
Acknowledgments
The basic work for this paper was carried out at the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University and the American Museum of Natural History, New York, while the author held a Fulbright Research Scholarship. I wish to express my deep appreciation to both of these institutions for assistance in many ways, and to the United States Educational Foundation for granting the research scholarship which made my visit possible. I am deeply indebted to Dr. Willis J. Gertsch, of the American Museum of Natural History, and Dr. Herbert Levi, of the Museum of Comparative Zoology for much information and advice, and to Dr. V. V. Hickman for specimens of Tasmanian spiders, and encouragement over many years. This paper would not have been possible without the numerous specimens which have been collected by Dr. T. E. Woodward, of the University of Queensland, and I wish to express my deep gratitude for these and other spiders which he has forwarded to me for examination over the last seven years. I am also much indebted to Professor B. J. Marples for information on web structure and many helpful discussions during the final preparation of the manuscript, and to the numerous individuals mentioned in the text who have assisted in collecting specimens.
| 1931. | Symphytognathidae Hickman. Proc. Zool. Soc. London. p. 1328. |
| 1935. | Anapidae Kratochvil. Act. Soc. Sc. Natur. Moravicae, 9 (12). |
| 1944. | Micropholcommatidae Hickman. Pap. Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm. p. 183. |
| 1945. | Textricellidae Hickman. Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sc. 36, p. 136. |
| 1956. | Tamasesidae Marples. J. Linn. Soc. Zool. 42 (287), p. 476. |
Cribellum and calamistrum wanting. Colulus present (except in Symphytognatha and Patu). Six spinnerets. Lungbooks usually wanting, when present somewhat atypical in form. Anterior spiracle usually leading into tracheal tubes which sometimes supply both abdomen and cephalothorax, but often only abdomen. Two posterior spiracles, one or none. Posterior spiracles when present supplying tracheal tubes to abdomen only, both abdomen and cephalothorax or cephalothorax only. Eight eyes, six eyes or four eyes. Lateral eyes always contiguous. Carapace usually high. Clypeus high, vertical. Labium fused, Maxillae converging. Palp in female without claw, often reduced in length and in the number of segments, sometimes completely absent. Legs prograde, without spines (except secondary spines on legs of males) or scopulae. Claw tufts wanting. Tarsus longer than metatarsus. Tarsal drum present. Three claws. Trichobothria few, two or three on tibia, one on metatarsus of first three legs, none elsewhere. Type genus Symphytognatha Hickman 1931.
The Symphytognathidae as defined above presents a number of characters which clearly separate it from other families. The relative lengths of the tarsus and metatarsus are very characteristic. The tarsus is usually much longer than the metatarsus, which is the reverse of the situation in practically all other spiders. In a few forms which I have included in this family (Mysmena) at least one pair of legs shows this character, while the lengths of these segments in other legs is subequal. Pholcomma, a genus usually placed in the Theridiidae, also shows this character to a less marked degree, but possesses a claw on the female pedipalp. I have not placed this genus into the Symphytognathidae although it possesses a number of other characters which might justify this action. An examination of a New Zealand species of Pholcomma shows that the lungbooks are normal. Levi (1956) recently

established a genus Archerius for a North American spider in which the tarsi are longer than the metatarsi and which possessed other characters which indicate that it could probably be placed within the Symphytognathidae. All of these spiders possess a tarsal drum, but until this structure is specifically looked for over a wider range of spiders it is not known how much significance it has in phylogeny. The loss of the claw from the female pedipalp seems to be common to all genera, while there is also a tendency to a reduction in the length and number of segments culminating in the complete loss of this appendage in several genera.
The original number of eyes must have been eight, but there is a tendency for the anterior median eyes to be reduced in size or absent, and in one genus the posterior median eyes are also absent (Anapistula Gertsch). In four genera (Pseudanapis and Anapistula, Textricella and Pseudanapis) I have grouped together spiders with different numbers of eyes where other characters have indicated a close relationship. The lateral eyes in all genera are contiguous, and except in Mysmena are well separated from the median eyes.
The carapace of both males and females is usually elevated, and this is probably a primitive family character. In Anapistula, however, the carapace is not conspicuously elevated, while in Mysmena it appears as a dimorphic character shown only in the males. I consider that this represents a regression rather than an indication that the elevated form has been developed within the family. The presence of an elevated carapace in both sexes is of considerable interest and represents a condition fundamentally different from that found in other families (Argiopidae including Landana, Theridiidae, Linyphiidae, Micryphantidae) where only the male possesses this character. The only other family which does possess this character in the same form is the Archaeidae, which shares other characters with the Symphytognathidae and in my view is closely related to it.
The respiratory system of these spiders is discussed at greater length elsewhere in this paper, but it is evident that the ancestral forms of this family must have possessed two anterior spiracles leading into lungbooks and two posterior spiracles leading into tracheae. Within the family there is great variation in the form of the respiratory system, and it appears evident that this variation is at the most of generic significance.
