Go to National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa
Volume 66, 1937
This text is also available in PDF
(540 KB) Opens in new window
– 72 –

Specific Distinctness of the Tarndale and Dun Mt. Plants.

Field-study and garden-culture both confirm the conviction that each of the two forms of Hooker's Celmisia Sinclairii is specifically distinct from the other. The living plants have a very distinct appearance, and each has a distinct though overlapping area of distribution. One is invariably glabrous, the other tomentose on both surfaces of the leaf, a fact not indicated by Hooker, but one a knowledge of which would have prevented much of the present confusion. Dr. H. H. Allan and the late Dr. L. Cockayne have both

– 73 –

concurred with me as to the specific distinctness of the two forms.

It thus becomes necessary to restrict Hooker's name to one or other of the two plants involved. His use of the term “glabrous” before “hoary” or “white below” in the published description suggests my selection of the Tarndale plant as the lectotype of the species, notwithstanding that in citing the localities Hooker refers to Dun Mt. before Tarndale. I understand that Dr. Summerhayes, in a letter to Dr. Cockayne, had expressed similar views. This restriction has the effect of making the Canterbury Museum specimen a co-type of the species. Curiously enough, there is not a single specimen of Celmisia Sinclairii as defined below in any herbarium or garden in New Zealand, albeit it is quite a common plant within its circle of distribution.