
Contributions to the Mineralogy of New Zealand—Part I.
[Read before the Wellington Branch, Royal Society, May 23, 1945; received by the Editor, May 24, 1945; issued separately, September, 1945.]
Summary.
New analyses of muscovite, ferruginous corundophilite, dravite, and beryl, have been made, and their optical constants determined. These data are briefly discussed in conjunction with some comparative analyses. Structural formulae have been calculated from the chemical analyses and compared with the ideal formulae derived by X-ray investigation.
Muscovite.
The two muscovites investigated herein occurred as large, thin books, usually without distinct outlines, in granite pegmatites, and were associated with quartz, orthoclase, microcline and perthites. In addition to the usual physical properties of muscovites, these micas exhibit pronounced planes of secondary cleavage, the directions of which are probably to be identified with those developed in the percussion figures; in the muscovite from Henry Pass (P. 8295) these secondary directions are so particularly well developed that the sheets of mica readily break up into relatively narrow strips. Both specimens are transparent, and the colour is very pale hair-brown in sheets approximately 4 mm. thick, and there is a distinct pearly lustre. Iron staining is relatively unimportant.
The analyses are given in Table I, and it will be noted that both minerals are true muscovites with some of the phengite molecule [H6K2 (Fe'', Mg)2 Al4 Si6 O24, Volk, 1939] present in solid solution. However, one of the micas (anal. A) is unusual in that 0.66 per cent. of BaO is present, and as barium very rarely enters the lattice of muscovite except in the unusual species barium muscovite, or oellacherite, comparative analyses have been difficult to find in the literature available to the writer. Nevertheless a muscovite from Western Australia with 1.16 per cent, of BaO (Table I, anal. B) is very similar, and a muscovite with 9.89 per cent, of BaO is included in order to give some idea of the extent to which barium may be present in a mica.
The source of the barium must be attributed to the late granite solutions from which the pegmatite minerals crystallised, and for this reason it would be of interest to know if the associated feldspars contained any celsian.

| A. | A1. | A2. | B. | B1. | ||
| SiO2 | 44.73 | 44.28 | 41.37 | 45.50 | 44.83 | |
| Al2O3 | 30.67 | 35.64 | 32.64 | 33.20 | 33.27 | |
| Fe2O3 | 3.42 | 2.56 | Nil | 1.03 | 4.00 | |
| FeO | 1.42 | — | — | 1.41 | 1.15 | |
| MgO | 1.56 | 0.28 | 1.55 | 0.96 | 0.54 | |
| CaO | nt.fd. | 0.28 | 0.36 | trace | Nil | |
| Na2O | 0.53 | 0.36 | 1.51 | 0.52 | 0.06 | |
| K2O | 10.18 | 10.34 | 6.33 | 10.49 | 10.44 | |
| H2O+ | 5.17 | 4.92 | 4.05 | 5.37 | 4.50 | |
| H2- | 1.43 | 4.05 | 4.05 | 1.10 | 0.66 | |
| CO2 | nt.fd. | — | — | nt.fd. | Nil | |
| TiO2 | 0.34 | 0.14 | — | 0.20 | 0.50 | |
| P2O5 | 0.03 | — | — | 0.05 | 0.10 | |
| ZrO2 | nt.fd. | — | — | nt.fd. | — | |
| S | 0.03 | — | — | 0.03 | 0.06 (SO3) | |
| MnO | 0.02 | Nil | 0.62 | 0.04 | 0.05 | |
| Cr2O3 | nt.fd. | — | — | nt.fd. | — | |
| V2O3 | 0.02 | — | — | nt.fd. | — | |
| BaO | 0.66 | 1.16 | 9.89 | 0.04 | — | |
| SrO | nt.fd. | — | — | nt.fd. | — | |
| F | 0.02 | — | — | 0.18 | — | |
| Cl | nt.fd. | — | — | nt.fd. | — | |
| Li2O | nt.fd. | — | — | — | trace | |
| —– | —– | —– | —– | —– | ||
| 100.23 | 99.96 | 100.16 | 100.12 | 100.16 | ||
| O for F | — | — | 0.08 | |||
| 100.04 |
| A. |
Muscovite (P. 8295) Henry Pass, between Lake Te Anau and George Sound. Anal. F. T. Seelye. |
| A1. |
Muscovite, Lower Chittering, Western Australia. Anal. E. S. Simpson (Simpson, 1932). |
| A2. |
Barium-muscovite, Franklin, N.J. Anal. L. H. Bauer (Bauer and Berman, 1933, p. 30). Also in summation ZnO = 1.84 per cent). |
| B. |
Muscovite (P. 8306), West Spur, Mariner's Peak, South Westland. Anal. F. T. Seelye. |
| B1. |
Muscovite, Charleston Mica Mine, Nelson. Anal. J. S. Maclaurin (Morgan and Bartrum, 1915). P. 8302 is probably identical with the analysed specimen. |
The analyses of the two muscovites (anals. A. and B.) have been recalculated on the basis of 12 (O. OH. F.) atoms to the unit cell (Table II), and it will be seen that they conform reasonably well with the structural formula of muscovite deduced by Jackson and West (1930, 1933) as K Al2 (Al, Si3O10) (OH,F)2
In consideration of these analyses the following points may be observed:—
-
(1) Slightly more than one-third of the aluminium is required in the 4-co-ordinated Y group to bring that group to the ideal value of 4 as demanded structurally.
-
(2) Barium, whose ionic radius is not greatly different from that of potassium, has been grouped with the alkali metals in A.
-
(3) The X group in both cases is slightly deficient.

-
(4) The (OH, F) group is notably in excess of the structural requirements; this fact suggests either a slight degree of alteration towards a hydro-muscovite, or the retention of some adsorbed water after heating to 105° C. Although Fe2O3 is in excess of FeO in A and a contrary condition applies in B, the greater excess in the (OH, F) group is observed in the case of muscovite B, a fact supporting the suggestion of adsorbed water, rather than alteration to a hydromica.
| Wt. per cent. | Mol. Prop. | Metal Atoms. | |||
| SiO2 | 44.73 | 0.745 | 3.053 | ||
| Al2O3 | 30.67 | 0.301 | 2.466 | 0.947 | 4.00 |
| 1.519 | |||||
| TiO2 | 0.34 | 0.004 | 0.016 | ||
| Fe2O3 | 3.42 | 0.021 | 0.172 | 1.94 | |
| FeO | 1.42 | 0.019 | 0.077 | ||
| MgO | 1.56 | 0.039 | 0.159 | ||
| BaO | 0.66 | 0.004 | 0.016 | ||
| Na2O | 0.53 | 0.008 | 0.065 | 0.97 | |
| K2O | 10.18 | 0.108 | 0.885 | ||
| H2O | 5.17 | 0.287 | 2.354 | 2.35 |
Formula: (OH)2 5 (Mg, Fe'', Fe''', Ti, Al)1 94 [(Si, Al)4 O10] (Ba, K, Na)0 93
| Wt. per cent. | Mol. Prop. | Metal Atoms. | |||
| SiO2 | 45.50 | 0.757 | 3.042 | 4.00 | |
| Al2O3 | 33.20 | 0.326 | 2.620 | 0.958 | |
| 1.662 | |||||
| TiO2 | 0.20 | 0.002 | 0.008 | ||
| Fe2O3 | 1.03 | 0.006 | 0.048 | 1.89 | |
| FeO | 1.41 | 0.019 | 0.076 | ||
| MgO | 0.96 | 0.024 | 0.096 | ||
| Na2O | 0.52 | 0.008 | 0.064 | ||
| K20 | 10.49 | 0.111 | 0.892 | 0.96 | |
| H2O | 5.37 | 0.298 | 2.396 | ||
| F | 0.18 | 0.005 | 0.040 | 2.43 |
Formula: (OH, F)2 13 (Mg, Fe'', Fe''', Ti, Al)1 80 [(Si, Al)1 O10] (Na, K)0 96
The optical properties of the two muscovites are set out in Table III. The differences in the composition and optical properties between the two micas are insufficient to allow comment except that the higher values of α, β, and γ in A appear to be due to the higher Fe2O3 figure in that mica.

| A. | B. | |
| α | 1.567 ± 0.002* | 1.560 ± 0.002 |
| β | 1.604 | 1.595 |
| γ | 1.609 | 1.599 |
| γ–α | 0.042 | 0.039 |
| 2 V | 39° ± 1° | 38° ± 1° |
* All refractive index measurements for this investigation were made in sodium light.
Corundophilite.
A ferriferous corundophilite was separated by electromagnetic and centrifuge methods, from a dravite-chlorite rock; these chlorite rocks are (Bell, 1907) altered ultrabasics, and they have been injected into the Aorere Series of argillites, greywackes, quartzites and schists. An analysis of this chlorite is closely comparable to that of one from Western Australia.
| A. | B. | |
| SiO2 | 27.64 | 28.08 |
| Al2O3 | 22.48 | 22.16 |
| Fe2O3 | 0.06 | 1.46 |
| FeO | 12.06 | 9.56 |
| MgO | 24.32 | 26.54 |
| CaO | nt.fd. | nt.fd |
| Na2O | 0.17 | nt.fd. |
| K2O | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| TiO2 | 0.22 | — |
| MnO | 0.025 | 0.04 |
| NiO | trace | — |
| V2O+++ | 0.06 | — |
| H2O+ | 11.45 | 12.66 |
| H2O- | 1.80 | 0.26 |
| 100.34 | 100.80 | |
| Sp. Gr. | 2.80 | — |
| A. |
Ferruginous coiundophilite from tourmaline-chlorite rock, P. 6079, 10 chains north-west of the junction of Dam Creek and Parapara River, Aorere S.D., Nelson. Anal. F. T. Seelye. |
| B. |
Corundophilite from Holleton, South West Division, Western Australia. Anal. E. S. Simpson (Simpson, 1936). |
The optical properties of the north-west Nelson corundophilite have been determined as follows:—
| α = β | 1.600 ± 0.001 |
| γ | 1.606 |
| γ — α | 0.006 |
| α = β | Green. |
| γ | Very pale yellowish-green to colourless. |
| Absorption | α = β > γ |
| 2 V | 0°; 5° and 8° determined on two flakes. |
| Optic sign | Negative. |
| Dispersion | ρ > θ |

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| Wt. per cent. | Mol. Prop. | Metal Atoms. | |||
| SiO2 | 27.64 | 0.460 | 2.769 | ||
| 1.231 | 4.00 | ||||
| Al2O+++ | 22.48 | 0.220 | 2.648 | ||
| 1.417 | |||||
| TiO2 | 0.22 | 0.003 | 0.018 | ||
| FeO | 12.06 | 0.168 | 1.011 | 6.07 | |
| MgO | 24.32 | 0.603 | 3.629 | ||
| H2O | 11.45 | 0.635 | 7.644 | 7.64 |
Formula: (OH)7 7 04 (Mg, Fe'', Ti, Al)6 07 07 [(SiAl)4 O10].
The refractive indices for this chlorite fall within the limits defined for prochlorite by Winchell (1936, p. 648)—viz., Nm = 1.59–1 62, Ng-Np = 0.004–0.010; in the broader sense, however, the mineral lies in the field of ferriferous corundophilites (Winchell, 1933, p. 284).
When the analysis is calculated on the basis of 18 (O.OH) atoms to the unit cell (Pauling, 1930) good agreement is obtained with the structural formula (OH)8 Y6 [(SiAl)4 O10], derived by X-ray analysis (Table V), the only noteworthy variation being the low figure for the (OH) group. This point was observed with two prochlorites from chlorite zone schists in Western Otago (Hutton, 1940, pp. 18–19) and one from similar schists in South Devon (Tilley, 1938, p. 503). It is difficult to account for this consistent low value, especially in view of the absence of noteworthy oxidation of the ferrous iron and the lack of fluorine. Some of the hydroxyl groups are linked to Mg, Al, and Fe, as in micas, and the remainder are grouped in a brucite layerlattice. Thus it would appear as if the hydroxyl group could be completely displaced from chlorites by moderate heating, and that there should be no need to resort to severe treatment with the use of the oxycoal gas blowpipe flame such as is required in the case of the amphibole and epidote groups (Smethurst, 1935, pp. 173–179; Hutton, 1940, p. 12).
Dravite.
Dravite occurs in large, simple, six-sided prisms, sometimes up to 6 inches in length, embedded in a matrix of fine, flaky corun-dophilite; in some specimens the tourmaline has crystallised in beautiful radiating forms. A large fragment of dravite was readily separated from its host, and a pure fraction obtained by centrifuge methods. The composition (Table VI, anal. A.) of this tourmaline is comparable with that of dravite from a marble in Connecticut, U.S.A. (anal. B), and with a similar type occurring in migmatized serpentinites and amphibolites in Sweden (anal. C.); the paragenesis of the latter example is somewhat similar to that of the Nelson tourmaline.
In an investigation concerning the composition of tourmaline in relation to their host rocks, Agrell (1941) concludes that with only

one exception, in all the examples noted by him, “the presence of Ca and Mg in the Y group of the tourmaline is controlled by the composition of the mineral or rock with which the tourmaline is developed.” The abundance of dravite in the chlorite-rock seems to leave no doubt that the tourmaline investigated herein owes its origin to the action of boron-bearing vapours reacting with the corun-dophilite described earlier. Therefore, it is not surprising that the composition is highly magnesian; this is in direct support of Agrell's contention.
A general formula for the tourmaline group has been deduced by Machatschki (1929) as follows:—
X3 Y27 B9 Si18 HxO93 wherein X = Ca, Na and some Mn”, and Y = Li, Mg, Mn, Fe, Al.
Although Machatschki does not indicate the probable extent of the range of hydroxyl in his general formula, this group appears to range between 4 and 13, with 10–12, probably most usual (Bragg, 1937, pp. 39–40). For the dravite molecule, Kunitz (1929) suggests the formula, H8 Na2 Mg6 Al12 Si12 B6 O62, which calculated on the same basis as Machatschki's is: X3 Y27 B9 Si18 H12 O93. The hexagonal unit cell contains 3 molecules, so that on the basis of 93 oxygen atoms the analysis of dravite (Table VIA) has been recalculated (Table VII).
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| A. | B. | C. | |
| SiO2 | 36.07 | 36.41 | 36.70 |
| Al2O3 | 30.43 | 31.27 | 30.97 |
| Fe2O3 | 2.17 | Nil | 1.73 |
| FeO | 3.62 | 3.80 | 2.94 |
| TiO2 | 0.84 | 1.61 | 1.38 |
| MgO | 9.33 | 9.47 | 8.83 |
| CaO | 1.60 | 0.98 | 1.63 |
| Na2O | 1.91 | 2.68 | 2.49 |
| K2O | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.21 |
| B2O3 | 10.35 | 9.65 | 9.50 |
| Cr2O3 | 0.07 | — | 0.03 |
| F | 0.08 | Nil | Nil |
| SiO | 0.02 | — | — |
| MnO | trace | trace | Nil |
| H2O+ | 3.20 | 3.79 | 3.49 |
| H2O- | 0.20 | 3.79 | 0.17 |
| 99.95 | 99.87 | 100.07 |
| A. |
Dravite from corundophilite-chlorite-rock (P. 6079), 10 chains N.W. of junction of Dam Creek and Parapara River, Aorere S.D. Anal. F. T. Seelye. |
| B. |
Dravite in marble, Monroe, Connecticut, U.S.A. (Agrell, 1941, p. 87, table 1, anal. G). |
| C. |
Dravite from Muruhatten. Anal. R. Blix (Du Rietz, 1935, p. 178). |

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| Wt.per cent. | Mol Prop. | Metal Atoms | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | 36.07 | 0.600 | 17.92 | 18.00 | |
| AL2O+++ | 30.43 | 0.298 | 17.79 | 0.07 | |
| 17.72 | |||||
| TiO2 | 0.84 | 0.010 | 0.29 | ||
| Fe2O3 | 2.17 | 0.013 | 0.78 | 27.17 | |
| FeO | 3.62 | 0.050 | 1.49 | ||
| MgO | 9.33 | 0.231 | 6.89 | ||
| B2O+++ | 10 35 | 0.148 | 8.84 | 8.84 | |
| CaO | 1.60 | 0.028 | 0.84 | ||
| Na2O | 1.91 | 0.031 | 1.85 | 2.69 | |
| H2O | 3.20 | 0.177 | 10.57 | 10.57 |
Formula: X2 00 Y27 17 B8 84 Si18 H10 57 O+++ or, fully expanded, we get: [Na1 85 Ca0 84] [Mg0 80, Fe''1 10, Fe'''0 78 Ti0 20, Al17 72] B8 81 Si18 H10.57 O [ unclear: ] .
The formula thus derived compares reasonably well with those proposed by Kunitz or Machatschki; however, it should be observed that an exceedingly small amount of aluminium occurs in the 4-fold co-ordination and further, there is a slight deficiency in boron and the X group.
In connection with the analytical work, it should be stressed that the figures for FeO and Fe2O3 given in Table VI be regarded as only approximately correct as the mineral is attacked extremely slowly by mixtures of HF and dilute H2SO4. In determining the FeO repeated attacks with the mixed acids were necessary with intermediate further grinding of the residue until the whole of the sample was decomposed; this treatment necessarily multiplies any error of experiment, and tends to decrease the FeO: Fe2O3 ratio. Although Rowledge's method for FeO (Groves, 1937, p. 85) by fusion with sodium meta fluo-borate gives a good decomposition and a somewhat higher result for FeO it was not thought advisable to accept this figure as there is some evidence that the flux itself will reduce at least some ferric compounds to the ferrous state and so produce too high a result for FeO.
The following physical constants have been determined:—
| Sp. Gr. | 3.25 ± 0.01 |
| α | 1.627 ± 0.001 |
| γ | 1.655 |
| γ-α | 0.028 |
| α | pale brown to nearly colourless. |
| γ | deep olive green. |
| Absorption | γ > α |
Beryl.
Beryl is a rare constituent of granite and granite pegmatites in New Zealand, occurring at Dusky Sound, Paterson's Inlet, and Charleston, where it can be considered no more than a mineralogical curiosity. At Charleston a few large, coarse, columnar crystals, up

to 5 inches in diameter, have been found, the analysis and optical properties of which are presented in Table VIII. The crystal analysed (P. 6893) is very pale green to nearly colourless, and is considerably stained with iron. Prism faces are well developed, but terminal faces, except basal plane at one end only, are undeveloped.
| SiO2 | 65.14 | Sp. Gr. | 2.70 ± 0.01 |
| Al2O3 | 18.20 | α | 1.572 ± 0.001 |
| Fe2O3 | 0.65 | γ | 1.577 |
| FeO | 0.28 | γ-α | 0.005 |
| BeO | 12.82 | ||
| MgO | 0.50 | ||
| CaO | trace | ||
| Na2O | 0.40 | ||
| K2O | 0.05 | ||
| TiO2 | 0.06 | ||
| MnO | trace | ||
| Loss on ignition | 1.98 | ||
| H2O— | 0.23 | ||
| 100.31 |
When alkalis are plotted against α and γ on Winchell's diagram (1933, p. 213) showing the effect of alkalis on refractive indices in beryl, the points for Charleston beryl, though very close to Winchell's curves, lie slightly above them.
The structure of beryl has been analysed by Bragg and West (1926), who find that the unit cell contains two molecules of Be3 Al2 Si6 O18. On the basis of 18 oxygen atoms the beryl analysis has been recalculated (Table IX); magnesium and iron have been grouped with aluminium, the total amount of the later being in 6-fold coordination, whereas sodium has been grouped with beryllium (Ford, 1932, p. 580). It would appear to the authors that the extent of this latter substitution would need to be exceedingly small when the great difference between the radii of the sodium and beryllium ions is considered.
| Wt. per cent. | Mol Prop. | Metal Atoms. | ||
| SiO2 | 65.14 | 1.085 | 6.017 | 6.02 |
| Al2O3 | 18.20 | 0.178 | 1.974 | |
| Fe2O3 | 0.65 | 0.004 | 0.044 | 2.10 |
| FeO | 0.28 | 0.003 | 0.016 | |
| MgO | 0.50 | 0.012 | 0.666 | |
| BeO | 12.82 | 0.512 | 2.839 | |
| Na2O | 0.40 | 0.006 | 0.066 | 2.91 |
Formula: (Be. Na)2 [ unclear: ] 1 (Mg, Fe'', Fe''', Al)2 1 Si6 O18.

Literature Cited.
Agrell, S. O., 1941. Dravite-bearing Rocks from Dinas Head, Cornwall. Min. Mag., vol. 26, no. 174, pp. 81–93.
Bauer, L. H., and Berman, H., 1933. Barium Muscovite from Franklin, N.J., Amer. Min., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 30.
Bell, J. M., 1907. The Geology of the Parapara Subdivision, Karamea, Nelson. N.Z. Geol. Surv. Bull. no. 3.
Bragg, W. L., 1937. Atomic Structure of Minerals. Oxford University Press, London.
Bragg, W. L. and West, J., 1926. The Structure of Beryl Be3 Al2 Si [ unclear: ] O18. Proc. Roy. Soc., vol. AIII, pp. 691–714.
Du Rietz, T., 1935. Peridotites, Serpentincs, and Soapstones of Northern Sweden. Geol. Foren. Forh. Stockholm, vol. 37, pp. 133–260.
Ford, W. E., 1932. A Textbook of Mineralogy. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
Groves, A. W., 1937. Silicate Analysis. A Manual for Geologists and Chemists, with Chapters on Check Calculations and Geochemical Data. Thomas Murby and Co., London.
Hutton, C. O., 1940. Metamorphism in the Lake Wakatipu Region, Western Otago, New Zealand. Dept. Sci. and Ind. Res., Geol. Mem. No. 5.
Jackson, W. W., and West, J., 1930. The Crystal Structure of Muscovite— KAl2 (Al, Si [ unclear: ] ) O10 (OH)2. Zeits Krist., vol. 76, pp. 211–227.
—1933. The Crystal Structure of Muscovite—KAl2 (Al, Si3) O10 (OH)2. Zeits. Krist., vol. 85, pp. 160–164.
Kunitz, W., 1929. Beit [ unclear: ] age zur Kenntnis der Magmatischen Assoziationen I. (Die Mineralien der Restkristallisation; Pegmatitisch-Pneumatoly-tisches Bildungsstadium). Die Mischungsreihen in der Turmalingruppe und die genetischen Bezichungen Zwischen Turmalinen und Glimmern. Chemie der Erde, vol. 4, pp. 208 251.
Machatschki, F., 1929. Die Formeleinheit des Turmalins. Zeits Krist, vol. 70, pp. 211–232; vol. 71, pp. 45–46.
Morgan, P. G., and Bartrum, J. A., 1915. The Geology and Mineral Resources of the Buller-Mokihinui Subdivision, Westport Division. Bull. N.Z. Geol. Surv. no. 17 (new series).
Pauling, L., 1930. The Structure of Micas and Related Minerals. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. 16, pp. 123–129.
Simpson, E. S., 1932. Contributions to the Mineralogy of Western Australia— Series VII. Journ. Roy. Soc. W. Australia., vol. 18 (for 1931–32), pp. 61–74.
—1936. Contributions to the Mineralogy of Western Australia—Series IX. Journ. Roy. Soc. W. Australia, vol. 22 (for 1935–36), pp. 1–18.
Smethurst, A. F., 1935. Anomalies in the Analytical Determinations of Water in Epidote. Min. Mag., vol. 24, no. 150, pp. 173–179.
Tilley, C. E., 1938. The Status of Hornblende in Low-Grade Metamorphic Zones of Green Schists. Geol. Mag., vol. 75, no. 893, pp. 497–512.
Volk, G. W., 1939. Optical and Chemical Studies of Muscovite. Amer. Min., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 255–266.
Winchell, A. N., 1933. Elements of Optical Mineralogy, 3rd. Ed. Pt. 2. John Wiley and Sons. New York.
—1936. A Third Study of Chlorite. Amer. Min., vol. 21, pp. 642–651.
