
Food-Group III.—Crabs.
The term “Crab” is here used in an ecological rather than a taxonomic sense, to include not only the Brachyura but also the crab-like Porcellanids of the genera Petrocheles and Petrolisthes. The distinctness of Filhol's species Petrolisthes novae-zelandiae from the common P. elongatus was verified, partly from the Portobello collections, by Bennett (1930), but at too late a stage for separate records to be quoted here. The same applies to Paramithrax, where most or all of the records refer to the common P. minor. The main taxonomic difficulties occurred among the Hymenosomidae, for although several rare species, not recognised since Filhol's description (Filhol, 1885), were secured, such as Halicarcinus edwardsi from red cod, the boundaries of the commoner species are at present too ill-defined to allow close specific distinctions; hence “Halicarcinus spp.” is a group-name for species with tridentate rostra, and “Hymenicus spp.” for those with trilobulate lamellar rostra. The name Hombronia is revived for a swimming crab hitherto regarded as rare, but now recognised to be not only generically separable from other members of the family, but ecologically of major importance.
| Predators | Prey | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paramithrax sp. | Halicarcinus spp. | Hymenicus spp. | Hombronia depressa | Cancer novae-zelandiae | Nectocarcinus antarcticus | Ommatocarcinus macgillivrayi | Hemigrapsus sexdentatus | Hemigrapsus crenulatus | Cyclograpsus lavauxi | Helice crassa | Petrolisthes spp. | Others | Total | |
| smooth-hound | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 10 | |||
| spined dogfish | X | X | X | X | 4 | |||||||||
| skate | X | X | X | X | 4 | |||||||||
| red cod | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Hemiplax hirtipes, Petrocheles spinosus | 13 | |
| rock cod | X | X | X | X | X | X | 6 | |||||||
| bastard red cod | X | X | X | 3 | ||||||||||
| brill | X | X | X | 3 | ||||||||||
| sand flounder | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | ||||||||
| green-b. flounder | X | X | X | X | 4 | |||||||||
| lemon sole | X | X | X | X | 4 | |||||||||
| tarakihi | X | X | X | X | 4 | |||||||||
| moki | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | ||||||||
| spotty | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | ||||||||
| stargazer | X | X | X | 3 | ||||||||||
| blue cod | X | X | X | Petrocheles spinosus | 4 | |||||||||
| Maori chief | X | X | X | Eurynolambrus australis | 4 | |||||||||
| barracouta | X | X | X | 3 | ||||||||||
| ling | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | ||||||||
| sea perch | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Leptomithrax longipes | 10 | |||
| pigfish | X | X | X | 3 | ||||||||||
| toadfish | X | X | X | 3 | ||||||||||
| red gurnard | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Hemiplax hirtipes | 9 |

The following were found preying on two species or groups:—
| Predators. | Prey. | |
|---|---|---|
| mullet | Nectocarcinus antarcticus | Halicarcinussp. |
| gurnard | " " | " |
| Crapatalus | " " | Hombronia depressa |
| bream | " " | Paramithrax sp. |
| black cod | " " | " |
| hake | " " | Cancer novae-zelandiae |
| witch | " " | " " |
| warehou | " " | " " |
| groper | " " | " " |
| carpet shark | Hemigrapsus crenulatus | " " |
| flathead | " " | " " |
| elephant fish | Halicarcinus sp. | Hombronia depressa |
| thorn fish | " | Petrocheles spinosus |
| common sole | Hymenicus sp. | Hombronia depressa |
| suckerfish | Hemigrapsus crenulatus | Petrolisthes sp. |
Finally, the following were found to prey on only one species or group:—
On Nectocarcinus antarcticus: conger eel, horse mackerel, kahawai, snapper, trumpeter, scarlet parrot-fish, banded parrotfish, kingfish.
On Petrolisthes sp.: rockfish, threepenny, cockabully, red rock cod.
On Cyclograpsus lavauxi: silverside.
On Hombronia depressa: turbot.
On Hemigrapsus sexdentatus: girdled parrot-fish.
Analysis of Food-group III.—It follows that 52 species of fishes were found to have been feeding on a total of 16 species and higher groups of crabs. The chief predator is red cod, with 14 species, followed by smooth-hound and sea perch, each with 10, and red gurnard with 9. No doubt further investigations would increase the number of predators and of prey, but the list suffices to show that a considerable number of important fish depend largely on crabs for their food. Lists compiled in this way are defective in not being quantitative, but it may be said that in general fishes which eat crabs do so frequently and in great numbers; stomachs of red cod, for example, are often found crammed with crabs, suggesting that other food is neglected if crabs are available. The importance of the planktonic zoeal stages can only be presumed, and a further item must be credited to the crabs in that a number of the predators in the present list appear as prey in food-group I; that is, fishes which eat few or no crabs may feed on fishes which depend largely on crabs.
The crab most abundantly consumed was Nectocarcinus antarcticus, a prolific swimming species which frequents all depths and was seen in abundance after dark at the surface. If acclimatisation of supplementary food supplies for marine fishes is mooted in other areas of similar latitude, this species is undoubtedly New Zealand's first suggestion. It is known from 37 species, including bottom fish and rovers, and is commonly consumed in great quantities.

Next on the list comes another swimming species, Hombronia depressa, known from 22 species of fishes. Other Hymenosomids prove to be of greater importance than hitherto suspected, making up in numbers what they lack in size. Cancer novae-zelandiae is a benthic crab known from 19 species, and the severe toll taken by fishes suggests a reason for the failure to establish a European congener in New Zealand waters after several years' trial at the station.
Petrolisthes was found in 9 species of fishes, but not frequently and not in large numbers, so that their importance is less than might be inferred from the number of entries. Both species are seclusive, hiding under stones and clinging tightly when disturbed; and their relative infrequence in fish stomachs, in spite of their extreme abundance on shallow bottoms, confirms the inference that these cryptozoic habits, in conjunction with their flattened shape and inconspicuous bluish-grey colours, are of protective value in an environment which proves precarious for less effectively concealed species. A case in point is that of Hemigrapsus crenulatus, a very abundant species in estuaries and on reefs, more venturesome in habits, and although active and armed with massive chelae, not provided with any noteworthy means of concealment; it is eaten in great quantities, notably by red cod from the harbour, and ranks very high as a source of food for fishes. The fact that it is known from only 8 species of fishes emphasises the contrast with Petrolisthes, and shows how a list of entries could be fallaciously interpreted if not qualified by quantitative data. The suggestion that Hemigrapsus crenulatus defends itself by its activity and strength and by its strong chelae is somewhat strengthened by the relative immunity of its congener P. sexdentatus from attack, save by a few of the larger fishes. This crab is known only from four species, and is characterised by its large size, unusually formidable chelae, and bright red colour; possibly the conspicuous pigmentation, in contrast to that of its drab mud-coloured relative, serves as a warning device.
It would appear that swimming habits (Hombronia, Nectocarcinus) imply a heavy toll and a dependance for racial survival on prolific breeding, as in other relatively small organisms of the nekton (sprat, pilchard, whalefeed) and of the plankton (Copepods); that relatively defenceless benthic crabs (Halicarcinus, Hymenicus, Cancer) also require in a lesser degree a high fertility in order that the species may survive; that cryptozoism and concealment colours (Petrolisthes) may have genuine protective value; that bulk and massive weapons (Leptomithrax, Jacquinotia) may give partial or even complete immunity from attack; that these defences may be effectively supplemented by warning colours (Hemigrapsus sexdentatus); and that there is a refuge from many species of predators in estuaries (Helice crassa, Hemiplax hirtipes) and at similarly higher levels on the beaches (Cyclograpsus lavauxi). Without closer discrimination of species it is difficult to determine the functional value of the supposedly protective mask of weeds (Paramithrax minor, P. longipes) or hairs (P. ursus) or sessile animals (Leptomithrax spp.) characteristic of the Majoid crabs.
