Go to National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa
Volume 79, 1951
This text is also available in PDF
(5 MB) Opens in new window
– 537 –

The similarities of species within genera of the Megascolecidae are often extremely close, and it is commonly necessary to make use of small differences in internal anatomy to differentiate between closely allied species.

The number and form of the spermathecae and their diverticula are useful and reliable specific characters. A great diversity is found within a genus, but within a species the constancy of form, particularly of the diverticula, is a character of great systematic importance.

Another constant and reliable specific character is the form of the penial chaetae which occur in association with the prostate glands in many species of the Megascolecidae. Pickford (1937) found the form of the penial chaetae of great systematic value in the Acanthodriline earthworms of South Africa.

In some cases the number of testes is a useful specific character, e.g. in Diporochaeta chathamensis Benham (1900) there is only one pair of testes, in segment xi, in contrast to the more general characteristic of two pairs, one in segment × and one in segment xi, found in this genus.

Pickford (1937) made use of the nature of the junction between the nephridial tubule and the nephridial vesicle to separate the species of some genera into groups.

The characters discussed above are useful and have been found to be reliable. Other characters whose reliability is more doubtful have been used for the distinction of some species. Beddard (1892) distinguished the two species Octochaetus multiporus and O. thomasi by the difference in their size, the former species being very large and the latter rather smaller, although he gave no measurements of O. thomasi for comparison with O. multiporus. These species were founded by Beddard on a small number of specimens and it is doubtful whether the distinction between the two can be upheld, since the author has observed that within a single species a great variation in size is frequently found among mature specimens. Benham (1905) made use of the number and position of the tubercula pubertatis to distinguish the species of Dinodriloides annectens (1905) and D. beddardi (1904a). It is doubtful whether this distinction of species can be upheld either, since in Microscolex aucklandicus (1902), Microscolex huttoni (1900) and Rhododrilus besti (1904a) Benham records great variation in the number and position of the tubercula pubertatis and the author has observed similar variation in other species.

– 538 –

Throughout these papers Roman numerals will be used to denote the segments of the earthworms described (e.g. xvii = segment seventeen; xvii/xviii = septum dividing xvii and xviii) and external intersegmental grooves will be denoted by ordinary numerals, e.g. 7/8, 8/9, etc.

One of the most common genera of earthworms occurring in the Australasian region is the genus Rhododrilus of the sub-family Acanthodrilinae. Nine species of the genus have been described by previous workers, three from the North Island of New Zealand, one from Little Barrier Island, one from the Kermadec Islands, one from Chatham Islands, one from Queensland, and two from the sub-antarctic islands of the New Zealand region. Eleven new species of the genus, all from the North Island of New Zealand, are described in this paper.

The genus was established by Beddard (1889) to include species showing the following characters:

Eight chaetae per segment. Nephridiopores in a single series on each side. Male pores on xviii or xvii or in 17/18; one pair of prostatic pores on xvii. Spermathecal pores one to four pairs, the last pair in 8/9. Gizzard well developed. Two pairs of free testes and funnels in × and xi.

It shows close affinities to Microscolex, from which it differs principally in the possession of a well-developed gizzard (in Microscolex the gizzard is vestigial). Michaelsen (1900) distinguished the two genera, but in 1905 he united Rhododrilus and Microscolex and then in 1907 separated them again and they have remained separate since then. Benham (1909) established a genus Leptodrilus for two species from Auckland and Campbell Islands which are identical with Rhododrilus except that the male and prostatic pores are on xvi instead of xvii. Michaelsen (1923) states, “[this difference] I regard as an abnormality of little systematic moment; in my opinion it is even doubtful whether there is any specific difference between Leptodrilus leptomerus and Rhododrilus cockayni, let alone a difference in genus.” Stephenson (1930) allows the genus Leptodrilus to stand, but it is doubtful whether the differences from Rhododrilus are significant.

One of the species described in this paper (R. disparatus) shows characters atypical of the genus in possessing a small ventro-lateral cluster of micronephridial tubules beside each of the meganephridial tubules in ii–xx. Also in R. intermedius, described in this paper, the ventro-lateral portions of the meganephridial tubules are coiled in a spirillar form, superficially resembling micronephridia. This condition is similar to that found by Benham and Cameron (1913) in Plagiochaeta (Perieodrilus) ricardi and P. montanus. It is regarded by Stephenson (1930) as probably intermediate between the meganephridial and the micronephridial conditions. There is little to distinguish R. disparatus (and to a lesser extent R. intermedius) from the sub-family Octochaetinae, especially since the author has recently discovered a new genus of that sub-family which has the microscolecine arrangement of the male reproductive organs (this genus will be described in a later paper).

The New Zealand species of Rhododrilus may be identified from the following key:

– 539 –
a1 One pair of spermathecae
  b1 Spermathecae in viii
   c1 Two pairs of hearts R. leptomerus Benh. (1909)
   c2 Four pairs of hearts R. edulis Benh. (1904a)
  b2 Spermathecae in ix
   d1 Penial chaetae absent R. albidus n.sp.
   d2 Penial chaetae present
    e1 Penial chaetae confined to xvii R. similis Benh. (1905a)
    e2 Penial chaetae running through xvii and xviii R. intermedius n.sp.
    e3 Penial chaetae running through xvii–xxi R. besti Benh. (1904a)
    e4 Penial chaetae running through xvii–xxiv
     f1 Meganephridial R. parvus Benh. (1905)
     f2 Micronephridia occurring with meganephridia in ii–xx R. disparatus n.sp.
a2 Two pairs of spermathecae
  g1 Three pairs of hearts R. sutherlandi n.sp.
  g2 Four pairs of hearts
   h1 Two pairs of vesiculae seminales
    i1 Tip of penial chaeta sharply recurved and hook-like R. papaensis n.sp.
     i2 Tip of penial chaeta rounded and smooth R. macroseptus n.sp.
   h2 Three pairs of vesiculae seminales R. benhami n.sp.
a3 Three pairs of spermathecae
  j1 Penial chaeta with smooth rounded tip R. kermadecensis Benh. (1904)
  j2 Penial chaeta with sharp recurved hook-like tip R. cockayni Benh. (1909)
a4 Four pairs of spermathecae
  k1 Dorsal blood vessel paired R. attenuatus n.sp.
  k2 Dorsal blood vessel unpaired
   l1 Laterally directed digitate spermathecal diverticulum R. minimus n.sp.
   l2 Anteriorly directed stout hook-like spermathecal diverticulum R. aduncocystis n.sp.
a5 Five pairs of spermathecae R. robustus n.sp.

R. robustus, by its possession of five pairs of spermathecae, falls outside the definition of the genus given by Stephenson (1930), but this character is not significant and the definition of the genus may be extended to include species having more than four pairs of spermathecae.

The following are descriptions of eleven species of Rhododrilus discovered in the North Island of New Zealand. Type specimens in the author's collection.

Rhododrilus albidus n.sp. (Plate 104, figs. 1–3)

Twenty specimens of this slender, unpigmented earthworm were collected from Taupo sandy silt and Puketitiri sandy silt in Ball's Clearing Forest Reserve, Puketitiri, Hawke's Bay. In its external features the species is rather similar to R. sutherlandi, described by the author from the “gumlands” of North Auckland.

The specimen on which this description is based is 95 mm. in length and 2·75 mm. in diameter, with 119 segments.

The prostomium is tanylobous. The chaetae are eight per segment, arranged in pairs. On xxiv:

ab = cd = 0·5 mm.; aa = 1 mm.; bc = 1·5 mm.; dd = 2 mm.

– 540 –

The first two segments are longitudinally furrowed. Segment iii and all the segments posterior to iii are biannulate. There is no marked clitellum.

There is a single pair of spermathecal pores at 8/9 in line with the chaetae ab. The pores have very prominent tumid lips. There is a pair of female pores on xiv anterior to the chaeta a. A single pair of prostatic pores occurs on xviii. Each pore is situated on a prominent brownish dome-like papilla in line with the chaetae ab. Tubercula pubertatis occur on xii in the form of a transverse tumid ridge extending from chaeta b of one side to chaeta b of the other side, and at 19/20, 20/21 and 21/22 in the form of a pair of small papillae in each intersegmental furrow in line with the ventral couples of chaetae.

Nephridiopores commence on ii and occur in a single series on each side of the body in line with the chaetae c.