Go to National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa
Volume 68, 1938-39
This text is also available in PDF
(1 MB) Opens in new window
– 422 –

Classification of Fishes in Terms of Food.

The following grouping appears as consistent as any hitherto devised, for although the categories are not mutually exclusive, in that certain species have a claim to inclusion in more than one group, yet this is not due to the choice of heterogeneous bases for the subdivisions, but to the inescapable fact that some species exhibit a much wider range of feeding habits and of foods than most. The basis of classification is in fact strictly homogeneous, in that it concerns exclusively the nature of the food eaten. Unfortunately, circumstances did not permit the preparation of food-lists of the microphages, an especially interesting group in that its members illustrate various stages in the forsaking of macrophagous nutrition (which is ancestral among fishes,

– 423 –

as shown by the dentition), and have abbreviated the usual food cycles by feeding on micro-organisms which normally represent early points in the cycle. To this end there is a tendency for the gill-rakers, originally a straining mechanism for the protection of the gills, to become elaborate sieves whereby micro-organisms are removed from the respiratory current to provide an accessory food supply, or in specialised cases perhaps even the essential food supply. Although the point is too wide to be decided in terms of fishes only, it appears likely that the present provisional classification, strictly in terms of food, may prove less satisfactory than one which takes into account the nature of the food-capturing mechanism. In particular, the group usually referred to as the planktivores is composite in that some members (John Dory, silver dory, boarfish) are microphages with a typical microphagous straining mechanism, others (pilchards, sprat, ahuru, opalfish) feed on small organisms such as copepoda by means of a macrophagous mechanism. Similarly the larval tarakihi is a planktivore, yet perhaps as truly a macrophage as the adult. On the other hand the sand flounder seems to be a microphage in its early stages and later a macrophage. Flounders, though listed as feeding on microbenthos, do so by means of the normal macrophagous mechanism. For these reasons the treatment of the microphages is provisional only.

A.

Macrophages; feeding on larger (macroscopic) organisms.

I.

Indiscriminate devourers of animals and plants (“omnivores”)—Red cod, warehou, kahawai, snapper, threepenny, cockabully, leather-jacket.

II.

Discriminating between animals and plants, not devouring both.

(a) Carnivorous; feeding on macroscopic animals.

(i) Feeding on the nekton—food-group i, in part food-groups ii, iii, iv: Most sharks; dogfishes; conger eel, hake, bass groper, horse mackerel, yellowtail, barracouta.

(ii) Feeding on macro-benthos—food-groups ii, iii, iv, v, vi, in part I: Skate, elephant fish, silverside, witch, flat-fishes, tarakihi, moki, spotty, girdled parrot-fish, stargazer, Crapatalus, flathead, black cod, thornfish, rockfish, red rock cod, toadfish.

(iii) Overlapping composite group; feeding on nekton and benthos: Eel, rock cod, black cod, green-back flounder, bream, groper, trumpeter, blue cod, hake, ling, sea perch, pigfish, red gurnard, sucker.

(b) Phytophagous; feeding on the macrophyton—food-group vii: Garfish, marblefish, kelpfish, scarlet parrot-fish, blue cod, bully.

B.

Microphages; feeding on micro-organisms and detritus (no food-group prepared).

(i) Indiscriminate devourers of plankton and micro-benthos: Bellows-fish, pipe-fishes, seahorse.

– 424 –
  • (ii) Discriminating, of limited vertical range.

  • (a) Feeding on plankton: Pilchard, sprat, minnow, ahuru, roughey, John Dory, silver dory, boarfish, larval tarakihi, Notothenia, opalfish.

  • (b) Feeding on micro-benthos: Moki, flounders (part).