persist as withered appendages, but are still provided with tracheae from the main longitudinal trunks. Newport (1851) described gills as being present on the thoracic segments of Pteronarcys, and demonstrates that in the adult the sacs with which the tracheae communicate are provided with trachea from the main longitudinal trunk, and states that they are functional. Similarly it is possible that in moist conditions the gills in Stenoperla may be functional.

The cerci in the male (Pl. 39, Fig. 29) bear on the inner sides of their short, basal joints sets of short, stout bristles, and on all the remaining segments longer more slender hairs on the outer. These latter are borne on all segments in the female.

The Male Genitalia.

The external male appendages (Pl. 39, Figs. 30 and 31) consist of a ventral, unpaired, inferior appendage, a pair of superior appendages, and an unpaired aedeagus. The sternum of the ninth segment is large, convex, and projects backwards for a short distance over the inferior appendage and forms the hypandrium or sub-genital plate, which bears on its inner surface the ejaculatory sac. The inferior appendage protects the aedeagus ventrally; whilst the superior appendages are upturned to form a short copulatory hook by means of which the male clasps the female during copulation. The aedeagus is an unpaired structure, pointed at its apex, and some-what shorter than the appendages. It lies between the superior appendages and the anus.

The Female Genitalia.

The female (Pl. 39, Fig. 32) has no external appendages, the two oviducts uniting and opening to the exterior on a slit-like invagination on the eighth segment, which condition must represent an extremely primitive condition. There is no ovipositor.

The Internal Anatomy of the Imago.

The Alimentary Canal.

The alimentary canal morphologically resembles that of the nymph in its division into various parts, but differs in several respects.

The Oesophagus occupies the same position as the nymphal. Posteriorly, however, at its junction with the crop, it constricts and its epithelium and intima are thrown into a large number of folds.

– 240 –

so that the lumen is almost obliterated. This region is surrounded by a large amount of fat.

The Crop is normal in position, but differs in that it is greatly distended with a gas the composition of which is unknown.

The Gizzard in the imago has increased in length and extends backwards as far as the fourth abdominal segment. Like the crop, it is distended with gas, this being prevented from escape into the mesenteron by the oesophageal valve.

The Mesenteron is shortened correspondingly with the elongation of the gizzard, and now lies in the fifth and sixth abdominal segments. It is much reduced in diameter and is pigmented posteriorly. The parasites referred to in the section on bionomics are extremely common.

The Hindgut is very much reduced in diameter, but displays the same structure as in the nymph. Posteriorly there is a constriction dividing it into ileum and colon-rectum, in the latter of which a trace of faece was detected.

Secretory and Excretory Glands of the Gut.

The Salivary Gland.—The salivary glands resemble those of the nymph in every respect.

The Malpighian Tubules.—These structures resemble those of the nymph except that they are of a darker yellowish brown suggesting a greater deposition of solid urates. Similarly the tubules pass forwards and are attached to the gizzard. They are all well supplied with tracheae, lie in close relation to the gonads, and arise from the mesenteron in two bands, each tubule opening into the latter by a separate opening situated on a small papilla.

The Nervous System.

The nervous system is identical with the nymphal.

The Circulatory System.

This is identical with what has already been described.

The Respiratory System.

The general nymphal respiratory plan is adhered to (Pl. 37, Fig. 24), although slight modifications have taken place to adapt it to a terrestrial mode of life. It has been shown that in the last larval instar the thoracic spiracles were present but closed; now, however, they are functional, and eight functional abdominal spiracles have been added. The main longitudinal trunk and its branches are still present, as are also the typical Y-shaped tracheae to the leg. In each of the first five abdominal segments, branches still pass downwards and outwards to the vestigial gills, a discussion of which has already been given. Each branch again sends a trachea to the gut, the muscles, and fat body, but with this difference that the large branch to the former is now connected with its fellow of the opposite side, to form a ventral commissure not found in the nymph. This condition occurs in the second to fifth abdominal segment, whilst the

– 241 –

first segment has a slightly different arrangement described below. Intersegmentally the longitudinal trunk gives off eight short, spiracular, unbranched tracheae to the first eight abdominal spiracles, except that the spiracular trachea of the first arises by the bifurcation of the tracheal trunk to the first gill, one branch of which passes to this latter, the second to the spiracle, whilst the third forms the posterior stem to the leg. This latter shortly after its origin from the spiracular trunk gives off a branch internally to join a similar branch from the opposite side, forming the first ventral commissure. This commissure is connected to the second on either side by a small longitudinal trachea running parallel and ventral to the main trunk. This again is not found in the nymph, and may or may not be a variation. In the specimen dissected the trunks to the wings were severed, since dissection was performed from the dorsal surface, but the cubito-anal branch to the forewing could be traced, and was found to be normal in position. From this there seems no reason to doubt that the basal tracheae to the legs and wings are the same as for the last nymphal instar. The atria of the thoracic spiracles are now much more marked than in this latter, and it is from these that the basal tracheae to the wings arise, the trachea having migrated along the leg stems to these regions.

In the mesothorax the main longitudinal trunk gives off a fairly large branch to the muscles, represented only by a single small branch in the nymph. Together with this are the smaller branches to the muscles, the increased tracheation being correlated with the increased activity of the wing-bearing segments.

The atrium of the first spiracle is deviated forwards and constitutes that portion of the main trunk lying in the pro-thorax. This by bifurcation gives rise to the dorsal and ventral head trunks, the latter of which gives off a large branch to the legs as it passes forwards. The former resembles that of the nymph, except that at the point where it curves outwards in the head, a large trachea is given off. This curves forwards and inwards to meet its fellow from the opposite side, forming a dorsal, anterior commissure between the two longitudinal trunks, a condition which is absent in the nymph.

The development of commissures is no doubt correlated with flight, this rendering it necessary to have direct communication between the trunks, thus making it possible for all parts to be oxygenated more rapidly.

The Reproductive System.

The Male Reproductive Organs.—These consist of a pair of long, convoluted tubes, the testes, extending forwards to the metathorax, where each joins its fellow from the opposite side (Pl. 40, Fig. 35). In a freshly dissected specimen each tube is seen to have an inner, opaque, central portion, and an outer transparent. Each tubule lies more or less dorso-laterally to the gut, and extends backwards. passing imperceptibly into the vas deferens. In the eighth segment

– 242 –

each vas deferens descends and runs backwards to the posterior region of the ninth, where it doubles back on itself, running forwards into a large vesicula seminalis (Pl. 40, Fig. 36). Each of these is joined to its fellow anteriorly, is pear-shaped, convex above and below, and opens into the ejaculatory duct by an opening of its own. There are a pair of accessory glands lying immediately beneath the vesicles, each of the former opening into the corresponding vesicle of its side. In shape they are irregular cylinders communicating with one another anteriorly. The accessory gland is revealed to be of the mesodenium type of Escherich.

The ejaculatory sac lies immediately above the hypandrium, and appears to have a portion of the median unpaired aedeagus together with the ductus ejaculatorius retracted within it.

The Female Reproductive System.—The ovaries are of the panoistic type in which no nutritive cells are present; they are two in number and extend backwards from the first abdominal segment to the eighth, lying dorso-laterally to the gut, which is much reduced in size. Each ovary has a long, straight tube, the oviduct, from which on either side are given off a large number of ovarioles (Pl. 40. Fig. 37), which increase in length from before backwards until a maximum is reached. Anteriorly on the mid-dorsal line each ovary joins its fellow. Each ovariole may be divided into three regions:—

  • (1) the terminal filament;

  • (2) the germarium;

  • (3) the vitellarium.

The Terminal Filament is a minute, slender prolongation of the peritoneum which invests each ovariole. All the filaments of an ovary are bound together, and anteriorly where the ovaries join they all meet and continue forwards as the median or dorsal ligament, which finds attachment on the pericardial diaphragm.

The Germarium (Pl. 40, Fig. 38) in the youngest ovarioles-appears as an undifferentiated portion containing large nuclei with nucleoli. From this region the ova and follicular epithelium are developed. In older ovarioles the germarium shows the ova differentiated in linear series; this condition appears to be present in the ovarioles nearer the gonopore, the more anterior ones seemingly being of a younger nature.

The Vitellarium (Pl. 40, Fig. 37) forms the major portion of the ovariole and has the ova disposed in a linear series, each ovum being enclosed in a definite follicle and surrounded by a layer of follicular cells, which, as the ova pass down the ovariole, secrete the chorion. Meanwhile, before this occurs, the ova increase in size by the accumulation of oil droplets. Each ovum has a large nucleus.

Each oviduct extends backwards so that the ovarioles lie on top, and on the sides of the gut, and in the intersegmental region between the seventh and eighth segments, each duct descends to

– 243 –

the midventral line, where both join up and pass forwards for a short distance to open on the pit-like depression already described. There is no uterus nor is there any vagina, the cuticle not being invaginated into the common oviducal duct, which according to some authorities is not a primitive condition.

An ovoid accessory gland lies in a posterior position to the common oviduct. It opens to the exterior on the pit-like depression into which the oviduct opens. Presumably it is an albumen gland, for the eggs when freshly laid are surrounded by an oval-shaped mass of transparent substance, which disintegrates after about twenty-four hours.

The Wings.

The wings fold closely round the body of the insect, the right forewing completely enwrapping all but the basal portion of its fellow, and they are longer than the abdomen, projecting, when at rest, beyond its apex. Forewing longer than hind, six times as long as broad, and bright green in colour; hindwing twice as long as broad, and of a more delicate texture and colour than the forewing; anal area large, forming an unbroken contour with the rest of the wing. It folds fanwise against the body.

The wings are large and cumbersome, with no coupling apparatus; flight is slow, and only short distances are covered in one flight. The wing venation is very unstable, that of two specimens differing, whilst even the wings of one side of a single individual will differ from those of the other. The greatest variation has been noticed in the branching of Rs. The cross-veins are extremely variable. Certain features, however, are constant.

Venation.

The Forewing (Pl. 41, Fig. 39).

The forewing exhibits a primitive venation and shows less clearly the two sources of tracheation, the costo-radial and cubito-anal; Sc is concave and is distally forked into Sc1 and Sc2, the latter of which dips down to run along or fuse with R1 for a short distance before curving outwards to the wing margin. C is absent, but Sc sends off a number, usually three, of cross-veins across the costal space to the anterior margin. Posteriorly the humeral veinlet comes off near the base of the wing; there is always a large space between this veinlet and the first veinlet across the costal space. About halfway along its length R, a convex vein, forks into R1, a straight, unbranched vein running to the wing margin terminating just in front of the apex, and into the Rs, which near its distal extremity bifurcates into R2 + 3 and R4 + 5. The former again branches into R2 and R3.

– 244 –

M, a convex vein, is fused basally with R for a short distance and is still in the primitively branched condition. Distally it bifurcates into M1 + 2 and M2 + 4. Cu is a straight vein arising from the cubito-anal trachea, but divides distally into Cu1 and Cu2, the former of which is convex and has a variable number of accessory veins, usually about three. Cu2 is a straight, unbranched, concave, weak vein lying in the anal furrow. 1A and 2A are both straight; the former is unbranched, whilst the latter divides into two. Crossveins are present, irregularly placed on all parts of the wing, but are more strongly developed between M and Cu, and between Cu1 and Cu2. The humeral veinlet is constant in position; there are always sub-costal veinlets present.

The Hindwing (Pl. 41, Fig. 39).

As in the forewing, C is absent, Sc is concave and two-branched; it gives off a variable number of costal veinlets and the humeral; there is always a large space between the former and the latter. Basally R and M are fused, this vein bifurcating to give two branches R1 and Rs + M; the former is a straight vein running directly to the margin in front of the apex. Rs + M forks giving Rs and M. This switching of Rs over to M is a constant feature and quite characteristic of the Plecoptera. Rs again divides into R2 and 3 and R4 + 5, but again may be three-branched, R2 + 3 splitting into R2 and R3. M is two branched into M1 + 2, M3 + 4, and is convex. Cu is two-branched, Cu1. having no accessory veins, whilst Cu2 is a very weak vein lying in the anal furrow. 1A is straight and unbranched. The anal area is increased by the development of accessory veins on 2A and 3A, while there is an indication of the formation of intercalary veins. Cross-veins are present throughout the wing membrane, but, as in the forewing, are irregularly placed, although more numerous than in the latter. Two strong sets strengthening the wings are developed between M and Cu, and between Cu1 and Cu2. The humeral veinlet is constant in position, and there are always sub-costal veinlets developed.

Brachypterous Males.

Four brachypterous males were taken at Ribbonwood Creek in February, 1932, associated with a normal winged female. Tillyard (1926) states that brachypterous males occur in other genera associated with females. These insects are of the same size and resemble the normal imagines in every respect, except that the wings are only one quarter of the normal size. The body is pubescent, and the gut as in normal insects is filled with a gas, both evidently being adaptations correlated with reproduction, and with the fact that these insects are never far from water, so that such adaptations would prevent drowning.

– 245 –

At first it was thought that they might be of a different species, but a careful examination has revealed no grounds for regarding them as such. On the contrary, it is contended that they are brachy-pterous males of Stenoperla prasina, supported by the fact that external and internal anatomy conform to the same general plan as found in the nymph and other imagines, and that the external genitalia show no difference whatsoever from the normal male. Moreover, these males were sexually mature and endeavoured to copulate with the female, which, however, very unfortunately died, together with two males, during a very severe frost. Where possible a comparison of their internal anatomy was made with that of normal imagines, and was found to be identical.

The Wings.

The wings (Pl. 42, Fig. 40) are one-quarter of the normal size and lie flat on the terga of their segments, the forewings slightly overlapping the hind; the anal fan of the latter is doubled under the rest of the wing so that its dorsal surface lies ventrally on the tergum. It is slightly shorter than the fore. Both are the same colour, the wings of three specimens are olive green, whilst those of a fourth are purple in colour. When the insect is disturbed, no attempt is made to use these, but escape is effected by their very rapid running. The anterior margin of both is thickened around to the apex, and both are clothed with microtrichia. The venation is extremely variable, the wings of a single individual showing great variations.

The Forewing.—In the forewing C is absent unless the anterior thickening of the wing can be regarded as such, whilst Sc is two-branched as in the normal wing. The humeral veinlet is constant in position, and a variable number of costal veinlets pass from Sc across the costal space. Sc2 in all cases curves downwards and is fused with R1 for a short distance. R + M pass outwards some distance and then bifurcates into R and M. It is here that the greatest variation takes place. In the more typical forms R continues towards the margin for a short distance, and then divides into R1 and Rs; the former is a straight, unbranched vein terminating just anterior to the apex. Rs bifurcates distally into R2 + 3 and R4 + 5, but in some cases is undivided and passes out as Rs to the wing margin. M divides distally into M1 + 2 and M3 + 4, but M1 + 2 may or may not be fused at its distal extremity with R4 + 5. Cu runs some distance along the wing membrane and then splits into Cu1 and Cu2 (both of which are usually unbranched). A strong set of cross-veins in all cases is developed between Cu1 and Cu2. 1A is straight and unbranched, whilst 2A is two-branched.

The Hindwing.—The hindwing is lacking in C, and Sc is twobranched, Sc2 fusing with R1 as before. The humeral veinlet is constant, and there are a variable number of veinlets across the

– 246 –

costal space, usually three. There is a large space between the former and the latter. R + M passes out beyond the humeral, where it splits into R1 and Rs + M. Again, R and M show the greatest variation. Rs + M bifurcates into Rs and M, the former dividing into R2 + 3 and R4 + 5, whilst R4 + 5 in one specimen is branched into R4 and R5. M, however, may not branch, in which case it passes as such straight to the wing margin. Shortly after leaving R + M, Rs + M divides into Rs and M. Distally M bifurcates into M1 + 2 and M3 + 4, the former of which may or may not be fused with R4 + 5; the latter when present is always fused distally with Cu1 Cu divides into Cu1 and Cu2, the former fusing with M3 + 4 when present. 1A is a straight, unbranched vein, whilst 2A is two-branched. 3A has a variable number of accessory veins which increase the anal area. Nowhere on the hindwing can there be said to be a strong development of cross-veins, which occur irregularly over the whole wing membrane, and are very variable. The humeral is constant.

Comparison of Normal and Brachypterous Wings.

Forewing.

C is absent from both; Sc is two branched, and the large space between the first veinlet across the costal space and the humeral is a constant feature. In both, M arises from R, whilst this latter is typically two-branched, R1 always being straight and undivided. Rs, however, in brachypterous forms may or may not divide; if it does, it usually bifurcates into R2 + 3 and R4 + 5. M is two-branched, but in brachypterous forms M1 + 2 may fuse distally with R4 + 5. Cu bifurcates into Cu1 and Cu2, the former, however, in the normal wing has accessory veins, which are usually lacking in the abnormal. The remaining veins are all similar, and cross-veins occur irregularly in both.

Hindwing.

The veins in these are similar except in the case of R and M. M, in the brachypterous forms, may or may not be branched into M1 + 2 and M3 + 4, and when this latter occurs, M1 + 2 may fuse with R4 + 5, while M3 + 4 is always fused with Cu1. Only the former fusion has been observed as a variation in the normal wing. In the brachypterous type cross-veins are developed to a much less extent.

The venation of brachypterous male on the whole conforms with that of the normal male, but is much more variable. The distal branching of Rs, M, and Cu show the greatest variation, and the development of cross-veins is greatly reduced.

– 247 –

Summary.

  • 1. A review of the literature on S. prasina (Newm.) is given together with its classification, systematics, and distribution.

  • 2. The bionomics of this insect is discussed. It is pointed out that for the most part the insect inhabits turbulent mountain torrents and requires water of extreme purity and high oxygen content. Its food, size, optimum, maximum, and minimum temperatures, its respiratory movements, locomotion, and reactions to light are discussed. Its enemies and known parasites are noted. An instrument for determining spot velocities in turbulent water is described.

  • 3. The detailed anatomy of the nymphal and imaginal instars is given and differences from the generalised insect-type indicated. Chief among these are the nymphal adaptations of the tibio-tarsal region of the legs correlated with its aquatic habitat; and the presence of a gas in the crop and gizzard of the imagines. Finally, in connexion with the venation, it is concluded that M5 is not present in Stone-flies.

  • 4. The venation of brachypterous males is described and shown to differ but little from the general condition; it is, however, more variable. The distal branching of Rs, M, and Cu show the greatest variation, and the cross-veins are greatly reduced in number.

Bibliography.

Balfour-Brown, F., 1932. Textbook of Practical Entomology, Edward Arnold and Co., London.

Clemens, W. A., 1917. An Ecological Study of the Mayfly, Chirotenetes, Univ. Toronto Studies, Series No. 17.

Comstock, J. H., 1918. The Wings of Insects, Comstock Publishing Co., N.Y.

Crampton, G. C., 1923. Phylogenetic Comparison of the Maxillae throughout the Orders of Insects, N.Y. Ent. Soc., Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 77–106.

Hudson, G. V., 1892. Manual N.Z. Entomology, West Newman and Co., London.

——, 1904. N.Z. Neuroptera, West Newman and Co., London.

Hutton, F. W., 1898. “On N.Z. Neuroptera,” Trans. N.Z. Inst., Vol. 31, p. 212.

Imms, A. D., 1925. Textbook Entomology, Methuen and Co. Ltd., London.

——, 1929. Some Methods of Technique Applicable to Entomology, Bull. Ent. Res., Vol. 20, Pt. 2, p. 165.

Lameere, A., 1922. Bull. Clas. des Sci. Acad. Roy. Belg., Series 5, No. 8, p. 138.

Martin, J. F., 1916. Thoracic and Cervical Sclerites of Insects, Annals Ent. Soc. Amer., Vol. 9, p. 35.

McLachlan, R., 1865–67. New Genus of Perlidae, Trans. Ent. Soc. London, p. 354.

Miall, L., and Denny. A., 1886. The Cockroach. Lovell Reed and Co., London.

Newman, E., 1845. Addendum to the “Synonymy” of the Perlites, The Zoologist, Simpson Marshall Hamilton Kent and Co., London, pp. 851–53.

– 248 –

Newport, G., 1851. Anatomy and Affinities of Pteronarcys regalis, Trans. Linn. Soc., Zoo., pp. 425–452.

Snodgrass, R. E., 1909. The Thorax of Insects and the Articulation of the Wings, Proc. U.S.A. Nat. Mus., Vol. 36, pp. 511–595.

Tillyard, R. J., 1917. Biology of Dragonflies, Camb. Univ. Press, Cambridge.

——, 1919. Panorpoid Complex, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., Vol. 11, Pt. 3.

——, 1921. Revision of Family Eustheniidae, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., Vol. 1, Pt. 2.

——, 1923. The Stone-flies of N.Z., Trans. N.Z. Inst., Vol. 54, pp. 197–217.

——, 1925. Amer. Journ. Sci., 9, p. 328.

——, 1926. Insects of Australia and N.Z., Angus and Robertson, Sydney.

——, 1928. Kansas Permian Insects, Part II, Order Protoperlaria, Family Lemnatophoridae (contd.), Amer. Journ. Sci., Vol. 16, pp. 313–348.

Walker, W., 1852. Neuroptera from N.Z., Cat. Brit. Mus., Pt. 2, pp. 206–210.

Wigglesworth, V. B., 1931. The Physiology of Excretion in a Blood-sucking Insect, Journ. Exp. Biol., 8.

Picture icon

Fig. 1 —Sketch of Pitot tube Fig. 2.—Side view basal portion of Pitot tube.

Picture icon

Fig. 3 —Gregarine from mesenteron last nymphal instar X 73

Picture icon

Fig 4.—Tentorium side view Fig. 5.—Pleurites of nymph.

  • po.a—posterior arm of tentorium

  • d.a.—dorsal arm of tentorium

  • a.a.—anterior arm of tentorium

  • b.—body of tentorium

  • ep—eplmeron

  • epi—episternum

  • tr.—trochantin

  • t.—trochanter

  • c.—coxa

  • a.c.—antecoxal plate

Picture icon

Fig. 6.—S. prasina nymph X 4 Fig. 7.—Nyphal head dorsal aspect. Fig. 8.—Nymphal head ventral aspect.

Picture icon

Fig. 9—Nymphal labrum Fig. 10.—Nymphal mandible. Fig. 11.—Nymphal maxilla. Fig. 12 —Nymphal labium. Fig. 13.—Nymphal hypopharynx.

  • ad a.—adductor apodeme

  • s.d —salivary duct

  • 1 —lacinia

  • di g—distigalea

  • b.g.—basigalea

  • ea.—eustipes

  • di.c.—disticardo

  • b c.—basi-cardo

Picture icon

Fig 14—Thoracic sternites and tentorium of nymph dorsal aspect. Fig. 15.—Thorax of adult ventral aspect.

Picture icon

Fig. 16—Tibio-tarsus of nymph showing aquatic adaptation. Fig. 17.—Basal leg and wing tracheae of last nymphal instar.

Picture icon

Fig. 18.—R + M and Cu1 + 2 showing their tracheae and the absence of a trachea in the cross-vem between.

Picture icon

Fig. 19.—Tibio-tarsus of imago showing the absence of nymphal adaptation and the development of an empodium.

  • hw.—hmdwing cu a.—cubito-anal trachea co.r.—costo-radial trachea st.—sternum f.—furca sp.—spinasternite f in.—furcal invagmation v.g.—vestigeal gills

Picture icon

Fig. 20.—Brain and sympathetic nerves ventral aspect. Fig. 21—Dorsal aspect ditto.

  • fr g.—frontal ganglion

  • p.c.—paroesophageal connective

  • a.n.—antennary nerve

  • tri c—triterocerebrum

  • de.c—deuterocerebrum

  • o g.—optic ganglion

  • sym.n.—sympathetic nerve

  • pro.c.—proterocerebrum

  • st g.—stomachic ganglion

Picture icon

Fig. 22—Ventral nervous system of nymph Fig. 23—Respiratory system of nymph (right side). Fig 24.—Ditto, imago.

Picture icon

Fig 25—S prasina last nymphal instar. X 4. Fig. 26.—Forewing-pad last nymphal instar. Fig. 27.—Hmdwing-pad last nymphal instar.

Picture icon

Fig. 28—S. prasina imago. X 4. Fig 29.—Male cersus showing bristles. Fig. 30—Male gemtalia ventral aspect. Fig. 31.—Ditto, side view Fig. 32—Female genitalia ventral aspect.

  • hy.—hypandrum i.a—inferior appendage sup a.—superior appendage ae.—aedeagus

Picture icon

Fig 33—Alimentary canal of nymph. Fig. 34—Brain and suboesophageal ganglion in situ, side view. Fig 35—Anterior region testes Fig 36—Male accessory organs, ventral aspect. Fig. 37.—An ovariole. Fig. 38.—The germarium.

  • oe.—oesophagus

  • s.g—salivary gland

  • cr.—crop

  • r.n.—recurrent nerve

  • g—gizzard

  • m.—mesenteron

  • m.t—malpighian tubules

  • i.—ileum

  • c.r.—colon-rectum

  • ac.g—accessory gland

  • v.s—vesicle seminalis

  • v.d—vas deferens

  • ej c.—ejaculatory sac

  • d.e.—ductus ejaculatoris

  • d.n.—anteunary nerve

  • de.c.—deuterocerebrum

  • tri.c.—triterocerebrum

  • pro.c.—proterocerebrum

  • o.g.—optic ganglion

  • svmn.n.—svmpathetic nerve

  • st g—stomachic ganglion

  • oe.—oesophagus

  • su.oe.g.—sub-oesophageal ganglion

Picture icon

Fig. 39.—Normal venation, S prasina.

Picture icon

Fig. 40—Brachypterous venation, S. prasina.

Picture icon

Fig 41—Apparatus used to determine reactions to light.

Picture icon

Fig 42—Ribbonwood Creek, Cass

Picture icon

Fig 43—Puran Stream, looking towards its source

Picture icon

Fig 44—Mount Misery, Cass, with Misery Creek in valley to the right

Picture icon

Fig 45.—Misery Creek. Cass