Go to National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa
Volume 83, 1955-56
This text is also available in PDF
(2 MB) Opens in new window
– 208 –

Key to New Zealand Species of Amphilochus and Gitanopsis

1. Molar process of mandible large and protruding with fluted triturating surface 2
Molar process of mandible very small and unarmed 3
2. Inner margin of lower lip medially incised; telson long and narrow, with 2 small terminal notches Gitanopsis squamosa (G. M. Thomson)
Inner margin of lower lip medially smooth; telson ovate, smoothly rounded distally Gitanopsis pusilloides Shoemaker
3. Gnathopod 2, hand not markedly longer than broad Amphilochus marionis Stebbing
Gnathopod 2, hand at least 1 ½ times as long as broad Amphilochus filidactylus n.sp.
– 209 –

Amphilochus marionis Stebbing, 1888.

  • Amphilochus marionis Stebbing, 1888: 743, Pl. 38, Stebbing, 1906: 151, Stebbing, 1910: 577, Schellenberg, 1938: 17.

  • Gitanopsis marionis Schellenberg, 1931: 95.

  • Amphilochus marionis, Chilton, 1923: 240. Chilton, 1925a: 84-85 (not Stebbing).

Schellenberg (1938) has pointed out that Amphilochus marionis and Amphilochus squamosus are not synonymous, and that the latter in fact is a Gitanopsis. Chilton's two papers indicate clearly that his specimens also had the strong molar process of Gitanopsis.

The only sign of A. marionis in the Chilton Collection is fragmentary material mixed in a slide also containing G. squamosa. There is no indication of its locality and for the purposes of this paper it is best disregarded.

Schellenberg (1931) states that he has a small collection from Lyttelton Harbour which includes 2 specimens of A. squamosus and 2 of A. marionis. This satisfactorily establishes the presence of A. marionis in New Zealand waters.

Amphilochus filidactylus, n.sp. (Figs. 67-90.)

  • Gitanopsis pusilla, Stephensen, 1949: 8, Fig. 1 (not Barnard).

Eyes in spirit black, reniform; animals in life reddish with black spots. Length, 4 mm. Like Gitanopsis squamosa (cf. below) except for the following details.

Antennae. First: First segment of peduncle slightly shorter than 2nd; 3rd ⅔ 2nd, tufts of spines and spine-setae on superodistal angles of 1st and 2nd, single group ½ along 2nd superiorly. Accessory flagellum of 1 segment, ½ length 1st segment of flagellum, has 2 or 3 long end setae. Second: Peduncle, 3rd segment about ½ length 4th, as wide, superodistally produced in 2 small rounded projections, 1 with large spine-seta, about 3 spine-setae on superior margin; 4th has 3 sets of 1-6 spine-setae on each margin, these also on distal angles especially inferior; 5th not ¾ length 4th, 2 or 3 groups of 1 or more spine-setae on each margin, also on angles; flagellum of 8 segments, as long as 4th peduncle segment, 3 or 4 fine setae on each distal angle.

Mouthparts. Lower Lip: Inner margin notched medially, small rounded bristled boss distally, 2 sets of 3 long teeth on inner margin below. First Maxillae: Inner plate has 2 end setae; outer has 7 stout teeth, palp 3 short spines and 1 seta. Second Maxillae: Inner plate has approximately 11 fine end setae, 3 or 4 fine bristle-setae proximally. Outer has 3 end spine-setae, a few bristles outside these. Mandibles: Molar process a produced conical tubercle narrowing to small truncate tip; spine-row of about 19 spines, the lower 9 less strong and tending to be fused; right cutting edge of about 8 strong serrations, left of 10 or so fine serrations, accessory of about 16 fine serrations. Palp of 3 segments, 1st small, about ½ length 2nd, 2nd about ⅔ length 3rd, which has no setae, is finely bristle-combed, narrows to acute tip. Maxilliped. Inner plate has 2 very small, boss-like spines on end margin; outer plate distally rounded, has stout end spine, finely serrate margin, seta inside spine, a few down margin. Palp merus width ⅔ length, outer margin has 5 single setae, inner about 6, carpus almost as wide as long, length about ⅗ merus, seta ⅓ along outer margin, 2 or 3 on angle, inner margin has 7 or so on distal angle; propod width ½ length, length ⅔ merus; 1 or 2 spines at ⅓, ⅔ and distal angle of outer margin; 8 or so on inner distal angle, at their base 5 small blunt comb-fingers. Dactylos a straight sharp spike, little more than ½ propod length, inner margin finely combed.

– 210 –
Picture icon

Text-fig. 5.—Neocyproidea pilgrimi n. sp. 61, Peraeopod 2. 62, Peraeopod 4. Gitanopsis pusilla Barnard. 63, Gnathopod 1, end segments. 64, Gnathopod 1, dactylos and palm margins. 65, Gnathopod 2, end segments. 66, Gnathopod 2, dactylos and palm margins Amphilochus filidactylus n. sp. 67. Gnathopod 1. 68, Gnathopod 1, palm and dactylos. 69, Gnathopod 2. 70, Gnathopod 2, sideplate ventral margin. 71, Gnathopod 2, palm and dactylos. 72, Gnathopod 2, palm margin. 73, Telson.

– 211 –

Gnathopods. First: Sideplate somewhat trapezoid, anterodistally rounded with fine setae on margins. Basos proximal width about ¼ length, boatshaped with double anterior margin, concave between margins, to receive propod; anterior margins finely setose. Ischium about ⅕ basos; merus about ⅓ basos, subtriangular, about 4 spine-setae on posterior margin, 7 or 8 spine-setae on posterodistal angle. Carpus as long as ischium, distally widening to more than twice length, posterior ½ strongly spine-setose especially angle which extends nearly ½ along propod posterior margin. Propod width a little more than ½ length, margins convex, posterior rounding to convex distal palm margin and separated from it only by 2 small, stout defining spines; the palm has about 16 small setae slightly below finely serrate margin. Dactylos curved, as long as palm is wide, stout tooth on inner margin about ½ along, 12 or so fine comb-teeth inside tooth, dactylos stout except for last ⅕ which is noticeably filiform. Second: Sideplate ovately-subrectangular, width ½ length, angles rounded, margins finely setose. Basos as before, widest distally, distal width ⅓ length; ischium wider than long, length about ⅙ basos, merus subtriangular, length ⅓ basos, narrowing bluntly to a stout spine and several short spine-setae, 4 strong spines on posterior margin: reaching as far as propod base. Carpus subtriangular, anterior margin not ⅓ basos, posterior produced in long, slender, spoon-shaped process almost but not quite to palm defining angle, the process has 2 or 3 long terminal spine-setae, 10 or 11 short setae on inner margin. Propod ovate-rectangular, widest distally, distal width about ⅔ length, length ⅚ basos, lateral margins more or less straight, postero-distal angle rounding to fully crenulate slightly convex palm which is defined by 2 stout spines and has 9 or so fine setae below margin, stouter one inside dactylos base, dactylos as before.

Peraeopods. First: Like G. squamosa, perhaps more spinous. Second: Setae on posterodistal angle give crimped appearance as in Stebbing's A. marionis. Third: Sideplate posterior lobe deeper than anterior, almost basos length; basos ovate, anterior margin has about 18 short stout spines, posterior minutely and regularly setose; other segments seem comparatively strongly spined. Fourth and Fifth: Basos like Pr. 3, more strongly spined anteriorly than in G. squamosa.

Epimeral Plates: All have rounded anterodistal angle, slightly produced acute posterodistal angles; are subrectangular; 1st almost subtriangular; posterior margins slightly sigmoid; ventral have 4,14 and 16 spine-setae.

Uropods. First: Much the longest; peduncle slightly longer than subequal rami; has about 16 spines dorsally; rami have 7 or 8 spines on one or both margins, spines each in marginal serration. Second: Outer ramus about ⅔ peduncle length, inner ¾; outer has 5 and 2 marginal spines, inner has 4 and 5, the median margins finely pectinate. Third: much the smallest; outer ramus the shorter, has 4 spines on outer margin, 1 on pectinate inner; inner ramus as long as peduncle, 3 spines on inner margin, 5 on outer; the median margins finely pectinate; the spines in sharp serrated pockets; 4 or 5 spines on peduncle. Telson: Width about ⅔ length, narrowing distally from about ½ to rounded blunt tip.

Localities: Off Pyura pachydermatina stalk with encrusting Elzerina blainvilli, Portobello. Marine Biological Station, coll. D.E.H., 15/5/52.

Distribution: New Zealand; Tristan da Cunha.

Types: Slides P. 130, female.

Discussion. This species keys out according to Stephensen's key (1949) as G. pusilla or G. tortugae. G. pusilla is not very fully described, but I have speimens

– 212 –
Picture icon

Text-fig.. 6.—Amphilochus filidactylus n.sp. 74, Antenna 1. 75, Right mandible and cutting edge. 76, Left mandible. 77, Maxilliped, right half. 78, Maxilliped, end of inner plate. 79, Maxilliped, end of outer plate. 80, Maxilliped, end of palp. 81, Maxilliped, propod inner distal margin 82, Maxilla 1, end of palp. 83, Maxilla 2. 84, Lower lip, right half. 85, Peraeopod 3. 86, Peraeopod 3. posterior margin of basos. 87, Epimeral plates, 88, Uropod 2. 89, Uropod 3, 90, Uropod 3, margin of ramus.

– 213 –

from the Chilton Collection labelled as coming from Cape Town which appear to be G. pusilla, and they are markedly different from the specimens described above. I have taken the liberty of drawing the gnathopods of these Cape Town specimens for comparison (Figs. 63-66). It will be seen that they differ from the above in having a stouter dactylos with the prominent inner tooth ⅔ along instead of ½ along, and are not constricted to a filiform tip as in A. filidactylus. Since Barnard (1916) places his species in Gitanopsis, one may also expect a difference in the molar process. (Stephensen does not mention the molar process in his specimens.) A. filidactylus also lacks the single stout anterior propod spine of G. pusilla The telson, gnathopod shape (length of carpal process), and characteristic dactylos are distinctive for the species.

It is also obvious that my species is identical with or extremely close to that described by Stephensen (1949) as G. pusilla Barnard. With the exception of the projection which he figures and describes for the anterior margin of Gnathopod 1 basos, there is no difference which I can see between the two sets of specimens. I have therefore included his G. pusilla in the synonymy of A filidactylus.