
The Development of the Antheridium, Archegonium, and Sporogonium of Cyathophorum bulbosum (Hedw.) C. M.
[Read before the Otago branch of the Royal Society June 14, 1938; received by the Editor, July 7, 1938: issued separately, March, 1939.]
Contents.
-
Introduction—Material and Methods.
-
General Account of Cyathophorum.
-
(a) Ecology.
-
(b) Gamctophyte.
-
(c) Sex organs.
-
(d) Sporogonium.
-
Development of the Antheridium.
-
Development of the Archegonium.
-
Development of the Sporogonium.
-
(a) Embryo.
-
(b) Young capsule.
-
(c) Older sporogonium.
-
Discussion.
-
Summary.
-
Bibliography.
Introduction.
Cyathophorum is a small genus of Mosses placed in the Hypoterygiaceae and found in Eastern Australia, Tasmania and New Zealand. As regards the total number of species, and how many occur in the latter country there appears to be some confusion.
W. Wilson (34) in Hooker's Flora Novae Zelandiae, 1855, listed one species Cyathophorum pennatum Lab. and two varieties minus and apiculatum.
V. F. Brotherus (10), 1924, gave two species C. densirete (Broth.) and C. bulbosum (Hedw.) C. M. (Syn. C. pennatum Bridel. Bryol. Univ., 1927), both of which he stated occur in New Zealand.
In 1913, however, H. N. Dixon (15) had adopted the original view of Hooker and Wilson and had reduced C. densirete (Brotherus in Oefv. af. Finska. Vet-Soc. Foerh. XXXV 40—previous to 1913) to the status of a variety. He listed but one New Zealand species C. bulbosum and a variety minus—“the limits of which moreover are difficult to define” (Dixon, loc. cit.). New Zealand botanists are inclined to follow H. N. Dixon's nomenclature.
The present paper deals with the development of the sex organs and sporogonium of Cyathophorum bulbosum (Hedw.) C. M. together with a short ecological account of the species. An account is also given of the methods of killing and fixing, infiltration, etc. used by the writer, as these processes offer some difficulty.

This paper forms part of a thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Science in the University of New Zealand. The work was carried out at the Department of Botany, University of Otago, under the direction of Dr. J. E. Holloway, F.R.S., to whom the writer would like to express his sincere thanks for helpful criticism and advice.
Material and Methods.
Material was collected from numerous localities in both North and South Islands, over a continuous period of fourteen months. Over fifty collections were made in the vicinity of Dunedin. Some killing and fixing was done in the field, but the majority of plants were brought to the laboratory and kept in damp Wardian cases, when the necessary microscopical dissection could be more conveniently carried out.
Killing and Fixing.
As a group, mosses appear to offer considerable difficulties in fixing [Chamberlain (1); Wilson (33); Bryan (12).] Air bubbles are troublesome, cell walls especially in the older capsules are thick, and also at certain points in the life history (notably in very young embryos and older antheridia) it is commonly found difficult to get good results. Several fixing reagents were employed by the writer and although generally good results were eventually obtained, it was only after considerable experiment.
An air pump was used on every occasion with the exception of material killed in the field. Capsules were as a rule pricked gently in several places with a sharp needle, to aid both in penetration of the killing and fixing agent and to ensure good infiltration of paraffin at a later stage.
The following fixing agents were employed:—
| I. |
Chrom-acetic acid mixtures. [Chamberlain (1).] |
|
(a) “Strong,” (b) “Stock,” (c) “Weak.” |
|
| II. |
Chrom-acetic acid-formalin (Licent's formula). |
| III. |
Formalin acetic alcohol. |
|
(a) 5 ccs. glacial acetic acid; 5 ccs. com. formalin; 90 ccs. of 70% alcohol. (b) 5 ccs. gl. acetic acid; 10 ccs. com. formalin; 85 ccs. of 70% alcohol. Other combinations using 50% alcohol were tried, but the results were the same as with the above two formulas. |
|
| IV. |
Absolute alcohol. |
| V. |
Carnoy's fluid (using 95% alcohol). |
The variety of objects in which study was attempted, namely, embryos and older sporogonial stages, antheridia and archegonia, made it certain that no one killing and fixing agent was likely to be equally successful with all types. Wherever possible, therefore, material was killed in at least two different reagents and the results compared. In the following account the various objects are taken separately and the results with different killing and fixing agents discussed in some detail.

Embryos or Young Sporogonia: For very young embryos none of the above reagents were very successful. Chrom-acetic acid mixtures were useless, causing the tissues to shrink and even break up. This was more apparent in the foot region of the embryo than elsewhere. Various times were tried from 6–48 hours, but the results were all poor—the longer periods being worse than the short. Formalin-acetic-alcohol [formula (a)] gave good results with all embryos after the apical cell had cut off a few segments, but for earlier stages it was only fair. However, it was distinctly better than any other agent tried. The time for fixing is fairly short (6–12 hours), but some material collected in the North Island remained in this fluid for some three months and still gave excellent results. Carnoy's fluid was not tried for very young embryos, as only a limited number were obtained. For older stages, however, it was good, and almost equal to the formalin acetic alcohol. The time that material was left in the reagent affected it greatly. Embryos left for up to 18 hours gave good results, but after this collapsing began, and one lot left for two days was quite spoiled.
Older Sporogonia: Young capsules with sporogenous tissue just set apart gave good results after fixation in formalin acetic alcohol [either formula a or b]. In the later stages, however, the alcohol may have tended to harden the material a little, and capsules of this stage cut more successfully after fixing with “strong” chromacetic acid for 48 hours. Carnoy's fluid was good for the young stages of development of the sporogenous tissue and, of course, penetrated excellently. For the later stages, however, it was poor. Capsules dropped into the fluid about the “spore tetrad” stage usually burst near the apophysis and the contents was extruded in a long spiral.
Archegonia: Strong chrom-acetic acid and Licent's formula gave good results, although in a few cases a little plasmolysis occurred. Chamberlain (loc. cit.) recommends long periods for fixing in the chrom-acetic mixtures. This was accordingly followed, the usual time being 36–48 hours. Equally good results were obtained, however, by fixing for only 18 hours. Washing was done in running tap water. Carnoy's fluid was found to cause more or less plasmolysis if allowed to act for more than 18 hours, but with shorter times was quite good.
Antheridia: Young stages, up to the cutting off of the central spermatogenous tissue offer far less difficulty than do the later stages. In the latter shrinkage frequently occurs, due no doubt to the mucilaginous nature of the contents with poorly defined cell walls. Chrom-acetic acid (“strong” and “weak” above) and Carnoy's fluid caused plasmolysis in all but the young antheridia. Absolute alcohol caused no shrinkage even in the later stages, but formalin acetic alcohol again proved to be the best of the reagents tried. It caused no plasmolysis at any stage and staining with haematoxylins was brilliant. The time for fixing seems immaterial and objects may be left in the solution for months.

Dehydration and Infiltration.
Following Chamberlain (1) a very gradual series was used in the passage from alcohol to xylol and paraffin. While this appears necessary for detailed cytological work a less gradual series gave equally good results in the present research.
Owing to the hard wiry nature of the main stem, sectioning of antheridia or archegonia is practically impossible unless the “tufts” (Fig. 2) are dissected off and handled separately. Although this is extremely tedious, it is by far the most successful method, and for median sectioning of young sporogonia the only one, owing to the manner in which they curve away from the stem.
It was found difficult to get complete sections of older capsules due to the fact that the peristome teeth tore away from the other tissues. In an attempt to overcome this, two methods were tried:
(1) A long period of infiltration followed by some weeks on the paraffin bath, in paraffin (51°.).
(2) The use of hydrofluoric acid (Langdon 5). This was tried with 10% acid for periods varying from two to five days. Later both the above methods were combined, as material treated with hydrofluoric acid was also given a prolonged time on the bath for infiltration. Capsules treated in this latter manner gave much improved results although for the mature perestome even this was only partially successful.
Staining.
The following stains were employed: Haidenhain's Iron Alum Haematoxylin; Delafield's Haematoxylin; Safranin and Light Green (in clove oil); Gentian Violet; Orange G and Erythrosin were both used with the haematoxylins as counter stains. For the older capsules Safranin and Light Green was good—the walls of the spores and teeth of the perestome staining a bright red. Delafield's Haematoxylin and Orange G gave excellent results with antheridia. For embryos Haidenhain's Iron Alum Haematoxylin was very good, staining both the cell walls and the nuclei—the addition of Orange G gave much better differentiation.
When using the Iron Alum Haematoxylin destaining was tried with 4% Ferric Ammonium Sulphate or with a saturated solution of Picric Acid (Tuan H'su Chuan. 6). The latter was much more successful, especially when the sections were washed for five minutes afterwards in Scott's Tap Water Substitute.
Sections were cut on a Cambridge rocking microtome or on a heavy sledge microtome and varied from 5–18 microns in thickness, depending on the object to be sectioned. Drawings were done with an Abbé camera lucida or a Leitz projection drawing apparatus.
General Account of Cyathophorum.
(a) Ecology. Cyathophorum occurs in mixed wet forest and is absent from or much rarer in the drier Nothofagus forest. It appears to be a generally epipetrous species (Verdoon 32), although in a sufficiently humid atmosphere it is often found on exposed roots,

fallen tree trunks, etc. It is in general not very plentiful. As a rule Cyathophorum forms pure colonies often covering a few square feet —the largest observed by the writer was some six feet by three feet. Frequently it is found in clumps of a few score plants on boulders or rocks in creek beds, etc.
The factor limiting its distribution would appear to be the humidity and the generally damp condition of the substratum rather than light intensity. The species has been found in a great variety of situations, ranging from places where light intensity was very low to those where the plants grew in bright light—always, however, the station was decidedly damp.
The plants may actually grow with water falling on them, but this is unusual and only one such habitat was observed. All the plants here were sterile.
(b) Gametophyte. The mature gametophyte develops from a protonemal stage as is usual in Mosses. The spores are green when shed, with large obvious chloroplasts, oil droplets and practically no exospore.
To obtain mature spores, capsules were artificially ripened by drying slowly in a Wardian case. For culturing protonemata broken bricks were used. These were sterilised with 4% formalin, boiled in water for half an hour and then stood in glass dishes with distilled water. The spores were sown at room temperature (viz. about 15°.) and the cultures kept under bell jars. They were left alone for some weeks and as growth appeared slow, drops of Knopp's Solution were pipetted on, and allowed to run down the slope of the brick. This caused more vigorous growth and buds soon developed on the protonemata.
Spores were found to have germinated a day after sowing and development was quite normal. The spore swells slightly and a blunt protuberance is pushed out through the exospore which splits. With further growth and transverse divisions an “alga-like” filament of indefinite length is produced with plentiful oval chloroplasts—a distinguishing feature from the green algae that frequently occur with the plants in nature. The erect gametophores arise on the protonema in the usual way.
The mature gametophore of Cyathophorum consists of a stem from two to ten inches in length bearing leaves arranged dorsiventrally (Fig. 1). There are two rows of large dorsal leaves extending laterally, and a single row of small ventral leaves. Usually the stem is unbranched, but a number of instances were seen where branching had occurred. This is an abnormal feature and will be referred to later.
The base of the stem ends in a thickish rhizomatous axis which can creep to some extent and turn erect. This is apparently a method of vegetative reproduction, as the apex, when it does turn erect, gives rise to a new leafy axis.
(c) Sex Organs. Cyathophorum is strictly dioecious. The sex organs are borne terminally on small branches in the axils of the dorsal leaves (Fig. 2) and are overlapped by the leaves of the ventral

row. Both antheridial and archegonial branches have an investment of small leaves enclosing the sex organs and paraphyses. The latter are much more abundant in the antheridial tufts, where they have somewhat swollen heads. Paraphyses do occur among the archegonia, but there are very few and they are much smaller than those in the male tufts.
Archegonial plants seem to be much more plentiful than the antheridial, and frequently whole colonies—in some cases feet across—were found composed entirely of the former.
A similar example is quoted by Johnson (23) for Plagiochila adiantoides. He advances the explanation that vegetative propagation from a few original pioneers, all female, is responsible for these large collections of one-sexed colonies.
Antheridial plants are found in similar patches, but here they are usually limited to a few dozen plants.
In most of the localities listed above Cyathophorum is plentiful. Yet in spite of this fact the percentage of plants found to be bearing sporogonia is surprisingly small—probably not more than about 10%.
The explanation seems to be due primarily to the separation of the sexes as mentioned above. There is no lack of either male or female plants, but the occasions on which they are intermixed in such a way to allow fertilisation to take place seem to be by no means frequent. This conclusion is borne out by the fact that when plants of different sexes are found together practically every archegonial plant bears several sporogonia.
The following instance may be given in illustration of this:—Sporogonia at several stages of development were found on all of a small clump of plants (about 10–20), growing on a vertical rock bank by a waterfall. No male plants were present among these, and they appeared quite isolated. However, two or three feet above this were found a number of antheridial plants with water dripping from them on to the female plants below. Clearly fertilisation had been most efficient. In contrast with this, hundreds of archegonial plants on a bank alongside had not a single sporogonium.
A longitudinal section of a sex branch shows a definite central zone of elongated cells which run into the cortex of the stem but do not attach themselves to the main strand in the latter. As already noted, a much-branched main axis is occasionally met with. This condition seems to arise from the antheridial or archegonial branches failing to form sex organs and the apical cell of some of these branches growing on to give leafy branches of some length. In all cases examined these laterally branched plants were completely sterile. Other cases were observed where instead of sex organs there was a large tuft of secondary protonemata. These tufts usually occurred in the axils of half a dozen or so of the leaves nearest the apex of the stem.
Considerable attention was given to ascertaining the season when the sex organs mature, and it can be stated that for New Zealand as a whole, sex organs and sporogonia can be found in any

stage of development in any season of the year. However, in any one locality this will not be the case, and the sex organs will show a periodicity in development. With any one plant it would be expected that but one crop of antheridia or archegonia would be borne per season and this is borne out by the fact that large plants are sometimes found with a crop of old (last season's?) sex organs towards the base and young or mature ones nearer the top. How far this periodic development holds in the different patches of Cyathophorum along one creek, for example, cannot be said, as more detailed observation over some years would be necessary to establish such a point with any certainty.
(d) Sporogonium. The sporogonia occur on the underside of the stem and hang downwards, the number on any one plant varying from one to about fourteen. There seldom appears more than one mature capsule from any one archegonial clump. Two or more archegonia in a clump may be fertilised and embryos develop up to a certain stage, but eventually one outstrips the others, which abort, the successful embryo going on to produce the mature sporophyte.
The vaginula is obvious and remains on the gametophore after the capsule has withered and fallen.
Microchemical tests show that in the cells at the apex of the sex branches there is a great concentration of large oil droplets, which stain deeply with Sudan III. These oil droplets also occur in the actual wall cells of the archegonial necks. When the embryo develops, oil is still abundant in the gametophytic tissues, but is absent in the embryo itself. A number of cases were found where the venter had swollen and undergone secondary growth but where there was no embryo present. This apparently was a case of secondary growth in an archegonium that had been unfertilised—in all these cases oil was abundant not only in the cells of the venter but also in those of the calyptra.
Development of the Antheridium.
The developmental series described below is based upon serial sections of over fifty antheridial tufts.
The antheridia develop from surface cells at the apex of the antheridial branch. Whether or not the apical cell of the branch itself gives rise to the first antheridium as in Fontinalis and Andreaea (Sachs 30, p. 372) cannot be said, as it was not found possible to trace any regularity in the order of formation of the antheridia. A surface cell protrudes very slightly and an oblique wall is formed in it, cutting off an apical cell with two cutting faces (Figs. 5–6). Cyathophorum in this respect evidently differs from Funaria hygrometrica (Campbell 13), Fontinalis and Sphagnum (Sachs 30). For Funaria, Campbell states “a superficial cell projects above its neighbours and this papilla is cut off by a transverse wall. The outer cell either becomes at once the mother cell of the antheridium, or other transverse walls may occur so that a short pedicel is first formed.”
In Cyathophorum nothing in the nature of a pedicel was observed before the advent of the apical cell. This functions immediately after the first oblique wall is formed (Figs. 5–6) cutting

off two rows of segments in the usual regular succession (Figs. 7–9). Obviously, owing to the absence of any pedicel, the stalk of the antheridium in the early stages of development cannot be distinguished definitely. All that can be said is that the lower segments (i.e., the first cut off by the apical cell) constitute the basal part of the stalk, while its upper limits are indefinite until periclinal walls appear in those segments destined to give rise to the body of the antheridium (Figs. 11–12).
Before these appear there is often a certain amount of subdivision of the lower segments cut off by the apical cell although the extent to which this occurs is variable and in general affects the lower portion of the stalk rather than the upper.
The number of segments cut off by the apical cell varies, but is usually about eight. Before the full number is attained secondary divisions begin in the lowest of the segments and extend upwards.
As seen in longitudinal section (Figs. 10–11) these divisions appear as periclinal walls cutting off an inner series of cells, the forerunner of the spermatogenous tissue, from a peripheral series which constitutes the antheridial wall.
How this is accomplished can only be made out clearly by a comparison of longitudinal with transverse sections of the antheridium. Before periclinal division sets in, a transverse section through a young antheridium shows two segments separated by their bounding wall. (Fig. 12.) The divisions which follow are best described with the aid of a diagram (I).
The original wall separating adjacent segments is represented a–a. The advent of periclinal division is marked in transverse section by the appearance of walls b–b which divide the two segments into cells of unequal size. The walls b–b are approximately parallel and meet the primary wall a–a towards opposite ends. The third series of walls c–c meets the other walls a–a and b–b as shown in Diagram I.
This results in the formation of centrally placed cells, surrounded by peripheral ones. The latter from now on divide only radially, so giving rise to the one-layered wall, while the former divide in all planes and eventually produce the mass of sperm cells. The central cells from the first stand out clearly in stained sections, having large nuclei and very dense cytoplasmic contents. The spermatogenous tissue can thus be distinguished at a very early stage from those cells which constitute the wall, since in the latter the cytoplasm is much vacuolated and the nuclei somewhat smaller.

The lower of the periclinal divisions, as seen in longitudinal section, occur while the apical cell is still actively cutting off segments. According to Campbell (13, pp. 196–7), “The number of these segments is limited, in Funaria not often exceeding seven, and after the full number has been formed the apical cell is divided by a septum parallel with its outer face into an inner cell, which, with the inner cells of the segments forms the mass of sperm cells, and an outer cell which produces the upper part of the wall.”
The present writer finds that the apical cell in Cyathophorum shows no such division, but apparently retains the ability to divide further. As already noted the spermatogenous tissue can be recognised early, and when this is apparently all formed, and much sub-divided, the apical cell is still intact (Figs. 20–21). In fact, the fully mature antheridium usually shows one or two divisions at the apex directly resulting from the action of the apical cell (Fig. 23). These are not isolated instances but were seen in dozens of antheridia.
This appearance is explainable in two ways: Either the periclinal walls do not form in the last few segments nearest the apex, or else the apical cell cuts off segments subsequently to the formation of the last of the central cells. Whichever interpretation is accepted, the fact remains that the apical cell functions to a late stage and can be recognised even in the mature antheridium.
The spermatogenous cells divide very regularly in all planes, and the original walls separating adjacent primary segments can be recognised at a late stage (Fig. 22). However, eventually all the cell walls break down and the mature antheridium consists of a large number of sperms embedded in mucilage, which still shows traces of cellular structure.
The stalk is relatively long. In median longitudinal section the original divisions due to the “two-sided” apical cell can be traced, although with increase in age the regularity of the early segmentation is much disturbed. However, it is quite clear that the stalk is derived from segments cut off from the two-sided apical cell, and not due to a series of transverse divisions, formed by the original papilla (as in Andreaea) prior to the setting apart of the two-sided apical cell. The wall is one layered and its cells, except for a few at the apex, contain chloroplasts.
Ripe antheridia open in a few moments if placed in water or very dilute sugar solution (0.4%)—the latter was found to cause much more vigorous movement in the sperms when they were attempting to escape from the mass of mucilage in which they were extruded from the antheridium.
A rupture occurs between the opercular cells, of which there are several, and the complete contents of the antheridium emerges through a constricted opening. This mass of sperms, still enclosed in mucilage is often two or three times the length of the antheridium from which it came, giving an indication that the swelling of the mucilage, by inbibition of water, is one of the main factors causing the bursting of the antheridium.

While the lower part of the contents is still within the antheridium the sperms at the upper end begin to show a characteristic gyrating movement. The mucilage gradually thins out and the sperms are set free. The form of the sperm is the usual one for Mosses. There is a distinct vesicle, and the two very long cilia, so characteristic of the Bryophyta as a whole, are attached to a densely staining nuclear portion which forms the main body of the sperm.
Development of the Archegonium.
The following description is based on evidence obtained from sectioning over eighty archegonial tufts, the majority of the stages figured being observed frequently.
Like the antheridia, the archegonia arise from surface cells at the apex of the female branches. A surface cell protrudes and becomes more or less papilliform. (This papilliform nature is much more marked than in the antheridium initial.) The first wall formed in it shows a little variation, but generally it is very oblique, so cutting off a two-sided apical cell, as in the antheridium. (Figs. 25–26.) The variation is in the degree of slanting of this first wall, which may range from almost vertical to practically transverse. In the latter case a second wall meeting the first one has to form before one can speak of a “two-sided” apical cell. There appears to be no wall cutting off a basal cell from the archegonial mother cell as described by Campbell (13), Goebel (17) and Gayet (16). In this respect the development in Cyathophorum agrees with that given for Mnium cuspidatum by Holferty (21).
The two-sided apical cell cuts off from three to six segments in the same manner as in the antheridium before the characteristic development of the archegonium from a so-called “three-sided” apical cell commences. The change from a two-sided to this “three-sided” apical cell takes place when a wall is formed in the former, which is more nearly vertical than the walls which precede. As noted by Holferty (21) this is an abrupt change and immediately gives the “three-sided” apical cell. (Figs. 29–30.) This now divides by a transverse wall, so forming a terminal and an inner cell (Fig. 31, t and i). This inner cell is the first of the axial row in both Liverworts and Mosses, while all the tissue below goes to form the pedicel. There is some disagreement as to the parts played by the terminal cell and the inner cell in the later history of the archegonium. This concerns in particular the origin of the axial row, but for the sake of continuity the discussion of these views is held over till later and the development as found in Cyathophorum is continued.
The inner cell (Fig. 31 i) divides transversely, giving rise to a lower and an upper cell (Fig. 35 1–p). The upper cell is the primary canal initial or mother cell of the canal row, while the lower is the primary ventral cell. The latter appears to divide fairly late as Bryan (11) also states. Fig. 37 shows a stage with five neck canal cells and the primary ventral cell still undivided. However, there appears to be some variation here as cases have been noted by the present writer where the egg cell and the ventral canal

cell are clearly to be recognised when there are no more than four or five neck canal cells. Seeing that the mature archegonium has as many as fourteen of these, this may be taken as a comparatively early separation of the egg.
The apical cell at this stage in the development is referred to by other writers as a “three-sided” apical cell. It must be remembered that in addition to segments cut off parallel to the three lateral faces, this cell also cuts off segments parallel to its base. There are, therefore, four cutting faces, and the cell should, strictly speaking, be termed “four-sided.”
The “three-sided” apical cell cuts off segments parallel to the three lateral faces, and also parallel to the base. The former series divide by vertical walls, so forming six rows of cells which make up the wall of the archegonial neck, while the latter add to the axial row of neck canal cells. Both the cells of the neck and those of the axial row may undergo intercalary divisions so adding to the length of the archegonium. (Fig. 38.)
In the vicinity of the egg the wall becomes two or three-layered, so forming the venter, which merges with the massive pedicel. This latter owes its origin first to the activity of the two-sided apical cell, and secondly to subsequent divisions in the original segments.
There are two sources of evidence to show that the apical cell does add to the series of neck canal cells by cutting off segments parallel to its base. The first is shown in Fig. 39. The outline of the original apical cell is clearly seen, and the cell cut off by the wall parallel to its base obviously adds to the canal row. The second source of evidence is in seeing the mitotic figure of the apical cell lying in such a way that the resulting wall will be parallel to its base. (Fig. 38.) Figs. 37–38–39 are not isolated examples, but were found about eight times.
The apical cell continues to cut off segments adding to the length of the neck till a late stage, but according to Holferty (21) “the last divisions for this purpose are always intercalary.” However, in the present study no mitotic figure was secured to prove that intercalary division took place, after the apical cell had ceased functioning, so that there must remain some doubt on the point in regard to Cyathophorum. The mature archegonium (Fig. 40) consists of the usual long spirally-twisted neck, two-layered venter and massive pedicel. The axial row consists of from ten to fourteen neck canal cells, the ventral canal cell, and the egg—the latter in all cases observed being much larger than any other cell of the axial row. When mature, the archegonium opens at the apex, the terminal cells diverging fairly widely and being sometimes detached altogether. At a stage immediately before the neck opens the canal row has practically disintegrated. The walls between the cells disappear, so that finally, when the neck does open, there is a passage to the egg. This may be filled more or less with mucilage, derived from the disintegrated canal cells, a certain amount of which appears to be extruded when the archegonium opens.

Development of the Sporogonium.
(a) Embryo. Very early stages as already noted are difficult to kill and fix, due to the large size of the cells and the extremely delicate nature of the cell walls. The earliest stage found (Fig. 41) consists of two much-elongated cells. The succession of divisions appears different from those in Andreaea and Funaria, where the second wall occurs in the epibasal cell and strikes the basal wall in such a way as to cut out an apical cell with two cutting faces.
In Cyathophorum successively older embryos (Figs. 42 and 44) show that a series of transverse divisions occurs to give a very elongated embryo, before the apical cell appears. Eventually, however, an oblique wall forms in the uppermost cell, which now constitutes the two-sided apical from which the embryo grows for a very long time. The actual setting apart of the apical cell was not observed. The embryo as it grows becomes embedded in the tissue of what was the pedicel of the archegonium, now very much swollen. This embedding of the embryo takes place so completely at a later stage that the question is raised as to whether it is due solely to the upgrowth of the underlying gametophytic tissue, or to some process of digestion on the part of the young sporogonium itself. Owing to the manner of the earliest cell divisions in the embryo, the limits of the foot are difficult to define, but in the later stages the greater part of the absorbing portion of the embryo does not belong to the true foot at all, but has come from the apical cell.
Longitudinal sections show that the apical cell cuts off segments it very regular succession as usual in Mosses. At first thought it is difficult to picture how a two-sided apical cell can cut off segments in such a way as to build up a solid cylindrical embryo. A detailed study of a large number of longitudinal and transverse sections makes this clear. In this study some eighty embryos were sectioned. A close series of figures, derived from a large number of embryos, setting forth the development as seen in transverse section is given by Figs. 50–60. In addition, Fig. 46 a–k shows serial sections taken at intervals of eight microns through the upper portion of one embryo. Any longitudinal section shows that periclinal walls appear early (Figs. 43–44). (In these particular embryos distortion due to killing and fixing has occurred—see section on Material and Methods). A study of transverse sections, however, shows that they are preceded by anticlinal walls (Fig. 51 b–b,) dividing the original segments. These walls are followed by others which are obliquely anticlinal, represented c–c in Figs. 52–58. There is considerable variation as to whether the walls c–c meet the primary wall a–a or the wall b–b (Fig. 54). The next walls (d–d in Figs. 56–58) meet the walls b–b in such a way as to cut off a series of central cells, the endothecium, from peripheral cells or amphithecium. In Funaria the early divisions are somewhat different (Campbell 13). The second series of walls is usually periclinal, thus separating the endothecium and amphithecium at a slightly earlier stage. Campbell (loc. cit.) notes that this is not invariable for Funaria. Judging by the fact that only one instance (Fig. 47) was found in the whole of the series of numerous embryos studied, it would appear that for

Cyathophorum this early separation of the endothecium is an uncommon variation, and that normally the separation is not complete until the third series of walls is formed. This is also the case in other Bryineae which have been described by other writers.
When the endothecium has been separated, the structure shown in Fig. 59 remains constant throughout a considerable length of the upper region of the embryo (viz. for a distance of 96–120 microns in the particular examples studied). This structure as seen in longitudinal section is shown in Fig. 48. The embryo as a whole at this stage is shown in situ in Fig. 49. It has much increased in size and the swelling that eventually causes the rupture of the venter is evident. For purposes of convenience the account of the development of the young capsule is carried on from this point.
(b) Young Capsule. The nuclei of the four cells of the endothecium at this stage are very large and stain deeply. (Figs. 59–60.) There is slight variation in the divisions which follow on from the stage shown in Fig. 59, but by far the most usual case is for the amphithecium to become separated into two layers by periclinal divisions. (Figs. 60–61.) Occasionally the endothecium begins to divide before the amphithecium, but this is quite unusual, and as a rule by the time the former begins to divide the amphithecium is at least two and maybe three or four-layered.
The endothecial cells now subdivide to give a group of four central cells (c. Fig. 63) surrounded by about eight peripheral cells (p. Fig. 63). The regularity of the divisions is usually disturbed, and instead of the theoretical eight there may be ten or eleven cells in this layer (Fig. 64 p). It is from these cells that the archesporium and the inner spore sac develop, the four central cells subdividing further to make up the tissue of the columella. The peripheral cells (p. Fig. 64) divide first by radial, and then by periclinal division, into inner and outer cells. The inner cells constitute the inner spore sac (i.s. Fig. 77)—actually the outer layer of the columella—while the outer cells by a number of further radial divisions form the archesporum (Fig. 77 sp.).
As seen in transverse section the amphithecium consists in its primary stage of eight cells (Fig. 59). The first divisions in these cells are usually periclinal, cutting off smaller inner cells from larger outer ones (Fig. 60). These periclinal divisions separate what will become the wall of the capsule from the outer spore sac. The cells of the latter divide first radially (Figs. 62–64) and then periclinally so that at this stage the spore sac is two layered (Fig. 78 o.sp.s). Further periclinal divisions set in as a rule, giving an outer spore sac which may be three or four cells thick when mature (Fig. 82).
Longitudinal sections of embryos of increasing ages show how the capsule originates. Figs. 48–49 show that some distance behind the apex the cells undergo rapid division, resulting in a swelling of the young sporogonium at this point (Fig. 49 c). This swollen region is the forerunner of the lower portion of the capsule, while the tissues above this swelling give rise to the remainder of the capsule and operculum, although, of course, its limits cannot be defined as the embryo is still growing fast. The foot region at this

stage (Fig. 49) is relatively very large, and in fact it does not further-increase much in size even in the mature sporogonium. The outer layer of cells has obvious nuclei and rather dense contents, no doubt due to the rapid intaking of food from the gametophore, while the central cells are elongated. (Figs. 49 and 71.)
Where the young sporogonum emerges from the much swollen “venter,” it shows a distinct collar, very obvious in longitudinal sections (Fig. 67, semi-diagramatic). This collar appears to function in the forcing off of the calyptra—helped of course by the general elongation of the young sporophyte—and is still evident in the mature sporogonium where the seta enters the vaginula. (Fig. 68.) Rapid division in the tissues immediately above this collar initiates the formation of the seta which carries the young capsule, with its enclosing calyptra, upwards. (Fig. 68.)
Transverse sections taken through the young capsule show the development of the archesporium as already described, and also the origin of the air space. The layer of cells (1. Fig. 77) immediately outside the outer spore sac, shows very characteristically as noted by Campbell (13). They are narrow radially but rather extended laterally, and it is between these cells and the spore sac that the air space develops. The walls of the cells which will border the air space when it forms take the stain very deeply, enabling the position of the space, as seen in longitudinal section (Fig. 69) to be traced for some distance above the point where the cells have actually come apart. By the time the air space is formed the outer spore sac is two or even three layered, but the sporogenous tissue still remains in its one-layered condition for a time. (Fig. 77.) Eventually, when the full extent of the air space has formed and the general lay-out of the capsule has been completed, the fertile tissue becomes two layered—divisions appearing first at the base and extending upwards. (Figs. 72–74.) The result of these divisions is to produce the spore mother cells which come apart from one another and lie free in the space between the inner and outer spore sacs. Here they undergo the usual “tetrad” division, each producing four spores. (Fig. 84.)
A transverse section of the seta at this stage shows that the conducting strand has developed. In transverse section this is seen to consist of a few thin-walled cells, while the walls of the cortical and epidermal cells in the seta region become much thickened especially at the angles, and turn brown. (Fig. 80—full thickness of walls in cortex not shown.)
In Cyathophorum the operculum presents a characteristic appearance in longitudinal section. The apical cell functions for a very long time as already mentioned, and can frequently be recognised even in a mature capsule. (Fig. 76.) From the apex a central “core” of tissue with very regular divisions extends down to the top of the columella. The peristome arises from the fourth or fifth layer of cells from the outer margin of the operculum. In longitudinal section this layer is seen to consist of cells whose radial walls are much extended. (Fig. 81.) It is by thickening of these radial, and also peripheral, walls that the peristome teeth are formed.

Thickening is first seen on the peripheral walls and it gradually extends inwards along the radial ones until the lumen of the cell is practically filled—the nucleus remaining obvious till a very late stage in the process. (Fig. 75.) From this stage on it was found very difficult to get complete sections through the peristome, as the greatly thickened teeth usually tore away from the thinner walled tissues below.
At the junction of the operculum and theca there appears a ring-like depression which runs completely round the capsule. This marks the position of the annulus. In Cyathophorum the form of the annulus is rather different from that figured by Campbell (13) for Funaria. In longitudinal section there is one cell very much larger than those above and below, which still shows its nucleus and contents after the surrounding cells have lost theirs. Thus, as thickening of the walls of this cell occurs late, and is never well developed, it represents a place of weakness where the operculum joins the theca. (Fig. 81.) Eventually when the capsule is mature the rupture occurs at this level, and the operculum is shed. It seems that the peristome teeth must be effective in forcing off the operculum and causing the rupture of the annulus. No doubt the general drying and collapse of the central tissues will help, but the main factor seems to be the extremely hygroscopic nature of the teeth which respond to humidity changes even when protected by the operculum. The fact that when the operculum in a mature capsule is removed gently, the teeth of the peristome immediately curve outwards as if they had been held under tension, is further evidence in the same direction.
The apophysis in Cyathophorum is very poorly marked. Its cells are loosely arranged with wide air spaces, and except for the central conducting portion most of them have chloroplasts. Stomata are present on the surface, thus allowing communication between the atmosphere, the intercellular spaces and the actual air space of the capsule.
At the stage when the sporogenous cells are undergoing their final division the columella is very densely stocked with large starch grains, and the cells bordering on the spore mass appear to function as a “tapetum.” Their nuclei are large and the whole contents stains deeply. (Fig. 84) At a somewhat earlier stage, when the fertile tissue is in the condition shown in Fig. 70, starch grains are much less abundant and very much smaller. There are also fewer chloroplasts in those cells bordering on air spaces than in the later stages. Thus it seems reasonable to suppose that the bulk of the starch is the result of photosynthesis on the part of the sporogonium itself.
The calyptra is not large compared with that in some Mosses, and its development can be easily traced. The venter of the fertilised archegonium undergoes a large amount of secondary cell division and eventually becomes bell-shaped with a distinct incurved base. (Figs. 65–68.) A transverse section shows the outer cells to be much larger than those bordering on the space containing the young

sporogonium, and also much less densely stocked with cytoplasm. With further growth of the sporogonium the venter ruptures about its base and is carried away on top of the young capsule.
(c) Older Sporogonium. The general outline of the capsule with the operculum still attached is shown in longitudinal section in Fig. 70. The wall is four or five cells thick and the mass of spores occupies a larger space than before. In fact, the growth of the fertile tissue is such that the air space is practically obliterated except in the basal region. The columella is massive and shows signs of tearing away from the tissues of the operculum. This it does later and the upper part collapses leaving the lower half standing as a pillar surrounded by the spore mass. The outer spore sac persists at the base for a fairly long time, but when the columella breaks down it is reduced to a membrane in the upper part of the capsule. (Fig. 88.) Eventually the operculum is shed and the peristome teeth commence to excavate the mass of green spores. The peristome consists of an outer circle of sixteen heavy teeth with distinct thickenings in the form of bars, and an inner circle of the same number of V-shaped teeth alternating with cilia.
Brotherus (10) figures the teeth of Cyathophorum bulbosum, but no cilia corresponding to the type given by him were found by the present writer. Similarly his figure for the capsule of the same species is of quite different shape from that described in the present paper. It seems that the outer series of teeth is mainly responsible for excavating the spores by hygroscopic movements. If a mature capsule is mounted upright and observed under the microscope, the teeth can be made to act by breathing gently on them. When this is done those in the outer circle curve inwards and force their way between those of the inner series down into the spore mass. After a time (no doubt when the humidity has fallen again) the teeth straighten, and by so doing rasp their bar-like thickenings against those of the inner teeth and cilia. This is a very jerky motion and causes the dry spores adhering to the teeth to be scattered.
The seta is short and undergoes no hygroscopic movement as it does in some mosses (e.g. Funaria). As regards the “foot” region of the seta, the usual statement (e.g. Campbell 13) is that the base of the seta “grows down” into the tissue of the gametophore, from which it of course obtains nourishment. In Cyathophorum, as already noted, the embryo, even before the venter is burst, is as much embedded in the tissues of the gametophore as it ever is. The seta does not “grow down,” as its lower absorbing portion is already deeply embedded.
The final stage comes very much later when the seta breaks across the top of the vaginula and the whole empty and withered capsule is shed.
Discussion.
(a) Antheridium. The development of the antheridium is very similar to that described for other Mosses and differs only in slight details. The first of these is the very early setting apart of the

Fig. 1.—Gametophore of C. bulbosum ventral view. Nat. size. Fig. 2.—Diagram of L.S. main stem showing lateral sex branches, sex organs omitted; X 30. Fig. 3.—L.S. archegonial branch; large archegonium shows a young embryo; X 70. Figs. 4–9.—Development of antheridium as seen in L.S. before advent of periclinal division; X 570. Figs. 10–11.—Ditto, showing advent of periclinal division; X 570. Figs. 12–18.—Advent of periclinal division as seen in transverse section; X 570.

Fig. 19.—L.S. antheridium; fertile tissue undivided;X 570. Fig. 20.—Ditto, fertile tissue sub-divided; p.: paraphyses; st.: stalk of mature antheridium; X 290. Fig. 21.—Ditto, showing all nuclei in one segment dividing; X 570. Fig. 22.—L.S. nearly mature antheridium; X 150. Fig. 23.—Ditto of apex to show apical cell still intact; X 570. Figs. 24–28.—Development of archegonium from “2-sided” apical cell; X 700. Figs. 29–30.—Formation of “3-sided” apical cell; X 700. Fig. 31.—Division of apical cell; t: terminal cell; i: inner cell; X 700. Fig. 32.—T.S. “2-sided” apical cell; X 350. Fig. 33.—Ditto, “3-sided” apical cell; X 350. Fig. 34.—T.S. of neck; X 350.

Fig. 35.—L.S. archegonium; inner cell divided to give primary ventral cell (1) and primary canal initial (p); X 700. Fig. 36.—Ditto, showing primary ventral cell (p) and two neck canal cells X 700. Fig. 37.—Ditto showing intercalary division; primary ventral cell (p) still undivided X 350. Fig. 38.—L.S. older archegonium showing division in neck canal wall, and apical cell: X 350. Fig. 39.—L.S. apex mature archegonium with apical cell adding a segment to the canal row; X 700. Fig. 40.—L.S. mature archegonium; X 175. Fig. 41.—L.S. embryo in venter showing first wall; X 300. Fig. 42.—L.S. embryo in 3-celled stage; X 300. Figs. 43–45.—L.S. older embryos; X 150. Figs. 46 a–k.—Serial T.S. through one embryo from apex; en: endothecium. a: amphithecium; X 605. Fig. 47.—T.S. showing variation in formation of endothecium; X 605.

Fig. 48.—L.S. apex of sporogonium; en: endothecium; X 300. Fig. 49.—L.S. complete sporogonium; X 75. Figs. 50–59.—Transverse sections of sporogonia showing development of endothecium (en) and amphithecium (a); X 400. Figs. 60–64.—division of amphithecium and endothecium; o.sp.s.: outer spore sac, p: peripheral cells; c: central cells; X 400.

Figs. 65–67.—Diagrams to show development of sporogonium, calyptra, etc.; c: calyptra. vg.: vaginula. Figs. 65 and 66.—X 50. Fig. 67.—X 35. Fig. 68.—L.S. very young capsule; a.s: air space, c: calyptra, s: seta. f: foot, vg: vaginula; X 37. Fig. 69.—L.S. upper portion of young capsule (cf. Fig. 68). not perfectly median at apex; X 150.

Fig. 70.—L.S. immature capsule; a.s.: air space, sp: sporogonial tissue; X 50. Fig. 71.—T.S. foot, and surrounding gametophytic tissue. N.B., dense cytoplasm; X 172. Figs. 72–74.—Division of sporogenous tissue; o.sp.s.: outer spore sac; X 300. Fig. 75.—L.S. portion of peristome showing one tooth; X 150. Fig. 76.—L.S. apex of capsule showing apical cell; X 300.

Figs. 77–79.—T.S. young capsule showing development of air space (a.s.): o.sp.s.: outer spore sac, 1: inner wall of capsule, sp.: sporogenous tissue; X 300. Fig. 80.—T.S. seta with conducting strand; X200. Fig. 81.—L.S. upper portion of immature capsule; a.: annulus, a.s.: air space, sp.: sporogenous tissue; X 100.

Fig. 82.—T.S. immature capsule; a.s.: air space, c.: columella; sp.: sporogenous tissue; X 150. Fig. 83.—Ditto, sporogenous tissue dividing; X 150. Fig. 84.—L.S. spore sac with spore “tetrads”: o.sp.s.: outer spore sac; tl.: “tapetal” layer; X 300. Fig. 85.—T.S. portion of mature capsule; s.: spores, a.s.: air space, tl.: “tapetal” layer; X 150. Fig. 86.—T.S. peristome before operculum is shed; t: tooth; X 150. Fig. 87.—Ditto, near base of peristome; X 150. Fig. 88.—L.S. mature capsule, operculum shed; a.s.: air space, c.: columella; p.: spore mass. o.sp.s.: outer spore sac reduced to a membrane: X 30.

two-sided apical cells, before any pedicel is apparent. (This also occurs in Mnium, Holferty 21.) The segmentation of the antheridium to cut off central spermatogenous cells is somewhat different from that described by Goebel (17, p. 13); and Ruhland (29, p. 66). The succession of walls given by them is shown in Diagram II. In the species described by these authors the walls b–b both meet the primary wall a–a at the same point. Similarly with the third series c–c. In Cyathophorum (see Diagram I) the walls b–b are approximately parallel and meet the primary wall towards opposite ends. In Funaria hygrometrica (Campbell 13) the succession of walls corresponds to that given for Cyathophorum (Diagram I). The account of the apical cell has already been given.
(b)Archegonium. As already noted, there appears to be some confusion as to the exact manner in which the archegonium grows and forms the axial row. Campbell, Goebel. Holferty and others distinguish the archegonium of the Musci from that of the Hepaticae by the fact that the cover cell is active in the former, adding both to the cells of the neck and to the axial row. It thus seems fairly clear that in Musci the archegonium grows in length as a result of segmentation by the three-sided apical cell. How far this apical cell or cover cell is responsible for the cells of the canal row is however not so clear.
According to Campbell (13) in Funaria hygrometrica the terminal mother cell of the young archegonium divides transversely, giving rise to an upper cell, corresponding to the cover cell of the Liverworts, and an inner cell which produces the primary neck canal cell, the egg and the ventral cell. The cover cell functions as an apical cell cutting off lateral segments which give rise to the outer cells of the neck, and also segments parallel to the base to form the cells of the neck canal. Thus in this account all the neck canal cells arise from the apical cell, with the exception of the primary neck canal cell. This appears to persist as the lowest of the cells in the canal row lying immediately above the ventral canal cell. Campbell (loc. cit.) states definitely that “the canal cells so far as could be determined do not divide after they are first formed.” In Cyathophorum however this is evidently not the case.
G. M. Holferty (21) for Mnium cuspidatum gives the same general sequence of events except that he holds that the primary neck canal cell undergoes intercalary divisions. The cells cut off from the apical may also undergo intercalary division. Thus here the uppermost cells of the neck canal series are different in origin from those towards the base.

G. S. Bryan (11) in his work on Sphagnum subsecundum finds no evidence that any cells of the canal row are derived from the apical cell—the whole series being due entirely to intercalary divisions of the primary neck canal cell. Thus Sphagnum appears to be one of the Musci in which the archegonium shows distinct Hepatic characters.
Gayet (16) holds that growth of the archegonium in both Musci and Hepaticeae is terminal, but that the apical cell does not add to the canal row. As noted by Bryan (11), this view appears to be rather a contradiction.
The present investigation supports the view advanced by Holferty (21) viz., that the neck canal cells are derived in part from the apical cell. Intercalary divisions definitely do occur, adding further to the length of the neck.
(c) Sporogonium. As already noted, the early stages in development of the sporogonium of Cyathophorum differ from those in Andreaea and Funaria. The very elongated embryo resulting from a number of transverse divisions offers some analogy with the embryos of Sphagnum (Campbell 13) and even of Fossombronia (Humphrey 22). Of course such a comparison is very superficial and applies only to the first few divisions. Once the two-sided apical cell is formed this similarity ceases and development follows the usual course for the true mosses. In the development of the sex organs and the sporogonium as given above, it is seen that there are no fundamental differences between Cyathophorum and such other mosses as have been described. There are, however, differences in detail, as is only to be expected in such a large group.
As regards the embedding of the lower part of the seta in the tissue of the gametophore, Vaizey (31) for Polytrichum notes “that it is apparently effected by the cells of the young calyptra becoming hard and thick-walled before it is separated from the vaginula.” He goes on to explain that with further growth the apex of the young sporogonium is unable to push past the calyptra, and hence “the lower apex is forced down into the stem of the oophyte through the softer to the harder tissues, when the pressure on the ealyptra becomes so great that it is torn away from the vaginula.” Actually in Cyathophorum the apex and the whole upper part of the young sporogonium do not touch the calyptra at all (Fig. 49). The actual portion of the embryo which appears to force off the calyptra is the “swelling” which later gives rise to the capsule, and especially the peculiar “collar” of tissue already referred to. However, neither the “swelling” nor the “collar” develop until the embryo is some size, yet in spite of this fact its lower extremity has already penetrated practically as far as it ever does. Although this is partially explained by the secondary growth of the venter, it seems that some process of digestion by the young embryo is responsible for the appearance usually attributed to the “growing down” of the seta at a later stage.

Summary.
| 1. |
A developmental series of the antheridium and archegonium of Cyathophorum bulbosum is given. |
| 2. |
The sequence of divisions in the developing young sporogonium is studied. |
| 3. |
The formation of the capsule, with the origin of the fertile tissue and air space is described, and also an account given of the mature sporogonium. |
| 4. |
The ripening of the spores, their germination, and the growth of the protonema is described. |
| 5. |
A general account of the gametophyte of Cyathophorum is outlined, with a short note on its occurrence and ecology. |
| 6. |
Points of difference between this genus and others are discussed. |
| 7. |
Various methods of killing and fixing, infiltration, etc., are given, and their results commented upon. |
Bibliography.
A. Laboratory Technique.
1. Chambeblain, C. J., 1932. Methods in Plant Histology. Chicago Univ. Press; 5th Ed.
2. Couch, A. B., 1928. A method to soften tissues already embedded in paraffin, Science, 69, pp. 607–608.
3. Dowson, W. J., 1929. A new method of paraffin infiltration, Ann. dot., vol. 36, pp. 577–578.
4. Land, W. J. G., 1915. Microtechnical Methods. Contrib. Hull Botanical Lab., 203, Bot. Gaz., 59, pp. 397–401.
5. Langdon, La Dema M., 1920. Sectioning hard woody tissues, Bot. Gaz., 70, pp. 82–84.
6. Tuan, Hsu-Chuan, 1930. Picric acid as a destaining agent for Iron Alum Haematoxylin, Stain Technology, 5, pp. 135–138.
B. General.
7. Allen, Charles E., 1917. The spermatogenesis of Polytrichum juniperum, Ann. Bot., vol. 31, pp. 269–91.
8. Beer, R., 1906. Development of spores in Riccia glauca, Ann. Bot., vol. 20. pp. 275–289.
9. Bower, F. O., 1935. Primitive Land Plants, pp. 1–110.
10. Brotherus, V. F., 1925. In Engler und Prantl's Die Naturlichen Pflanzen-familien, 11 Band, Musci 2, pp. 276–278.
11. Bryan, G. S., 1915. The archegonium of Sphagnum subsecundum, Bot. Gaz., 59, pp. 40–56, and plates.
12. Bryan, G. S., 1927. Abnormal sex organs of Mnium medium, Bot. Gaz., 84, pp. 89–101.
13. Campbell, D. H., 1918. Mosscs and Ferns, 3rd ed.
14. Davis, B. M., 1908. Spore formation in Derbesia, Ann. Bof., vol. 22, pp. 1–20.
15. Dixon, H. N., 1913. Studies in the Bryology of New Zealand, Part I, N.Z. Inst. Bulletin, no. 3.
16. Gayet, L. A., 1897. Recherches sur le développement de l'archégone chez les muscinees, Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot., 8, pp. 161–258, and plates.
17. Goebel, K., 1905. Organography of Plants, Pt. II, pp. 7–18.
18. Heberlein, Enid A., 1929. Morphological studies on a new species of Marchantia, Bot. Gaz., vol. 88, p. 417.

19. Hooker, J. D., 1844. Flora Antarctica, vol. 1, 143 pp., and plate lxii, fig. iii.
20. Hooker, J. D., 1855. Flora Novae Zelandiae, 120 pp.
21. Holferty, G. M., 1904. The development of the archegonium of Mnium cuspidatum, Bot. Gaz., 37, pp. 106–126.
22. Humphrey, H. B., 1906. The development of Fossombronia longiseta Aust., Ann. Bot., vol. 20, pp. 83–108.
23. Johnson, Duncan S., 1929. Development of the antheridium and spermatozoid in Plagiochila adiantoides Lindb. (Swartz), Bot. Gaz., 88, p. 38.
24. Manning, Florence L., 1914. The life history of Porella platyphylla, Bot. Gaz., 57, pp. 320–323.
25. McCormack, Florence A., 1914. A study of Symphyogyna aspera, Bot. Gaz., 58, pp. 401–418.
26. McNaught, Helen Louise, 1929. Development of the sporophyte of Marchantia chenopoda, Bot. Gaz., 88, pp. 400–416.
27. O'Hanlon, Mary E., 1926. Germination of spores and early stages in the development of the gametophyte of Marchantia polymorpha, Bot. Gaz., 82, pp. 215–222.
28. Ridler, W. F. F., 1922. The fungus present in Pellia epiphylla (L.) Corda, Ann. Bot., vol. 37, pp. 193–207.
29. Ruhland, W., 1924. In Engler and Prantl's Die Naturlichen Pflanzen-familien, 10 Band, Musci 1, p. 66.
30. Sachs, Julius, 1882. Textbook of Botany, 2nd ed. (trans.), pp. 342–385.
31. Vaizey, J. Reynolds, 1888. On the anatomy and development of the sporogonium of the mosses, Journ. Linn. Soc., vol. 24, pp. 262–285, and plates.
32. Verdoon, 1932. Manual of Bryology.
33. Wilson, M., 1911. Spermatogenesis in the bryophyta, Ann. Bot., vol. 25, p. 422.
34. Wilson, W., 1855. See Hooker, Flora Novae Zelandiae.
35. Woodburn, W. L., 1913. Spermatogenesis in Blasia pusilla L., Ann. Bot., vol. 27, pp. 93–101.
