Go to National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa
Volume 77, 1948-49
This text is also available in PDF
(901 KB) Opens in new window
– 390 –

Discussion.

Professor Knight has provided much food for thought in his paper and has shown the necessity for civic authorities to face up to this vital problem. It is interesting to note that Wellington had its own town plan in the early days providing a grid subdivision for Te Aro Flat, which was divided into Town Acres. A wide area from the Basin Reserve to the sea containing a canal and suggestion for adjoining park lands would have been a feature worth carrying out. For every town acre, a similar acre was dedicated to a green belt or the Town Belt as we know it.

Had the development of this plan been followed it would have provided a good and conventional layout for the city, which would have had its centre moved from where it is to-day. In the years which followed the preparation of the plan, indifferent civic authorities permitted land speculators to drive alleys and cul-de-sacs into the town-acre subdivisions, producing the warren we know as Te Aro Flat to-day and completely spoiling it as the centre of the city.

In Washington, to which Professor Knight refers, the same thing happened. The original plan, conceived by Charles Pierre L'Enfant, a French engineer, was laid out on similar lines to his native Paris, with circles and squares, the principal boulevards or avenues radiating therefrom. In the years which followed, the same civic, or in this case federal, apathy permitted

– 391 –

the land speculators to superimpose the typical grid plan over the radial one, creating much confusion and a host of irregular sites where the radial avenue intersected with the grid. In later years, millions of dollars have been paid in compensation to property owners in an endeavour to return as nearly as possible to L'Enfant's plan.

In New Zealand, the Town Planning Act required cities and towns to produce within a period of years proposals for improvements; in brief, a long-term plan. The response has been poor and the results, with few exceptions, disappointing. There has been lack of co-ordination and the architectural profession has not had opportunities of participating and assisting. It would seem that if civic authorities had set out to produce a comprehensive contour plan of their areas as a sound basis, then surveyors, architects and engineers could have studied the problems and produced worth-while plans. It is up to us as a profession to take the keenest interest in all town-planning legislation and development if we are to assist in the improvement of our cities, their traffic problems and general amenities.