
Discussion
The foregoing description of Serpulorbis zelandicus affords a comparison with “Vermetus” novae-hollandiae, an exclusively ciliary feeding species (Yonge, 1932) and Serpulorbis gigas which has been shown (Boettger, supr. cit.) to rely wholly upon mucus traps for food collecting. Yonge was inclined to separate fairly widely the two latter forms and suggested that the Vermetidae were probably divisible into separate groups on the basis of their widely differing feeding mechanisms, stating (1932) “the taxonomy of the Vermetidae clearly requires revision in the light of these results.” Serpulorbis zelandicus, is now found to show a condition intermediate in most respects between novae-hollandiae and gigas, suggesting that ciliary and mucus trap feeding represent merely extremes of a single evolutionary series. Without at present opening the question whether all of the forms at present included in the Vermetidae are closely related, the evidence is strong that the three forms above discussed should be regarded as belonging to a single natural group. In each case the adaptation of the foot is fundamentally the same, and the detailed structure of the pedal gland and tentacles is closely similar. In the alimentary canal likewise, novae-hollandiae as described by Yonge (1932) shows a well recognizable resemblance to sipho; the digestive system of gigas, though the description of Yonge and Iles (supr. cit.) is merely a short outline, appears to conform to the same plan. In each species the pharynx is relatively prominent and bulbous, and the salivary glands minute with short ducts. The anterior portion of the oesophagus is dilated, being crop-like in novae-hollandiae, cylindrical and rather less wide in gigas and zelandicus. The structure of the stomach and style caecum, and the disposition and relative size of the digestive diverticula also agree in novae-hollandiae and gigas. Between gigas and zelandicus there is especially close agreement in the radula, the figure of Troschel (Das Gebiss der Schnecken) for gigas being almost identical with Text-fig. 1 above, affording strong support to the return of the New Zealand shells to Serpulorbis. The chief feature in which zelandicus differs from gigas and resembles novae-hollandiae is in the retention of the ciliary feeding habit, and the consequent high development of the ctenidium and food tract. Bivonia, represented by triqueter, described by Lacaze-Duthiers, is also typical of the present group in structure of the foot, and in the alimentary and reproductive systems. The structure of the genital ducts is incompletely known, but there is evidence that zelandicus is here again typical of the whole of the present group.
“Vermetus” novae-hollandiae stands somewhat apart from the other forms above by its extremely large size, and the straight cylindrical shell. The ciliary feeding condition in novae-hollandiae is no doubt a more primitive stage of vermetid evolution, and it should

be noted that this species retains throughout life the large slightly concave operculum, with the same relative proportions as in the embryo of zelandicus. The gill filaments are strongly developed and powerfully ciliated, though from their triangular shape, as well as from the lack of an endostyle and of a specialized food groove, it would appear that members of this group never become so completely adapted for ciliary feeding as some of the other style-bearing prosobranchs. Moreover, although the pedal gland in novae-hollandiae is much less well-developed than in either zelandicus or gigas it is yet of relatively considerable size. It may be suggested that this structure was not originally developed in the Vermetidae solely for the production of mucus for ciliary feeding, for which requirement the food tract mucus supply would seem sufficient. Although novae-hollandiae—occurring as stressed by Yonge in a wave-beaten environment—does not resort at all to mucus trap feeding—it is likely that most other species of this group may—like zelandicus—possess to some extent the ability to form mucus traps. Bivonia triqueter is a mucus trap feeder according to Yonge (1932), while on the north American Pacific coast, Spiroglyphus lituellus and Aletes squamigerus—as figured by Johnson and Snook (1935) have the same structure of head, foot, pedal tentacles and food tract as described above. Ricketts and Calvin (1948) briefly state the last-named species feeds by the formation of mucus strings. “Vermetus” maximus and “Vermetus” giganteus are stated by Yonge and Iles (supr. cit.) to possess the more primitive ciliary feeding condition of novae-hollandiae, though their exact relationship to the above species has yet to be ascertained.
It is probable—as suggested by Yonge and Iles (1939)—that the presence of operculum and a powerful ctenidial current tends to impede the employment of mucus strings. In zelandicus, however, mucus feeding appears to be carried out to a minor extent in the presence of a strong current passing into the pallial cavity. Pari passu with the loss of the operculum and the enlargement of the pedal gland, the ctenidium is reduced in size in vermetids, reaching its smallest proportions in gigas, which is probably mainly dependent on pallial respiration. A parallel evolutionary trend seems to be the reduction of the crystalline style. According to Yonge's figure the style is large and stout in novae-hollandiae; in zelandicus it is much more slender, and very delicate and impermanent. Its presence in gigas was first denied by Yonge (1932), but examination of living material (Yonge and Iles, 1939) later revealed a style and a small gastric shield “relatively much smaller than in ‘Vermetus’ novae-hollandiae.” It would be interesting to find whether the style is ever actually lost in mucus trap feeders; the ingestion of predominantly animal material such as small isopods captured by gigas (Boettger, 1930) would greatly diminish the need of a style. Yonge later found small gastropod shells in the stomach of gigas, and it seems well established that the mucus feeders are collectors of zooplankton. The presence or absence of a crystalline style is primarily a physiological character, which is probably not of major taxonomic importance—witness its separate appearance in gastropods in such groups as the prosobranchs and the thecostomatous pteropods.
