Go to National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa
Volume 86, 1959
– 6 –

Transactions and Proceedings of The Royal Society of New Zealand
(Report by a Sub-Committee of Wellington Branch, August 14, 1957)

The Council of the Wellington Branch in June, 1957, discussed the cost of the Transactions to the Branch (as a corporate body) and to members (as subscribers). In general discussion some members of the Council stated that they did not take the Transactions because its contents are not of great interest to them. A sub-Committee of the Wellington Council was formed to investigate:—

(i)

What fields of science are served by the Society's journal, in fact rather than in theory.

(ii)

Whether the scope of the journal should be changed.

(iii)

Whether the quality of the contents needs improvement.

(iv)

Whether methods of distribution can be changed to better meet the needs of members.

Members appointed to the sub-Committee were M. A. Barnett, J. W. Brodie, P. C. Bull, R. K. Dell, J. F. Gabites, H. J. Harrington (Convener), and W. H. Ward.

Contents of Transactions.

Table 1 shows the field of Science (and Art) covered by the Transactions at five-yearly intervals from 1900 to 1955. The classification of the papers is that in the List of Contents compiled by the editor and has some variability. For instance, paleontological papers may be listed under geology, zoology or paleontology. Some of the papers listed under “Chemistry and Physics” are partly biological, and those listed under “Miscellaneous” include papers on astronomy, Polynesian matters, and earthquakes. Entomology and marine ecology could be included with zoology.

Articles in the fields of zoology, botany, geology and paleontology make up 82% of those that are listed for the period 1900–1955. In rough terms one-half of the articles are biological and one-quarter ate geological for that period.

For the years 1945 to 1955, the approximate composition is zoology 46%, botany 25%, geology 20%, paleontology 5%, and other subjects only 4%. (See Table 1.)

Basically, the Society's journal is a “New Zealand Journal of Biology and Geology”.

Interests of Members of the Society.

An indication of the fields of interest of members of the Society may be obtained in at least three ways.

The officers of the Society seem to be drawn impartially from most fields of science. Some of the officers of some branches are laymen with an amateur interest in science, technology or the arts.

The titles of five Hudson lectures delivered to the Wellington Branch and published in N.Z. Science Review have been “New Zealand and Medical Research”, “Advance in Chemistry”, “The Utilization of Grassland”, “Notocenozoic: the New Zealand Cretaceo-Tertiary”, and “Antarctic Adventure and Research”.

The Wellington Branch consists of Physics, Biology, Technology, Geology, Social Science. and Astronomy and Geophysics Sections, and six or seven papers are read before each Section each year. Of the total of about 35 papers only one-sixth are biological and one-sixth geological and few of them are published in the Transactions. None of the papers read before some Sections are published in the Transactions. In all Sections some papers are not suitable for publication, and others are published in specialist journals in New Zealand or overseas, in the publications of Museums and in Memoir series such as the D.S.I.R. and Geological Survey Bulletins. Some papers that are published in the Transactions are read by title before the Wellington Branch but are not discussed. Table 3 allows a comparison of the titles of papers read before the Biology Section of the Wellington Branch in 1953 and 1954 with the titles of biological papers published in the Transactions in 1954–55. Some papers that would have been delivered to the Wellington Branch 50 years ago, or even 20 years ago, are now read at

– 7 –

meetings of the Geographical, Polynesian and other specialist societies, or at annual meetings such as those of the Geological Society of New Zealand and the staff conferences of the Geological Survey.

The other Branches and Member Bodies of the Royal Society also have wide fields of interest. The Canterbury Branch includes Field Club, Mathematics and Physics, and Scientific Photography sections, and has a large programme of General Meetings. The Otago Branch likewise has a programme of Main Branch Meetings in addition to those of its Historical and Astronomical sections. The Hawke's Bay Branch has Ornithological and Meteorological sections as well as two Historical sections, one in Napier and the other in Hastings. The Auckland Institute and Museum has wide public support, and as a Member Body has a series of Institute Lectures, a series of Sunday Lectures for the public, and supports Conchology and Anthropology sections.

Should the Scope of the Transactions be Changed?

As shown above there is a great contrast between the scope of the Society and the scope of its Transactions. The members of the Society are drawn from most fields of Science and Technology and to a lesser extent from the Arts, whereas the Transactions are basically a “New Zealand Journal of Biology and Geology”. Moreover, as shown in Table 2, 82% of the biological papers for the years 1951 to 1955 were in the fields of Systematics and Structure and Anatomy, whereas other biological fields such as Cytology, Genetics, Physiology, Biochemistry and Applied Ecology were represented sparsely or not at all.

The contrast should be recognised consciously whether or not it is justifiable and reasonable. It has been discussed at length by the sub-Committee.

The discussion commenced with consideration of whether physicists and others could be assured that the biological and geological papers in the Transactions are valuable, and worthy of the cost of publication. Members of the sub-Committee who work in these fields gave that assurance, with the qualification that the journal is not perfect, and that some papers could be condensed.

For purposes of discussion the sub-Committee then considered the propositions that “the Society as the premier scientific organisation of New Zealand should publish Transactions of wider appeal and coverage, and that the present journal is an historical survival that has not been changed deliberately to meet a changed environment”. In this connection the possibility was discussed of facilitating the widening of the scope of the Transactions by dividing them into series or sections following the custom of the Royal Societies of London, Edinburgh and Canada. It was suggested for example that our Transactions could be divided initially into three series or sections (A, General Science; B, Biological Sciences; C, Geological Sciences), and that if there was demand other series could be added from time to time to cover the physical, chemical, social and other sciences. The desirability or otherwise of separate publication of the Proceedings of the Society was also discussed.

The sub-Committee has reached agreement on the following: (1) That the scope of the Transactions need not be changed, though its actual scope should be recognised and should be stated on the title page or in the section on “Instructions to Authors”. A suitable statement would be:

“Papers published in the Transactions are mainly of a biological or geological nature.”

(2) That though division of the Transactions would have advantages, it cannot be successful at present for want of a sufficient number of papers. It would also be expensive, and is partly unnecessary because three journals for general, agricultural, and geological sciences are being commenced by the D.S.I.R. If division of the Transactions were attempted the obvious initial division would be into a biological series and a geological series. The biological series could be published sufficiently frequently to satisfy the needs of authors, but the geological series could be published probably only once a year. Rapid increase in the number of geological papers submitted for publication is unlikely because a “New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics” will be started by the D.S.I.R. in January, 1958.

(3) That the Proceedings of the Society should be printed separately from the Transactions, so that they may be distributed to members who do not take the Transactions.

Does the Quality of the Transactions Need Improvement?

It is recognised that “maintaining the highest attainable standards in publishing scientific papers is the greatest service scientific societies could render to the community, and successful journals of high quality provide a stimulus to scientific endeavour of the greatest importance.'

The maintenance of standards (at minimum cost) in our Society has been achieved largely through the labours, amounting almost to dedication, of the Society's editors.

It seems that some papers, especially student theses, could be improved by compaction of shortening, but that is a matter that could be watched by referees or supervisors. Additional labour should not fall on the Society's editors.

Should Methods of Distribution be Changed to Better Meet the Needs of Members?

In 1955 the membership of the Wellington Branch was 383, consisting of 281 ordinary members, 23 life members, 11 members of other Branches now attached to Wellington, and

– 8 –
Table I
Subject Year Totals Percentages to Nearest 1%
1900 1905 1910 1915 1920 1926 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1900–1955 1945–1955
Zoology 27 25 17 15 20 19 13 5 5 17 23 17 203 36 46
Botany 10 9 10 16 8 13 11 3 3 10 8 13 114 20 25
Geology 5 13 16 15 16 22 2 12 8 6 11 8 134 24 20
Chemistry and Physics 6 8 9 5 28 5
Miscellaneous 15 8 6 7 3 8 4 1 1 53 10 1
Anthropology 4 4 1
History 2 2 0.5
Astronomy 2 5 0.5
Chemistry 2 1 1 1 5 1 1
Paleontology 4 4 1 5 14 2 5
Agriculture 2 2 0.5
Entonology 2 2 0.5
Marine Ecology 2 2 0.5 2
565
– 9 –

68 associates, and of this total 159 members (41%) did not receive the Transactions. If associates are excluded the total membership was 315, and 91 (29%) did not receive the Transactions.

In July, 1957, the total membership of the Branch was 418, including 247 full members receiving the Transactions, 87 full members not receiving the Transactions, and 84 associates. Of the total membership 171 (41%) do not receive the Transactions, and of the full members 26% do not receive the Transactions.

Many physicists and others (including some members of the Wellington Council), do not take the Transactions because its contents are of no interest to them. Nevertheless, the Proceedings of the Society are of interest to all members and the sub-Committee recommends that the Proceedings should be printed separately from the Transactions and distributed to all members.

The sub-Committee also discussed and rejected the possibility that the “appeal” of papers in the Transactions could be improved by judicious use of editorial invitations to contribute papers. It is recommended, however, that Hudson Lectures should be printed in the separate Proceedings as well as Presidential Addresses and similar papers. It is recommended also that consideration be given to including in the Proceedings abstracts of the more important papers read before Branches.

The sub-Committee has not reached agreement on one very difficult matter touching methods of distribution. As mentioned above 44% of the members of the Wellington Branch did not receive the Transactions in 1955, and the question arises of whether they should have to pay for the Transactions. There are two opposed arguments. The first is that it is democratic for all members to pay for all of the benefits of the Society, even if some members receive only some of the benefits. The second argument is that a journal of bioligical and geological papers is a special benefit that is not received by a substantial minority of the members of this Branch (41% of all Branch members, and 26% of the full Branch members), who therefore should not be required to pay for it. Nevertheless, it is considered that the minority (excluding associates) would pay willingly if it is made clear that the Transactions are necessary, that the papers are valuable and are published at the minimum cost, and that financially the Transactions could not be published without the support of all members.

Table II.—Biological Papers in Transactions (1951–1955) According to The Type of Subject
Number of Papers
1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 Total %
Systematics 6 17 33 34 18 107 66
Structure and Anatomy 4 5 1 11 5 26 16
Distribution 1 2 3 4 2 12 7
Biology and Life History 3 1 5 2 11 7
Ecology 1 1 1 4 7 4
Number of Pages
1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 Total %
Systematics 34 234 437 489 340 1534 65
Structure and Anatomy 58 37 9 141 92 337 14
Distribution 21 10 17 33 16 97 4
Biology and Life History 58 11 43 20 132 6
Ecology 6 32 82 144 264 11
– 10 –
Table III
Papers Delivered to the Biology Section of Wellington Branch in 1953 and 1954. 1953 Biological Papers in the Transactions, 1954–55 (Vol. 82).
The Place of Systematics in the Biological Sciences; Experimental Virus Work; Freshwater Fisheries Research and Its Applications; Faunal Relationships across Cook Strait; Investigations into an Area in Southwest Fiordland; Jamaica—a Tropical Island. 1954 (First 5 titles in Botany and Zoology.)
Botany
The Female Conceptacle and Young Sporeling of Four N.Z. Species of Carpophyllum; N. Z. Hepaticae (Liverworts)—VIII. A Review of the N.Z. Species of the Genera Bazzania and Acromastigum; Variation in a Sample of Pinus radiata Cones from the Nelson District; Some Notes on Suaeda austrails Moq. var. nova zelandica var. nov. and Messembryanthemum australe Sol. ex Forst. f.; Studies in N.Z. Carices I—The Section Acutae Fries.
Discussion on Banding Animals for Study; Chatham Islands Expedition, 1954; The Biology of a Melting Ice Age; New Vistas in Arctic Scandinavia; Plants and Plant Communities of Western U.S.A.; The Tuatara Islands of Cook Strait; Auckland Islands Visit, 1954; Distribution of Marine Plants and Animals on the East Coast of New Zealand.
Zoology Studies in the N.Z. Elasmobranchii.…; Ascidians of N.Z.; The Land Mollusca of Stewart and Solander Islands; Geonemertes pantini, a New Land Nemertine from the Dunedin District; A New Genus and Species of Phasmidae from N.Z.

Mr. Allen moved the first recommendation, which was carried.

That the Proceedings of the Society be printed separately from the Transactions, and that they be distributed to all members.

In reply to a question, Dr. Salmon said he calculated that the cost involved would be approximately £150. Mr. Allen then moved, and at was carried:

That the Standing Committee be asked to investigate the possibility of including in the Proceedings the texts of Presidential Addresses and summaries of all suitable papers that are read before the Branches or before Sections of Branches.

Mr. Brooker stated that the appended report of the Sub-committee of the Wellington Branch was a valuable contribution, setting out as it did a tabulated section on the material published in the Transactions over a period of five years.

Mr. Callaghan said he thought that scientific publications in New Zealand as a whole would require to be looked into.

Proxies for Standing Committee Meetings. Dr. Dixon said the Rotorua Branch had raised the question of provision being made in the Rules for Member Bodies to have the right of proxies in attendance at meetings of the Standing Committee. Member Bodies had been asked to express an opinion, but from the replies received there did not appear to be a great deal of support. After reiterating the advantages of proxy representation, Dr. Dixon moved that the matter be referred to the Standing Committee. On being put to the meeting the motion was lost.

Travelling Expenses. Mr. Allen spoke to the report on the method of assessing the amount of travelling expenses which Member Bodies should share, stating that very few of the Branches had as yet expressed an opinion. He moved, Dr. Barnett seconded, and it was carried, that the matter be referred to the Standing Committee with a request that it continue investigations.

Accommodation. A letter from Dr. Hamilton regarding a proposal to provide accommodation in the building being erected for the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research at the corner of Bowen and Sydney streets was read to the meeting.

On the motion of Dr. Falla, seconded by Dr Archey, it was resolved that a reply be sent thanking the Secretary of D.S.I.R. for the offer of accommodation, and set-

– 11 –

ting out the space and other requirements of the Society; the secretary to be informed that other offers of accommodation have been received and that he be asked to indicate terms of tenure.

Details of the above reply to be investigated by a sub-committee.

It was mentioned that the Honorary Librarian, Professor Richardson, had made informal representations to the Principal of Victoria University regarding future accommodation in the new buildings.

It was resolved that a sub-committee consisting of Dr. Barnett, Mr. Callaghan and Mr. Allen (Convener) be set up to report to the Standing Committee.

Darwin Centenary. Dr. Falla presented a report in committee on the revised plans in connection with the proposed Darwin Centenary Expedition.

He stated out of committee that Mr. G. A. Knox, lecturer in zoology at Canterbury University, had been selected to be the New Zealand representative in the expedition to Chile. The meeting endorsed the appointment of Mr. Knox.

In reply to a question, Dr. Falla stated that the Royal Society of London was so far providing the required finance, but contributions from the participating countries would be required.

On the motion of Dr. Archey, seconded by Mr. Brooker, it was resolved that the Branches be asked for contributions towards the expenses of the expedition.

Conservation Committee's Report on Insecticides.