
Transactions
of the
Royal Society of New Zealand
Volume 88, (Quarterly Issue) Part 1.
Issued May, 1960
Published by the Royal Society of New Zealand,
Victoria University of Wellington, P. O. Box 196,
Wellington, New Zealand
Editor: J. T. Salmon, D. Sc., F. R. S. N. Z., F. R. E. S.
Associate Editor:
Sir Charles Cotton, D. Sc., Hon. LL. D., A. O. S. M., F. G. S., F. R. S. N. Z.
London Agent.
High Commissioner for New Zealand, 415 Strand, London, W. C. 2.
Printed by Otago Daily Times and Witness Newspapers Co., Ltd.,
Dunedin, New Zealand.

Ground Water Conditions in Canterbury
[Communicated by Mr. B. W. Collins and read before Canterbury Branch, July 22, 1957; received by the Editor, March 12, 1959.]
Abstract
The artesian area around Christchurch has a low rainfall, and in this paper the question of how much of the available rainfall reaches the water table to replenish it has been studied from an engineering point of view. The conclusion is reached that it is only on rare occasions that rain water reaches the water table, and this seems to indicate that the Waimakariri River water keeps the sub-strata charged.
In Canterbury there is a low rainfall of 25 inches per year, but in many places there is a very high water table. It is popularly supposed that the ground water is derived from the rain falling on the surface immediately above it. This is not necessarily true, for only in the regions of very heavy rainfall does this occur. In many cases the source of the ground water is situated at some distance away. This is true especially of the Canterbury Plains and the area around Christchurch, with its artesian system. The purpose of this paper is to point out that, in areas of low rainfall and high evaporation, only on rare occasions and during winter months does any rainfall reach the water table.
In my paper “Fluctuating Levels in the Canterbury Artesian System” (N. Z. I. E. Proceedings, Vol. 37, 1951) it was shown that rainfall at the surface would raise the pressure in the substrata sufficiently to cause an immediate rise in the levels of artesian wells sunk to an underground stratum. The point is that conditions in the zone below the surface are in a very sensitive state.
From an engineering point of view, soil consists of solids, water, and air. When the water table is located below the surface there is a zone of moist soil, or it may be quite dry in dry climates. A capillary fringe exists above the water table which is approximately 12in high in sands, 3ft 6in to 4ft high in silts, and 10in high in clays. There is suction, negative pressure, or a pressure deficiency present here. Below the water table the soil is saturated. In dry climates the soil above the capillary water zone seldom reaches saturation, and any rainfall quickly evaporates or is used by plants.
The pressure deficiency is the negative pressure measured in Kg/cm2. Soil suction is measured by the pF value which is the logarithm of the pressure deficiency in grams per square centimetre. Thus by the use of logarithms the very high pressure deficiencies obtained at low moisture contents may be depicted. Hence suction and pressure deficiency are the same. The typical pF versus moisture-content graph is shown in Graph No. 1.

G. D. Aitchison, in his paper “Some Preliminary Studies of Unsaturated Soils”, read before the second Australian and New Zealand Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, has gathered the existing information, and he recognises six states of unsaturation: A, complete saturation; B, primary unsaturation; C, secondary unsaturation; D, partial saturation; E, modified primary unsaturation; F, modified secondary unsaturation.
In case A, which is the state below the water table, there is no air present, and there is no tendency for the water to travel from one zone to a similar zone near it. In other words, there is no pressure deficiency.
In case B, all the pores are filled with water, which is the state in the capillary zone immediately above the water table, and there is a tendency for the pore water to drain away from the largest pores. There is also a slight pressure deficiency.
In case C, the air begins to enter the pores, and there is a pressure deficiency.
Further desiccation of the soil can then give rise to states D, E. and F, until finally the water has been driven off, and soil solids and air remain.
As has been stated, an engineer regards soil as consisting of solids, water and air. This is shown diagrammatically in Fig. 1.
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
Moisture content is expressed as the percentage of water present to the weight of oven-dried soil. Thus w=Ww/Ws.
In the above diagram let Va = the volume of air; Vw = the volume of water; Vs = the volume of solids; V. = the total volume; Vv=the volume of voids=Va+Vw.

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
The degree of saturation=Vw/Vv=Sr. By definition the voids ratio e=Vv/Vs, Porosity n=e/1+e, and e=n/1−n.
For saturated soils it may be proved that e=wG, where G. is the specific gravity of the soil.
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
A typical value of e for a soil near Christchurch would be 0.90 at a depth of 9in. The corresponding value of n is 0.45. Therefore, an inch of rain falling on the surface of a dried soil will saturate 2½m. If there is an existing moisture content of 10%, and the soil is saturated at 20% it will saturate 4½in. The saturated moisture content would be 100×0.90/2.65 = 33.5%.
Thus, starting from dry conditions—and there are long periods of drought in Canterbury—the ground would be saturated for 9in after 4in of rain. Soil suction would immediately come into action and the moisture would invade the drier zones. The question may then be asked, how much of this water will actually drain downwards to the water table and replenish it? Also, at what stage of this downward

passage of moisture will the pressure deficiency become zero, and the condition of equilibrium moisture content be established?
The equilibrium moisture content is established when all the voids are filled with water. When the soil is saturated, e = wG, so that the voids ratio may be calculated if the moisture content and the specific gravity are known.
At equilibrium moisture content, and the water table at the surface, the pressure at any depth z is called the effective pressure p̄. The effective pressure is equal to the total pressure p̄ (due to the weight of the water plus the soil) minus the porewater pressure, or p=p−uw.
p̄ may be proved equal to γ′z, where γ′ is the submerged density of the soil, and γ′ = γ−γw, where γ is the density of the saturated soil and γw is the density of water.
Also, γ = γs—n (γs−γw), where γs is the density of the solids, so that knowing e, n can be calculated. Thence γ and γ′ may be found.
From the above, effective pressure can be plotted against voids ratio (Graph No. 2).
Because the voids ratio decreases with depth owing to the increase of effective pressure, the saturation profile shows a greater moisture content at the surface than at a depth. This is shown in Graphs No. 3 and No. 4.
Commencing on March 13, 1957, after some days rain, in which over 4in fell, auger holes were sunk at the University site at Clyde Road, and moisture content and other samples were taken. The moisture-content profile is shown on Graph No. 3. Also plotted on the graph is the equilibrium moisture content distribution.
for the water table at the surface. Four inches of rain is well above the average rainfall at any one period in Canterbury; yet the moisture content at a depth of 2ft had only reached 10.7%. In other words, there could be no charging of the water table until the moisture content profile had straightened to the curve on the right. The profile shows a maximum pressure deficiency at 2ft, and to achieve equilibrium the water content would have to increase from 10.7% to 27.5%. According to the soil-suction and moisture-content graph, the pF value for a moisture content of 10.7% is 3.5. A great deal more rain than 4in would be needed to.

achieve this. For dry soil at the beginning it would require nearly 11in of rain falling in a short period to obtain equilibrium moisture content. This rainfall would saturate the soil to a depth of 24in, as far as the capillary fringe. As the average rainfall in Canterbury is 25in at the coast and 35in inland and there is a great deal of evaporation, it would seem that this state would seldom occur.
The amounts of rainfall (supplied by the Meterological Department in Christchurch) for the month of March, 1957, are shown in Table I.
| Cumulative | |||
| Total | |||
| Inches | (Inches) | ||
| March | 1–5 | Nil | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.81 | 0.81 | |
| 7 | 0.97 | 1.78 | |
| 8 | Trace | 1.78 | |
| 9 | 0.27 | 2.05 | |
| 10 | 1.85 | 3.90 | |
| 11 | 0.73 | 4.63 | |
| 12 | 0.02 | 4.65 | |
| 13 | 0.05 | 4.70 | |
| — Tests taken | |||
| 14 | 0.13 | 4.83 | |
| 15–16 | Nil | 4.83 | |
| 17 | 0.12 | 4.95 | |
| 18 | 0.01 | 4.96 | |
| 19 | 0.17 | 5.13 | |
| 20–22 | Nil | 5.13 | |
| 23 | 0.09 | 5.22 | |
| 24 | 0.01 | 5.23 | |
| 25 | Trace | 5.23 | |
| 26–28 | Nil | 5.23 | |
| 29 | 0.03 | 5.26 | |
| 30–31 | Nil | 5.26 | |
| April 1–10 | Nil | – | |
| —Tests taken |
On April 10 a further set of moisture contents was taken, and the two sets of readings are shown in Table II.
| 13/3/57 | 10/4/57 | 18/4/57 | May, 1957 | |
| (After 4.75in rain) | ||||
| Depth | Per cent | Per cent | Per cent | Per cent |
| 6in | 26.4 | |||
| 9–11in | 18.2 | 22.5 | ||
| 12in | 21.4 | 230 | ||
| 15–17in | 15.6 | |||
| 18in | 17.1 | 16.4 | ||
| 24in | 10.7 | 17.3 | 14.4 | 21.5 |
| 32in | 19.6 | 27.6 | ||
| 33in | 16.9 | 19.9 | 27.9 | |
| 42in | 23.6 | 26.7 | 26.1 | 27.8 |
| Top of capillary fringe |
After very little additional rain it will be seen that at the zone of the lowest moisture content—that is, 10.7% on 13/3/57 at a depth of 2ft, the moisture content on the 10/4/57 has increased to 17.3%. From the graph (No. 3) the moisture content at saturation is 27.5%. The moisture content at the surface has fallen owing to evaporation. The tendency to attain equilibrium moisture content by straightening the profile of the moisture-content diagram may be seen. Until the drier zone at 2ft has been wetted, there can be no downward flow of water to the top of the capillary fringe at 3ft 6in.

After further rain in April, a further set of moisture contents at the site was taken. The profile followed the readings taken on 13/3/57 down to 2ft, where the moisture content had increased to 14.4%, but saturation had not been effected, although there is a tendency for the moisture content to increase at a depth of 2ft. In the winter months saturation might be achieved and the water table replenished. The above information is shown on Graph No 3.
The particle sizes of the soil were as set out in Table III.
| Sand Sizes | Silt Sizes | Clay Sizes | ||
| (above 0.05 mm) | (0.005–0.05 mm) | (up to 0.005 mm) | ||
| Depth | per cent | per cent | per cent | Classification |
| 0–12in (humus) | ||||
| 14–17in | 14 | 54 | 32 | Silty clay |
| 23–25in | 27 | 61 | 12 | Sandy silt |
| 32–34in | 23 | 65 | 12 | Sandy silt |
| 40–42in | 4 | 65 | 31 | Silty clay |
The calculations for determining the saturated moisture content taken on 10/4/57 are set out in Table IV.

| Depth | Natural | G | V | Ws | Vs | Vv | e | Sat. w | n | Sr | Liquid |
| M/C% | c.c. | gm | c.c. | c.c. | % | Limit | |||||
| 9–11in | 18.2 | 2.65 | 26.5 | 36.69 | 13.8 | 12.7 | 0.92 | 34.5 | 0.48 | 52.5 | — |
| 15–17in | 15.6 | 29.1 | 48.80 | 16.8 | 12.3 | 0.74 | 28.0 | 0.43 | 55.7 | 31.8 | |
| 32–34in | 19.6 | 41.4 | 64.90 | 24.4 | 17.0 | 0.70 | 26.4 | 0.41 | 74.2 | 26.8 | |
| 40–42in | 26.7 | 53.7 | 79.95 | 30.20 | 23.5 | 0.69 | 26.1 | 0.41 | 100 | 33.6 |
Water table at 42in.
Sr = Degree of saturation=Vw/Vv.
Aitchison states that at Melbourne, Victoria, the average annual rainfall is 30in, and the evaporation is 39in, and the soil is yellow podsolic. As a comparison, the length of the wet period is 6 months and that of the dry period 4 months. The seasonal limits for the pF value are 2.5 to 4.5, w varies from 13% to 4% at 6in depth, and from 30% to 24% at 2ft depth, with e between 0.90 and 0.80, and Sr between 38% and 12% at the surface, and 100% and 80% at 2ft. Below 2ft depth the moisture content decreases slightly, and Sr is 95%, and although it is very close to saturation, it cannot be said that there is a water table.
The two graphs, Nos. 4 and 5, which are taken from Aitchison's paper, show the moisturecontent profile in the dry season and the wet season. In the wet season there is a tendency to form a water table at a depth of 2ft, but below this point the moisture content falls off to a figure below saturation. In other words, the presence of a water table is not dependent upon rainfall.
From the above it is evident that rainfall is a very uncertain source of supply to the water table in lowrainfall areas such as Canterbury, and that the causes of the replenishment of the water table must be looked for elsewhere. In the Canterbury case there is the Waimakariri River running over gravel strata, which would keep the underground system charged. The level at Halkett, which is 15 miles from the mouth, is 300ft above sea level, so that artesian conditions could prevail. Professor Speight, a former Professor of Geology at University of Canterbury, always maintained this to be true. In his paper “A Preliminary Account of the Geological Features of the Christchurch Artesian System” in the Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, Vol. 43, 1910, he stated that in his opinion the Waimakariri River was responsible. Even in the drier years the Avon River continues to run without any significant change in level.
The North Canterbury Catchment Board has taken gaugings of the Waimakariri River after stable conditions of weather at the gorge outlet from the mountains, and at the bridge, which is a few miles from the mouth of the river. The readings were 1,700 cusecs at the gorge, and 1,200 cusecs at the bridge. Allowing for 100 cusecs used in water races, 400 cusecs must have entered the underground strata. When it is remembered that the volcanic mass of Banks Peninsula acts like a plug, and that deposits of the finer silts and clays at sea would cause a further barrier to flow, it may soon be realised that the conditions are ripe for the storing of water

underground. Of the 400 cusecs which finds its way underground under these conditions, only about 50 cusecs are used for water supply in the area.
Postscript
An amount of 4.75in of rain fell between May 16 and May 20, 1957, making the total for nearly five months 17in. As this is well above average, one would expect the water table to approach the surface. This occurred in many places, but at Clyde Road moisture-contents samples still showed a deficiency. At a depth of 2ft the moisture content was 21.5 per cent, saturated conditions being about 27 per cent.
If the available space in the voids of the soil is calculated as it existed on 18/4/57, it is found that it will take exactly 4in of rain to bring the profile of moisture content out to the saturation stage.
Some subsoil drainage tests have been carried out with a lysimeter which show that there is a downward tendency for the flow. Any apparatus which destroys the natural conditions which exist in the subsoil should not be used.
References
Terzaghi, K., and Peck, R. T., 1948. Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Capper, P. L., and Cassie, W. F, 1948. The Mechanics of Engineering Soils, Second Edition. Billing & Sons Ltd., Great Britain.
Aitchison, G. D., 1956. Some Preliminary Studies of Unsaturated Soils. Proceedings of the 2nd Australian and New Zealand Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.
Baver, L. D., 1948. Soil Physics. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Northey, R. D., 1956. Soil Moisture and Civil Engineering. Proceedings of the Conference on Soil Moisture at D. P. L. Wellington, N.Z. Department Scientific and Industrial Development Information Series.
Oborn, L. E., 1955. The Hydro-Geology of the Canterbury Plains Between the Rakaia and Ashley Rivers (Thesis).
— 1956. Ground Water in Metropolitan Christchurch. .D.S.I.R. Hydrological Report, 128.
P. J. Alley
, B.E., A.M.I.C.E., M.N.Z.I.E., M.I.S.S.M.F.E.,School of Engineering,
University of Canterbury,
Christchurch.

Contributions to the Knowledge of the New Zealand Bryophyte Flora
[Received by the Editor, May 25, 1959.]
Abstract
One new moss species and three new varieties are described, one being of a Chilean species now reported for the first time from New Zealand. Sporophyte characteristics, previously unknown, are described for one of our little-known mosses. Of the hepatics, one new variety is described, two new combinations are made, and new localities are given for four rare species.
Musci
1. Brachythecium subpilosum (H.f. & W.) Jaeg. var. angustifolium var. nov.
A typo in foliis longioribus et angustioribus, auriculis plus distinctis differt.
On rotten stump and earth in open space in pine plantation, southern base of Flagstaff Hill, Dunedin; K. W. A, 9.5. 55. Type in herb. K. W. A., No. 5723, with duplicate in herb. G. O. K. Sainsbury.
The plant formed straggling light yellow patches amongst sparse grass: leaves narrow lanceolate, longly acuminate, plicate, nerved to about midleaf or rather more, alars large and conspicuous. Seta long and roughened with papillae.
The above points taken together will distinguish it from our other species of Brachythecium. It resembles some forms of B. salebrosum which, however, has a smooth seta and B. rutabulum which, with a rough seta, has much broader and smooth or only faintly plicate leaves.
This moss was submitted to G. O. J. Sainsbury and by him to Le Roy Andrews, who remarked that it could be a new species but that the genus was so difficult he could not be sure. E. B. Bartram reported that he could not match it with any species with which he was familiar but that it came near Brachythecium subpilosum. He noted that our plant had narrower, longer acuminate and more plicate leaves and was somewhat more glossy than this Chilean species. Specimens were also sent to the Swedish bryologist, Dr. Herman Persson, who at first considered them a new species, perhaps belonging to the closely related genus Camptothecium, but related to Japanese species of Brachythecium in which the alar leaf regions are also so well developed as to be subauriculate and the nerve divided at the apex into two short divisions as occasionally occurs in our plant. Eventually he agreed that it came close to B. subpilosum, although most of the specimens he had seen of that species had shorter and broader leaves.
2. Fissidens taylori C. M. var. sainsburiana var. nov.
F. pygmaeus Tayl. Lond. Journ of Bot., V. 66, 1846.
Sainsburia novae-zealandiae Dix. Bryologist 44: 40, 1941.
The genus Sainsburia was erected by H. N. Dixon for a plant agreeing with Fissidens except that the peristome teeth were entire or merely cracked somewhat along the middle, not divided wholly or deeply into two lobes as in that genus. Sainsbury recognised the great similarity of the plant to F. taylori and referred it to that species, considering it only a form.

H. N. Dixon, however, considered the deviation in the peristome character entitled the plant to generic rank, probably on that account not comparing it with species of Fissidens. As far as known, there is no transition between F. Taylori with its bifid teeth and this variety where they are entire or merely cracked along the median line and erect when dry instead of incurved. In view of the importance of the peristome in moss taxonomy, the erection of a variety here seems justified. Sainsbury states that the type of F. pygmaeus Tayl. (already reduced to synonymy with F. taylori) has the teeth entire or nearly so; it is therefore included in this variety.
This variety has been reported from Western Australia, Victoria and Wairoa County in the North Island.
3. Fissidens epiphytus sp nov.
F. taylori affinis autem planta sterilis major, ad 10 mm, alta, tapetem formans: folia plurijuga, patentia, sicca minime mutata, lamina vaginans magna limbo bene notato. Plantae fertilae in caulibus sterilibus epiphyticae, eis multo breviores, 0.5–1.5 mm longae, folus paucis ut in F. taylori. Theca erecta dentes peristomii bifidi: sporae ad 36μ diametro. Plantae masculae 0.2–0.3 mm longae, in caulibus sterlibus epiphyticae.
Closely related to F. taylori but the sterile plants are much taller, up to 10 mm long, usually with 15–25 pairs of leaves. The blades of the vaginant lamina usually join between the nerve and the leaf margin, but occasionally at or very near the nerve, with the margins usually bordered. Female plants 0.5 to 1.5 mm high with 2 or 3 pairs of leaves, attached by rhizoids to the sterile stems. Male plants 0.2–0.3 mm high also attached by rhizoids to the sterile stems. Seta 4–5 mm long capsule and peristome as in F. taylori spores 36μ in diameter.
Distribution. Victoria (Australia). New Zealand, forming a carpet on shallow soil on flat sheltered rock near Roxburgh, Otago. K.W.A. No. 5860, 6.12.55: type.
This moss belongs to the Heterocaulon section of the genus in which the fertile stems are very small and bear leaves mostly composed of the vaginant lamina. It was referred to Mr. Sainsbury, who reported that a similar plant is in the National Herbarium of Victoria under No. 86 as F. brevifolius H.f. & W. det by E. Hampe; leg F. von Mueller, Avon River, Victoria. This is apparently the moss referred to at page 103 in the Studies (Dixon) because there is a trace here and there of the border on the vaginant lamina on the leaves of the sterile stems. This would account for Dixon's statement that the Victorian moss is of the Semilimbidium group, presuming he saw only barren material, as otherwise he could scarcely have missed seeing the “heterocaulon” character. Dixon states in the same place that F. brevifolius is synonymous with F. taylori.
This new species differs from F. taylori in the greater development of the sterile stems, 10 mm as against 2 mm long or less (Sainsbury, p. 49): in both male and female plants being epiphytic on the sterile one, not only the male plants as in F. taylori: in the vaginant lamina of the leaves of the sterile plants being usually rather strongly bordered and in the larger spores, 36μ diameter against 16–22μ.
4. Macromitrium proprepens (Hook.) Schwaegr. var. aristata var. nov.
Folia, praecipue superiora, aliquando omnia in ramulis tenuibus, in proboscidem praelongam subulatam vel loriformem, sicca/erecta vel subpatula prolongata.
Distribution Growing on Leptospermum ericoides at 300ft on Little Barrier Island. Collected by J. M. Dingley, 30.8.58 Holotype in herb. K.W.A. No 6323; paratype in herb. Mrs. E. A. Hodgson, No. M51.
The terminal leaves of normal branches or sometimes all the leaves of slender branches, gradually narrow to a long prolongation which may be half as long again as the leaf (much as in M. gracile var. proboscideum) and may form a slender penicillate tuft at the branch apex. Part of the gathering bears capsules, both calyptrate and showing peristomes, and these plants show the normal leaves of the

species, strap shaped from a somewhat widened base and suddenly narrowed to a very obtuse and apiculate apex.
5. Psilopilum bellii Broth.
Seta mostly 2 cm high, stout and somewhat flexuous. Capsule light green when fresh, light brown when thoroughly dried out or overmature, turgidly oval in outline, erect or held at a slight angle, asymmetrical, laterally compressed with one edge longer and more curved, making the small mouth oblique; peristome wanting: operculum small, conical and erect when young but soon becoming slender and gracefully curved from a wider base; calyptra 3–4 mm long, split up for two-thirds on one side and held at an angle astride the upper margin of the capsule by the curved operculum till they fall away together, smooth and glabrous except for the minutely bristly apex. Spores 20–24μ diameter, pale, very minutely punctate. Dioecious. Male plants uncommon, shorter but robust, bracts shorter and broader than the leaves.
This description of plants collected in bush near the top of the Leith Valley, Dunedin, gives details mentioned by Sainsbury (1955, p. 37) as unknown. The illustration in the Handbook is misleading, as the capsule is shown as wide mouthed and symmetrical.
The plant grows in patches on damp or wet ground in bush or heavy “scrub” and at first sight is very similar to patches of Bryum truncorum. A. further locality for the species is east of Lake Hauroko, Southland, collected by J. E. Henry in February, 1947.
Hepaticae
6. Acromastigum marginatum Hodgs.
Known previously only from Waipoua Forest (North Auckland), Great Barrier Island and Stewart Island, this species has now been collected from Secretary Island, Fiordland, at 650ft by Dr. J. Murray, February, 1959. Further collectings will probably show that, although uncommon, this species may be widely spread throughout high rainfall areas.
7. Adelanthus magellanicus (Lindenb.) Spr.
Collected by Dr. J. Murray at 3,400ft on Secretary Island, Fiordland.
8. Dendrolembidium insulanum (Martin & Hodgson) Allison & Hodgson.
Lembidium insulanum Martin & Hodgson, Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z., 78, 497. 1950.
Dendrolembidium martini Herz. Rev. der Leberm. Gatt. Lembidium Mitt. Ark. f. Bot. 1: 13, 1951.
As Martin & Hodgson's specific epithet insulanum was published in 1950 it must take precedence over Herzog's epithet martini published in February, 1951, but in the genus Dendrolembidium which he erected (Herzog, 1951) for this and two other species. These are D. tenax (Grev.) Herz., described as Lepidozia tenax in the Handbook (Hooker, 1867), from Eastern Australia. Tasmania and New Zealand and D. dendroides (Carr. & Pearson) Herz from New South Wales.
Until now the only known collecting of D. insulanum was from Stewart Island by W. Martin, who kindly supplied me with some specimens. It has now been found by Dr. J. Murray at 650ft on Secretary Island, Fiordland, in February, 1959.
9. Jamesoniella sonderi (G.) St. var. latifolia var. nov.
Robusta, ad 10 cm longa: folia oblique subreniformia, latiora quam longa: Cetera ut in typo.
Under small waterfall above Lake Tekapo, near Godley Glacier, 3,400ft. Collected by D. Scott, No 215, 18.11.58 No. H6,091 herb. J. W. A. type of variety.
As in the type variety, the leaves are asymmetrical and secund to the dorsal aspect with the ventral margin inflexed, but they differ in that they are broader than long, sub-reniform or transversely oval, only occasionally more or less isodiametrical. In the type variety the leaves are obovate (Hodgson, 1958). Jamesoniella colorata, J. pseudocclusa, J. sonderi and Adelanthus magellanicus, except for the presumed

difference in the fructification in the latter which would put it into that genus, are a group of very similar plants, differentiated mainly by the leaf shape and marginal curving, or want of it, so it seems advisable to draw attention to the leaf shape in this plant by describing it as a variety.
10. Ptilidium hodgsoniae Allis.
This species was described from plants collected from Lake Wakatipu (Allison, 1950). Two collections have since been made by D. Scott, both from the Godley River Valley above Lake Tekapo, in November, 1958. No. 181 is from shady wet rock at 4,500ft, the other, No. 192, from subalpine scrub on a south aspect at 4,000ft. No fertile plants have yet been found.
11. Sphenolobus perigonialis (Tayl.) Steph.
This very slender small plant was collected by D. Scott on shady wet rock at 4,500ft in the Upper Godley River Valley, above Lake Tekapo. It is probably commoner in mountain localities than the few recorded gatherings indicate.
12. Tylimanthus cinerascens (L. & L.) Allison & Hodgson comb. nov.
Acrobolbus cinerascens (L. & L) Steph.
Marsupia terminal, 1–15×0.6–0.8 mm, when young, green and shortly oblong, rounded at apex, when old, pale coloured and narrowed to the apex making it oblong-obconic, rather sparsely hairy. Capsules wanting.
This plant was found with marsupia by Dr. J. Murray, at 650ft on Secretary Island. Fiordland, in February, 1959.
Mrs. Hodgson, who recently described the male inflorescence of this species (Hodgson, 1958), remarked in the introduction to the paper that it was very close to Tylimanthus. The discovery of the marsupia confirms this, for they are in fact, quite typical of Tylimanthus. being comparatively short and broad, whereas those of Acrobolbus are long and slender and buried in the ground.
Acknowledgments
Grateful acknowledgements are made to the late Mr. G. O. J. Sainsbury, of Wairoa and Havelock for much sympathetic help, and especially for sending the Brachythecium to Mr. E. B. Bartram and Dr. Le Roy Andrews of the U. S. A. and to these two authorities for their reports and specimens; to Dr. H. Persson, of Sweden, for specimens and advice, to Dr. Th Herzog, of Jena University, Germany, for naming specimens and for much recent literature to Mrs E. A. Hodgson, who has always given me so freely of her time, specimens and advice to the collectors, Dr. J. Murray and Mr. D. Scott, of Otago University, and Mr. W. Martin, of Dunedin.
Literature Consulted
Allison, J. W., 1950. New Species of New Zealand Bryophytes, Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z., 78:1, 93–96.
Dixon, H. N., 1913–28. Studies in the Bryology of New Zealand, Bull. N.Z. Inst. No. 3, pts. 1–6.
Herzog, Th., 1951. Revision der Lebermoos Gattung Lembidium Mitt. Arkiv f. Bot., l:13, Sweden
Hodgson, E. A., 1946. New Zealand Hepaticae V, Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z., 76, 1:68–86.
— 1958 New Zealand Hepaticae × Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z., 85, 565–584
Hooker, Sir J. D., 1867. Handbook of New Zealand Flora, ii:London
Martin, W, 1950. The Bryophytes of Stewart Island pt. 2. Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z., 78, 4, 497.
Sainsbury G. O. K., 1955. A. Handbook of the New Zealand Mosses. Bull. Roy. Soc. N.Z., No. 5.
K. W. Allison
,9 Delta Street.
Roslyn, Dunedin.

Natural Acaena Hybrids in the Vicinity of Wellington
Botany Department, Victoria University of Wellington*
[Received by the Editor, April 23, 1959.]
Abstract
The three taxa of Acaena occuring in the Wellington area were studied primarily by means of progeny tests, supplemented by field observations, determinations of pollen fertility, germination rates and chromosome numbers.
Acaena novae-zelandiae and A. anserinifolia were widespread in disturbed habitats, and the latter particularly was represented by many forms. Acaena novaezelandiae var. pallida‡ was restricted to coastal sand dunes and was the most uniform of the three taxa. Chromosome counts were obtained for forms of all taxa, and in each case 2n = 42.
The plants comprising several populations were found to have pollen of low fertility and seed of a low germination rate, which in most cases produced some seedlings of low viability. The surviving plants showed marked segregation. It is suggested that these plants were interspecific hybrids and in each case their general similarity to one another, and their low pollen fertility by comparison with that of their progeny, leads to the further hypothesis that they all belong to the F1 generation.
The suspected hybrid progeny were analysed (in one suitable case Anderson's Hybrid Index method was applied) and the data obtained indicated that two types of interspecific cross occur:
-
(1) Crosses between Acaena anserinifolia and A. novae-zelandiae.
-
(2) Crosses between A. anserinifolia and A. novae-zelandiae var. pallida.
In view of its comparative abundance and early flowering habit combined with marked proterogyny in all species, it is suspected that Acaena anserinifolia generally acts as the male parent in such cases of hybridism.
Assuming that only F1 hybrids establish themselves in nature, it is concluded that any breakdown of specific boundaries is unlikely to be rapid.
Acaena belongs to the family Rosaceae, sub-family Rosoideae. Within this sub-family it is included in the tribe Sanguisorbae with the familiar, herbaceous northern genera Alchemilla, Agrimonia, Poterium and Sanguisorba, and with the less familiar woody genera—Polylepis (tropical South America), Bencomia (Canary Islands) and Cliffortia (South Africa). Vegetatively it is very similar to both Sanguisorba and Agrimonia.
Estimates of the number of species in the genus have varied from a few dozen to over a hundred. The actual number is probably somewhere between these extremes. Of these, only a handful are found in the northern hemisphere—1 in California; 1 in Mexico and 1 in Hawaii, as well as a few others which extend across the equator in South America. In the southern hemisphere the majority of species (perhaps 50) are found in South America. The remaining 17 or so are distributed as follows. New Zealand, 14 (1 of these extends to Australia); Australia and Tasmania, 3; South Africa, 1; and 1 or 2 in the isolated islands of Tristan da Cunha, Kerguelen and Macquarie.
[Footnote] * This paper represents the results of a study submitted as a thesis for the M. A. degree.
[Footnote] ‡ In the author's opinion this is quite distinct from A novae-zelandiae, and should be accorded specific status.

The investigation described in the present paper concerned natural hybrids between three lowland species of Acaena in New Zealand—A. anserinifolia (Forst.) Druce (syn. A. sanguisorbae Vahl), A. novae-zelandiae Kirk and A. novae-zelandiae var. pallida Kirk. A generalised description applicable to these three taxa will be followed by a tabulated comparison designed to illustrate their chief differences.
Herbaceous perennials with slender, creeping stems rooting at the nodes; leaves alternate, stipulate, pinnately compound; leaflet margins serrate; stems and abaxial surfaces of the leaves distinctly hairy; peduncles terminal, erect, leafless in the upper part; flowers 100 or more, sessile, crowded into a perfectly spherical, terminal inflorescence; receptacle perigynous, constricted distally; calyx four-lobed, green, persistent; petals absent; stamens 2, filaments exserted, anthers shorter than broad; carpel solitary with a single ovule, style short, stigma markedly feathery, receptive before anther dehiscence; mature fruiting calyx with 4 ribs, prolonged distally into 4 slender, barb-tipped spines exceeding the fruit in length.
The barbed spines provide an efficient means of attachment to the coats of animals. Diploid chromosome number 42 in all three taxa.
| A. anserinifolia | A. novae-zelandiae | A. novae-zelandiae var. pallida |
| Widely distributed and quite common throughout the study area. | Widely distributed but more occasional than A. anserinifolia. | Almost entirely restricted to coastal sand dunes where it may be abundant. |
| Occupies open situations or semi-shade. | Always in open habitats. Will grow under drier conditions than A. anserinifolia. | As above. |
| Cotyledon blade 2–3 mm long. | Cotyledon blade 4–5 mm long. | Cotyledon blade about 6 mm long. |
| First leaf simple. | First leaf trifoliate. | First leaf trifoliate. |
| Seedling growth rapid. Prostrate habit quickly assumed. | Seedling growth rapid. Prostrate habit quickly assumed. | Seedling growth slow. Prostrate habit assumed more slowly. |
| Spreading growth habit. Seedling laterals vigorous. | Trailing growth habit. Seedling Seedling laterals weak or absent. | Trailing growth habit. Seedling laterals absent. |
| Stem diameter 1.5–2 mm at 7th internode. | Stem diameter 2–2.5 mm. | Stem diameter 3.5 mm. |
| Length of terminal leaflet 6–11 mm. Generally 5 pairs of leaflets. | Length of terminal leaflet 11–15 mm. Generally 6 pairs of leaflets. | Length of terminal leaflet about 20 mm. Generally 6 pairs of leaflets. |
| Adaxial surfaces of lower leaflets, at least, more or less pilose. Hairs at serration tips distinctly fascicled. | No hairs on the adaxial leaf surface. Hairs at serration tips sparse, not fascicled. | No upper surface hairs serration tips hairless. |
| Adaxial leaf surface dull. Thin cuticle present. | Adaxial leaf surface shining. Moderately thick cuticle present. | Adaxial leaf surface shining. Thick, wrinkled cuticle present. |
| General foliage colour palegreen, yellow-green or brown-green. | General foliage colour dark-green. | General foliage colour dark-green. |
| Secondary colouration generally pale brown on stem, red-brown on adaxial leaf surface, purple on adaxial surface and brown to reddish on the spines. Hydathodes pink. | Secondary colouration bright-red on the stems and petiole and crimson on the spines. Hydathodes crimson. | Secondary colouration pale-red on stems (except peduncle) and spines. Hydathode white. |

Fig. 1.—Comparable adult leaves from forms of the three species. a–b, Acaena novae-zelandiae.
var. pallida (both Lyall Bay–Seatoun; b, an anomalous form). c–h, Acaena anserinifolia (c, Wainui; d, Southern Tararuas; e, Wainui Reservoir; f, Brooklyn; g, South Karori Stream; h, Prince of Wales Park) i-l, Acaena novae-zelandiae (i, South Karori Stream; j, Wainui; k, Prince of Wales Park; l, Eastbourne). Fig. 2—Lyall Bay-Seatoun Garden Plants. Comparable leaves from one probable parent and progeny of hybrid. A. Acaena novae-zelandiae
var. pallida. Remainder from hybrid progeny.

Fig. 3.—Prince of Wales Park. Garden plants. Comparable leaves from probable parents and progeny of hybrid. A, Acaena novae-zelandiae; B, Acaena anserinifolia. Remainder from progeny of hybrid. Fig. 4.—Prince of Wales Park. Glasshouse plants Comparable leaves from probable parents and progeny of hybrid. A, Acaena novae-zelandiae; B, Acaena anserinifolia. Remainder from progeny of hybrid.

| Achene length 3–5 mm. | Achene length 3–5 mm. | Achene length about 6 mm. |
| Spine length 5–7 mm. | Spine length 8–12 mm. | Spine length about 14 mm. |
| First flowering in September. | First flowering in October. | First flowering in October. |
The species of Acaena in New Zealand have long been regarded as taxonomically difficult, and it has been suggested that this may be due to a relatively high incidence of interspecific hybridism.
Cases of interspecific hybridism have already been reported in the genus both in the field (Buchanan, 1871; Cockayne and Allan, 1926) and in garden cultures (Bitter, 1911). The aim of the present study was to determine whether such hybridism is taking place between Acaena anserinifolia, A. novae-zelandiae and A. novae-zelandiae var. pallida.
Text-fig. 1.—Cotyledons and first leaves. a, Acaena novae-zelandiae var. pallida (Lyall Bay–Seatoun) b–d, Acaena novae-zelandiae (Prince of Wales Park,; Wainui; Eastbourne). e–h, Acaena anserinifolia (Wainui; Southern Tararuas; Prince of Wales Park; Kapiti Island).
The study area comprised the south-west sector of Wellington Province. (Fig. 2.)
Acaena anserinifolia was observed in a number of places in the vicinity of Wellington Harbour, throughout the Tararua Mountains to the north, and on Kapiti Island. Acaena novae-zelandiae was also observed at various localities around Wellington Harbour and at one locality in the Tararuas. Acaena novae-zelandiae var. pallida was observed in sand dunes at Eastbourne, Seatoun and Tapiri Bay.
Suspected hybrid populations were investigated at four localities: Prince of Wales Park, Brooklyn; the south coast from Lyall Bay to Seatoun; Wainui Valley; and the South Karori Stream.

Prince of Wales Park, Brooklyn
This Acaena population was found within the city area in the vicinity of a football ground known as Prince of Wales Park. The excavations made in 1932 to form this field resulted in steep banks, about 30ft high, along the western side. North of the centre line these appear to have slipped, forming a 30–40° slope with dimensions of approximately 60 yards by 15 yards. It was on this comparatively even surface that the Acaena population was found.
The pattern of the population is illustrated in Fig. 3. The plants referred to as Acaena novae-zelandiae or A. anserinifolia were readily identified in the field; the former by their dark-green foliage, shining upper leaf surfaces and large fruiting heads with long, bright crimson spines; the second by their lighter brown-green foliage, dull upper leaf surfaces and small fruiting heads with short brownish spines. Plants forming the extensive colony to the northern end could not be identified, but evidence obtained from progeny tests strongly suggested that they were hybrids between the two species present.
As the date of formation of the habitat is definitely known, the population as a whole could not have been older than 21 years at the time of study. An attempt was made to determine the ages of individual plants by means of ring counts but little significant information was obtained for the following reasons:
(a) The annual rings were only weakly developed;
(b) In all cases the oldest woody parts available had broken ends directed away from the growing point. It is possible, therefore, that the first-formed parts of such branches, if they could be traced, would be several years older than those actually obtained. A maximum of 4 annual rings was found in the 2 species and the hybrids.
In many cases apparently separate plants were found to be in connection with one another over a distance of several yards. It seems, therefore, that individual plants spreading vegetatively by this means could eventually cover a considerable area.

Seeds were taken from one plant of either species and from two plants of the suspected hybrids. In the latter case 9 seedlings of plant A. and only 7 seedlings of plant B. survived the seedling stage. These were eventually transferred to the garden area. A second set of 19 viable seedlings was obtained from plant A. in the second year, which, allowing for deaths of weak seedlings, represented an effective germination rate of only 34%. These seedlings were kept in the glasshouse.
An account follows of those characters of the 2 species in the area which were found to be of value when investigating the hybrids.
Acaena novae-zelandiae.
Germination rate, 100%; cotyledon laminae averaging 5 mm long; first leaf trifoliate; growth habit of mature plants trailing with few lateral branches; average diameter of stems at 7th internode 2.25 mm; stems clothed with unicellular, thick-walled hairs arising from pronounced multicellular bases; mature stems red in colour; adult leaves with 5 pairs of leaflets and a terminal one under glasshouse conditions, or 6 pairs of leaflets and a terminal one in the garden; average length of the terminal leaflet 11 mm; length ratio of one leaflet of the second pair from
Text-fig. 4.—Frequency distributions of hybrid indices, Prince of Wales Park. 1, Garden plants. 2, Glasshouse plants. N.Z. = Acaena novae-zelandiae. H. = Suspected hybrid progeny A. = Acaena anserinifolia.
the tip / one leaflet of the third pair is 10/7.6; upper surface of leaflets green only, lower surface of leaflets green only, hydathodes at serration tips white in glasshouse plants, crimson in garden plants; upper surfaces of leaflets glabrous; calyx lobes green only; average length of longest fruit spine 9.8 mm; fruit spines bright crimson; pollen fertility 98%; (for method of determination see Owczarzak, 1952) chromosome number n = 21.
Acaena anserinifolia.
Germination rate 96%; average length cotyledon laminae 2.4 mm; first leaf simple; growth habit of mature plants spreading with many lateral branches; stems clothed with unicellular hairs lacking multi-cellular bases; mature stems olivebrown

in colour; adult leaves with four pairs of leaflets and a terminal one under glasshouse conditions or 5 pairs of leaflets and a terminal one in the garden; length ratio of one leaflet of the second pair from the tip/one leaflet of the third pair is 10: 4.7; upper surface of leaflets with a red-brown colouration at serration tips and along margins; lower surface of leaflets with pink-purple veins; hydathodes pink; upper surfaces of lower leaflets pilose; calyx lobes reddish on the abaxial surface; average length of longest fruit spine 5.2 mm; fruit spines pale-brown to reddish-brown; pollen fertility 94%; chromosome number n=21.
The above contrasting characters of the two species were used according to Anderson's hybrid index method (Anderson, 1949) for the investigation of the suspected hybrids. In each case the Acaena novae-zelandiae character was rated as 0 and the A. anserinifolia character as 1, 2 or 3 depending upon the number of intermediate grades.
(a) Length of cotyledon: 4.5–5.5 mm. = 0 (A. novae-zelandiae); 3.5–4.5 mm. = 1; 2.5–3.5 mm. = 2; 2–2.5 mm. = 3 (A. anserinifolia).
(b) First leaf form: Trifoliate = 0 (A. novae-zelandiae); simple, deeply incised = 1; simple = 2 (A. ansernifolia).
(c) Growth habit: For each plant the total number of visible nodes possessed by lateral branches was determined. 0–10 nodes = (A. novae-zelandiae); 10–20 = 1; 20–40 nodes = 2; more than 40 nodes = 3 (A. anserinifolia).
(d) Stem colour: Red = 0 (A. novae-zelandiae); olive-brown = 1 (A. anserinilolia)
(e) Hair bases: Pronounced multicellular bases = 0 (A. novae-zelandiae); small multicellular bases = 1; no multicellular bases = 2 (A. anserinifolia).
(f) Number of leaflet pairs: 5 pairs (or 6 in the open) = 0 (A. novaezelandiae); 4 pairs (or 5 in the open) = 1 (A. anserinifolia).
(g) Leaflet size gradation: Ratio more than 10.7 = 0 (A. novae-zelandiae); ratio 10.5–10.7 = 1, ratio less than 10.5 = 2 (A. anserinifolia).
(h) Colour of leaflet upper surfaces: No red colouration along upper margins of leaflets = 0 (A. novae-zelandiae); red-brown colouration along margins = 1 (A. anserinifolia)
(i) Colour of leaflet under-surfaces: No purple colouration = 0 (A. novaezelandiae); some degree of purple colouration on veins and surface between = 1 (A. anserinifolia)
(j) Hydathode colour: Hydathode white (or crimson on plants in the open) = 0 (A. novae-zelandiae); hydathode pink = 1 (A. anserinifolia)
(k) Upper surface hairs on lower leaflets: Lower leaflet pair glabrous on upper surface = 0 (A. novae-zelandiae) lower leaflet pair moderately hairy on upper surface = 1 (A. anserinifolia).
(l) Colour of calyx lobes: Green only = 0 (A. novae-zelandiae); reddish colouration on margins and midrib of abaxial surface = 1; general reddish colouration over abaxial surface = 2 (A. anserinifolia)
(m) Colour of spines: Distinct red colouration = 0 (A. novae-zelandiae) brown colouration = 1; (A. anserinifolia.)
(n) Length of longest spine: 9–11 mm = 0 (A. novae-zelandiae); 7.5–9 mm = 1; 6–7.5 mm = 2, 4–6 mm = 3 (A. anserinifolia)
Suspected hybrids in the field.
The plants forming this colony were inspected fairly closely on several occasions and a comparison of specimens from seven well separated points revealed no significant variations in vegetative or reproductive features. There are, therefore, three possibilities: (a) that these plants are first generation hybrids; (b) that they are a clone derived from a single F1 hybrid; (c) that they are a clone derived from an F2 or back cross hybrid. The following data support the first and second possibilities.

As no seedling stages were available these plants could be scored for the following characters only:—
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| Stem colour—red | 0 |
| Hair bases—prominent | 0 |
| Number of leaflet pairs—5 | 1 |
| Hydathode colour—crimson | 0 |
| Leaflet margin colour—red-brown | 1 |
| Upper surface hairs—present | 1 |
| Under surface colour—purplish | 1 |
| Spine colour—red | 0 |
| Spine length—6–7.5 mm | 2 |
| Calyx lobe colour—partially red | 1 |
| Total (= hybrid index) | 7 |
For these characters Acaena novae-zelandiae scored 0 and A. anserinifolia 14 so the suspected hybrids were exactly intermediate.
Pollen slides were made from four inflorescences possibly representing four different plants. The percentages of fertile pollen were 63%, 0%, 18%, 48%.
Progeny of suspected hybrids.
These were chiefly studied in the vegetative state. The 16 surviving plants from the first sowing were planted out in the garden and the 19 seedlings from the second sowing were kept in the glasshouse. Only 6 of the garden plants came to flower, and their pollen fertility percentages were: 54%, 81%, 80%, 79%, 65%, 93%.
By contrast with the 2 species and the suspected field hybrids these plants were markedly variable. This variability was analysed according to the scheme outlined above with the garden and glasshouse plants receiving separate treatment.

The 18 glasshouse plants were scored for characters a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, j, J The extreme scores for Acaena novae-zelandiae and A. anserinifolia in this case were 0 and 17 respectively. The progeny of their suspected hybrid scored as follows: 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 7, 7, 7, 7, 8, 9, 9, 9, 10 (Fig. 4.)
The 15 garden plants were scored for characters d, e, f, h, i, j, J. The scores of Acaena novae-zelandiae and A. anserinifolia for these characters are 0 and 8 respectively. The progeny of their suspected hybrid scored as follows: 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6. (Fig. 4.)
Discussion
A comparison of the forms of Acaena novae-zelandiae and A. anserinifolia in this locality with forms of the two species elsewhere reveals that the first is relatively large and the second relatively small in most measurable characters. The contrast between the two species is therefore particularly marked in this locality.
The hybrid hypothesis advanced in explanation of the unidentifiable colony was based on the following evidence.
(1) The plants possessed a mixture of the distinctive features of the two species present.
(2) Germination rates and pollen fertility were both low.
(3) Progeny obtained showed marked segregation for all characters.
The supplementary hypothesis that the field hybrids were all F1 plants is based on the following evidence:
(1) The field hybrids appeared to be uniform and intermediate between the two species present.
(2) The average pollen fertility of the field plants is 32.25% and that of their progeny 75.3% Such an improvement in fertility has been observed by other workers in the F2 generation of interspecific hybrids.

The extent of the suspected hybrid colony appears to contradict this hypothesis, for if the increase in area has been due to the production of new plants, then there should be a significant proportion of F2 plants in the colony. However, the spreading and rooting habit of the Acaenas, which is an effective means of vegetative reproduction, suggests that the colony may have been entirely derived from a few original F1 plants.
The low germination rate of seed from these presumed F1's and the low survival rate of seedlings suggests that F2 plants would find difficulty in establishing themselves under field conditions.
In Fig. 4 it will be noted that the average hybrid index is displaced towards Acaena novae-zelandiae. A. possible explanation is that in the case of three characters scored in the more than two grades A. novae-zelandiae is probably overrepresented— ie, with growth habit inherent lack of vigour may reduce the number and length of laterals formed, and with cotyledon-length and first-leaf form, in respect of which the majority of seedlings resembled Acaena novae-zelandiae, A. novae-zelandiae dominance is probably a factor. The approximately normal curve formed by the hybrid indices does not suggest backcrossing to Acaena novaezelandiae.
Lyall Bay-Seatoun Coast
This area is a strip of coastline approximately three miles long partly within and partly outside the entrance to Wellington Harbour. It consists for the most part of a narrow coastal platform (averaging about 25 Yards wide) backed by steep hills. The platform came into being partly as a result of general uplift during the 1855 earthquake and the habitats so formed were later considerably modified by the construction of a coastal road in 1923. The soil consists mainly of rock fragments mixed with shingle and a small amount of sand.
An extensive area of sand dunes formerly existed at Lyall Bay, but these were later levelled to make way for housing and for Rongotai aerodrome. A comparatively sandy area also exists at the head of Tapiri Bay, and a few sand dunes still remain along the Seatoun foreshore.
The coastal platform supports a rather stunted grass cover with scattered prostrate shrubs, and a similar association is found on the lower hill slopes. On the latter, however, growth is generally more vigorous and in places where there is a certain amount of seepage, almost luxuriant. The major part of the area would be fully exposed to southerly gales.
The population pattern of Acaenas in this area (Fig. 5) is not nearly so straightforward as at Prince of Wales Park. The most common type, indicated by the letter H. on the map, could not be assigned to any known species. The type marked P? was at first identified as Acaena novae-zelandiae var. pallida but later comparisons showed it to be smaller than the common type of that species in all respects. The type marked P. was indentified as Acaena novae-zelandiae var. pallida. Specimens in various herbaria indicate that this variety was also quite common on the formerly existing sand dunes at Lyall Bay.
Only one plant of Acaena novae-zelandiae (marked N) and four plants of A. anserinifolia (marked A) were found and these were at some distance from the unidentified populations.
Ring counts were not attempted in this area, but many plants had quite thick woody parts at the base which resembled those collected at Prince of Wales Park.
Seeds were collected from three Hand one P? colony, from one plant of Acaena novae-zelandiae var. pallida, from one plant of A. novae-zelandiae and from two plants of A. anserinifolia.
The plants of Acaena anserinifolia and A. novae-zelandiae differed in minor details only from the forms at Prince of Wales Park.

Acaena pallida.
Germination rate, 92%; pollen fertility, 95%; chromosome number n = 21. For other features see tabulated comparison.
The form marked P? on the map was smaller in all respects than Acaena novae-zelandiae var. pallida but otherwise closely resembled that species. When seed of this form was germinated certain unexplained abnormalities became apparent. The germination rate was only 52% and this was later reduced to an effective rate of only 22% as a result of the early death of several seedlings. This last phenomenon followed a uniform pattern. The cotyledons expanded normally, the first leaves appeared as minute, malformed structures, and growth then ceased. A second test using new seed from the field gave similar results. Those seedlings which developed normally showed only minor variations and plants transferred to the garden area in the first year grew vigorously and flowered freely.
Field Hybrids.
Plants from the various colonies marked H on the map were observed to be very similar to each other, and later detailed study confirmed this first impression. As progeny from plants representing all these colonies are extremely variable, the situation here seems to be similar to that obtaining at Prince of Wales Park, and the same explanation suggests itself—i.e., that the plants in question are F1 hybrids.
Progeny of Suspected Hybrids.
Sets of seedlings were raised in the first year from colonies H1, H2 and H4. The H1 seedlings were planted into the garden area, and in the second season 2 of the 11 surviving plants flowered. Glasshouse seedlings were also obtained from the three colonies in the second year. Germination rates for seed from the three colonies were: H1, 42% (10% died soon after germination and a further 8% in the first leaf stages. Effective germination rate therefore = 24%); H2, 52% (20% died soon after germination and a further 20% in the early seedling stage. Effective germination rate = 12%); H4, 48% (12% died soon after germination and a further 6% in the early seedling stage. Effective germination rate = 30%).
Pollen fertility percentages for the two plants that flowered were 87% and 66%. By contrast, percentages for plants from the 3 field hybrid colonies were 47%, 33% and 62%.
As possible parents for the suspected hybrids are rare in this locality, Anderson's hybrid index is difficult to apply. The method of “extrapolated correlates” designed by Anderson for situations where one or both parents are unknown was also considered as a tool for investigation. However, the requirement of at least two characters which could be scored accurately in a number of grades proved a major difficulty. Size characters at first suggested themselves, but the fact that certain plants of the suspected hybrid progeny appeared to be inherently stunted made these difficult to use. Finally it was decided to restrict investigation in this case to a study of those characters of the suspected hybrids that are useful in delimiting the three local species.
The hypothesis that the colonies symbolised by the letter H consist of F1 hybrids is based on evidence similar to that put forward in the section on Princes of Wales Park. The additional hyphothesis that Acaena novae-zelandiae var. pallida is one of the parents involved is based on the following pallida-like characters possessed by the field hybrids and their progeny:
-
(a) Stem diameter approaching that of Acaena novae-zelandiae var. pallida — 4 plants (progeny).
-
(b) Length of terminal leaflet almost as great as that of A. novae-zelandiae var. pallida — 1 plant (progeny).
-
(c) Hydathodes white — 4 plants (progeny).
-
(d) Serration tips hairless — 3 plants (progeny).

-
(e) Fruit spines pale-red and partly colourless — field hybrids. Characters which suggest Acaena anserinifolia as the other parent involved are:
-
(a) Leaf, stem and fruit spine dimensions of the field hybrids are generally less than those of the Acaena novae-zelandiae and more or less intermediate between those of A. novae-zelandiae var. pallida and A. anserinifolia. (See table.)
-
(b) Simple first leaves — 3 plants (progeny).
-
(c) Stems pale-brown — 2 plants (progeny).
-
(d) Distinct red-brown colouration on the upper margins of leaflets — 3 plants (progeny), also field hybrids.
-
(e) Extensive purple colouration on the under surfaces of leaflets — 2 plants (progeny), also field hybrids.
-
(f) Fascicled hairs at the serration tips — 1 plant (progeny).
-
(g) Some degree of hairiness on the upper surfaces of leaflets — 8 plants (progeny) also field hybrids.
The evidence derived from stem, leaf and fruit spine dimensions can be demonstrated most effectively in tabulated form. Averages for the three local species were based on collections from several localities in the study area.
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| (1) Acaena novae-zelandiae var. pallida (Average) | (2) Acaena novae-zelandiae (Average) | (3) Acaena anserinifolia (Average) | Average of 1 and 2 | Average of 1 and 3 | Field Hybrid | Range of Hybrid Progeny | Average of Hybrid Progeny. | |
| Length of cotyledon lamma (mm) | 5.8 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 5 | 4.2 | 2.8–3.9 | 3.35 | |
| Diameter of stem(mm) | 3.5 | 2.1 | 1.75 | 2.78 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2–3 | 2.35 |
| Length of terminal leaflet (mm) | 19.0 | 13.5 | 8 | 16.25 | 13.5 | 11.7 | 10–17.25 | 12.3 |
| Length of longest fruit spine (mm) | 13.8 | 9.25 | 5.6 | 11.5 | 9.7 | 8.4 |
The evidence suggesting Aceana novae-zelandiae var. pallida and A. anserinifolia as the parent species of the hybrid colonies is therefore fairly strong.
The question arises—where did the hybrids originate and how did they become established at such widely separate points? The comparative rarity of possible parents in the vicinity makes speculation difficult. Two possibilities are:
(1) That crossing has taken place outside the area (possibly at Lyall Bay when Acaena novae-zelandiae var. pallida was common there) and hybrid seeds have been carried into the coastal section at various times by people and animals.
(2) That isolated plants of Acaena novae-zelandiae var. pallida have established themselves in sandy spots along the coastal section from time to time and have produced hybrid seed as a result of fertilisation by windborne pollen of distant A. anserinifolia. The inconspicuous flowers, prominent plumose stigmas and elongate stamens of the Acaenas suggest wind rather than insect pollination.
Both suggestions presuppose a selective influence of the environment which discourages establishment of Acaena novae-zelandiae var. pallida seedlings and encourages the hybrids. The majority of habitats available along the coastal strip are certainly unsuitable for Acaena novae-zelandiae var. pallida.

Wainui Valley and South Karori Stream
Plants which are undoubtedly hybrids were discovered at the above localities, and in both cases Acaena anserinifolia and A. novae-zelandiae were observed in the vicinity. The hybrids were not subjected to detailed study but sufficient information was obtained to suggest that they were first generation crosses between the above two species.
Hybrid seed from the South Karori Stream had a germination rate of 38% reduced to an effective rate of 36% by the death of one seedling.
The first leaves varied in form from simple to trifoliate. Simple — 4 plants; simple, deeply incised—3 plants; trifoliate—11 plants. Adult leaves varied greatly in size, shape and colour.
In the Wainui-o-Mata Valley seed was collected from two plants suspected to be hybrids between Acaena anserinifolia and A. novae-zelandiae in the vicinity. The first had a germination rate of 40% reduced to an effective rate of 16% by the death of several seedlings. The first leaves were as follows: simple — 3 plants; simple deep incised—3 plants; trifoliate—5 plants.
The second seed lot had a germination rate of 14%, reducing to an effective rate of 12%. The first leaves were as follows: simple—3 plants; simple deeply incised—3 plants; trifoliate—6 plants.
Southern Tararuas and Kapiti Island
The Acaenas in these localities belong almost exclusively to one species — Acaena anserinifolia. Acaena novae-zelandiae was observed at only one locality in the southern Tararuas. The form of Acaena anserinifolia on Kapiti Island is similar to those in the Wellington area, but the commonest form in the Tararuas was distinctive in the following respects: relatively large leaves and incised leaflets; distinct pilosity of the upper surfaces of all leaflets; and a preference for the semi-shady habitats of bush tracks.
The few plants of Acaena novae-zelandiae mentioned above were found at widely separated points near the bank of the Tauwharenikau River. In each case a few plants were found in the vicinity which were possibly interspecific hybrids between Acaena novae-zelandiae and the common Tararua form of A. anserinifolia. These possible hybrids had the dark-green foliage, red stems and crimson spines of Acaena novae-zelandiae, but their general dimensions were less and there was a noticeable degree of pilosity on the upper surfaces of their leaflets.
Colour Variation in Acaena anserinifolia
The majority of plants of Acaena anserinifolia observed had red and purple pigments in addition to chlorophyll. At a number of localities there were a few uniformly bright-green plants which lacked the secondary pigments. These plants bred true for this character Some of the plants possessing secondary pigments bred true, but in others a proportion of the offspring had secondary pigments, while in a lesser proportion these pigments were lacking. Figures for the latter phenomenon in the various localities were as follows:—
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| Secondary Pigments Present | Secondary Pigments Absent | |
|---|---|---|
| Lyall Bay-Seatoun | 84 | 26 |
| South Karori Stream | 84 | 29 |
| South Karori Stream | 39 | 9 |
| Wamui Valley | 34 | 17 |
| Kapiti Island | 45 | 26 |
| Southern Tararuas | 49 | 17 |
| Totals | 335 | 124 |

The overall ratio of progeny with secondary pigments to progeny lacking secondary pigments is 2.7: 1. It seems, therefore, that the production of secondary pigments is controlled by a single genetic factor whose recessive allele is inhibiting when homogygous.
These occasinal plants lacking secondary pigments are probably the form described by Cockayne as Acaena anserinifolia var. viridior (Cockayne, 1916).
General Discussion
As a result of the present study it is concluded that the production of F1 hybrids by the three local species of Acaena is quite frequent in the Wellington area. These hybrids are considered to be of two types: (1) Crosses between Acaena novaezelandiae var. pallida and A. anserinifolia (Lyall Bay-Seatoun); (2) Crosses between Acaena novae-zelandiae and A. anserinifolia (Prince of Wales Park, South Karon Stream, Wainui Valley and possibly in the Tauwharenikau Valley).
With the second type of cross a few plants of Acaena novae-zelandiae were generally found in association with the suspected hybrids. This suggests that Acaena anserinifolia normally acts as the male parent and this is probably explained by the following facts. The generally early flowering habit of Acaena anserinifolia combined with the pronounced proterogyny of all species means that when the first stigmas are appearing on the flower heads of the later flowering species only Acaena anserinifolia pollen is available. In all probability the majority of hybrids are produced in this way, and it follows that Acaena anserinifolia is most frequently the male parent.
The question aries whether the incidence of natural hybridism has always been so high or whether it is largely a recent phenomenon coinciding with the period of Europeans settlement in New Zealand. The latter view is favoured by the author, for, since European settlement, the distribution pattern of the lowland Acaenas must have been greatly altered, and as a result opportunities for hybridism must have increased immeasurably.
A comparison of pre- and post-European times with respect to conditions of dispersal and the extent of available habitats should make this clear.
In pre-Europeans times the only agents for achene dispersal were the Maori and his dog and possibly some of the flightless birds. There are no antive land mammals in New Zealand and the Maori had no form of animal husbandry. In these times, too, the country was largely covered with forest, so open habitats suitable for Acaena were much less common than now. With white settlement came the introduction of domesticated animals, notably sheep, and other animals which became established in the wild—deer, pigs and rabbits. In time the lowland areas were cleared of forest and brought into cultivation, and since that time the creation of disturbed habitats by roading and other construction works has been a recurring phenomenon. Thus, settlement has caused a marked increase in the number of dispersal agents and a parallel increase in the total area of habitats suitable for Acaena.*. The result has been an overlapping of the three species throughout their ranges, and a consequent increase in the opportunities for hybridism.
[Footnote] * With the exception of Acaena novae-zelandiae var. pallida which become less common following obliteration of sand dune areas.

If the generalisation that second generation hybrids do not survive under natural conditions is correct, then it would appear that the increased hybridism is unlikely to result in a general merging of the lowland species. There is always the possibility, however, that a first generation hybrid might backcross with one or other of its parent species and perhaps produce viable offspring, but there is no evidence of this having occurred.
References
Anderson, E., 1949. Introgressive Hybridisation. Wiley & Sons, New York.
Bitter, G., 1911. Die Gattung Acaena. Bibliotheca Botanica, Stuttgart.
Buchanan, J., 1871. On a supposed Hybrid Acaena. Trans. N.Z. Inst., 3:208.
Cockayne, L., 1916. Notes on New Zealand Floristic Botany Including Descriptions of New Species (No. 1) Trans. N.Z. Inst., 48: 193–202.
— and Allan, H. H., 1926. Notes on New Zealand Floristic Botany, including Descriptions of New Species. Trans N.Z. Inst., 56. 21–53.
Owczarzak, G., 1952. A. Rapid Method for Mounting Pollen Grains. Stain Tech., 27: 249–251.
Dr. J. W. Dawson
,Botany Department,
University of Wellington.
P. O. Box 196,
Wellington.

Studies in Pimelea I—The Breeding System
[Read by title before Canterbury Branch, December 3, 1988; received by the Editor, March 11, 1959.]
Abstract
The paper describes the gynodioecious breeding system of natural populations of four species of the genus Pimelea1. 2 growing in a restricted area at Cass Some experimental work and observation of breeding behaviour in a year of one flowering season is discussed. The insects effecting pollination are noted. The breeding system is shown to make possible some factors of evolution, particularly hybridization, in the genus Pimelea.
1 A. detailed account of variation, hybridization and taxonomy in Pimelea is given in Burrows (1958).
2 The species of Pimelea at Cass are P. prostrata, Willd. Sp. Plant (1798), P. traversii, Hook. f., Handbook N.Z. Fl (1864), P. “shorb tussock” and P. “snow tussock”. The writer is not yet in a position to publish descriptions of the latter two species. Reference specimens are. P. “Short tussock”, No. 320 and P. “snow tussock”, No. 321 in the Botany Department, University of Canterbury herbarium, Cass Collection Hybrids are found, especially between P. “short tussock” and P. “snow tussock”, but also notably between P. “snow tussock”, and both P. travesii and P. prostrata.
Iintrodution
A Knowledge of the breeding system of a plant species is necessary in order to understand the patterns of group variation. On the breeding behaviour depends the genetic structure and ultimately the kind and degree of genetic, heritable variation. Darwin (1884) defines gynodioecy as the state where there is a group of plants having female and hermaphrodite individuals. The term gynodioecious is restricted to species of plants which maintain in their populations a high proportion of female plants, contributing significantly to the type of genetic structure of the population. If the selfed hermaphrodites set seed the recombination benefits of outcrossing are conferred while the certainty of inbreeding is retained. In many populations of hermaphrodit species, there is a small propotion of male sterility, resulting from abortion of pollen, which is not significant in consideration of the breeding system of a population (see Frankel, 1940). This is not to be regarded as gynodioecy.
Lewis (1941) showed that where male sterility is due to a dominant or recessive gene the females cannot exist in wild populations unless more than twice as fertile as hermaphrodites (on the female side). This arises from the fact that hermaphrodites contribute potentially three times the amount of genic material that females do. Lewis, in this paper, explains the reason why, at that time (1941), cytoplasmic inheritance was the only explanation for the existence of gynodioecy in the natural populations of plants then investigated. In the case of cytoplasmic male sterility, only a slight advantage of the females is necessary to maintain them in the field, as opposed to the large advantage required when the process is controlled by nuclear genes. Although Correns (1928, ex Lewis 1941), Lewis (1941) and many other writers (mentioned by the latter) gave the gynodioecious breeding system a cytoplasmic.

basis, Lewis and Crowe (1956) have re-examined the field in terms of orthodox genetics since then. Some of the data published by Correns is found, in the light of work by East (1934, ex Lewis 1956), to be explicable on an orthodox genetic basis. C. & H. Yampolsky (1922) list only 97 species of 5 genera as being gynodioecious. They mention Pimelea as having 70–80 species, hermaphrodite polygamous or dioecious. Baker (1948) gave more than 70 species in 16 families in which functional female flowers were smaller than functional hermaphrodites. Many of these were gynodioecious. The Thymelaeaceae (to which Pimelea belongs) was not listed by him. Godley (1955 and 1957) described gynodioecy in Fuchsia, Cyathodes and Leucopogon in New Zealand.
Gynodioecy in Pimelea
In the most careful description of polymorphism in Pimelea flowers yet published, Thomson (1880) concluded that P. prostrata, “Though hermaphrodite in structure… is dioecious in function and will probaly tend rapidly to become so in structure as well”. Thomson described hermaphrodite forms where the style lengthened after the flowers opened until it extended beyond the anthers. Other dioecious forms had large male flowers on some individuals and smaller females on others. In the former, the short style, with tiny stigma, lengthened and protruded between the lobes of the flower tube, although the ovary then shrivelled. The female plants had flowers with a long style, a large capitate stigma and aborted anthers. P. longifolia was described by the same writer (Thomson, 1927) as being polygamous and dioecious.
Cheeseman (1925) gives as a generic character for Pimelea that the flowers are hermaphrodite but functionally dioecious or occasionally polygamo-dioecious and that “The male flowers are the most numerous….” Cheeseman designates as polygamo-dioecious3, erroneously, some 10 of the species described by him in the “Manual” including P. traversii and P. prostrata. The other species he describes are not classified, as to breeding system. Cheeseman (1914), figured four species and gave similar details. Parlane (1925) wrote about floral features in Pimelea but followed Cheeseman.
Dr. E. Godley (pers. comm.) has found that P. longifolia and P. virgata are gynodioecious. He has noted that in the specimens used by Cheeseman for the illustrations of P. longifolia (sheets 5336.1 and 5336.2 in the Cheesemand herbarium) all hermaphrodites have protruding styles so that the male flowers described by Cheeseman are not present. It seems probale that Cheeseman had observed hermaphrodite flowers in different stages of development.
As well as for the four species at Cass, the present writer has observed that P. aridula, P. sericeo-villosa, P. pseudo-lyalii and P. arenaria have female and hermaphrodite flowers on separate plants. It will be shown that on functional grounds also the Cass Pimeleas are gynodioecious.
Australian and Tasmanian writers, Black (1952) and Cruickshank (1953) have not used the term gynodioecy for the type of breeding system in Australian Pimelea spp. The former says of the genus, that species are “bisexual or unisexual by abortion of stamens or ovary, often diocious”. The latter describes some species as dioecious. It appears that there is greater variation in types of breeding system in Australia than in New Zealand. Descriptions of some of the large number of Australian species of Pimelea (Bentham, 1873) leave little doubt, however, that gyno-
[Footnote] 3. Polygamo-dioecious species are defined as having plants of different sexes, female and male, where one or other, or both, have few flowers of the opposite sex or hermaphrodite flowers, or both.

dioecy is present Species with large hermaphrodite flowers and small females on separate plants exist, but other species described appeared to be wholly hermaphrodit.
Flower Structure
The flower of Thymelaeaceous plants is considered by Heinig (1951) to be an expanded torus, with the calyx at the end of the floral tube. The flower is best referred to as the flower tube, and this term will be used in future discussion of Pimelea flowers.
A description of the flowers of one of the Pimelea species at Cass, in general terms, will cover all of them, except in gross dimensions, since little other difference is to be seen in flowers from different species.
Flowers are terminal and grow erect in dense heads of 10–20 flowers. They are almost sessile on very short stalks, and at the base of the flowers is a dense growth of silky hair which remains after the fruit has fallen. The flower tube is cylindrical, with four calyx lobes at the distal end of a hollow tubular torus. The lobes are small and spreading when the flowers are open. Petals are absent, but the torus is petaloid. The upper side of the calyx lobes and inside of the floral tube is waxy white and usually glabrous (some hairs may be found, especially in P. traversii, inside the tube) and bears very small tubercles which give a shining appearance. The outer wall of the flower tube and underside of the calyx lobes are densely clothed with simple hairs. The base of the tube, surrounding the ovary, is red in P. prostrata, P. “snow tussock” and P. “short tussock” Especially in female flowers this area is often folded, and bulging. The hermaphrodite flower tube base bulges less and is narrower and longer than in females. The hermaphrodite flower tube base bulges less and is narrower and longer than in females. The flowers of P. prostrata, P. “short tussock” and P. “snow tussock” have a distinctly sweet scent, but the scent of P. traversii is negligible Nectar is produced in both females and hermaphrodites, apparently by morphologically unspecialised cells on the inner walls of the flower tube. It lies here, about half way up the tube or at the bottom of the tube.
Measurements of the long axis of flower tubes in from 20–30 plants (average of 5 flowers per plant) in both sexes of each species at Cass are given below.
In all cases the hermaphrodite flower tubes are larger than the female ones, although in any one species, a few individuals of either sex approach one another in size. Other structural differences between hermaphrodite and female are also
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| Species | Mean Flower Tube Length | Range | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| P. “snow tussock” ☿ | 5.4mm | 4.5–6.5mm | 0.65 |
| P. “snow tussock” ♀ | 3.3mm | 2.2–4.1mm | 0.45 |
| P. “short tussock” ☿ | 4.4mm | 3.5–5.2mm | 0.49 |
| P. “short tussock” ♀ | 3.0mm | 2.4–3.8mm | 0.36 |
| P. prostrata ☿ | 4.0mm | 2.6–4.9mm | 0.43 |
| P. prostrata ♀ | 2.6mm | 2.1–3.0mm | 0.28 |
| P. traversii ☿ | 7.4mm | 6.2–8.5mm | 0.93 |
| P. traversii ♀ | 4.8mm | 4.0–6.0mm | 0.53 |

obvious. Stamens are two in number in hermaphrodit flowers and inserted just below the throat of the floral tube, opposit the two outer lobes. Filaments are slender and the anthers extend straight above the flower tube for 2–3 mm and face inward. Dehiscence of anthers in the hermaphrodite allows pollen to fall into the flower tube. In the female stamens are withered and filaments are shorter. Shrivelled pollen is found in a few cases.
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
The ovary in both female and hermaphrodite is one-celled and the slender style rises from one side of it, near its summit. During the period after opening of the flower, the style, which lies to one side of the floral tube, begins to elongate. Eventu|ally, if the flower is unpollinated, it may extend from 1/2 - 3/4 of the length of the floral tube beyond the mouth of the tube. The stigma of the female flower is more than twice as wide as that of the hermaphrodite, and its simple papillae are also longer. They are twice the lengeth of those of the hermaphrodite and extend radially from the centre. (See Fig. 1.) In a few cases hermaphrodite plants carried a few female flowers in the heads of hermaphrodite flowers. Some such mixed heads had a few flowers of intermediate dimensions and with characters of both sexes.
The upper part of the ovary is hairy. After fertilization the ovary begins to swell and in P. “snow tussock”, P. “short tussock” and P. prostrata the growth is sufficient to burst the persistent base of the flower tube. This serves as a loose outer coat, becoming glabrous brown and straite, but soon falls away. Although the tube does not appear to be articulate between base and upper tube, it often breaks here.
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| Species | Number of ☿ plants | Number of ♀ plants | Ratio ☿ ♀ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cass | ||||
| P. “snow tussock” early in season | 47 | 49 | 1 : 1 | |
| P. “-snow tussock” late in season | 41 | 38 | 1 : 1 | |
| P. “short tussock” early in season | 41 | 39 | 1 : 1 | |
| P. “short tussock” late in season | 35 | 35 | 1 : 1 | |
| P. prostrata early in season | 54 | 35 | 1.54 : 1 | |
| P. prostrata late in season | 42 | 22 | 2 : 1 | |
| P. traversii early in season | 32 | 25 | 1.28 : 1 | |
| P. traversii late in season | 43 | 23 | 2 : 1 | |
| Erewhon | ||||
| P. “snow tussock” early in season | 44 | 22 | 2 : 1 | |
| P. prostrata early in season | 60 | 10 | 10 : 1 | |
| Macaulay River | ||||
| P. “snow tussock” | 47 | 24 | 2 : 1 | |
| P. prostrata | 55 | 18 | 3 : 1 | |
| Lake Tekapo | ||||
| P. “snow tussock” | 37 | 33 | 1 : 1 |

In P. “snow tussock”, P. “short tussock” and P. prostrata only the base is left, but in P. traversii the whole hairy flower tube is left surrounding the ovary, although not adherent to it.
The fruits of P. “snow tussock” and P. “short tussock” are oval, yellow, orange, or red and fleshy. They are somewhat flattened laterally, and the seed, black, hard and oval, is imbedded in the fleshy portion. Fruits of P. prostrata are similar in size, but snow white and fleshy. In these plants fruits are produced in large numbers in crowded clusters. Very few of the flowers of females do not produce fruit. In P. traversii there is a small green, hard fruit. Fruits are quickly shed when ripe from all four species.
Natural Populations
The table above shows the numbers of different sexes of plants counted in line transects at Cass in the season, summer 1957–58. The counts were made of every flowering plant on lines through each population. The ratios of the sexes one to another are also given. Included in the table also are figures for counts along the same transects at different parts of the flowering season and for some counts made of plants at Erewhon, in the Rangitata watershed in 1957, at the Macaulay River, and at Lake Tekapo in 1959. The plants counted at different parts of the flowering season will, in most cases, be different individuals, since any one plant flowers for a comparatively short period.
The above figures should be compared with figures for absolute numbers of fruit set and for percentage fruit set in the same species at Cass. The latter were arrived at by counting between 20–30 flowers in heads of individual plants, then marking these and finally counting the number of fruit set for each of these. For 20 plants (10 of each sex) about 25 flowers each were counted in an area of a few square.
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| ☿ | ☿ | |||||
| Plant | No. of Flowers Counted | No. of Fruit Set | Plant | No. of Flowers Counted | No. of Fruit Set | |
| 1 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 23 | 14 | |
| 2 | 24 | 3 | 2 | 28 | 9 | |
| 3 | 22 | 0 | 3 | 25 | 11 | |
| 4 | 29 | 0 | 4 | 25 | 2 | |
| 5 | 21 | 0 | 5 | 27 | 12 | |
| 6 | 24 | 1 | 6 | 23 | 18 | |
| 7 | 23 | 0 | 7 | 33 | 26 | |
| 8 | 23 | 0 | 8 | 23 | 2 | |
| 9 | 22 | 0 | 9 | 24 | 3 | |
| 10 | 22 | 0 | 10 | 24 | 5 | |
| Total | 232 | 5 | Total | 255 | 102 |

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| ☿ | ☿ | |||||
| Plant | No. of Flowers Counted | No. of Fruit Set | Plant | No. of Flowers Counted | No. of Fruit Set | |
| 1 | 25 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 15 | |
| 2 | 24 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 11 | |
| 3 | 24 | 0 | 3 | 25 | 23 | |
| 4 | 24 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 23 | |
| 5 | 22 | 1 | 5 | 21 | 19 | |
| 6 | 24 | 0 | 6 | 27 | 20 | |
| 7 | 24 | 3 | 7 | 22 | 16 | |
| 8 | 24 | 2 | 8 | 23 | 20 | |
| 9 | 27 | 1 | 9 | 25 | 24 | |
| 10 | 24 | 0 | 10 | 23 | 17 | |
| Total | 243 | 9 | Total | 239 | 188 |
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| ☿ | ☿ | |||||
| Plant | No. of Flowers Counted | No. of Fruit Set | Plant | No. of Flowers Counted | No. of Fruit Set | |
| 1 | 23 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 5 | |
| 2 | 27 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 0 | |
| 3 | 24 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 19 | |
| 4 | 22 | 0 | 4 | 21 | 11 | |
| 5 | 22 | 1 | 5 | 23 | 10 | |
| 6 | 24 | 0 | 6 | 23 | 4 | |
| 7 | 21 | 0 | 7 | 22 | 16 | |
| 8 | 24 | 2 | 8 | 23 | 7 | |
| 9 | 24 | 3 | 9 | 23 | 5 | |
| 10 | 23 | 4 | 10 | 25 | 19 | |
| Total | 234 | 10 | Total | 229 | 96 |

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| ☿ | ☿ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant | No. of Flowers Counted | No. of Fruit Set | Plant | No. of Flowers Counted | No. of Fruit Set | |
| 1 | 23 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 23 | |
| 2 | 24 | 7 | 2 | 22 | 6 | |
| 3 | 25 | 13 | 3 | 22 | 16 | |
| 4 | 28 | 5 | 4 | 32 | 28 | |
| 5 | 24 | 20 | 5 | 23 | 22 | |
| 6 | 23 | 11 | 6 | 35 | 35 | |
| 7 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 23 | 17 | |
| 8 | 26 | 8 | 8 | 32 | 30 | |
| 9 | 27 | 7 | 9 | 33 | 31 | |
| 10 | 25 | 2 | 10 | |||
| Total | 247 | 88 | Total | 249 | 208 |
chains. The range of variation in fruit set from plant to plant both in females and hermaphrodites is of interest. Figures for P. prostrata, P. “snow tussock” and P. “short tussock” are fairly consistent, but those for P. traversii are more variable, as in seen in the table below.
It is possible that error could arise through loss of some fruit before counting P. “snow tussock” in a shady gully may have been affected in this way since a few female plants had far fewer fruits than the expected number. This may account for some of the variation in female fruit set. For this latter group of plants two sets of calculations, one involving all the plants and the other excluding those with very low fruit set, are given in the percentage fruit set table.
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| Species | Mean % Fruit Set | Ratio | |
| ☿ | ♀ | ♀ ☿ | |
| P. “snow tussock” low figures included | 40.0 | 2.15 | 16.7 : 1 |
| P. “snow tussock” low figures excluded | 56.25 | 2.15 | 26.1 : 1 |
| P. “short tussock” | 78.66 | 3.72 | 21.4 : 1 |
| P. prostrata | 41.92 | 4.27 | 9.8 : 1 |
| P. traversii | 83.54 | 40.64 | 2.0 : 1 |

The importance of these tables in showing that, firstly, the different Pimelea spp. vary considerably with respect to proportions of different sexes in the populations and secondly, population differences in the same species from area to area indicate that breeding system structure varies from population to population. The figures given by Godley (1955) for variation in proportion of females to hermaphrodites in Fuchsia from area to area show similar conditions. The differences from species to species are probably inherent in the genetics of the plants, but the population differences may be due to selective influences. An examination of these figures shows that at Cass both P. “snow tussock” and P. “short tussock” with 50% each of females and hermaphrodites in the population also have about 20 female to 1 hermaphrodite fruit set. This is important as a compensating factor, allowing the high proportion of females to be maintained in the field. On the other hand P. prostrata and P. traversii, with only about 30% of female plants in the population, have about 10 female to 1 hermaphrodite and 2 female to 1 hermaphrodite fruit set respectively. The higher proportion of hermaphrodite fruit set determines that fewer females may be retained in the population. It is to be expected that the Erewhon population of P. prostrata has yet a lower female fruit set. Low fruit set in hermaphrodites may perhaps be connected with incompatibility. Although these figures are indicative, and most useful in gauging the nature and extent of gynodioecy in Pimelea spp., the picture would be more complete with a study of the proportions of female to hermaphrodite seed which viable. This was not carried out owing to lack of time and difficulty of germinating seed.
The differences in fruit set compared with percentage numbers of the different sexes in the field in P. prostrata and P. traversii indicate differences in the sex determination mechanisms. It will be noticed that the percentage of female flowered plants counted in the populations of P. prostrata and P. traversii early in their flowering seasons was greater than at a later stage. There may be some connection in this with hormone balance. The higher proportion of female flowers open early in the season could, however, if insect vectors are active, contribute to the high proportion of females in the population. The competition between insects for flowers might have some bearing on this.
Crossing Experiments
Some closely controlled experiments were carried out at Christchurch and at Cass, where plants of the four different species were used to assess relative amounts of fruit set by female and hermaphrodite plants upon artifical crossing. Selfing of hermophrodites and cross pollination of hermaphrodites and females were used in these intraspecific crosses. No adequate figures for statistical treatment were obtained and no seed could be germinated to test viability. All flower heads used were bagged prior to opening of flowers, and care was taken to avoid accidental crosses. In all cases females set fruit in a high percentage of flowers, but very few attempts at crossing and selfing of hermaphrodites were successful. Enough evidence was gathered to show that P. “snow tussock”, P. “short tussock” and P. prostrata (the two latter more rarely) can all set fruit through self pollination of hermaphrodite flowers, but it is obvious that this is less efficacious than cross pollination of females. Cross pollination of emasculated hermaphrodites also results in a low percentage of fruit set in P. “snow tussock”.. Upon selfing, only a few fruit per head were set at Christchurch on P. “snow tussock” hermaphrodites but P. traversii hermaphrodites at Cass showed higher self fertility (8–10%). Artificial crosses with hermaphrodites thus resulted in fruit set comparable with that in natural conditions. Dr. E. Godley (pers comm.) has verified self fertility of hermaphrodites for P. traversii.

These experiments in Pimelea show that, in fact, not much more than half the amount of genic material supplied to a new generation comes from the hermaphrodites in P. “short tussock” and P. “snow tussock”, since hermaphrodite fruit set, whether due to selfing, or cross fertilization, is very low in them. Hermaphrodite fruit set is only about 4–5% of the total fruit set by females in natural populations of these two taxa. In P. prostrata the percentage fruit set of hermaphrodites as compared with females is also low—about 10%, but in P. traversii it is much higher —just less than 50%. The systems of inheritance of sex may differ between P. traversii and the other species but it is possible for them all to have a genetic basis. Cruickshank (1953) discussing Tasmanian species of Pimelea stated that “All species examined have fertile pollen, and there is no evidence of any apomixis in the genus.” The specimens from Cass were tested for apomixis by bagging (and emasculation of hermaphrodites) but no fruit was set by unpollinated flowers. All the species had apparently fertile pollen. Examination was made of pollen stained with cotton blue in lactophenol, and in each species the grains were full. Only a small percentage of pollen was deformed, abnormally small or empty.
The Pollen Vectors
Numbers of insects were captured on flowers of the various species of Pimeleas at Cass Some were sent to the Cawthron Institute for identification, and Dr. E. S. Gourlay determined some of these. Other insects were determined by Dr. R. Pilgrim of the Zoology Department, University of Canterbury. The writer made further determinations by comparison of insects with already identified specimens. The details about insects are tabulated below.
Most of the flies, the little purple butterfly, Crysophanus boldenarum and the small bee Halictus huttonii are ubiquitous in the short tussock areas at Cass. On fine days when Pimeleas are flowering, some flies and the bee in particular are present in large numbers, flying from flower to flower. Their main purpose is to suck nectar, and pollination is achieved incidentally to this, except in the case of occasional pollen collection by Halictus. Close observation showed that flies and bees had pollen adhering to body hair and on the head. Occasional individuals of Halictus collected pollen on the hind tibia. Although pollen was seen on bees and flies none of this was examined closely. The foraging range of individual insect species was also not examined closely but some general observations were made. Of the more frequent visitors, most of the Dipterans seemed fairly restricted in range. Crysophanus boldenarum, however, although it remained in one area for a time, was able to fly long distances. Halictus huttonii has its home in clay patches and banks, and is a solitary bee, but is quick flying and appeared to be the most widespread pollinating agent. Halictus and some of the flies by virtue of their presence in numbers are the most important vectors. Hundreds of bees and flies are found within areas of a few hundred square yards. Up to a dozen bees could be seen on one plant or small group of plants and half a dozen flies would be present in the same area. The insects moved quickly from flower to flower. Nectar, which accumulates at or near the bottom of the floral tubes was eagerly sought. Scent is most noticeable on sunny days about the plants (except P. traversii) and combined with the white shining calyx lobes serves as a daytime attractant to butterflies, bees and flies.
Apart from sweet scent and colour the showiness of flower heads is important. Although individual flowers are small, their presence in crowded heads with up to 1,000 flowers per plant ensures that a showy mass of flowers is presented to insect visitors. The flower heads of P. traversii are extremely showy.
In visiting Pimelea flowers there was no distinction by the insects between female or hermaphrodite plants growing side by side. Several plants of P. “snow tussock”, P. “short tussock” and hybrids (between them) were seen to be visited.

| Order. | Family | Genus and Species. | Determination. | Pimeleas Visited. | Description. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Hymenoptera | Andrenidae | Halictus huttonii Cam. | E.S.G. | P, A, L, T, and hybrids | Small black bee. |
| 2. " | ? | sp. indet. | T. | Larger bee, collects pollen. | |
| 3. Diptera | Tachinidae | Erythronychia velutina Mall | E.S.G. | P, A. | Large fly. |
| 4. " | " | Zealandotachina varipes varipes Mall. | E.S.G. | P. A, L. and hybrids | small nondescipt fly. |
| 5. " | " | Heteria sp. | E.S.G. | P. | samall haisrsy fly. |
| 6. " | " | cf. Protohystrica alcis | R.P. | T. | Large orange bodied fly. |
| 7. " | " | sp. indet. | A. | Small grey fly. | |
| 8. " | Muscidae | Calliphora laemica | R.P. | A. | Large brown blowfly. |
| 9. " | " | sp. indet. | A, T. | Medium sized grey fly. Few wing marks. | |
| 10. " | Syrphidae | Syrphus novae-zealandicus | R.P. | T. | Hover fly. |
| 11 " | Anthomyidae | sp. indet. | P. | Fly with mottled abdomen and wings | |
| 12. " | ? | sp. indet. | T. | Large brownish fly. Resembled hover fly. Cream body marking. | |
| 13. " | ? | sp. indet. | A, P. | Very small blueish fly. | |
| 14. " | ? | sp. indet. | A. | Rusty brown hairy fly. | |
| 15. Lepidoptera | ? | Crysophanus boldenarum | C.J.B. | P, A, L. | Small purple-winged butterfly. |
| 16. " | C. sallustius | C.J.B. | T. | Larger orange-winged butterfly. | |
| 17. " | sp. indet. | P. | Small brownish moth. | ||
| 18. " | sp. indet. | A. | Fawn winged moth. | ||
| 19. Coleoptera | Cerambycidae | Zorion cf. guttigerum | C.J.B. | T. | Blue-black beetle with 2 orange spots. |
| 20. " | ? | sp. indet. | T. | Small blue-black beetle. | |
| 21. " | Curculionidae | sp. indet. | T. | Large light brown weevil. | |
| 22. Hemiptera | Lygaeidae | sp. indet. | T. | Small Hemipteran insect. | |
| 23. ? | ? | sp. indet. | L, X, A | Brown long bodied insect. | |
| hybrid |
E.S.G.—E. S. Gourlay. R.P.—R. Pilgrim. C.J.B.—the writer. P.—P. prostrata. A.—P. “short tussock”. L.—P. “snow tussock”. T.—P. traversn.

indiscriminately by the same bee or fly. At this time, the same vectors were observed visiting P. prostrata plants. Few insects were seen on any one P. traversii plant. While it was noticed that flies and Halictus worked systematically over a flower head in the othe species, in P. traversii, Crysophanus sallustius was seen to be present for long periods and is an important vector.
Most P. traversii individuals flower later than the other Cass species, and most of the individuals grow amongst thick scrub, so that this may account for different animal populations on P. traversii. However, a number of single plants of P. traversii are mixed with all the other species in some areas and flowering times overlap. Similarly P. prostrata, P. “snow tussock” and P. “short tussock” are all juxtaposed in some places and these all have overlapping flowering times. In any one day the P. “snow tussock” plants, growing in shady places, are visited for shorter times by the sun-loving flies, butterflies and bees than are P. prostrata and P. “short tussock” in open sunlight. Some P. “snow tussock” plants grow on fans and exposed places, however.
No night flying insects have been taken into account in describing pollinating agents, but many moths are found in the tussock country. The scented white flowers of P. prostrata, P. “short tussock” and P. “snow tussock” no doubt attract night flying insects. Since distances between different Pimelea species, flowering at the same time, are not great in some places at Cass (some are only feet apart), the physical possibility of cross pollination between species as well as outbreeding within species is important in considering hybridization and variation. The non-selectiveness of unspecialized vectors may help to account not only for similarity in flowers in different Pimelea species but for the amount of hybridization taking place. (See Thomson, 1880, 1927). A. number of the same insects have, in fact, been captured on as widely different genera as Aciphylla, Leptospermum, Leucopogon, Brachycome, Celmisia and Hypochaeris, but when Pimeleas were in full flower other profuse flowerers like Leptospermum were not yet out. It was not ascertained whether one individual Halictus restricted itself to one genus or not.
The effect of heavy rainfall on pollination and fruit set is difficult to gauge. In the 1957-58 summer it appeared to have had considerable significance in decrease of total fruit set. The flowers of one head may be opening over a period of a little more than a week, and the flowers of each plant over a two-week period. They soon wither and die when fruit begins to form or if they are unpollinated. Most plants of any one taxon in a given area flower together. If some catastrophe occurs this may result in a reduction in numbers of fruit set. As a general observation, it was noticed that much more fruit were set, especially in P. “short tussock” and hybrids in the summer of 1956–57. P. traversii and P. prostrata were less affected. Heavy continuous rain affects not only the ability of insects to fly and seek nectar, but it may drown out such ground dwellers as Halictus and also fills floral tubes with water, washing pollen off anthers. The most favourable weather for animal activity and for optimum attractiveness to animals of Pimelea flowers is the hot, dry, sunny weather usually experienced at flowering time.
Relations of Floral Parts at Pollination
Growth of floral parts is important when detail of the breeding system is to be considered. In both females and hermaphrodites it was noticed that after flower opening, the styles elongated and were conspicuously exserted. At first, this was thought to indicate that hermophrodites were protandrous, since anthers dehisced as soon as flowers were open. However, Dr. E. Godley (pers. comm.) noticed that only in unpollinated flowers were styles strongly exserted. A series of tests, consisting of bagging, emasculating (hermaphrodites) and pollinating flowers, showed that this was so. From the time of flower opening both female and hermaphrodite.

flowers were examined as to (a) original position of the stigma with respect to the mouth of the floral tube; (b) final position of the stigma; (c) position of stigma at which pollination is successful in initiating fertilization; (d) the degree of inhibition of style growth due to pollination. Careful observations were necessary for this part of the study. Pollination was found to inhibit most of the growth of styles in both females and hermaphrodite flowers, and furthermore the stigmas were found to be receptive to pollen (resulting in fruit set) over a limited period. This extends for 1–3 days after the flowers open and they begin to wither within a week. When female flowers open the stigma is just above the mouth of the flower tube, but in the hermaphrodite it is still below the mouth of the tube (about a third of the way down it). Growth of the style is continuous after the opening of flowers unless pollination occurs, when the growth is slowed down. In the hermaphrodite during the 1–3 days when successful pollination can occur the stigma is below the level of the mouth of the flower tube. Once the stigma is exserted beyond this, fertilization cannot occur although pollination still inhibits most of the growth. In some cases it was found that pollen from one species is capable of halting style growth of another species. P. prostrata pollen on P. “snow tussock” stigmas and P. “snow tussock” pollen on P. prostrata stigmas was found to act in this way. This inhibition of style growth holds for both female and hermaphrodite flowers but fertilization of the latter is more rare. If unpollinated, the style of hermaphrodite flowers may eventually grow to nearly twice the length of the floral tube. Female styles rarely grow to more than one and a-half times its length in the same circumstances. Because of this it is possible to see in the field which flowers are pollinated although this is not a direct measure of fertilization and fruit set. A high proportion of hermaphrodite flowers in the field were noticed to be unpollinated.
Growth of the style is important mainly in connection with selective influences in the breeding system. Because of differences in stigma and stamens, both in gross structure and, in their position within the floral tube when mature and because of the short time of their receptivity to pollen, it may be shown that a situation favouring cross pollination is present in Pimelea. The floral tubes in female and hermaphrodite flowers are of differnt length and styles of about the same length when the flowers open. (Fig. 1.) The implications of this, as concerns the insects involved and cross pollination are as follows. The insects visiting female and hermaphrodite flowers when both are functional will be more effective in corss pollination between sexes than in self pollination of hermaphrodites (although some self pollination of or crossing between hermaphrodites may be brought about by insects). This situation is dependent on the hermaphrodite stigmas being receptive to pollen only when low down in the floral tube. Insects will not normally carry pollen to these stigmas. They are not receptive when they are exserted, which occurs when they grow older (if not pollinated). Position of receptive stigmas in females relative to anther position in hermaphrodites, together with larger papillae on female stigmas, which pollen adheres to more readily, encourages outcrossing between sexes. Crude tests consisting of rubbing a clump of pollen grains on a needle against both female and hermaphrodite stigmas showed that pollen stuck to the larger female papillae more easily. Natural selfing of hermaphrodites without aid of insects, can and does occur as was shown experimentally, but this is rare. From the flower count and fruit set data it is seen, however, that a significant small percentage of hermaphrodite flowers set fruit in all the taxa. This must result largely from cross fertilization, and ensures that a number of fruit are set in hermaphrodites. Presumably there is some physiological barrier, genetically controlled, which prevents a very high percentage of hermaphrodite fruit set. This needs further investigation, although genetic experiment in Pimelea is a long term project. The females, however, set fruit freely in all species.

It is a possibility that some pollination is brought about by wind in Pimelea, but pollen is heavy and shedding of pollen from inward facing anthers, unless it is carried away by insects, usually results in the bottom of the hermaphrodite flower tube being filled with pollen grains. Since the receptive stigma is below the level of the anthers, although usually to one side of the floral tube, there is a strong chance of pollen falling on it. This does not often occur or the resulting pollination is not effective, as is shown by the large number of exserted styles seen in the field in hermaphrodites. It has been shown previously that effective pollination inhibits style growth in both female and hermaphrodite flowers. In the field, fertilized flowers with non exserted styles were seen to bear pollen on their stigmas and occasionally pollen could be seen on exserted styles.
Modifications of Sex Expression
Some plants in cultivation, and others in the wild populations at Cass and Macaulay River were noticed to bear female flowers in the same heads as hermaphrodites. These do not conform strictly to the implications of the term gynodioecy but are gynomonoecious. At Christchurch P. “snow tussock” and P. prostrata plants, members of clones, bore mixed flowers, although in each case the rest of the clone was made up of purely hermaphrodite plants. At Cass a few plants of all the species had the same condition, but P. traversii always had more female flowers on hermaphrodite plants than the others. The numbers of female flowers could have had some effect on the genetic structure of the species in P. traversii (since fruit set was established for female flowers in mixed heads) but probably is not important for the other species. In several cases, P. traversii plants marked as females early in the season, with hundreds of female flowers, had, later in the season, hundreds of hermaphrodite flowers. Many other plants had numbers of female flowers in hermaphrodite heads. Production of a few female flowers en bloc at the beginning of flowering by an otherwise hermaphrodite plant was the most usual situation. The early production of female flowers on these plants—they are usually the outermost flowers and first to open, suggests difference in environmental treatment. The differences must, however, be slight in nature. Heslop-Harrison (1957) puts the cause of such phenomena in flowering plants to variations in hormone supply.
Checks of the numbers of different sexes of P. “short tussock” and P. “snow tussock” at Cass in both 1956–57 and 1957–58 summers revealed that there was no change in relative numbers of sexes from year to year. It seems that, although immediate control of sex may be hormonal, the ultimate causes of sex difference are genetic.
In addition to production of clearly female and hermaphrodite flowers in the same head, some of the Christchurch and Cass plants were noticed to have “intersexed” flowers. Most of the female flowers on hermaphrodite plants had typical female dimensions. A few such flowers had one anther and small stigma papillae, but female dimensions. Others were larger than females, although smaller than hermaphrodites and some had large and some small papillae. Further female plants with a few flowers having one or two anthers were seen. A very few plants in a population were hermaphrodites with very small flowers or very large flowered hermaphrodites. Again this tends to bear out the idea that sex is controlled, immediately, by a hormonal balance mechanism.
Sex Determination
The determination of sex in Pimelea is of some interest. It is highly probable that size of flower and other polymorphic variations are linked to the cause of sex difference. Some meagre data about time of differentiation of female flowers show that pollen is produced but degenerates in the anthers of at least some flowers.

Chromosome counts of stages of meiosis could be made from anthers of some female flowers of P. traversii and, especially in a few flowers of P. “short tussock” and P. “snow tussock”, pollen was noticed during the very early development of female buds in marked plants. By the time buds were ready to open their anthers were shrivelled and pollen was unrecognizable. In one female P. “short tussock” plant with mature flowers, the anthers, indehiscent and shrivelled, contained collapsed pollen. Frankel (1940) found this phenomenon in Hebe townsoni. Some of the meiotic figures in plants at Cass (the sexes of the parent plants were not determined) appeared to show one set of unpaired chromosomes during second metaphase. These may have been females with degeneration setting in. In Pimelea some emasculated hermaphrodite flowers showed slight reduction in size from normal.
It appears possible that corolla growth is influenced by a hormone produced in the anthers and released post-meiotically. Determination of corolla lengths probably occurs at a stage later than that of the determination of sex of the flower. A paper by Plack (1957) deals with a very similar situation in a sexually dimorphic Labiate, Glechoma hederacea. In this normally gynodioecious species she found that some individuals produce female flowers only, others are gynomonoecious, and the proportion of female to hermaphrodite flowers varies with the stock and the season. This parallels the situation in P. traversii at Cass in all respects. Glechoma is four anthered. Flowers intermediate in size between the small females and larger hermaphrodites had one, two or three anthers. Artificial emasculation of hermaphrodites in bud showed that corolla size was reduced. Plack thought that corolla growth is influenced by a hormone produced in the anthers and released after meiosis since the critical time for growth of corolla (or lack of it) was at a certain corolla length. There appears to be a close similarity between Pimelea and Glechoma in these respects.
In a more recent paper (Plack, 1958) it is shown that treatment with Gibberellin caused growth of small female corollas in Glechoma, to the larger hermaphrodite size.
Baker (1948) states that the wide range of dicotyledons in which small female flowers and larger hermaphrodites are found indicates a common factor in their origin, and there is a strong suggestion from the above evidence that hormone balance controls flower size. A considerable body of information is summarized by Heslop Harrison (1957) who wrote of experimental modification of sex expression. It has been shown in certain plants that various factors of environment may affect development of flowers (with consistent experimental results for either monoecious, dioecious or hermaphrodite plants) causing variations in sex expression. These variations are considered to be due to hormonal causes, the environmental factors affecting production or movement of hormones which control sex. Heslop Harrison suggests that, as flowers are initiated at the apices, the auxin levels favouring optimum development of one sex suppress the other. In a normal environment the mechanism of sex inheritance establishes in some individuals one developmental path and in some the other.
Baker (1948) states that “Because functional pistillate flowers may be distributed in a gynodioecious or gynomonoecious manner in the same species, abortion of anthers cannot always be determined by direct genetic means…”. These ideas do not, however, necessarily conflict with the concept of genetically controlled gynodioecy. Most individuals in populations of Pimelea are clearly of one sex or the other and remain so from year to year.

Discussion
The Pimelea species at Cass, and others in New Zealand are gynodioecious both in structure and function, although some variations in sex expression are extant, as they are in many plant and animal populations. Some genetic experiment is needed to establish the basis for control of sex determination in Pimelea and to discover reasons for variation between different populations in numbers of the sexes. In wild populations the presence of relative proportions of one sex to another is interpreted by Heslop-Harrison (1957) as being due to the interaction of environment with the hormone system of the plants. In Pimelea maintenance of a high proportion of females benefits the species by ensuring outcrossing. This is enabled by activity of animal pollinating agents and the dimorphism of the sexes. Differences in pollinating species in different areas may contribute to variations in proportions of females to hermaphrodites. Ford (1957) in discussion of “intersexes” and the heterostyly of Primula shows how the control of these conditions is genetic and changes are induced by selective influences.
Gynodioecy is in the main an outbreeding system. The higher the proportion of females to hermaphrodites, the greater the amount of outcrossing which is possible. Thus P. “short tussock” and P. “snow tussock” each with 50% of their populations females, at Cass, potentially are able to exchange genes most readily within or between species. The consequences of this, especially with regard to the plasticity of and hybridization between the Pimelea species are most interesting. The probable selective action of flower structure and insect activity in maintaining this situation are supplemented by the low fruit set in hermaphrodite plants as compared with females. However, a little inbreeding can take place, and this could also be of benefit. In P. prostrata and P. traversii the proportion of females is not as high but must also have an important bearing on their variation and ability to hybridize. It is clear, however, that the amount of hybridization between them and other species is more limited than between P. “snow tussock” and other species. They are also less variable throughout their range than P. “snow tussock”. The outbreeding of the latter thus contributes to its plasticity and to the amount of hybridization occurring between it and other species, including P. aridula and P. sericeo-villosa at Cass and elsewhere. Some of this hybridization (observed in terms of variations in morphology and supported by experimental work) is very far-reaching, and probably of the type described by Anderson (1953) and others, as introgression. Widespread hybridization in the genus Pimelea may be attributed in a large measure to gynodioecy in many of the species.
Acknowledgments
The writer is indebted to Professor W. R. Philipson for much assistance and encouragement and to Dr. E. Godley for his most valuable advice and criticism. The information which he made available was extremely helpful. Many other people assisted in various ways and their help is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Anderson, E., 1953. Introgressive Hybridization. Biol. Revs., 28, p. 280.
Baker, H. G., 1948. Corolla Size in Gynodioecious and Gynomonoecious Species of Flowering Plants, Part II. Proc. Leeds Phil. Lit. Soc., 5, p. 136.
Bentham, G. and von Mueller, F., 1873. Flora Australiensis, London.
Black, J. M., 1952. The Flora of South Australia, Part III. p. 592.
Burrows, C. J., 1958. Variation in Some Species of the Genus Pimelea. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Canterbury Library.

Cheeseman, T. F., 1914. Illustrations of the New Zealand Flora, 2.
— 1925. Manual of the N.Z. Flora.
Cruickshank, R. H., 1953. Chromosome Numbers in the Genus Pimelea. Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasmania, 87, p. 13.
Darwin, C., 1884. Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species. London.
Ford, E. B., 1957. Polymorphism in Plants, Animals and Man. Nature, 80, No. 4598, p. 1317.
Frankel, O. H., 1940. Studies in Hebe, II: The Significance of Male Sterility in the Genetic Ststem. J. of Genetics, 40, p. 171.
Godley, E. J., 1955. Breeding Systems in New Zealand Plants, 1: Fuchsia. Ann. Bot., 19 n.s., p. 549.
— 1957. Unisexual Flowers in the Ericales. Nature, 180, No. 4580, p. 284.
Heinig, K., 1951. Studies in the Floral Morphology of the Thymelaeaceae. Am. J. Bot., 38, p. 113.
Heslop-Harrison, J., 1957. The Experimental Modification of Sex Expression in Flowering Plants. Biol. Revs., 32, p. 38.
Lewis, D., 1941. Male Sterility in Natural Populations of Hermaphrodite Plants. New Phytol., 40, p. 56.
— and Crowe, K., 1956. The Genetics and Evolution of Gynodioecy. Evolution, 10, p. 15.
Parlane, B. J., 1924. The Pimeleas of the Cass Valley, Canterbury. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis.
Plack, A., 1957. Sexual Dimorphism in the Labiates. Nature, 180, No. 4596.
— 1958. Effect of Gibberellic Acid on Corolla Size. Nature, 182, No. 4635.
Thomson, G., 1880. On the Fertilization of New Zealand Flowering Plants. Trans. N.Z. Inst., 13, p. 271.
— 1927. The Pollination of New Zealand Flowers by Birds and Insects. Trans. N.Z. Inst., 57, p. 106.
Yampolsky, C. and H., 1922. Distribution of Sex Forms in the Phanerogamic Flora. Bibliotheca Genetica 3, p.
C. J. Burrows,
M.Sc.,Botany Department,
University of Canterbury,
Christchurch.

The Subalpine Scrub of the Hokitika Catchment, Westland
[Received by the Editor, October 7, 1959.]
Abstract
In the subalpine scrub of the Hokitika catchment the following types of community are recognised, and named according to the most abundant dominant species: (1) Hoheria glabrata forest; (2) Olearia forest; (3) Olearia colensoi scrub; (4) Dracophyllum uniflorum scrub; (5) Dacrydium biforme scrub. These types belong respectively to the following habitats: (1) young, moist, freely drained, deep soils; (2) slightly more mature, moist, deep, freely drained soils; (3) shallow, usually immature, freely drained soils on steep slopes; (4) shallow soils on exposed ridges and spurs; (5) poorly drained soils.
Autecological studies show that Hoheria glabrata and composites grow fairly quickly and regenerate freely. Dacrydium biforme and the epacrids grow very slowly and do not often reproduce from seed, but they are long lived and in three species there is vegetative reproduction through downhill layering.
The true scrub communities have been little modified by deer and chamois, except at the upper margins and along main ridge tracks. Browsing is preventing the establishment of new Hoheria glabrata forests. Opossums and fire are minor factors.
Phenomena needing explanation include the contrasting timber line vegetation in Westland and Canterbury, the tendency for grassland to replace scrub on gentle slopes and flats, and discontinuities in the age structure of populations of Libocedrus bidwillii and Dacrydium biforme.
Introduction
Subalpine scrub is widespread on the New Zealand mountains, especially in the wetter districts. The strange life forms and unusual floristic composition have excited the curiosity of botanists; but the inaccessibility and impenetrability of the scrub have prevented any detailed studies. Cockayne (1928) gave broad floristic descriptions and Zotov (1939) related the distribution of scrub and beech forest in the Tararua Range to the occurrence of fog.
One of the functions of the Forest and Range Experiment Station of the New Zealand Forest Service will be the study of mountain ecology; the subalpine scrub is receiving particular attention. The ecological survey of the Hokitika catchment which was carried out during the summer of 1957–58 gave me the opportunity of gathering the material for this preliminary paper on the subalpine scrub communities, in an area representative of the Westland botanical district. A week's visit in July, 1959, enabled me to see the vegetation under winter conditions. The bulk of the work was done in the basin at the head of the Toaroha river (Locality map, Fig. 1.). The subalpine scrub there is fully representative of the Hokitika catchment and the configuration of the basin is such that its parts can be reached easily from the hut, which is situated at 2,900 feet above sea level.
In ascending the Hokitika River, one crosses alluvial valleys, terraces and foothills, for a distance of 12 to 15 miles. This rather broken “plain” halts abruptly against a mountain wall, which rises, often precipitously, to some 5,000ft. The Hokitika and its tributaries head into the mountains through successions of gorges, waterfalls and narrow valleys. Most of the larger tributaries are fed by the snowfields and glaciers of the main divide which, in the southern corner of the catchment, includes peaks over 8,000ft in height.
The bulk of the mountainous part of the Hokitika catchment is underlain by schist, but the greywackes which compose the Canterbury mountains generally begin

a mile or two west of the main divide. In the altitudinal level occupied by subalpine scrub, the bedrock is usually covered only by shallow immature soils and talus, though there are patches of moraine and recent alluvium. At lower altitudes, there are striking deposits of fluvioglacial gravels.
Slopes within the subalpme scrub zone are steep, being typically over 40°. Slopes of more than 70° are frequent, and may support dense vegetation. At the upper margin of the scrub, there is often an abrupt decrease in the angles of slopes, and the upper mountain slopes are, on an average, less steep than those below (Plate 3, Fig. 1).
Because the Southern Alps he across the prevailing westerly air streams, rainfall in Westland is heavy. At Hokitika the average is 110m, but in the mountains it is much greater. No records exist, but it probably exceeds 300 inches per annum. Added to the rain, there is a high frequency of fog and cloud. During three months of the summer of 1957–58, there were no more than 10 fine sunny days. Above 3,000ft snow can fall in any month. Winds are frequent and violent.
The subalpine scrub forms a dense belt which extends for 500–1,000ft above the forest. It cannot be readily defined on a floristic basis, since nearly all the species also occur in the higher altitude forest. However, the upper altitudinal limit of Libocedrus bidwillii can usually be regarded as the treelme, setting a lower boundary to the scrub. Even above this boundary, there are areas of low forest, most of which are dominated by Hoheria glabrata. In this paper, therefore, the subalpine scrub zone is to be understood as embracing such low forest, in addition to true scrub.
Botanical names are used according to Cheeseman's Manual (1925), with the following exceptions:

| Name Used in Present Paper. | Name in Manual. |
| Hoheria glabrata Sprag. and Sum. | Gaya lyallii Baker |
| Aristotelia serrata (Forst. f.) Oliver | Aristotelia racemosa Hook. f. |
| Coprosma pseudocuneata Oliver | Coprosma cuneata J. D. Hooker |
| Coprosma depressa Col. | Coprosma ramulosa Petrie |
| Danthonia flavescens Hooker | Danthonia raoulii var. flavescens Hackel |
| Blechnum minus (R. Br.) Ckne. | Blechnum capense Schlect. var. minus |
| Hook. f. | |
| Sticherus cunninghamii. (Hew. ex Hook.) Ching | Gleichenia cunninghamii Hew. |
I. Classification of the Communities
In the following account, the subalpine scrub vegetation is subdivided into categories, each named according to the most abundant dominant species. The following categories are recognised:
-
Hoheria glabrata low forest.
-
Olearia low forest.
-
Olearia colensoi scrub.
-
Dracophyllum uniflorum scrub.
-
Dacrydium biforme scrub.
-
Cliff communities.
Under each heading, there is a description of a typical community, followed by a general account. All the typical communities were described in the top basin of the Toaroha River, while the general accounts have been compiled from observations made throughout the Hokitika catchment.
Hoheria Glabrata Low Forest
Typical Community
Altitude, 3,200ft. Slope, 38°. Aspect, N. E.
Canopy. Pure Hoheria, the trees being 15–20ft tall, with diameters averaging 10in. * Stand apparently even-aged.
Ground Cover. Dense Polystichum vestitum. Ranunculus hirtus is the main plant between the clumps of fern. Coprosma depressa and Astelia cockaynei are less common.
Regeneration. Hoheria seedlings up to 3 years old and 6in tall are abundant. Apparent saplings of Hoheria are really coppice shoots from stumps of decadent trees. Saplings of Olearia ilicifolia 1–10ft tall are frequent.
Soil 1in: Matrix medium-dark brown, fine sand, with numerous small schist fragments; loose crumb structure.
2in: Grey zone, probably slightly leached.
>5in: Light brown sand and stones.
The material of the whole profile is loose. Roots are distributed throughout but are densest at 0–1in. Earthworms are present.
General Account
Hoheria glabrata communities are always found on young, deep, moist, welldrained soils, the usual habitats being healed slips, talus slopes and alluvial fans. Due to the rapid erosion, these habitats are extensive, and Hoheria forest comprises a large proportion—perhaps a third—of the vegetation of the scrub belt. The main features are the dominance of Hoheria in the canopy and of Polystichum vestitum in the ground cover. Olearia ilicifolia is usually present, and may be co-dominant. Species less constantly present include Olearia lacunosa, Coprosma ciliata and Phormium colensoi.
[Footnote] * Diameters of stems in this paper refer to the part of a stem immediately above any basal buttresses.

Below 2,500–2,800ft the numerous small trees which colonise similar habitats at low altitudes begin to enter; the first are Fuchsia excorticata and Aristotelia serrata. A. community of Hypolepis millefolium, Polystichum vestitum, Danthonia flavescens and Phormium colensoi often develops on young, loose soils both above the altitudinal limits of Hoheria, and in places where the succession to Hoheria forest is delayed.
The pH values of several samples of soil collected in July, 1959, were measured with a Marconi pH meter (Type TF 889/1), using a mixture of approximately 2 volumes of water to 1 of soil. Two samples of soil collected under Hoheria forest at depths of 1–3 inches gave values of 5.1 and 5.3.
(C.f. Hoheria glabrata low forest, Cockayne, 1928, p. 267.)
Olearia Low Forest
Typical Community. Altitude, 2,800ft. Slope, 5°. Aspect, N. E.
Canopy. Co-dominance of Olearia lacunosa, Dracophyllum traversii and Hoheria glabrata. There is also some Olearia ilicifolia. The Dracophyllum traversu is 20–25ft tall and about 10in in diameter. The lower parts of the trunks are inclined downhill; in some trees the trunks are prostrate for a length of 6ft, but no adventitious roots were detected Olearia lacunosa is as tall, and grows to 20in in diameter Hoheria glabrata is a smaller tree.
Shrub Storey. Open, includes Coprosma ciliata and C. pseudocuneata.
Ground Cover This is sparse, due to browsing and trampling. Polystichum vestitum, Coprosma depressa and Uncinia sp are the most important species. There are also Phormium colensoi and Astelia cockaynei.
Regeneration. Seedlings of Olearia ilicifolia and O. lacunosa are common (being comparatively browse-tolerant or unpalatable). There are occasional young plants of Dracophyllum traversii.
Soil. There is a continuous litter of Dracophyllum traversu leaves.
4in: Fine sand, coloured dark brown by humus.
8in: Grey-brown silty sand with numerous, unweathered fragments of schist Roots are mostly between the surface and 6in depth.
General Account
Communities such as the above occupy, like the Hoheria glabrata low forest, deep, moist, freely drained soils But the soils are older with more advanced development of profile, and the communities are more varied and richer. On the old alluvialfan where the typical community is sited, there is considerable variation. Dracophyllum traversu, Olearia lacunosa, O. ilicifolia and Hoheria glabrata may each be clearly dominant, or conversely, absent over small areas. The shrub storey shows similar variations Usually the canopy of Olearia low forest is pierced by trees of Libocedrus bidwillii and occasionally by Podocarpus hallii Olearia colensoi, Senecio elaeagnifolius and Archeria traversii are present where the tree canopy is not continuous.
Olearia Colensoi Scrub.
Typical Community. Altitude, 3,200ft Slope, 45°. Aspect, N. E.
General Shrub Canopy. Olearia colensoi contributes half of the canopy. The plants measure 12ft from ground to apex, but grow nearly horixontally. Archeria traversii, Senecio elaeagnifolius and Olearia lacunosa are also important. There are scattered bushes of Dracophyllum longifolium.
Discontinous Storey of Tallers Shrubs. Dracophyllum traversii forms scattered groups. The stems are up to 10in in diameter and 20ft tall, and their lower parts are inclined.

Ground Cover. Blechnum minus forms a dense sheet, except in the darkest places. Scattered Phormium colensoi and Astelia cockeynei.
Regeneration. No young plants of Dracophyllum traversii, D. longifolium and Archeria traversii were seen. There are occasional seedlings of Senecio elaeagnifolius and Olearia lacunosa. Small seedlings of Olearia colensoi are abundant everywhere, and they succeed in gaps. Occasional small seedlings of Hoheria glabrata do not become established.
Soil. ¼in : Litter.
2in: Dark brown, structureless fine sand.
3in. Medium brown, fine sand, with occasional schist fragments.
>5in: Light brown, fine sand. The proportion of weathering schist particles increases with increasing depth.
General Account
Communities similar to the one described occupy all scrub land sites where the slope is steep, the drainage free, the soil shallow, and the exposure not extreme. They comprise about half of the vegetation of the scrub zone. Their characteristic feature is the dense storey of shrubs, mainly Olearia colensoi, with groups of taller Dracophyllum traversii. Dracophyllum longifolium is usually present, and on drier or warmer sites, such as slight spurs and terrace faces, it may rise to dominance.
On exposed ridges, especially those with northerly aspect, Olearia colensoi scrub passes gradually into communities dominated by Dracophyllum uniflorum. There is a corresponding decrease in height of the scrub, and an increase in the proportions of certain species, notably Dracophyllum longifolium, Olearia lacunosa, Gaultheria rupestris and Coprosma serrulata. On southerly faces low-growing communities of nearly pure Olearia colensoi intervene between tall scrub and grassland.
Occasional slipping of the substratum may explain the occurrence of scattered plants of Hoheria glabrata and Olearia ilicifolia. Gaps often contain herbfield inclusions with Aciphylla (?) colensoi, Celmisia coriacea, Danthonia flavescens (usually the very broad-leaved form), Astelia cockaynet and Phormium colensoi.
In a downhill direction, with the entry of Libocedrus bidwillii, Olearia colensoi scrub passes into high altitude forest. The following pH values were obtained from a soil supporting a community in which Olearia colensoi and Dracophyllum longifolium share dominance:
| Depth | pH |
|---|---|
| 2in | 4.4 |
| 4in | 4.4 |
| 8in | 4.6 |
(C.f. shrub composite scrub of Southern Alps and mountains of north-western district, Cockayne, 1928, p. 278).
Dracophyllum Uniflorum Scrub
Typical Community. Altitude, 3,800ft Slope, 43°. Aspect, N. E. Steep ground on the crest of a ridge.
Shrub Storey. Dense clumps of Dracophyllum uniflorum 2–3 feet tall.
Ground Cover. Mainly Blechnum minus and large moss (genus Dendroligotrichum.) Also Gaultheria sp., Suttonia nummularia, and Schoenus pauciflorus. Occasional clumps of Phormium colensoi, Danthonia flavescens (2 forms), and Celmisia coriacea.
Regeneration. Seedlings of Dracophyllum uniflorum were not seen; but the bushes are propagating by “downhill layering”. One chance seedling of Hoheria glabrata seen.

Soil. ¾in : Black humus.
2in: Dark brown, fine sand.
>5in: Grey-brown, fine sand, containing weathering fragments of schist.
General Features
On exposed ridges, especially those with northerly aspect, Olearia colensoi scrub peters out into Dracophyllum uniflorum communities like the one described. Further, Dracophyllum uniflorum is dominant in the stunted outliers of scrub which occupy rock spurs up to 4,500ft. These high-altitude communities merge into grassland; the shrub component is predominant on steep slopes and shallow soils, the grasses are predominant on gentler slopes and deeper soils (Plate 3, Fig. 2).
(C.f. Dracophyllum scrub: Cockayne, 1928, p. 280.)
Dacrydium Biforme Scrub
Typical Community. Altitude, 2,800ft. Slope, 23°. Aspect, N.E.
Discontinuous Storey of Stunted Trees. Scattered Dacrydium biforme up to 12ft tall, with distinct erect trunks up to 16m in diameter.
Main Shrub Storey. 3–5ft tall, consisting of dense clumps with spaces between. Main species are shrub-form Dacrydium biforme, Dracophyllum longifolium, Olearia colensoi and Archeria traversii. Other species are Nothopanax lineare, N. simplex, Pittosporum divaricatum, Coprosma pseudocuneata and C. colensoi.
Ground Cover and Low Shrubs. The herbs are found mainly between the clumps of bushes, and include Celmisia armstrongii, C. walkeri, Schoenus pauciflorus, Astelia cockeynei, Blechnum minus, Sticherus cunninghamu and Lycopodium scariosum. Danthonia flavescens grows in the widest gaps. Podocarpus nivalis occurs abundantly, and Coprosma serrulata less so, mainly within the shrubby clumps.
Regeneration. No seedlings of Dacrydium biforme were seen, but the bushes propagate freely by downhill layering. All ages of Olearia colensoi and Dracophyllum longifolium are represented.
Soil. ¼in: Humus.
4in: Silty loam, coloured grey by humus. There are a few small schist pebbles. On solid schist, weathering at top.
The upper part of the profile is very wet, and water collected in the pit dug for the examination of the profile. The depth of soil varies; over a fissure in the bedrock it was at least 14m deep, and well drained.
General Account
Dacrydium biforme is conspicuous where the soils are cold and poorly drained. Such conditions occur on gentle slopes where the soil texture is too fine to permit free vertical drainage. On old moraine in the top Toaroha basin, Dacrydium biforme is important on puggy soils, which have developed an alpine gley profile. The following soil description is typical of alpine gley:
Surface flat. Altitude, 2,500ft. The soil forms a matrix between morainic boulders.
¼in: Litter.
4–6in: Greyish brown, fine sand with loose, weak crumb structure. Many roots. Transition to:
3–4in: Bluish-grey, fine sand, puggy and compact, with blocky structure. Weathering pebbles present, and there are also conspicuous reddish-brown blotches which appear to represent the last traces of pebbles destroyed by weathering. Sharp and irregular transition to:
¼in: Reddish-brown, soft iron pan. This gradually lightens in colour to:

2–4in: Light reddish-brown, moderately compact fine sand with weathering pebbles. Gradual transition to:
≥ 4in: Light brown, with a bluish tinge, compact sand. Samples taken from a soil of this type gave the following pH values:
| Depth | pH |
|---|---|
| 0–2in | 4.6 |
| 4in | 4.4 |
| 12in | 4.8 |
Most of the Dacrydium trees here are growing over morainic boulders which project up to 2 feet above the level of the surrounding ground. They accumulate from several inches to a foot of black raw humus between their roots. A sample of this humus gave a pH value of 4.3.
Where the soil is shallow over solid rock, as in the typical community, the soil water is kept near the surface and conditions again induce Dacrydium biforme scrub. Dacrydium biforme is also common on poorly drained soils in the forest zone, right down to lowland terraces where it is joined by the other Dacrydium spp. characteristic of the “pakihi” habitat.
(C.f. cupressoid-podocarp scrub, Cockayne, 1928, p. 279.)
Cliff Communities.
Under the excessively wet climate of Westland, cliffs cut in moraine and alluvium support dense vegetation. In the scrub zone, the characteristic species are Olearia arborescens, Dracophyllum longifolium, Carmichaelia grandiflora, Coprosma depressa, Phormium colensoi, Danthonia cunninghamii, and Blechnum minus.
II. Autecological Notes on Dominant Species
The following notes summarise the site requirements and features of the regeneration of the most important shrubs. Counts of growth rings form the basis for estimates of growth rate. These counts were made in the field, using a hand lens.
The results were plotted, and estimates of growth rate have been read off. These estimates are merely preliminary approximations; for the slow-growing species, they are gross over-estimates of growth rate, since microscopic examination will certainly reveal more rings than could be detected in the field.
The figures in brackets following the estimates of growth rates are the approximate heights and diameters attainable by mature plants in the scrub zone; but it must be stressed that with all the species discussed, these dimensions vary greatly according to the habitat.
1. Hoheria glabrata is dominant on recent fans, slips and talus slopes between 2,500ft and 3,500ft, but the species ranges from 1,500ft to 4,000ft. Chance seedlings occur nearly down to sea level. Newly germinated seedlings appear in profusion near parent trees, but they do not often survive the attacks of deer. J. T. Holloway (pers. com.) has noted vivipary during wet years, but it is not known whether the seedlings can become established.
The tree is deciduous, and in the summer of 1957–58 the leaves did not expand until December. I have not ascertained the time of leaf-fall, but the total growing season cannot exceed four months. Despite this, H. glabrata is one of the fastest growing subalpine shrubs and trees, as the following estimates show :
Height growth, 1.5in per year (25ft). Growth rings per inch, 36 (24in).
2. Olearia colensoi is the most abundant shrub of the scrub zone, and it occurs in all communities except Hoheria glabrata forest and the higher and more exposed Dracophyllum uniflorum scrub. On steep southerly faces low clumps of O. colensoi

occur in moist, forb-rich* grassland above the continuous scrub. The altitudinal range is about 2,000–3,800ft.
O. colensoi is relatively short lived (probably it does not exceed 60 or 100 years), but it regenerates profusely in gaps. The following growth estimates were made:
Height growth, 2.5in per year (12ft).
Growth rings per inch, 40 (4in).
3. Olearia ilicifolia grows on young soils from near sea level to 4,000ft. Scattered plants colonise fans and slips at the same time as Hoheria glabrata. and since the seedlings tolerate shading by Hoheria, it gradually increases in importance in the Hoheria forest. Due to the ready dispersal of the seeds, seedlings also colonise scattered gaps in tall scrub. They occasionally become established on sheltered tussock slopes well above the limits of continous scrub, where, in 1957, they were severely damaged by frost.
Estimates of growth rate: Height growth, 6in per year (25ft). Growth rings per inch, 14 (20in).
4. Olearia lacunosa occurs occasionally in the Hoheria low forest, and is one of the dominants of the Olearia low forest and related communities, containing Libocedus bidwillii. In Olearia colensoi scrub, it is common on northerly aspects and in a stunted form becomes abundant in communities transitional to Dracophyllum uniflorum scrub. It accompanies Dacrydium biforme only on less poorly drained sites. The seedlings occur mainly in gaps.
Estimate of growth rate:
Height growth, 1.5in per year (25ft).
Growth rings per inch, 36 (24in).
5. Dracophyllum traversii grows from 1,200ft to 3,800ft, on soils which are well drained. The seedlings, which appear to be shade-tolerant, are not common. The sparing reproduction, however, is compensated by longevity. In some places large isolated plants of D. traversii stand in grassland; it is possible that these remain from continuous scrub, the shorter-lived shrubs having died. On steep slopes groups of D. traversii occur, in which the lower prostrate parts of the trunks are connected. It remains to discover whether these groups all rise vegetatively from a single parent plant, or whether grafting between separate plants has occurred.
Estimate of growth rate:
Height growth, 0.5in per year (25ft). Growth rings per inch, 50 (16in).
Thus, a tree 12in in diameter is likely to be at least 300 years old.
6. Dracophyllum longifolium grows on all except the youngest soils. It is abundant from 2,500–3,500ft, but does extend from sea level to 4,000ft. It is slowgrowing, and the lower parts of the stems tend to be prostrate. The unbranched stem of one sapling, growing among scrub on a 40° slope, was 17ft long, and the first 6ft lay on the ground and bore adventitious roots. Such downhill layering often results in vegetative propagation. Seedlings apparently reach maturity only under full light or slight shade. The species is abundant where exposure, excessive drainage or water-logging reduce the density of the shrub canopy and so improve illummation. Thus, it is conspicuous in drier variations of Olearia colensoi scrub, in the transition between Olearia colensoi and Dracophyllum uniflorum scrub and in Dacrydium biforme scrub. It is also abundant in the mosaics of scrub and tussock which occupy gentle slopes. A stunted form occurs in Sphagnum bogs.
7. Dracophyllum uniflorum is dominant on exposed ridges and at high altitudes. The seedlings are light demanding, so that the species is excluded from the scrub
[Footnote] * Forb-a herbaceous plant which does have a grassy habit.

Fig. 1.—The basin at the head of the Toaroha River. Note the change of slope corresponding to the upper limit of the scrub. The flat at the left is occupied by tussock grassland, and the top of the terrace supports bog. Fig. 2.—The upper limits of scrub on a northern aspect at the Toaroha Saddle (3,840ft) The shrub component is almost solely Dracophyllum uniflorum. Fig. 3.—Mosaic of grass and scrub on morainic area in the top Toaroha basin. The tall shrubs are Dracophyllum longifolium (left) and Dacrydium biforme (centre)

communities which occupy less rigorous habitats, and from dense Danthonia flavescens grassland.
D. uniflorum has the strongest development of the downhill layering habit. Especially on slopes of over 30°, the branches on the downhill side become procumbent, produce adventitious roots, and eventually become separated from the parent plant. With continual layering of the downhill branches, and death of the older uphill shoots, the whole colony migrates downhill.
Estimates of growth rate:
Height growth, 0.4in per year (5ft).
Growth rings per inch, 110 (2in).
These figures suggest that colonies of D. uniflorum can be extremely old.
8. Dacrydium biforme grows on leached soils with poor drainage. The altitudinal range is sea level to 3,000ft, but in the upper Hokitika catchment there are few suitable habitats below 2,000ft. At its upper limits, D. biforme is always a low shrub with prostrate outer branches, while within the forest zone it is nearly always a tree. In an intermediate belt it occurs both as a shrub and as a tree. Plants of intermediate size and form are rare. The shrubby forms show marked downhill layering.
Estimates of growth rate:
Height growth, 0.5in per year (20ft).
Growth rings per inch, 120 (18in).
Some trees which exceed 18in diameter may prove to be well over 1,000 years old.
III Effect of Fire and Herbivorous Mammals on the Subalpine Scrub
A few small areas of scrub near tracks have been burnt. An area in the middle Toaroha, burnt 10 years ago, is a typical example. On a 35° slope Dracophyllum traversii, Olearia lacunosa and O. colensoi were co-dominant before the fire. Phormium colensoi is now the physiognomic species. Polystichum vestitum and Hypolepis millefolium are also important. There is profuse regeneration of shrubs, now 1–3ft tall. Seedlings examined had 6–7 growth rings. The most abundant seedlings are those of the light demanding Olearia ilicifolia which was probably rare or absent in the original scrub. Seedlings of Olearia colensoi are common. There are also hybrids between Olearia lacunosa and O. ilicifolia. Even where this fire extended onto a 70° slope, there is now dense vegetation dominated by Phormium colensoi.
Red deer and chamois both feed within the scrub zone, and their effects were not distinguished from each other. Though Hoheria glabrata is palatable, there does not appear to be much damage to trees in established Hoheria forest; but isolated Hoheria trees are usually badly damaged or killed through removal of bark by chewing and rubbing, and the animals are almost completely preventing regeneration and the establishment of new Hoheria communities on bared areas. The usual community of young alluvial fans and healing slips is now an open one containing Poa cockayniana, Helichrysum bellidioides, Danthonia cunninghamii and browsed, suckering Carmichaelia grandifolia; on steep slopes Hypolepis millefolium is dominant. These communities are being invaded gradually by shrubs, especially the browse-resistant Olearia ilicifolia.
In the true scrub communities the impenetrability and low palatability of most of the species discourage the deer and chamois. Therefore their activity is mostly confined to the formation of sharply defined tracks on the crests of spurs and ridges, leading from the forest to the grassland. Along these tracks, shrubs die and are not replaced. The tracks tend to enlarge into erosion channels, and such grassland species as Danthonia flavescens and Celmisia spp. enter. Away from the tracks there are surviving plants of highly palatable species, notably Nothopanax colensoi and

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| Soil Drainage | Soil Depth | Soil Age | Altitude Exposure | Shrub Species | Community |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep | Young | O. ilicifolia H. glabrata | H. glabrata low forest | ||
| Older | O. lacunosa D. traversii O. ilicifolia H. glabrata | Oleria low forest | |||
| Good | High Alt. Extreme Exp. | D. uniflorum | D. uniflorum scrub | ||
| Shallow | Exp. not extreme | O. colensoi D.longifolum O.lacunosa D. traversii | O. colensoi scrub | ||
| Poor | O. colensoi D. longifolium D. biforme | D. biforme scrub | |||
| Very Poor | D. longifolium D. biforme | Mosaic of boggy grassland and D. biforme scrub |

[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| Altitude Aspect Exposure | Soil Moisture | Shrub Species | Community |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Alt. Extreme Exp. | D. uniflorum | D. uniflorum scrub | |
| Highly Exp. Nth. aspect | O. colensoi D.longifolium D. traversii O.lacunosa D.uniflorum | O. colensoi scrub transitional towards D.uniflorum scrub | |
| Moderately Sheltered North Aspect | Relat. dry | O. colensoi D. longifolrum D. traversii O. lacunosa | Scrub on slight spurs and terrace faces, with D. longifolium rising to co-dominance or dominance. |
| Moist | O. colensoi D. longifolrum D. traversii O. lacunosa | Fullest development of O. colensoi scrub | |
| Moderately Sheltered South Aspect | Relat. dry | O.colensoi D.longifolium D. traversii. | Scrub on slight spurs of south aspect, with D. longifolium rising to co-dominanceor or dominance. |
| Moist | O. colensoi D. longifolium D. traversii | Well developed O. colensoi scrub on south aspect. | |
| High Alt. Moderately sheltered Sth. aspect | O. colensoi | Pure community of low growing O. colensoi |
Explanation of underlining in Tables I. and II.
O. colensoi—Species is dominant.
O. colensoi—Species is co-dominant.
D. longifolium—Species is important, but not dominant or co-dominant.

N. simplex. Along the margins between scrub and grassland, and in places where shrubs are scattered through grassland, less palatable species—especially Dracophyllum uniflorum— are heavily browsed in the winter.
From the point of view of the control of deer and chamois the scrub belt is important. Its position as a barrier between forest and grassland allows the animals to use the uppermost forest almost undisturbed by hunters, who work either from the valley tracks or from the grassland. This uppermost forest is severely damaged throughout the Hokitika catchment.
Hares are present, and in winter they probably make considerable use of the scrub, but their effects were not recognised.
Mature specimens of Hoheria glabrata, Olearia colensoi, O. lacunosa and O. ilicifolia growing within the forest zone are often badly defoliated and, at least sometimes, opossums are responsible. However, no serious damage to the subalpine scrub was noted, although the animals range throughout. There is an exception to this statement; on fault-shattered terrain above the Kokatahi gorge, areas of scrub have died. Opossums are notoriously thick in the forest below, and probably overpopulation has forced numbers of them into the scrub.
Discussion
1. Factors Determining the Grouping of Scrub Species
The ranges of species in the subalpine scrub are apparently determined by their tolerances in respect to several sets of factors, especially soil depth and drainage, altitude and exposure, and light avaiable to the seedlings. A community is formed by species whose tolerances overlap; the richest communities are included in the Olearia colensoi scrub, where there is most overlap (Tables 1 and 2).
There is a close connection between variations in soil and vegetation. The soils which support Hoheria glabrata forest are immature, deep, moist and well-drained. Olearia forest grows on similar, but older, soils; the richer communities, which include the very slow-growing Dracophyllum traversii among the dominant trees, and the more developed soil profiles reflect the longer occupation. Olearia colensoi scrub and Dracophyllum uniflorum scrub usually grow on sites so sleep that the shallow soils cannot develop more than rudimentary profiles, though occasionally one sees deep, brownish-yellow sub-soils which indicate greater maturity of profile. The poorly-drained soils which support Dacrydium biforme have well-developed leached or gley horisons. The fine puggy texture which impedes the drainage of some of these soils may itself be a result of advanced weathering.
It is most probable that differences in nutrient status among these soils influence the vegetation quite so much as do the physical differences. For example, the favourable physical properties of the soils which support Hoheria glabrata forest are possibly reinforced by a better nutrient status. The possibility receives some slight support from the two measurements of pH, which were 0.3 and 0.4 units higher than the highest readings from soils supporting other communities.
To a certain extent, altitude and exposure have similar effects on the vegetation. Thus, Dracophyllum uniflorum ascends highest and is also dominant on sharp ridge crests. However, Olearia colensoi is the uppermost shrub on moist southerly faces, perhaps because it can compete with dense Danthonia flavescens.
The light demands of seedlings have important bearing on regeneration and succession. Dracophyllum longifolium and D. uniflorum seedlings demand most light for their establishment, and this is in keeping with the preponderance of these species on spur and ridges. Where there is full light and suitable soil conditions, Hoheria glabrata and Olearia ilicifolia seedlings are the most rapidly growing; thus they are able to occupy their preferred sites to the initial exclusion of other shrubs

and trees. The seedlings of both species also at least survive under the canopy of Hoheria forest. Olearia lacunosa seedlings may be a little more shade-tolerant. The seedlings of Olearia colensoi, senecio elaegnifolius and Nothopanax colensoi become established freely in all but the deepest shade, but apparently they reach maturity only in gaps. Dacrydium biforme seedlings grow steadily under a fairly dense shrub canopy; in their light requirements they seem similar to most other podocarp seedlings. Dracophyllum traversii seedlings are rarely seen, but they too appear to be shade-tolerant.
2. The Transition from Subalpine Scrub to Forest
The subalpine scrub replaces forest in severe habitats where the canopies can attain heights of only 2–30ft. Taller scrub passes into low forest, where many of the stunted trees have massive gnarled trunks up to 20 inches diameter. The transition from forest to scrub taken as the upper limit of Libocedrus bidwillii occurs at 2,600–3,200ft.
Libocedrus bidwillii ascends highest on northerly aspects. In the top Toaroha basin, Libocedrus trees project through understories corresponding to Dacrydium biforme scrub and to Olearia forest. The altitudinal limit is 3,000ft in both cases, and would thus appear to be controlled by temperature; but whereas the trees grow to 30ft tall when associated with species of the Olearia forest, they are usually stunted to 10ft or 15ft when associated with Dacrydium biforme. The fact that Hoheria glabrata forest ascends as high as continuous scrub also shows that favourable soil conditions can outweigh climatic disadvantages.
3. The Transition from Subalpine Scrub to Grassland
The altitude of the transition from scrub to mountain grassland varies widely, largely according to the slope of the ground. Continuous scrub attains its highest altitudes (about 4,000ft) on steep slopes with northerly aspect, and patches of Dracophyllum uniflorum occur at 4,500 feet on rocky spurs. In the Hokitika catchment, the upper limit of the scrub frequently corresponds to the sharp change of slope between steep, lower slopes leading down to the entrenched valleys and moderate upper mountain slopes. Tussock grassland communities are favoured by moderate slopes and hollows; on valley flats they can descend to 1,200ft (at Price's Flat) and abut on lowland forest (Pl. 3, Figs. 1 and 2).
On gentle slopes, especially below 3,000ft, a remarkable savannah-like vegetation is frequent, with islands of scrub scattered through tussock grassland. Some 10 acres of such “savannah” occupy the highest, flattest part of the morainic area in the top Toaroha basin (Pl. 3, Fig. 3). There, hollows support bog communities, and in some there is accumulation of peat. Steeper ground, with slopes for example of 20°, have patches of dense scrub, predominantly comprised of Olearia colensoi and Dracophyllum longifolium, but also including Dacrydium biforeme. The remainder of the surface is occupied by a mixture of shrubs and such species of boggy grassland as the narrow-leaved form of Danthonia flavescens, Celmisia armstrongii, Schoenus pauciflorus, Carpha alpina and Oreobolus pectinatus. The shrubs, which range in age from seedlings to rotting stumps, include Dracophyllum longifolium, Archeria traversii, Dacrydium biforme, Pittosporum divaricatum, Podocarpus nivalis and Coprosma pseudocuneata, but not Olearia colensoi. The soils in this morainic area are old, and their drainage is impeded. But in the same basin, there is an extensive alluvial fan, sloping gently at about 5°. The soils here are freely-drained, coarse gravels which show little development of profile. The vegetation is again a mosaic, but one component is related to the Hoheria glabrata forest, and the other to a seral type of grassland. The main species are Hoheria glabrata, Olearia ilicifolia, Coprosma ciliata, C. rugosa, Aristotelia fruticosa, Polystichum vestitum, the form of Danthonia flavescens with conspicuous light-coloured midribs, Poa cockayniana, Phormium

colensoi, Uncinia sp., Cotula perpusilla, Helichrysum bellidioides, Muehlenbeckia axillaris and Hypolepis millefolium. Grassland gives every appearance of being the climax vegetation on this fan; the shrub component is maintained by the frequent changes of stream course. Thus, we have grassy vegetation conspicuous on two neighbouring areas within the scrub zone, which resemble each other in their gentle slopes, and contrast strongly in soil characters.
Topography, therefore, has a marked influence on the distribution of scrub and grassland, but it is uncertain how this influence is exerted. The two contrasting examples of mixed scrub and grassland indicate that soil factors are not necessarily responsible. The explanation may lie in microclimate factors, such as ponding of cold air and depth of snow.
The low timber line and the wide scrub belt contrast sharply with the conditions on the mountains in the adjacent part of Canterbury, where the timber line of Nothofagus cliffortioides reaches 4,600ft in places and subalpine scrub is poorly represented. The difference must be explained either by the absence of Nothofagus in central Westland, or by the marked differences in climate. The summer climates especially differ; in the Westland mountains the summer is cool, sunless, and the average annual rainfall probably exceeds 300 inches, whereas in the Canterbury mountains, the summer is sunny, and although the annual rainfall exceeds 50 inches, it is largely offset by the dry, warm, föhn winds.
4. Growth Rates, Habit and Regeneration
The growth rates of the dominant species, though falling over a wide range, are markedly less than the growth rates of the dominants of the forest below. In this respect, as in their low stature, they show adaptation to the rigorous climate. Hoheria glabrata and the composites comprise the faster growing species and Dacrydium biforme and the epacrids comprise the slower growing species. The former group all regenerate freely, at least where light conditions are suitable, and in the absence of browsing animals. Seedlings of the slow-growing species on the other hand are only occasionally encountered (with the exception of D. longifolium, whose seedlings may be abundant in well-lighted places). But longevity and, in Dracophyllum uniflorum, D. longifolium and Dacrydium biforme vegetative reproduction through downhill layering, appear to compensate for scarcity of seedlings.
This downhill layering is only the extreme development of a feature found in all the scrub species—i.e., the tendency for the lower part of the trunk to lie prostrate or inclined in a downhill direction. The very limited annual increment of wood in the stems may explain this tendency; and young stems growing in the shade of taller shrubs are weaker than those growing in the open. On steep slopes, the direct action of gravity in producing the prostrate habit may be reinforced by movement in the upper 12in of the soil mantle, and by weight of snow. The form of the shrubs is well adapted to the environment. The violent winds rarely cause breakage, and heavy snow can press shrubs at least 2ft tall to the ground without damaging them.
A large proportion of Libocedrus bidwillii trees near the upper forest limits are dead or dying, and saplings and young trees were not seen. But seedlings up to 3ft tall seem to be quite plentiful. A similar discontinuity within populations of Dacrydium biforme in the lower part of the scrub zone has already been described (p. 55). A. careful census of populations of these long-lived species would be worth while, for they may reveal a counterpart in our mountains of the “Little Ice Age” in Europe. In the European Alps the glaciers advanced from the end of the sixteenth century until the middle of the nineteenth century, and since then retreat has been rapid. The behaviour of the glaciers is related to climatic variations, which have also influenced the behaviour of the vegetation. For instance, markedly increased

regeneration of timber line conifers has followed the recent amelioration of climate in both the European Alps and the Finnish Arctic (see, for example, Gams 1954).
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank the personnel of the Forest and Range Experiment Station, and the students employed on the Hokitika survey, for their co-operation. I also gratefully acknowledge Mr. Bannister's careful criticism of my original draft.
References
Cheeseman, T. F., 1925. Manual of the New Zealand Flora. 2nd ed. Government Printer, Wellington.
Cockayne, L., 1928. The Vegetation of New Zealand. 2nd ed. W. Engelmann, Leipzig.
Gams, H., 1954. “La subdivision de I'étage alpin et ses variations séculaires et récentes dans les Alpes orientales.” Extract from “Etude botanique de I'étage alpin particuliérement en France,” published on the occasion of the 8th International Botanical Congress by the Scientific Committee of the French Alpine Club and the Executive Committee of the Congress.
Zotov. V. D., 1939. An outline of the Vegetation and Flora of the Tararua Mountains. Trans. N.Z. Inst., Vol. 68.
P. Wardle
, M.Sc., Ph.D.,New Zealand Forest Service,
Forest and Range Experiment Station,
Ashley Forest,
P.B., Rangiora.

An Interpretation of the Senecio lautus Complex in New Zealand
[Received by Editor, March 4, 1959.]
The Senecio lautus complex in New Zealand has been the object of various taxonomic interpretations by several authors dealing with the group. On the basis of experimental and morphological studies a considerable realignment of taxonomic boundaries in this group has been made. The complex is interpreted as consisting of five species: Senecio lautus Sol. ex Willd., of mainland New Zealand and the Chatham Islands; S. sterquilinus Ornduff, endemic to bird nesting grounds on some small New Zealand coastal islands, S. radiolatus F. Muell., endemic to the Chatham Islands; S. antipodus T. Kirk, endemic to Antipodes Island, and S. glaucophyllus Cheesem. of mainland New Zealand. Infraspecific taxa are recognised in Senecio lautus and S. glaucophyllus. Artificial hybridisations have shown that, with the exception of the hybrid between S. lautus and S. sterquilinus, the species are isolated by internal barriers to gene exchange; the subspecies within a species are rather highly interfertile. Conclusions in this paper are based upon studies of the breeding systems of the species in the complex, greenhouse and field studies of living plants, interspecific and intraspecific hybridisations, chromosome numbers, and examination of herbarium specimens. The name Senecio lautus is not considered applicable to any Australian plants, all of which are morphologically, genetically, and geographically distinct from any Senecio found in New Zealand.
Introduction
This study was inspired by the late Dr. H. H. Allan, who remarked that a study of the variation pattern in the coastal forms of Senecio lautus (Compositae: Senecioneae) would be a valuable contribution toward the knowledge of the flora of New Zealand. A preliminary survey of the available herbarium specimens of the three varieties then recognised in the species by Cheeseman (1925) indicated that the taxon was one which was badly in need of taxonomic revision. Until the “species” was better understood taxonomically an investigation of the relationship between variation in the coastal form and environment would have been difficult, since it was suspected that more than one species were involved under one specific name. The main purpose of this paper, therefore, is to present a taxonomic interpretation of this group of Senecio species. For reasons which will be clear later, the study was expanded to include two additional previously described species, Senecio radiolatus F. Muell. and S. glaucophyllus Cheesem. Although Senecio antipodus T. Kirk is considered a member of this complex it has not been considered in any detail because of the lack of adequate material of it.
The experimental approach to taxonomy is well enough known that there is no need to detail its background, aims, or methods. In the last 40 years new terms have been coined to describe the ecological and genetical interrelationships of plant populations. While many of these new concepts and terms have proved useful to taxonomists, the terminology has not been included in the formal nomenclature. In many instances experimentalists have attempted to superimpose the new concepts or the new terms upon the formal nomenclature. The extent to which this can or should be done is a bone of contention among taxonomists. This is not the proper place to review the controversy, but it does seem desirable to state the principles and bases used in formulating the taxonomic treatment presented here.

The results of morphological studies are the main basis for the taxonomic treatment herein, but much useful comparative data have come from field studies, garden cultures, distribution patterns, artificial hybridisations, and chromosome counts. The term species when used here refers to a population system which is internally homogeneous with respect to most of the properties of its members and is separated from other related groups by discontinuities in morphology. These discontinuities have been shown to be the result of some genetic, geographical, and/or ecological barriers to any large-scale gene exchange. The term subspecies refers to two or more regional facies of a species which possess relatively minor distinguishing features; the term variety is not used. The foregoing statements refer to the taxonomic structure, which has seemed to be the most practical and useful method of handling the rather complex pattern of variation exhibited by this group of Senecio species.
Since the four species discussed in this paper have, at one time or another, been considered synonymous, the term “species complex” is used in this historical sense and does not cannote the meaning of a group of closely related species. The treatment of this group of species was evolved as a result of the analysis and integration of a number of lines of evidence. It was necessary to examine all the available herbarium material of members of the complex and of related species, to collect living materail, to observe populations in the field, to review pertinent literature, and to conduct breeding experiments and cytological investigations. Using these methods, it has been possible to construct a reasonably workable taxonomic framework into which the majority of the specimens of the complex fit and which seems to reflect natural relationships more adequately than have the previous taxonomic treatments of the group.
Acknowledgments
It is a pleasure to take this opportunity to thank Professor H. D. Gordon and the faculties of the Botany and Zoology Departments at Victoria University of Wellington for their hospitality during my stay in New Zealand. Special thanks are due the late H. H. Allan, G. T. S. Baylis, T. Carrick Chambers, John W. Dawson, A. P. Druce, N. L. Elder, C. Leo Hitchcock, M. D. King, George Mason, Lucy B. Moore, Mrs. P. R. Woodhouse, Sheila Natusch, Graham Pritchard, Graeme Ramsay, Ross G. Robbins, G. M. Schulze, Margaret Simpson and Colwyn Trevarthen, who have contributed in various ways to the completion of this work. I. would also like to thank the staffs of the herbaria for extending the use of their facilities and making loans during the course of the project. I. am deeply indebted to A. R. Kruckeberg, of the University of Washington, for his valuable advice on many of the problems which arose from time to time. Finally, I. gratefully acknowlege the generous financial support of the United States Educational Foundation in New Zealand.
Key to the Taxa of the Senecio lautus Complex
The roman numerals preceding the names of the taxa in the key refer to the sequence of the discussions of the taxa in the systematic section.
(1) Plants annual or short-lived perennials, mainly coastal; leaves usually pinnatifid (2).
(1) Plants perennial, usually not coastal, but if so (on the eastern coast of the South Island) then the leaves usually merely serrate, or if pinnatifid then the heads borne in corymbs (5).
(2) Leaves membranous, 5–18 cm long, pinnatifid with broad lobes and broadly winged petioles; herbage arachnid-tomentose when young; Chatham Islands.

III. Senecio radiolatus
(2) Leaves usually somewhat fleshy and otherwise not as above (3).
(3) Heads large, the disk 1.5–2 cm in diameter; leaves to 10 cm long, pinnatifid; habitat the nesting grounds of sea-birds on offshore islands.
II. Senecio sterquilinus
(3) Heads smaller, the disk well under 1.3 cm in diameter; leaves merely serrate, but if deeply pinnatifid then under 6.5 cm long and habitat not as above (4).
(4) Plants fleshy and very succulent, low, sparingly branched; the leaves entire or pinnatifid with broad lobes, the leaf margins revolute; internodes shortened and the leaves subopposite or whorled at least below; ray florets recurved, the ligules under 4 mm long.
Ib. Senecio lautus ssp. carnosulus
(4) Plants fleshy, but not succulent; low or erect much-branched plants, the leaves usually pinnatifid at least above, the leaf margins not revolute; ray florets with ligules usually over 4 mm long and not revolute.
Ia. Senecio lautus ssp. lautus
(5) Ligules absent; plants of screen of the North and South Island mountains.
IVd. Senecio glaucophyllus ssp. discoideus
(5) Ligules present; plants of more stable ground (6).
(6) Stems erect, branched from the base but usually simple above; leaves pinnatifid; heads usually borne in corymbs.
IVc. Senecio glaucophyllus ssp. raoulii
(6) Stems erect or decumbent, but leaves not deeply pinnatifid (7)
(7) Stems erect, branched at the base but usually quite simple above; leaves serrate; heads borne in corymbs; plants of higher altitudes in the northern South Island.
IVa. Senecio glaucophyllus ssp. glaucophyllus
(7) Stems erect or decumbent, simple or more often freely branched above; leaves serrate or incised; heads borne loosely; plants of coastal areas in the eastern South Island.
IVb. Senecio glaucophyllus ssp. basinudus
Herbarium Studies
The following herbaria were visited or furnished loans of material of the species in the Senecio lautus complex; abbreviations which are used in the text and specimen citations are those suggested by Lanjouw and Stafleu (1956). The abbreviation marked with an asterisk is not listed by them and is original. Since many New Zealand collectors do not use collection numbers, the citations of representative herbarium specimens which follow the discussion of each taxon are transcriptions from the labels on the specimens. If duplicates are present in other herbaria these transcriptions should facilitate their identification. Specimens cited in the text are not listed again in the sections listing representative specimens.
-
Auckland Institute and Museum, Auckland (AK).
-
Bernice Bishop Museum, Honolulu (BISH).
-
Botany Division, DSIR, Christchurch (CHR).
-
Canterbury Museum, Christchurch (CANTY).
-
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (K).
-
British Museum, Natural History (BM).
-
National Herbarium of Victoria, South Yarra (MEL).
-
Museum of Natural History, Paris (P).

-
Otago University, Dunedin (OTU).*
-
Dominion Museum, Wellington (WELT).
Systematic Treatment
-
Ia. Senecio lautus Solander ex Willd. Sp. Pl. 3: 1981. 1804. (ssp. lautus).
-
S. lautus Sol. Prim. Fl. N.Z., unpublished MS., after 1771.
-
S. lautus Forst. Fl. Ins. Austral. Prodr. 1786. nomen nudum.
-
?S. angustifolius Forst. (non L.) Fl. Ins. Austral. Prodr. 1786. nomen nudum.
-
S. neglectus A. Rich. Essai Fl. Nouv.-Zel. 258. 1832.
-
S. australis var. β unidentatus DC. Prodr. 6: 374. 1837. (Cited for N.Z. and Tasmania)
-
pro parte.
-
S. lautus var. α lautus Hook. f. Fl. Nov.-Zel. 2 (1): 145. 1853. pro parte.
-
S. lautus var. α Cheesem. Man. N.Z. Fl. 373. 1906 (including carnosulus).
A varible, much branched glabrous to villous annual or short-lived perennial herb; the prostrate to ascending branches 15–35 cm long, leafy throughout, the stems often purplishpigmented; lower leaves lance-ovate in outline, entire to sparingly toothed, petiolate, often withering early; middle cauline leaves 3–6.5 cm long, lance-ovate to oblong in outline, deeply once-pinnatifid, the principal lateral lobes remote, narrowly oblanceolate or linear, these lobes frequently entire or sparingly toothed, the lamina in the sinuses between the lobes usually entire; terminal lobe usually larger than the lateral lobes; upper leaves reduced, sessile, with a lacerate or nearly entire auriculate clasping base; heads cylindric, borne loosely at the ends of branches throughout the plant; involucre 4.5–5.5 (7) mm high, the bracts numbering 11–13, villous at the often black tips; disk 5–10 mm in diameter; the ligules about 13, yellow, narrowly elliptic-oblong (3.5) 5–7 (9) mm long, rarely shortened and barely exceeding the involucre, 1.3–2 (2.7) mm wide; cypselas 2.5–3 mm long, grooved, strigose overall or merely in the grooves; n=20. Fig. 2.
Senecio lautus had had an exceedingly confused nomenclatural history. This confusion stems from several sources, including application of the name to many Australian texa, application of the name to other New Zealand species, and bibliographic and historical erros. The synonymy is difficult to work out since many of the early collectors were not careful in their notations on specimens. Original material of all the names listed in the synonymy has been seen with the exception of the De Candolle specimen.
The type specimen of the species is No. 15757 in Willdenow's herbarium preserved at Berlin-Dahlem; isotypes are at Kew and the British Museum (Natural History). In his cursory description of the species Willdenow (1804) cited only the Forsters' specimens and indicated the range of the species as simply New Zealand. Photographs of the Willdenow types of both Senecio lautus and S. australis were furnished through the kindness of Dr. G. M. Schulze of Berlin-Dahlem. The photograph of the fragment of Senecio australis leads to the conclusion that this name should probably not be considered synonymous with S. lautus since there is little resemblance between the two specimens. Schulze wrote that these specimens had been given Willdenow by Sprengel; according to Merrill (1954) Sprengel's specimens were originally from the Forster collections. Thus the lineage would appear to be quite clear. However, in 1826 Sprengel listed Senecio lautus and followed his short descriptive paragraph with the obscure statement “Falsum habet Willd.”. Since this remark applies to the holotype it could have considerable importance were its significance known. At the present time an acceptance of the Forster specimen as valid would seem to be the wisest course to follow. Duplicates of this collection are at Kew and the British Museum (Natural History) and closely resemble the Willdenow specimen.
The type locality is unknown, but the ships carrying J. and G. Forster anchored at Dusky Bay for some weeks and in Queen Charlotte Sound on three occasions Since the type collection was made just as the plants were coming into flower, it is likely that the collection was made by the Forsters on their second (November) visit to the Sound.

The typical subspecies of Senecio lautus occurs on cliffs, rocks, or sand dunes of the coastal areas of the North Island and probably in similar habitats along the northern and eastern portions of the South Island coast. It has also been collected from the Chartham Islands. Plants may occur as scattered individuals or in colonies of several dozen individuals. In flower September to June.
The precise limits of the distribution of Senecio lautus ssp. lautus are difficult to determine. In addition to the areas mentioned above, it has been reported from Stewart Island and vicinity by Cockayne (1909) and Poppelwell (1912; 1916; 1918). Since there are no specimens in New Zealand herbaria confirming these observations it is not known whether these reports refer to Senecio lautus or to one of the subspecies of S. glaucophyllus formerly considered as S. lautus. The species has not been reported or collected on the subantractic islands (Hamilton, 1895; Chilton, 1909; Oliver and Sorensen, 1951). It has not been recorded from Lord Howe Island (Oliver, 1917) and the one Mueller specimen so labelled in the British Museum (Natural History) is an erechtitoid Senecio. Laing (1915) reported that he “got a form of this (Senecio lautus) on the beach near the Cascades” on Norfolk Island. His specimen has not been seen, but another collection from this Island (seen at the National Herbarium of New South Wales, Sydney) appeared to be closer to the Australian taxa formerly included in Senecio lautus. Cheeseman (1888) was doubtful about the specimens he saw on Macauley Island in the Kermadecs, nothing that “only a few specimens (were) seen, and these so young that the identity is doubtful”. Oliver (1909) reported the species from French Rock in this island group, but his specimen (WELT) is so badly damaged by insects that it cannot be identified with certainty.
Senecio lautus ssp. lautus is exceedingly variable throughout its range. This variability is due to the presence of a large number of biotypes within the populations as well as to the phenotypic plasticity of the various biotypes. Plants grown in the greenhouses at Wellington and Seattle showed both intrapopulational and interpopulational variation with respect to ligule length, head size, amount of pubescence, branching habit, stem pigmentation, and pattern of leaf dissection. Generally, the populations of this subspecies are more homogeneous in the northern portion of the North Island than they are in the southern half, particularly along the coast of Wellington province. In addition, the northern plants (and those from Nelson province) have a finer texture, smaller leaves, and smaller heads than the Wellington plants.
Representative Herbarium Specimens. North Island: North East Island, Three Kings, J. F. Buddle, 31/12/54 (AK 24111); Awanui Heads, North Auckland, H. B. Matthews, 1934 (AK 35383); Bream Trail, North Auckland, Hutson 26/11/48 (CHR 82601); Rangitoto Island (CHR 8222); Gannet Rock, Hauraki Gulf, B. E. G. Molesworth, 10/11/47 (AK 35379); Whale Bay, Raglan, P. Hynes 21/10/51 (AK 28049); New Harbour, Napier, W. R. B. Oliver, 27 Oct. 32 (WELT); East Cape, New Zealand, Dr. Sinclair (K); Tolaga Bay, Banks and Solander (BM); Base of Mt. Egmont, Dieffenbach (K); Mt. Egmont, manuka scrub, H. H. Allan 2/9/27 (CHR 10305); Rapanui, Wanganui, 7/3/1937 (CHR 18276); Lepperton, Taranaki (CHR 475); Terawhiti, Dec. '06 (WELT); Kapiti, manuka scrub, H. H. Allan, 2/9/27 (CHR 10304); near Paekakariki, V. D. Zotov, 21/11/44 (CHR 85773); Day's Bay, H. H. Allan (CHR 85770); Muritai, Wellington, L. B. Moore, 7/12/49 (CHR 67643). South Island: Naomi Island, Kenepuru Sound (CHR 83767); Paponga, Farewell Spit, J. A. Petterson, 13/11/54 (CHR 77891); Akaroa, T. Kirk, 10/1/76 (Canty). Chatham Islands: Chatham Islands, W. Travers (WELT, MEL); Te Whanga Lagoon, Chatham Island, J. F. Findlay, Jan., 1955 (CHR 87403).

Ib. Senecio lautus ssp. carnosulus (T. Kirk) Ornduff hoc loc.
S. lautus var. carnosulus T. Kirk Students' Fl. N.Z. 341. 1899.
S. lautus var. a Cheesem. Man. N.Z. Fl. 373. 1906 (with ssp. lautus).
A stout-stemmed, fleshy, succulent annual or biennial herb; leaves thick, entire, or with a few broad, entire, lateral lobes, the leaf margins revolute; internodes shortened so that the lower leaves appear subopposite or whorled; heads obconic or cylindrical; the ligules 8–15, 3–4 mm long, recurved, often widely and irregulary, spaced; cypselas frequently sericeous; n=20. Fig. 8a, 8b.
There are no herbarium specimens extant labelled by Kirk as Senecio lautus var. carnosulus so far as can be determined. The neotype selected is a greenhouse grown plant from fruits collected by G. T. S. Baylis at sea level, Black Head, Dunedin, on January 1, 1956. His commentary on the wild plants was that they were “compact much-branched forms growing in rather argillaceous soil along the cliff base”. The neotype has been sent to the herbarium of the Botany Division, D.S.I.R.
This subspecies is known definitely from only two South Island localities which are at the southern edge of the range of Senecio lautus ssp. lautus. These localities are: Punakaiki Beach and the environs of Dunedin. However, it would be expected to occur more or less sporadically throughout the range of ssp. lautus, particularly in regions with saline soils or in areas exposed to strong oceanic winds In flower October to January.
This maritime ecotype is similar in its morphological characteristics to the coastal ecotypes of Achillea borealis noted by Clausen, Keck and Hiesey (1948). The taxonomic recognition of Senecio lautus ssp. carnosulus is complicated by the fact that some segments of genetically “good” ssp. lautus when growing under maritime conditions will produce ecads which are similar in their form to ssp. carnosulus. When these forms are brought into the greenhouse or are grown as progeny from collected fruits, the plants which develop are indistinguishable from the inland ecotypes of Senecio lautus which occur in the same region. On the basis of studies made to date there is no sure method of distinguishing true ssp. carnosulus from the “mimic” plants of ssp. lautus. However, the fact that this confusion can exist is not a sufficient reason for denying taxonomic recognition of ssp. carnosulus. It is probable that ssp. carnosulus is actually more common than herbarium collections indicate, since its compact and succulent nature make it a rather unattractive plant to collect and dry.
At least one collection (Seatoun, Wellington) showed characteristics intermediate between the two subspecies when grown in the greenhouse at Victoria University.
Representative Herbarium Specimens. South Island: Punakaiki, between Westport and Greymouth, 15/1/27, W. Mackay (CHR 60309); Punakaiki Beach, early Jan., 1953, I. W. Davey (CHR 81981); Foot of Black Head, Oct. 21, 1925, Marie C. Neal 332 (BISH); Dunedin, Lawyer's Head, Oct. 21, 1925, Marie Neal (BISH).
II. Senecio sterquilinus Ornduff nom. nov., hoc loc.
Senecio lautus var. γ macrocephalus Hook. f. Fl. Nov.-Zel. 1853.
A coarse, fleshy, thickly pubescent short-lived perennial herb; similar to Senecio lautus in aspect, but the central stem stout, erect, up to 90 cm tall; often a few secondary branches from near the base, but these branches less well developed; leafy throughout, the middle cauline leaves thick, to 10 cm long, with revolute margins, pinnatifid, with up to 10 lateral lobes, these often oblique to the midrib; upper leaves reduced, sessile, with an auriculate clasping base; heads large, the involucre 8 mm high, the bracts numbering 15 (21); disk 1.5–2 cm in diameter; ray florets (15) 21, yellow; ligules narrowly elliptic-oblong, 7 mm long and 3 mm wide; cypselas 3 mm long, strigose, becoming gelatinous when wet; n=20. Fig. 3.
The only specimens in Hooker's possession marked Senecio lautus var. γ macrocephalus are three fragments at Kew collected by Colenso under his number 268 (Sheet 5/H1232/55). A. search of the Hooker-Colenso correspondence by the Kew staff members revealed the following comments by Colenso regarding this collection:

“?Senecio, from an Islet in the Harbour, with a very large globular receptacle and involucrum”, dated 1846. According to N. L. Elder, Colenso was then living at the Waitangi Mission station in Hawke's Bay; this suggests that the islet is one of those in the inner harbour at Napier. Specimen No. 4 on the Kew sheet mentioned is here selected as the lectotype for this species. The specific epithet “macrocephalus” cannot be used since it has already been given at least twice to other Senecio species.
This species is known only from the sea-bird nesting grounds on Brothers Islands and the type locality. The only collections since that of Colenso were made on the main Brothers by an unidentified collector (WELT), by William Dawbin (WELT), and by me. However, Dawson (1954), noted that on Stephens Island “bird burrows are common between the tussocks, and large plants of Senecio lautus are numerous and widesperead”. Furthermore, Dawbin (1955 in litt.) reported that on Trio Island “there was a form resembling that at the Brothers at least in general appearance, large size, and thickness of leaves”. In light of these remarks, it is probable that Senecio sterquilinus does occur on islands in Cook Strait other than the Brothers group. Collections from these islands would be highly desirable.
Through the courtesy of the Marine Department, Wellington, it was possible for me to visit the Brothers Islands in October, 1954, in order to observe this species in the field. The main island constitutes only a few acres in area, rises sharply from the sea, and is densely populated by burrowing petrels. The accumulation of faeces from these birds has resulted in an odorous, friable soil which is presumably very high in levels of phosphate and nitrate.
Senecio sterquilinus was abundant around the bird burrows and formed dense stands on the more sheltered portions of the island. In exposed spots dwarfed plants were seen, but even these plants retained the distinctive features of this species. This guano endemism is reminiscent of that in Senecio antipodus T. Kirk reported by Cockayne (1904).
It would be reasonable to assume that the coarseness and large size of Senecio sterquilinus are the results of the high soil fertility of its habitat. However, greenhouse grown progenies from the Brothers retained most of the features of their wild progenitors. These plants, grown in ordinary greenhouse soil, grew to the same average height of their parents and had their same large heads and number of fioral parts.
Representative Herbarium Specimens. Brothers Island, Dawbin (CHR 71821a, b); Brothers Island, Cook Strait (WELT).
III. Senecio radiolatus F. Muell. Veg. Chatham Is. 25, Pl. IV. 1864.
Included in S. lautus by Hooker, Handb. N.Z. Fl, 724. 1864.
S. lautus var. radiolatus J. Buch. Trans. and Proc. N.Z. Inst. 7: 333. 1875. As to name but not as to material cited.
S. lautus var. radiolatus T. Kirk Students' Fl. N.Z. 1899.
A simple or strongly branched short-lived perennial herb with fibrous roots; stem stout, (13) 20–45 (90) cm tall, usually erect, grooved, leafy throughout, and often purplish in the lower portion; lowest leaves with a long, narrowly winged petiole, often withering early; middle cauline leaves broadly ovate in outline, 2.5–12 cm wide, 5–18 cm long, abruptly narrowed below the middle to a broadly winged, entire to toothed petiole; distal portion of the blade of the middle cauline leaves pinnately parted to nearly flabellate, the divisions agian lobed, and these lobes acutely toothed, midrib prominent; upper leaves sessile, auriculate-clasping, somewhat reduced, the proximal portion pinnately parted or merely lobed, the ultimate teeth mucronate or acute; herbage arachnid-tomentose when young, becoming subglabrate with age; inflorescence terminal on the branches, corymbose-paniculate, the numerous heads cylindric-urceolate when fresh, pressing to campanulate; involucre 6–9 mm high, the bracts linear, usually 14 or 21; disk 5–10 mm in diameter; ray florets numbering 10–14, often irregularly and widely spaced, the yellow, oblong or linear ligules 3–6 mm long, 1–1.5 mm wide; disk florets yellow; pappus white, copious, equalling or exceeding the corolla; cypselas 2.5–4 mm long, strigose overall or merely in the grooves; n = 40. Fig. 1.

The holotype of Senecio radiolatus is Travers No. 5, “Chatham Island, November. On sandy places at sea beach above level of the sea. “It is in the National Herbarium of Victoria, South Yarra.
This species is endemic to the Chatham Islands, where it is apparently limited to sandy sea beaches, flat rocks, or rocky creivces near the sea (fide Cockayne, 1902; 1921). In flower November to February.
Senecio radiolatus has been collected only a few times; the early collections, including the type, consist of the upper portions of flowering plants. Various authors have considered S. radiolatus synonymous with or a variety of S. lautus. In his description of the species, Mueller (1864) allied it to Senecio latiflius (S. solanderi Allan) and S. banksii, or even the European S. vulgaris “should it prove annual”.
Examination of living plants in the greenhouse and of available herbarium specimens suggests that the relationship of Senecio radiolatus to any of the above species is remote. It is here proposed that its closest alliance is with Senecio antipodus T. Kirk, an endemic of the heavily bird-manured soils of Antipodes Island. These two species are similar in many respects: they are both much-branched herbs with large leaves, the distal portions of which are expanded and pinnatifid, the petioles of which are broadly winged; they both have a conspicuous cobwebby tomentum and prominently veined leaves, and they are both endemics of islands a considerable distance from the main islands of New Zealand.
The few collections of Senecio radiolatus in herbaria show that it is morphologically a rather uniform species.
Representative Herbarium Specimens. Chatham Islands, Cox (WELT); N. coast of Chatham Is., L. Cockayne, Feb., 1901 (WELT, Canty); Chatham Island, Travers 79 (MEL); Chatham Island, J. F. Findlay, January, 1955 (CHR 87402).
IV. Senecio glaucophyllus Cheesem.
This species is comprised of at least four geographical races which are recognised as subspecies. Most of the members of this species are easily fitted into their respective taxonomic niches, but there is a great amount of variation within the subspecies. In Marlborough plants with an admixture of characteristics used to distinguish three of the subspecies occur. Individulas from some localities are not readily assignable to any of the subspecies and will have to be identified arbitrarily. Moreover, on the seaward side of the range of Senecio glaucophyllus ssp. discoideus intermediates between this subspecies and presumably ssp. basinudus or ssp. raoulii are found. These plants have ligulate outer florets and occupy stable ground.
Severe disturbances of the natural vegetation of New Zealand have occurred since European settlement, particularly in the South Island. Fire, rabbit infestations, over-grazing, and the introduction of foreign plants and animals have resulted in profound changes in the biotic balance. Many plant species have nearly been eliminated; some plant associations have been destroyed and new ones formed. It is quite possible, therefore, that the high degree of variation within and between the South Island populations of Senecio glaucophyllus is the result of the breakdown of ecological barriers formerly separating the distinct regional populations of the species and/or the opening up of large unforested tracts for rapid colonisation by the plants.
IVa. Senecio glaucophyllus Cheesem. Trans. and Proc. N.Z. Inst. 28: 536. 1896. (ssp. glaucophyllus)
S. lautus var. montanus Cheesem. Man. N.Z. Fl. 1906. pro parte.
An erect, perennial herb, branched from the base but sparingly so above, the stems 15–60 cm tall, the aerial portions of the plant dying back in the winter and the next season's growth arising from basally clustered shoots; herbage glabrous and often somewhat glaucous; lower leaves 2 or more cm long, oblanceolate to obovate, obtuse or acute, sinuate-dentate to serrate,

Fig. 5—S. glaucophyllus ssp. glaucophyllus (immature topotype, Mt. Arthur), Fig. 6—S. glaucophyllus ssp. basinudus (holotype, near Lake Ellesmere), Fig. 7—S. glaucophyllus ssp. discoideus (Blue Cliffs Station near, St. Andrews). Scale marked in dm Photographs by the Still Photo Unit, University of Washington.

tapering to a short petiole; middle cauline leaves similar in outline to the lower, up to 9 cm long, narrowing to a broad petiole or a clasping base; upper leaves often somewhat reduced and narrower, the uppermost clasping by an entire or lacerate auriculate base; heads campanulate, borne in a terminal corymb; disk 5–8 mm in diameter; heads radiate, the yellow ligules numbering 13–15, ovate or oblong, 2–6 mm long, 2–2.5 mm wide; involucral bracts linear, about 5 mm long; cypselas about 3 mm long, scabrid in the grooves. Fig. 5.
Specimen A. on sheet 10601 (AK) collected by Cheeseman on Mt. Arthur, Nelson, at an altitude of 4,000 feet, January, 1886, is here selected as the lectotype for Senecio glaucophyllus.
The nomenclatorially typical subspecies of Senecio glaucophyllus occurs in the crevices of limestone rocks at altitudes of 2,000–4,000 feet in the Tasman mountains, the eastern section of the Lyell range, and possibly the Richmond range. Flowers December and January.
Representative Herbarium Specimens. South Island: Gouland Downs, January, 1927, A. Wall (Canty); Gordon's Mountain, Nelson, alt. 3,000ft, January, 1882, TFC (AK 10590); Mt. Arthur, Nelson, 4,000ft, W. Townson (AK 10589); Mt. Arthur, Nelson, F. G. Gibbs (AK 10595); Mt. Arthur, J. Adams (AK 15762); Mt. Arthur, 3,800ft, January, 1933, Alfred Meebold, 17594 (BISH); Mt. Pat., Herb. F. G. Gibbs (CHR 582).
IVb. Senecio glaucophyllus ssp. basinudus Ornduff ssp. nov., hoc loc., a ssp. glaucophyllo differt absente caulium brevium ad basum per hiemem; caulis remosus supra.
Similar to ssp. glaucophyllus in many respects; erect or prostrate herb, usually rather freely branched above, the aerial portions of the plant not dying back to the ground in the winter and hence the basally clustered shoots absent; heads borne rather loosely, not in terminal corymbs; measurements of the capitula as in ssp. glaucophyllus but the ligules of the ray florets from nearly absent to 3.5 mm long; n=50. Fig. 6.
The type collection of this subspecies consists of plants collected by J. W. Dawson in July, 1954, on a road-cut of the Christchurch-Akaroa road at a point just northeast of the tip of Lake Ellesmere. The holotype has been deposited in the herbarium of the Botany Division, D.S.I.R.
This subspecies is found on dunes and cliffs along the coast from Lyttelton Hills southward to at least Dunedin; also collected at Cape Campbell. In flower october to March.
Most of the herbarium material of Senecio glaucophyllus ssp. glaucophyllus has been collected at Mt. Arthur and is morphologically rather uniform. On the other hand, the few collection of ssp. basinudus show that it is a variable entity in the field.
These two subspecies of Senecio glaucophyllus are superficially similar, but there is a good basis for recognizing them both: ssp. glaucophyllus occupies a montane habitat, ssp. basinudus is littoral; the former is erect and branched only from the base, the latter is erect or decumbent and freely branched above; the former bears its heads in a loose corymb, the latter in a loose panicle; the former dies to the ground during the winter and renews its growth the next season from basally clustered shoots, while the latter does not do this. These differences remain constant when plants are grown in the greenhouse and are considered of sufficient magnitude to justify the recognition of two subspecific taxa.
Representative Herbarium Specimens. South Island: Cape Campbell, L. B. Moore (CHR 85767); Port Hills, Christchurch, H. H. Allan, 19/12/40 (CHR 83768); Lyttelton Hills, H. H. Allan, 23/10/47 (CHR 83769); Oamaru, sea coast cliffs, H. H. Allan, Jan. 1929 (CHR 969); head of Dunedin Harbour, foot of

hill, in sand, Marie C. Neal 333, Jan. 2, 1926 (BISH); Allans Beach, Dunedin, G. T. S. Baylis, 2/1/1956 (OTU 003593); Catlin's River, Clutha Co., D. Petrie, March, 1891 (WELT).
IVc. Senecio glaucophyllus ssp. raoulii (Hook. f.) Ornduff comb. nov., hoc loc.
Senecio lautus var. β Raouli Hook. f. Fl. Nov.-Zel. 1853 pro parte. Senecio lautus var. montanus Cheesem. Man. N.Z. Fl. 1906. pro parte.
A perennial herb (19) 25–40 (60) cm tall, branched from the base but usually simple above, the aerial portions of the plant dying back in winter and the next season's growth arising from basally clustered shoots; herbage glabrous or very sparsely pubescent when young, especially in the leaf axils; stems erect, often purplish below, leafy throughout, the leaves ascending and gradually reduced upwards; lower leaves 2–5.5 (8) cm long, often purplish beneath, the oblanceolate shallowly toothed blades narrowing to a long petiole; middle cauline leaves somewhat ascending, lanceolate-elliptic in outline, deeply pinnatifid, the lobes usually serrulate and somewhat remote, the blade of the sinuses between the lobes usually serrate; these leaves lacerate-clasping at the base; upper leaves much reduced and bract-like below the inflorescence; heads small, numerous, usually borne in a rather dense corymbiform panicle; involucre about 5 mm high, the linear bracts numbering about 13; ray florets yellow, the ligules broadly elliptic, 2–4 (5.5) mm long, 1.5–2 (2.5) mm wide; cypselas 2.8–3 mm long, pubescent in the grooves; n=50. Fig. 4.
Specimen No. 4 on Kew sheet 3-H1232/55 (Colenso No. 85) is here selected as the lectotype for this subspecies. The Hooker-Colenso correspondence at Kew revealed that this collection was made “near the summit of barren and lofty hills. These hills were composed chiefly of pumice and ashes.” The collection was made on January 5, 1842, while Colenso was on a journey between Waikare and Ruatahuna. Hooker labelled several of his specimens as “var. β Raoult” and all of them correspond to the present concept of ssp. raoulii. This specimen was collected at Akaroa by Raoul and is an erechtitoid Senecio. With this exception, all of Hooker's specimens were supplied by Colenso and appear to be North Island collections.
This subspecies occurs on rocky cliffs, amongst the tussock, or “as a shingle plant in most of the main river valleys” (N. L. Elder in litt.) at an altitude of 1,500–4,800 feet in the mountains just east of Lake Taupo, in the Kaimanawas, Ruahines, Huiaraus, and probably other ranges of the North Island volcanic plateau. In the South Island it has been collected in Marlborough and extreme northern Canterbury, and presumably occupies similar habitats there, except that it apparently descends to lower altitudes than in the North Island. In flower November to May.
This subspecies appears to be relatively uniform in the North Island, but as mentioned earlier, it appears to merge with other subspecies on the periphery of its South Island range. The South Island collections are characterised by a lesser amount of leaf serration and by the more remote nature of the leaf lobes than the North Island plants, but these differences are not considered to be of taxonomic significance.
Representative Herbarium Specimens. North Island: N.W. Ruahines, Mangaohane Station, Jan. 1946, A. P. Druce (CHR); Moawhango R., 12/3/53, Druce and Hamlin (CHR 79505); East of Taupo, ca. 2,000ft, J. W. Allison, 18/11/34 (CHR 17696); Mt. Tauhara, Taupo, alt. 3,000ft, TFC, Jan., 1889 (AK 10593); on scrub burn, Waiouru, 1931–32, T. E. Attwood (AK 35235); Ruahine Range, early Jan., 1914, B. C. Aston (WELT, 1910); Lake Taupo, Nov., 1897, D. Petrie (WELT, Canty); Waiouru Plain, 3,350ft, Jan., 1911 (WELT); Kaimanawas, 12/14 (WELT). South Island: Ure Gorge, shaded limestone cliffs, Geo. Simpson (CHR 18939); Ward Pass, Archeron River side, H. H. Allan, 2/4/1945 (CHR 51285); Molesworth Hill, H. H. Allan, 30/3/1945 (CHR 51274); Mt. Highfield block, Waiau, L. B. Moore, 5/5/48 (CHR 62619); Waipara, river bed near township, H. H. Allan, 28/1/41 (CHR 85772); Boundary Creek,

limestone rocks, H. H. Allan, 5/1/29 (CHR 10187); Puki Puki R., Kaikoura Mts., Dec., '29, A. Wall (Canty); Hanmer, open places, 3,000ft, H. H. Travers, March, 1909 (P).
IVd. Senecio glaucophyllus ssp. discoideus (Cheesem.) Ornduff comb. nov., hoc loc. Included in S. lautus var. α lautus by Hook. f. Fl. Nov.-Zel. 1853. S. lautus var. discoideus Cheesem. Man. N.Z. Fl., 1906.
Low perennial herb, the stems arising from what appears to be a rootstock but is the main stem of the previous years covered by unstable scree; stems 9–15 (25) cm tall, erect or more often lax, simple, or branched from the base; herbage glabrous or seldom sparsely pubescent when young; stem leafy throughtout, the leaves gradually reduced upward and often purplish pigmented on the lower surface; lower leaves 2–6 cm long, oblanceolate-ovate in outline, petiolate, shallowly toothed or pinnatifid; middle cauline leaves oblong-elliptic in outline, serrate to deeply pinnatifid, often with a clasping base; heads discoid, solitary or few, the disk 6–9 mm in diameter; involucre (4) 5–6 mm high, the bracts numbering about 13 (21); florets and pappus at length longer than the involucre; ligules of the outer pistillate florets absent; cypselas about 3 mm long, sparingly pubescent in the grooves; n = 50. Fig. 7.
Specimen B. on sheet 10596 (AK) is here selected as the lectotype for this subspecies. It was collected by Cheeseman in January, 1880, on Mount Torlesse, Canterbury Alps, at an altitude of 3,500 feet Cheeseman described Senecio lautus var. discoideus to include the large-headed, discoid, low plants from the South Island mountains which he felt were within the species. While he rarely based his descriptions on single specimens, the only material of this taxon in his herbarium which had been collected before 1906 are sheets 10596 and 10597 (AK). Since both collections are morphologically quite similar, a specimen in the earlier collection has been chosen as the lectotype.
This subspecies grows on unstable debris slopes of the mountain ranges east of the Southern Alps in Canterbury and Otago and has also been collected in the Kaikouras. A sole collection has been made in the Ruahines in the North Island. In flower December to January (one collection dated April).
This subspecies appears to be an ecotype adapted to unstable scree, a habitat in which many interesting plant species are found in New Zealand. The deep soil of the scree is stable, but there is much surface movement. According to Fisher (1952) ssp. discoideus avoids damage from the moving stones by bending before the rubble and later sending new shoots back to the surface.
One characteristic of this subspecies which has no obvious adaptive value is the absence of the ligule in the outer pistillate florets of the head. Haskell (1953) discusses the case of radiate and discoid forms in Senecio vulgaris L. and presumes the discoid form to have a greater reproductive capacity than the radiate form, although this idea is not supported satisfactorily. De Vries (1910) reported the discoid form of S. jacobaea L. on the dunes of North Holland and the radiate form of the species from the dunes of South Holland, but he offered no opinion as to the basis for this geographical separation.
The lack of ligules in Senecio glaucophyllus ssp. discoideus may not be an adaptive trait in itself, but perhaps may be one of the effects of a pleiotropic gene or a gene linked with one associated with other characteristics of the subspecies which adapt and limit it to the scree. Random fixation is not acceptable as an explanation for the presence of this character in the population, since presumably compatible populations of other radiate subspecies of S. glaucophyllus are known to occur on stable ground adjacent to populations of ssp. discoideus, yet the two forms retain their integrity. Just what the adaptive significance of this character is, if any, will have to remain problematical for the present.
Representative Herbarium Specimens. North Island: Ruahines, Te Atua Mahuru, ca. 4,800ft, N. L. Elder, Jan., '46 (CHR 63036). South Island: Big Hill, Molesworth, on scree fan, M. Simpson, 29/1/56 (CHR 90786); Yeo River, debris slope, 1/4/1945, H. H. Allan (CHR 51301); Kyeburn Crossing, Nov., 1892,

D. Petrie (WELT); Shingle slip, limestone hill between Broken and Porter rivers, Leonard Cockayne, Dec. 29, 1890 (WELT); Limestone rocks, Trelissick basin, 2,800ft, T. Kirk (WELT, 1908); Mts. behind Castle Hill, Canterbury, TFC, Jan., 1883 (AK 10597); Mt. Torlesse, open places, 2,500ft, 4/09 H. H. Travers (P); Mt. Hay, Two Thumb Range, Barker 352 (CHR 20454); S. Pisa Range, Jan., 1923, A. Wall (Canty); Mt. Arnould, ca. 2,800ft, D. Petrie (WELT, 1908); Dunstan, approx 3,500ft, I. A. McNeur 25/12/1949 (CHR 68905); Eweburn Valley, ca. 2,000ft, 10/1/11, D. Petrie (WELT).
Breeding System
An understanding of the breeding system of an organism may aid in interpreting the variation pattern in a taxon and may give some clues as to the limits and evolutionary potentialities of the group. For most of the flowering season the majority of the taxa of Senecio discussed in this paper are outbreeding. Flowering plants are visited on warm days by hover-flies (Syrphidae) and to a lesser extent by honey bees and bumblebees. The large number of hybrid seedlings on the benches under the plants in the greenhouse lends some support to the idea that most taxa are outbreeding, and further suggests that the pollinators of Senecio do not respect the boundaries of taxonomy or of ploidy in their activities.
Despite this primarily outbreeding nature, all the taxa are self-compatible. It appears that Senecio glaucophyllus ssp. discoideus and S. lautus ssp. carnosulus normally set a high percentage of selfed fruits. Furthermore, the sequence of events in the maturation of florets of all species is such that self-pollination will eventually occur if no pollinator makes a visit. This suggests that in poor weather, when pollinators are not active, self-fertilisation may be frequent. This combination of outbreeding and inbreeding is undoubtedly chiefly responsible for the mosaic of variation characteristic of most of the taxa of the Senecio lautus complex.
Apomixis has not been demonstrated in any of the species; emasculated heads of caged plants set no fruit.
Chromosome Numbers
Although other numbers forming an aneuploid series have been reported, most of the Senecio species which have been investigated by various workers have diploid chromosome numbers in multiples of 10, ranging from 20 to 180 (Darlington and Wylie, 1956). The four species investigated in this paper are polyploids at various levels. For Senecio lautus, n = 20; S. sterquilinus, n = 20; S. radiolatus, n = 40; and for S. glaucophyllus, n = 50. Chromosome numbers were determined from squash preparations of microsporocytes stained with aceto-carmine. Meiosis was regular in all species. Buds were preserved in a fixative consisting of 3 parts 95% ethyl alcohol and 1 part glacial acetic acid.
Following in a list of plants which were used for the chromosome counts, the localities from which they were taken, and their collectors:
Senecio lautus ssp. lautus, n = 20: Motuhoropapa Island, Hauraki Gulf, Geo. W. Mason; Bream Head Peak, Whangaeri Head, Geo. W. Mason; Little Barrier Island, Graeme Ramasay; Cape Turnagain, N. L. Elder; Paekakariki hill summit, R. Ornduff, Mana Island, R. Ornduff; Red Rocks Stream, near Wellington, R. Ornduff; Makara Beach, R. Ornduff; Pencarrow Head, near Wellington, R. Ornduff; Rimutaka summit, R. Ornduff; Mable Island, near Picton, R. Ornduff.
Senecio lautus ssp. carnosulus, n = 20: Punakaiki Beach, I. W. Davey; Black Head, Dunedin, G. T. S. Baylis.
Senecio sterquilinus, n = 20: Brothers Island, Cook Strait, R. Ornduff.
Senecio radiolatus, n = 40: Chatham Island, E. A. Madden.

Senecio glaucophyllus ssp. glaucophyllus, no count.
Senecio glaucophyllus ssp. basinudus, n = 50: near Lake Ellesmere, J. W. Dawson; Allans Beach, Dunedin, G. T. S. Baylis.
Senecio glaucophyllus ssp. raoulii, n = 50: Moemoe, northwest Ruahines, R. Ornduff et al.; Pohatuhaha, N. L. Elder; Ngauroruru, N. L. Elder; Titiokura, N. L. Elder.
Senecio glaucophyllus ssp. discoideus, n = 50: Blue Cliffs Station, near St. Andrews, Mrs. P. R. Woodhouse.
Artificial Hybridisations
Crosses were made in all possible combinations of the four species discussed in this paper, and among all the infraspecific taxa. No living plants of Senecio antipodus were available. Since three of the species represent different levels of polyploidy, it would be expected that hybrids between them would be highly sterile as was the case. These interploid hybrids formed no viable pollen at all. However, hybrids between Senecio lautus and S. sterquilinus, both of which have the same chromosome number, were as fertile as their parents.
The hybrids obtained from the intraspecific crosses were of special interest because they indicated that despite the high degree of variation within the species, nearly all the infraspecific categories are highly interfertile. In a few instances, there is a reduction of fertility in the second generation. Fertility of the hybrids was determined by scoring stained and non-stained pollen grains mounted in cotton blue-lactophenol.
Since the four species are highly self-compatible, particular care had to be taken to prevent self-pollination during the course of the hybridisations. The heads of the seed parents were emasculated by removing the upper portions of the heads with a razor blade, thus removing the anthers but not the stigmas. The heads were then bagged until the stigmas were receptive, and then the pollinations were made. If the pollination was successful, the stigmas withered within a few hours and the cross was considered effected. The species of the Senecio lautus complex are freely crossable under greenhouse conditions, although such free crossability is not a universal feature of the genus.
The results of these breeding experiments show that individuals of three of the four species investigated here are intersterile. In addition to this effective isolating mechanism, S. glaucophyllus and S. radiolatus are completely allopatric, one being mainland and the other an insular endemic. Senecio lautus is spatially isolated from S. glaucophyllus over most of its range, although it occurs within the range of S. glaucophyllus ssp. basinudus in parts of the South Island coast. Senecio lautus and S. radiolatus are both found on the Chatham Islands. Senecio sterquilinus is presumably spatially isolated from all the other members of the complex and is endemic to a unique edaphic situation. Its close relationship to S. lautus is unmistakable on grounds of morphology and high hybrid fertility, and if the two were to occur together in nature a certain amount of hybridisation would be expected.
Senecio sterquilinus is treated as a distinct species because of the relatively large number of characters by which it differs from S. lautus. While hybridisation between these two species, if it does occur, could have a profound effect on their future evolution it would not necessarily affect their present taxonomic status.
The infraspecific taxa which are recognised within two of the species are generally compatible with one another. Consequently, the factors which serve to keep the subspecies of a species distinct over most of their range must be their different ecological requirements combined with spatial isolation. Intermediate forms do

occur, especially in S. glaucophyllus, but since genetic segregation does not occur when these intermediates are grown in cultivation it appears that these intermediates are stabilised biotypes.
The relationship of Senecio lautus to S. glaucophyllus is inferred from the morphological similarity of some of the subspecies of these species. One cannot assume a very close genetic relationship, however, because of the different chromosome numbers of the two species. It is possible that S. glaucophyllus originated long ago as an amphiploid hybrid between a lautus-like ancestor and a form similar to some of the 30-chromosome-pair species now in the New Zealand flora (latter chromosome numbers supplied by J. B. Hair in litt.).
Senecio radiolatus and S. antipodus appear to be more closely related to each other than to any other species. Kirk (1899) compared the latter species with the Fuegian S. candidans, but the resemblance is slight indeed.
The Relationship of the New Zealand Senecio lautus Complex to
Australian Taxa
Many authorities have used the name Senecio lautus to apply to a remarkable diversity of Australian forms. All of the herbarium specimens of “Senecio lautus” and its allies in the National Herbarium of New South Wales, Sydney; the National Herbarium of Victoria, South Yarra; the State Herbarium at Perth; Kew; and the British Museum, Natural History, were examined. In addition, the few Australian specimens in American herbaria were examined.
Nine seed collections of “Senecio lautus” from New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania, and Western Australia, representing extremes of morphology and habitat, were sown in the greenhouses at the University of Washington in Seattle. All oof the plants which developed were found to have haploid chromosome numbers of 20. These plants were utilised in reciprocal crossing experiments with Senecio lautus ssp. lautus and S. sterquilinus. The range in fertility in the hybrids was between 10% and 70%, with the average about 50%. In addition to this partial sterility barrier there is a definite morphological discontinuity between the array of Australian forms and the relatively more homogeneous New Zealand forms.
It is concluded, therefore, that the interests of taxonomy would be best served by the exclusion of the Australian forms from the limits of Senecio lautus. The Tasman Sea provides an effective barrier to gene exchange between populations in the two countries and provides a convenient taxonomic boundary as well. To include any of the Australian forms in S. lautus would be unwise, since the transition from somewhat similar Australian forms to quite different races in Australia is gradual and would result in considerable taxonomic confusion. Consequently, Senecio lautus, already sensu latissimo, is considered a New Zealand endemic.
Bibliography
Cheeseman, T. F., 1888. On the flora of the Kermadec Islands. Trans. N.Z. Inst. 20: 151–181.
— 1896. On some additions to the New Zealand flora. Trans. N.Z. Inst. 28: 534–537.
— 1906. Manual of the New Zealand flora. Wellington, Govt. Printer.
— 1925. Manual of the New Zealand flora, 2nd ed. Wellington, Govt. Printer.
Chilton, Chas., ed. 1909. The Subantarctic Islands of New Zealand. Wellington, Govt. Printer.

Clausen, J., Keck, D., and Hiesey, W. M., 1948. Experimental studies on the nature of species. III. Environmental responses of climatic races of Achillea. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. No. 581: 1–129.
Cockayne, Leonard, 1902. A. short account of the plant covering of Chatham Island. Trans. N.Z. Inst., 34: 243–325.
— 1904. A. botanical excursion during midwinter to the southern islands of New Zealand. Trans. N.Z. Inst., 36: 225–333.
— 1909. Report on a Botanical Survey of Stewart Island. Wellington, Govt. Printer.
— 1921. The Vegetation of New Zealand. Leipzig, W. Engelmann.
Darlington, C. D. and Wylie, A. P., 1956. Chromosome Atlas of Flowering Plants. London, Allen and Unwin.
Dawson, J. W., 1954. Trio and Stephens Islands: home of the tuatara. Wellington Bot. Soc. Bull., 27: 2–8.
De Candolle, A. P., 1837. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, pars VI. Paris, Treuttel and Würtz.
De Vries, H., 1910. The Mutation Theory, vol. 2. Chicago, Open Court Publ. Co.
Fisher, F. J. F., 1952. Observations on the vegetation of screes in Canterbury, New Zealand. J. Ecol., 40 (1): 156–167.
Forster, G., 1786. Florulae insularum australium prodromus. Gottingen, Dieterich.
Hamilton, A., 1895. Notes on a visit to Macquarie Island. Trans. N.Z. Inst., 27: 559–578.
Haskell, Gordon, 1953. Adaptation and breeding system in groundsel. Genetica 26: 468–484.
Hooker, J. D., 1853–1855. Florae Novae-Zelandiae; vol. 2 of Botany of the Antarctic Voyage. London, Lovell Reeve.
— 1864–1867. Handbook of the New Zealand Flora. London, Lovell Reeve.
Kirk, Thomas, 1899. The Students' Flora of New Zealand. Wellington, Govt. Printer.
Laing, R. M., 1915. A. revised list of the Norfolk Island flora, etc. Trans. N.Z. Inst., 47: 1–39.
Lanjouw, J. and Stafleu, F. A., 1956. Index herbariorum, 3rd ed. I. The herbaria of the world. Utrecht, Kemink en Zoon N.V.
Merrill, Elmer D., 1954. The Botany of Cook's Voyages. Chronica Botanica 14 (5, 6): 161–384.
Mueller, F. von, 1864. The Vegetation of the Chatham Islands. Melbourne, Govt. Printer.
Oliver, R. H. and Sorensen, J. H., 1951. Botanical Investigations on Campbell Island. Cape Expedition Series No. 7: Dept. of Sci. and Indus. Res. Dunedin, John McIndoe, Ltd.
Oliver, W. R. B., 1909. The vegetation of the Kermadec Islands. Trans. N.Z. Inst. 47:118–175.
— 1917. The vegetation and flora of Lord Howe Island. Trans. N.Z. Inst. 49: 94–161.
Poppelwell, D. L., 1912. Notes on the plant covering of Codfish Island and the Rugged Islands. Trans. N.Z. Inst. 44: 76–85.
— 1916. Notes on the plant covering of Pukeokaoka, Stewart Island. Trans. N.Z. Inst. 48: 244–245.
— 1918. Notes on a botanical excursion to Bunkers Island. Trans. N.Z. Inst. 50: 154.
Richard, A., 1832. Essai d'une flore de la Nouvelle Zelande. In J. Tastu, ed., Voyage de decouvertes de I'Astrolabe. Paris.
Solander, Daniel, 1771–1782. Primitiae florae Novae Zelandiae. unpub. MS. in the library, Dept. of Botany, British Museum (Nat. Hist.).
Sprengel, C., 1826. Systema Vegetabilium, pars III. Gottingen, Dieterich.
Robert Ornduff
, B.A., M.Sc.,Department of Botany,
University of California, Berkeley 4, California,
U. S. A.

Plant Communities of the Mokohinau Islands, Northern N.Z.
[Communicated by E. G. Turbott and read before the Canterbury Branch on June 9, 1959; received by the Editor, June 11, 1959.]
Contents
-
I. Position and Extent.
-
II. Geology and Soil.
-
III. Rainfall and Exposure.
-
IV. Burning and Grazing History.
-
V. Vegetation.
-
1. Species List.
-
2. Bush Communities.
-
3. Flax Communities.
-
4. Sedge Communities.
-
5. Grass Communities.
-
6. Coastal Communities.
-
7. Aquatic Communities.
-
VI. Plant Zonation in Relation to Exposure.
-
VII. Relationship of Vegetation and Grazing Animals.
-
1. Grazing.
-
2. Trampling.
-
3. Manuring.
-
VIII. Gull Colonies.
-
IX. Petrel Colonies.
-
References.
Abstract
The vegetation of Mokohinau, 63 ml. N.N.E. of Auckland, has been much modified by burning and grazing and 46% of the 127 spp. recorded are introduced. Six types of plant community are described and their distribution in relation to spray-bearing winds from the N.E. discussed. Cattle graze European pasture spp. during the moist winter season and summer-green Stenotaphrum secundatum during the summer. Successions postulated for these communities on alleviation of grazing are through Scirpus, Pteridium, etc., to Phormium and eventually to Metrosideros or mixed bush, though regeneration of woody spp. is slow in the more exposed habitats. Halophytes such as Disphyma perennate in the nesting colonies of red billed gulls, but much of the vegetation of these is cyclic, having a five-month growing season when the birds are absent in winter and being destroyed in summer. Grey-faced petrels burrow in almost all types of community where the soil is not too consolidated by grazing mammals and characteristic spp. are found in the burrow entrances.
I. Position and Extent
The Mokohinau Group has been described as the least accessible of the island groups in the outer Hauraki Gulf (Fleming, 1950). It lies 63 mls. N.N.E. of Auckland and about 12 mls N.W. of Great Barrier Island. The nearest point on the mainland is Bream Head, 27 miles to the W.N.W. and no other islands lie within 15 miles.
[Footnote] * This work was done when the author was at Massey Agricultural College, University of New Zealand.

The group consists of about 12 islands and a scatter of reefs with Fanal Island (not visited) lying approximately 6 miles S. E. of the main group. The largest, Burgess Island, is between ⅝ and ¾ ml. long, about ¼ ml. wide and covers approximately 400 acres. The relative size of the others in the group can be seen in Fig. 1.
II. Geology And Soil
The rocks are igneous with the exception of a small patch of raised beach conglomerate at the landing place. The group is part of a chain of volcanic islands and rises to 366ft (112 m.) above sea level at the Burgess Island lighthouse. Burgess
Figure 1
Mokohinau Islands. Map Showing Location of Seabird Colonies, Transects and Soil Sample Areas
Island consists of an extrusive cumulo-dome of glassy rhyolite of late Pliocene age surmounted by pyroclastic rocks and intruded by rhyolite dykes and the andesite plug on which the lighthouse stands (Fleming, 1950).
Non-organic soil exposed and eroding on the cliffs is of sandy or gravelly texture but most of the island soils have a fair amount of incorporated humus. Of 15 samples tested all were on the acid side of neutral, the pH ranging from 5.2–6.6 (average, 6.1). Readings are inserted in the appropriate localities on the map in fig. 1.
III. Rainfall And Exposure
The annual average rainfall is from 32–33in but only 9in had fallen in 1957 up to the middle of August and little more was expected, as the summers from August onwards are generally dry. In 1956, however, 60in had fallen, the highest total since records were first kept by the lighthouse personnel 20 years previously.
Heavy seas from the Pacific Ocean strike the northern and eastern coasts of the island, but a certain amount of protection is afforded in the W. and S. by Northland and Great Barrier Island. The exposure suffered is much greater than on the forested island of Little Barrier, 20 miles to the S., but Fanal Island supports a covering of bush. Nevertheless, the small patches of relict bush on Burgess Island.

are confined to sheltered, W. facing slopes, suggesting that, once cleared, bush species may not readily regenerate in the most exposed situations. Even the most salttolerant species, pohutukawa (Metrosideros excelsa), taupata (Coprosma repens) and ngaio (Myoporum laetum) showed signs of severe salt scorching more than 200ft (61 m.) above sea level and a considerable distance from the coast.
In a recent severe N.W. gale the sea had broken across the low-lying part of the island between the Blowhole and the landing beach and transformed the freshwater marsh there into a brackish one. The water level rose and all existing foliage was killed, regeneration not taking place until several months had elapsed (Smith, in lit.).
IV.—Burning And Grazing History
The islands were previously inhabited by Maoris, whose descendants return annually for the mutton bird harvest. It seems likely that either regenerated or original forest remained after Maori occupation; this was probably destroyed subsequently by fire rather than by grazing, although both would have contributed towards preventing its regeneration (Tohana in lit.).
There had been no burning for many years when the lighthouse was erected in the early 1880s, but the vegetation was quite open (Anderson in lit.).
An early lighthouse keeper, Sandager, writing in 1889, listed 7 woody species as important constituents of the vegetation (Carmichaelia, Coprosma, Metrosideros, Myoporum, Olearia, Pittosporum and Veronica), but stated that these were more or less scattered and stunted owing to the lack of shelter. In 1957, Olearia and Pittosporum were not recorded, Veronica (Hebe) was seen only on the smaller ungrazed islands and only 1 tree of Carmichaelia was found on Burgess Island (more on the western isles) suggesting a further reduction in woody species during the past 70 years.
From at least as early as 1920 the lighthouse keepers grazed stock on Burgess Island and burned the vegetation at intervals of approximately three years to keep the sedges (Mariscus and Scirpus) in check. In 1932 Trig Island and Maori Bay Island in the W. were burned by fishermen (Anderson in lit.) the vegetation having regenerated in the subsequent 25 years to a flax (Phormium) community with scattered shrubs.
It is fairly certain that grass seeds (Paspalum and Stenotaphrum and probably also Lolium and Dactylis) were broadcast on Burgess Island after burning (Anderson in lit.) and these now occupy a considerable area.
V.—Vegetation
1. Species List
One hundred and twenty-seven species were collected, specimens of all but those five marked “§” having been determined in the D.S.I.R., Botany Division, at Christchurch. Forty-six per cent of the total flora were introduced spp., these being marked “*” in the following list.
A generalised map of the major plant communities has been constructed from more detailed maps and is shown in Fig. 2.
| Cyathea dealbata | Histiopteris incisa |
| Adiantum aethiopicum | Blechnum norfolkianum |
| A. affine | Doodia media |
| A. hispidulum | Asplenium flaccidum |
| Pteris tremula | A. lucidum |
| Pteridium esculentum | A. obtusatum |

-
Polystichum richardii
-
Pyrrosia serpens
-
*Pinus pinaster
-
*Paspalum dilatum?
-
P. scrobiculatum
-
*Stenotaphrum secundatum
-
Oplismenus undulatifolius
-
*Dactylis glomeratus
-
*Vulpia myuros
-
*Febusa rubra
-
*Bromus catharticus
-
*Briza maxima
-
*Eragrostis brownii
-
Poa anceps
-
*P. annua
-
P. pratensis
-
*Agrostis sp.
-
Deyeuxia billardieri
-
D. sp.
-
*Sporobolus capensis
-
*Holcus lanatus
-
*Aira caryophyllea
-
Danthonia racemosa
-
D. sp.
-
Arundo conspicua
-
*Lolium perenne
-
Isolepis cernuus
-
Scirpus nodosus
-
S. sp.
-
Carex sp.
-
Mariscus ustulatus
-
Leptocarpus simplex
-
*Zantedeschia aethiopica
-
Rhipogonum scandens §
-
Phormium colensoi
-
Arthropodium cirrhatum
-
Thelymitra longifolia
-
Acianthus sinclairii
-
Macropiper excelsum v. psittacorum
-
Peperomia urvilleana
-
Parietria debilis
-
Muehlenbeckia complexa
-
*Rumex crispus
-
*R. obtusifolius
-
*R. acetosella
-
Rhagodia triandra
-
Chenopodium allanii
-
*C. murale
-
Salicornia australis
-
*Amaranthus lividus
-
*Phytolacca octandra
-
Disphyma australe
-
Tetragonia trigyna
-
*Stellaria media
-
*Cerastium glomeratum
-
Spergularia media
-
*S. rubra §
-
*Polycarpon tetraphyllum
-
*Silene anglica
-
*S. gallica
-
*Fumaria muralis
-
*Coronopus didymus
-
Tillaea sieberiana
-
Acaena anserinifolia
-
*Lotus corniculatus
-
*L. uliginosus
-
Trifolium dubium
-
*T. repens §
-
*T. pratense
-
T. subterraneum §
-
Carmichaelia aligera
-
*Vicia sativa
-
*Pelargonium quercifolium?
-
Geranium microphyllum?
-
G. dissectum v glabratum?
-
Oxalis corniculata §
-
*O. stricta
-
*Linum marginale
-
*Euphorbia peplus
-
*Lavatera arborea
-
*Malva rotundifolia?
-
*Modiola caroliniana
-
Pimelea urvilleana
-
Centaurium australe
-
Metrosideros excelsa
-
Haloragis erecta
-
Apium prostratum
-
*Anagallis arvensis
-
Samolus repens
-
Parsonsia heterophylla
-
Solanum nigrum
-
*S. humile
-
Calystegia tuguriorum
-
Dichondra repens
-
Hebe solicifolia
-
*Orobanche minor
-
Myoporum laetum
-
*Mentha arvensis?
-
*Plantago major
-
*P. lanceolata
-
Coprosma repens
-
C. robusta
-
*Galium operine
-
Sicyos angulata
-
*Aster subulatus
-
*Erigeron floribunda
-
Gnaphalium purpureum
-
Cassinia retorta
-
Cotula australis
-
C. coronopifolia
-
Senecio lautus
-
*Cirsium vulgare
-
*Hypochoeris radicata
-
*Sonchus oleraceus
-
*Sonchus oleraceus
-
*Crepis sp.
2. Bush Communities
Metrosideros excelsa was the most abundant tree species and occurred mainly on steep, craggy cliffs where it probably escaped most of the ravages of fire. The trees were generally stunted and very different from the tall coastal Metrosideros of little Barrier Island which was not only in a more sheltered situation but received twice as much annual rainfall (see inset, Fig. 1).

Little grew beneath them except where grazing animals prevented regeneration of saplings. Here the trees were older and less leafy, with fewer low branches, and some had fallen to leave gaps, so that more light penetrated and shade-tolerant natives such as Tetragonia trigyna and aliens such as Dactylis glomerata from the pasture had invaded part of the ground beneath (see Fig. 4, transect V).
On some of the ungrazed western isles not known to have been burned since 1932, Metrosideros was locally co-dominant with the more generally abundant Phormium colensoi, suggesting that the species represented a later successional phase than the flax and possibly the climatic climax, as on other similarly exposed but less modified islands.
Younger Metrosideros saplings penetrated the dense mats of Stenotaphrum secundatum on the northern, ungrazed, face of Lighthouse Hill, so it seemed that the previous Phormium stage of the succession could be replaced by an introduced species.
The Metrosideros seldom extended down to sea level, there being normally a narrow belt of Myoporum laetum and/or Coprosma repens with Carex sp, Disphyma australe, etc, at its lower margin. Cassinia retorta, a wind-hardy shrub, occurred among or above the Metrosideros with Mariscus ustulatus, Scirpus nodosus and species of the alien grassland.
Growth rate was fairly rapid, the Metrosideros among the Stenotaphrum having increased in height from 1 m to 2 m in the past 4 years, Coprosma repens planted in an inland situation from .75 m to 1.5 m in the same time (Smith, in lit).
The only other type of bush community present was a small patch of low mixed woodland with no one species dominant, but Myoporum laetum abundant and Macropiper excelsum v. psittacorum almost equally so.
This community occurred in what was probably the most sheltered part of Burgess Island on the W. face of Lighthouse Hill at the junction of the intrusive Andesite plug and the raised beach conglomerate behind the landing jetty. The more salt-hardy Coprosma repens and Mariscus ustulatus grew at the junction of

the bush and the buffalo-grass of the flat across which came winds from the quarter with the smallest distance of fetch. Lighthouse Hill gave shelter from winds from the Pacific.
The bush occupied a low steep cliff and the boulders at its foot and was accessible to grazing animals which had severely pruned the Macropiper
Its preservation as the only inland community of native bush which had escaped the depredations of fire and grazing livestock on Burgess Island, suggested that the constituent species might be more resistant to these two suppressive factors when not having to suffer the added rigours of exposure to the worst salt-bearing winds. It is of interest in this connection that the only two stands of Metrosideros surviving on grazed parts of Burgess Island were on sheltered W. facing cliffs near the Cauldron in the N. and Pohutukawa Gully in the N.W., whereas on the ungrazed islands the species occured also on exposed cliffs.
The presence of the garden species Viola odorata and Zantedeschia aethiopica and the proximity of the old tapu Maori grave in a walled, overgrown garden a few hundred yards away, suggested that this sheltered locality, near the only beach where it was practicable to make a landing, might have been occupied by a former island community.
With the exception of Blechnum and Pyrrosia, both of which were rare on the islands, the following species were recorded only in this mixed bush:—
| Asplenium lucidum | Coprosma robusta |
| Blechum norfolkianum | Haloragis erecta |
| Pteris tremula | Parsonsia heterophylla |
| Pyrrosia serpens | Peperomia urvilleana |
| Oplismenus undulatifolius | Rhipogonum scandens |
| Macropiper excelsum v. psittacorum | Sicyos angulata |
3. Flax Communities
All but the lowest of the smaller, ungrazed islands were dominated by Phormium colensoi which formed thickets 4–6 ft. (1–2 m.) high and was scarcely penetrable in places. Metrosideros excelsa was abundant with it, Cassinia retorta, Carmichaelia aligera and Myoporum laetum frequent and Hebe salicifolia and Muehlenbeckia complexa occasional. Important constituents of the ground flora were Arundo conspicua, Pimelea urvilleana, Pteridium esculentum and Scirpus nodosus.
These outer islands had suffered less modification from human occupation than had Burgess Island and the proportion of aliens in the flora was smaller—33% as opposed to 48% on Burgess Island. Less time was spent investigating the outer islands but this would not wholly account for the fact that less than half as many species were recorded there as in the more heterogeneous flora of Burgess Island (54 and 121 spp. respectively).
Isolated flax plants occurred on the more sheltered of the inaccessible cliffs of Burgess Island where they found a refuge from grazing animals rather than because of their affinity for sea spray. Where not pushed back to this marginal habitat by grazing, Phormium preferred slightly more inland situations, giving way to other spp. on exposed coasts (see Fig. 2)
4. Sedge Communities
The two most important Cyperaceous plants on the islands were Scirpus nodosus and Mariscus ustulatus, but an unidentified species of Carex was locally dominant on exposed, ungrazed cliffs.
a. Scirpus nodosus
Scirpus nodosus formed dense swards on the northern, western and eastern peninsulas of Burgess Island most remote from the centres of human occupation. As the latter were approached the Scirpus communities became progressively more

open, with European pasture species growing between the tussocks until they eventually merged into grass pasture with Scirpus occasional or absent.
In the extreme W. Pteridium esculentum was co-dominant with the Scirpus but this became rare on slopes with an exposed aspect. On E. facing coasts the Scirpus became patchier and merged with exposure-tolerant grasses such as Holcus lanatus, finally giving way to belts of halophytic species.
High above sea level on the W. of Trig Island the Scirpus was co-dominant with Phormium and it persisted as an important subordinate species in the main flax communities of the western isles.
b. Mariscus ustulatus
Mariscus ustulatus covered much less ground than Scirpus and occurred mainly on fairly wet ground and cliffs. It was sometimes associated with Scirpus or pasture plants or formed a belt between these and the Leptocarpus simplex or Disphyma australe of the lower cliffs.
The species was apparently fairly plastic in its water requirements, growing on both water-logged flats and well drained slopes. With Leptocarpus simplex and Stenotaphrum secundatum it co-dominated the marsh behind the landing bay, but gave way to Leptocarpus, Cotula coronopifolia, Isolepis cernuus and grasses in the wetter parts of the Cauldron flat which it dominated.
Very little was seen on the western isles where it may have been unable to compete effectively with the ungrazed Phormium of similar but more robust life form.
c. Leptocarpus simplex
Leptocarpus simplex (Restionaceae) dominated not only areas with a high water table but also a number of well drained cliff areas subjected to heavy spray. Its distribution was essentially coastal and the water around its roots was often brackish.
5. Grass Communities
Grass communities were of two main types, almost pure swards of Stenotaphrum secundatum and mixed swards of European grasses and legumes, often associated with Scirpus nodusus. They occurred around the centres of human activity viz:— the landing jetty, the lighthouse, the keepers' dwellings and the S. E. block of the island which was occupied by an R.N.Z.A.F. camp during the World War II.
a. Buffalo grass
The strongly-growing alien Stenotaphrum secundatum occupied the sheltered central valley of Burgess Island, and varied from a lawn-like turf a few cm. high where stock congregated around water troughs, to dense mats 1 m. thick. This last growth habit was that most commonly seen, the top of the mattress-like layer being fairly level where subjected to little wind action but undulating, from 15 to 100 cm. deep where at all windswept, giving local turbulence as in the hummocky Holcus lanatus swards of exposed British clifftops (Goodman and Gillham, 1954). Mariscus ustulatus often replaced the Stenotaphrum locally where there was much falling spray or where the water table rose above the surface seasonally. The Stenotaphrum seemed to approach exposed coasts only in moist areas where falling spray was diluted. The dense growth habit of the plant, however, rendered it fairly immune to spray damage because there were always young shoots pushing up through the protective mat of old ones which might suffer damage in salt storms.
The aggressive growth of the dominant excluded most subordinates and the purity of the swards is illustrated in the accompanying table where Stenotaphrum is seen to form an average ground cover of 94%.

The community was an essentially alien one, native plants competing poorly and occupying only 1% of the area analysed. It was probably maintained as such by seasonal grazing but, even after c 70 years free from grazing, native species were slow in becoming established.
Floristic Analysis of Two Buffalo Grass Communities.
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
| Percentage | Ground Cover | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Landing Flat | Central Valley | Average |
| *Stenotaphrum secundatum | 96.00 | 91.80 | 93.90 |
| *Dactylis glomerata | 2.45 | 3.60 | 3.03 |
| *Holcus lanatus | 0.35 | 1.40 | 0.88 |
| *Cirsium vulgare | 1.25 | 0.63 | |
| Carex sp. | 0.60 | 0.30 | |
| Muehlenbeckia complexa | 0.55 | 0.28 | |
| *Rumex crispus | 0.55 | 0.28 | |
| Mariscus ustulatus | 0.40 | 0.20 | |
| Scirpus nodosus | 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.20 |
| *Plantago lanceolata | 0.25 | 0.13 | |
| Geranium dissectum v. glabratum | 0.15 | 0.07 | |
| *Vicia sativa | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.07 |
| Oxalis corniculata | 0.05 | 0.02 | |
| *Sonchus oleraceus | 0.05 | 0.02 | |
| No. of Species | 8 | 11 | 14 |
| Per cent ground cover of aliens | 98.90 | 98.95 | 98.93 |
| Per cent ground cover of natives | 1.10 | 1.05 | 1.07 |
(b) European Pasture Species
European pasture plants and the American Bromus catharticus had a central and south-easterly distribution and formed mixed communities in which the dominant species were kept in check by grazing so that invasion by native plants was not uncommon.
The four most constantly recurring dominants were Dactylis glomerata, Holcus lanatus, Lolium perenne and Lotus uliginosus with Sporobolus capensis and Bromus catharticus rising to local dominance. Plantago lanceolata, Trifolium dubium and T. repens were fairly characteristic.
The most successful native invader was Scirpus nodosus, and one of the last of the pasture dominants to be choked out by it was Dactylis— a species which also survived quite severe shading by Metrosideros excelsa.
Other native components of the pasture possessing the advantage of height were Mariscus ustulatus and Pteridium esculentum, the latter avoiding the more exposed areas. Muehlenbeckia complexa straggled prolifically over the grasses on windswept slopes and considerable areas were dominated by creeping Dichondra repens which competed particularly well in moist hollows on shallow soils. The shade-tolerant Adiantum aethiopicum was widespread and characteristic where protected by taller plants.
The range of species was wider than in any other community and included a high proportion of hemicryptophytes.
Introduced pasture plants were rare on the ungrazed western isles, occupying only about 1% of the total area but numbering 33% of the species recorded—i.e., it was likely to be competition with more aggressive natives rather than lack of disseminules which kept them in check there.

6. Coastal Communities
Species rising to local dominance on the cliffs included Carex sp., Cassinia retorta, Coprosma repens, Disphyma australe, Leptocarpus simplex, Mariscus ustulatus, Metrosideros excelsa, Myoporum laetum, Phormium colensoi and Samolus repens. Some of these were likely to have been more widespread in the past, but had retreated to the coastal habitat on Burgess Island as a result of grazing and burning. Chief in this category were Metrosideros and Phormium; less abundant were Arthropodium cirrhatum, Carex, Cassinia and some of the ferns.
Muehlenbeckia complexa formed a 98% cover over the boulders of the landing beach, 12 other species occurring sparsely among the 15–30 cm high shots. A discontinuous belt of Mariscus ustulatus and European pasture occupied the inland slope of the beach and the slight hollow behind, but in areas not too exposed to salt spray, the Stenotaphrum secundatum of the flat behind invaded the boulders. Muehlenbeckia reappeared with Dichondra repens where boulders overlay parts of the conglomerate flat (see Fig. 4, transect V).
For details of coast vegetation see Figs. 3 4 5 and 6.
7. Aquatic Communities
Small brackish pools occurred on various parts of the coast, the six most characteristic species of these being an unusual submerged attenuated form of Disphyma australe, Cotula coronopifolia, Isolepis cernuus, Leptocarpus simplex, Salicornia australis and Samolus repens.
With decreasing salt content Mariscus ustulatus and finally others such as Deyeuxia sp., Holcus lanatus, Lotus uliginosus and Stenotaphrum secundatum became important.
Leptocarpus, Mariscus and Stenotaphrum were co-dominant of the marsh S. of the Blowhole which was sometimes fresh and sometimes brackish. All seemed fairly plastic as regards water requirements and grew freely in both wet and dry habitats, but Leptocarpus appeared to tolerate the greatest submergence of its shoot bases, Stenotaphrum the least.
In spite of the dryness of the year the depth of water averaged 15–20 cm here in places in August, 1957, but no freshwater hydrophytes were recorded—all the marsh species being mesophytes, mostly from the surrounding pasture and tracks.
Streams that were little more than seepages occurred on the N. and S. E. coasts, and plant zonation from their seaward ends is shown in Fig. 3.
VI. Plant Zonation in Relation to Exposure
Fig. 2 shows the prevalence of coastal belts of halophytes on cliffs with a N.E. aspect. On more sheltered S. W. cliffs these belts are too narrow to be included on the vegetation map but the western cliffs of Trig Island were not explored, so the omission of coastal belts there may be of no significance.
Zonation from the sea upwards on the E. coast of Trig Island where the situation was uncomplicated by grazing was as follows:—
1. Disphyma australe. A. narrow discontinuous strip descending to 3–12 m above sea level, depending on the local topography and exposure.
2. Carex sp. Drooping clumps occupying crevices in the Disphyma zone or on vertical faces higher up where there was roothold for little else.
3. Myoporum laetum. Dense thickets seldom more than 1 m high on steep slopes; sometimes descending to the lower limit of land vegetation, but apparently less spray-tolerant than Disphyma or Carex. Mostly pure but with patches of these 2 spp., Coprosma repens and Phormium colensoi.
4 (a). Phormium colensoi. Dominant of the main slopes with patches of Myoporum in the lower part, Metrosideros excelsa and other spp. in the upper part.

(b). Metrosideros excelsa. Dominant on the steeper more broken cliffs at this level.
5. Muehlenbeckia complexa and Scripus nodosus co-dominant with the Phormium on windswept crests and Pteridium esculentum co-dominant in local shelter. Arunda conspicua and Myoporum quite common.
Leptocarpus simplex frequently replaced some of the Disphyma zone near sea level on the other S. W. islands or on cliff edges 50–80 m high in the N. and E. Other salt marsh plants found 70 m or more above sea level on the N. and E. coasts were Salicornia australis, Samolus repens, Spergularia media, Cotula coronopifolia and Isolepis cernuus, the roots of the last two penetrating the dung pellets of sheep in the rockier situations.
Coprosma repens seemed to be the most exposure-tolerant of the shrubs, as on islands of Cook Strait and Bass Strait (Gillham, 1960b). The leaves of Myoporum laetum suffered severe salt-scorching in almost all localities, but the plants as a whole, though stunted, survived to cover considerable areas. Where the Myoporum was damaged so also were mesophytes such as Plantago lanceolata and some of the native and alien pasture grasses.
Soon after the mat of Stenotaphrum secundatum had been cut away from around the Metrosideros excelsa saplings on Lighthouse Hill the leaves of the young trees suffered severe salt damage in a bad storm, although growing much further from the coast than was normal (Smith, in lit.) A less xeromorphic leaf type than usual, formed in the shelter of the Stenotaphrum, may have contributed to the plants' susceptibility.
Fig. 4 shows zonation of plants in three coastal areas; the boulder beach near the Burgess Island landing, the cliffs of Pohutukawa Gully in the N.W. of Burgess Island and a lower-lying Metrosideros community in the N.E. of Maori Bay Island.
Fig. 5 shows cliff zonation in four other localities: transect VII from Disphyma through the alien Dactylis, Lotus and Holcus to pasture containing native Muehlenbeckia, Oxalis and Dichondra: transect VIII from Disphyma through the alien Lotus, Lolium and Holcus to the native Scirpus: transect IX from Disphyma through Lotus, Holcus and the native Leptocarpus and Pimelea to cassinia scrub: transect X. from Myoporum, Disphyma and Arundo through Pimelea and Muehlenbeckia to Phormium, Scirpus and Carmichaelia with aliens unimportant (see Fig. 1 for localities).
VII. Relationship of Vegetation and Grazing Animals
1. Grazing
In August, 1957, Burgess Island supported a small herd of about 12 dairy cattle, a herd of feral goats numbering not more than about 30, and a few pigs, the sheep having been removed the previous March.
The goats lived mainly on the N.E. segment of the island, which was accessible only by a narrow isthmus and not visited by the cattle, but they made occasional sorties along the northern cliffs to the W. Some of the cattle were pastured on the European grasses between here and the lighthouse, one of the bulls shared the central of the five northern peninsulas with the pigs and the milking cows had the run of the rest of the island except for part of the inland face of Lighthouse Hill.
During the winter, the dairy, cows fed mainly at night, resting on the Stenotaphrum of the “home paddock” during the day but grazing very little. After the evening milking they drank at the troughs in the Stenotaphrum of the landing flat, then dispersed W., N.W., and S.E. to the areas occupied by European pasture spp. and Scirpus nodosus. They grazed their way outwards, eating the grasses and legumes and reaching towards the edge of the more peripheral zones of pure Scirpus

Figure 4
Zonation of Plants on Coast Transects Passing Inland From the Coast to Show % Ground Cover of Chief Species
Fig. 4.—IV—Landing Beach, S. Burgess Island. Transect across low boulder bank from c. 2 m above sea level. Muehlenbeckia on boulders, Mariscus, Holcus and Dactylis in dip behind, Stenotaphrum on inland flat. V—Pohutukawa Gully, N.W. Burgess Island. Transect up steep cliff from c. 11 m above sea level. Note effect of shading on Scirpus, Dactylis and Tetragonia and of shelter from sea winds on Pteridium. Of three shrubs Coprosma occurs nearest the source of salt spray, then Myoporum, then Metrosideros. VI—E. of Maori Bay Island. Transect up gradual slope from c. 3 m above sea-level (ungrazed). Phormium most important at seaward margin of Metrosideros, Cassinia close to sea level in shelter of taller trees.

but seldom entering them. (Owing to the small scale of the accompanying vegetation map, most of this area is shown as Scirpetum but the Scirpus was only apparently dominant in the proximal areas because of its greater height, the pasture spp. covering more ground.) Scirpus is eaten by cattle under conditions of heavy stocking, but they prefer European grasses and legumes where these are available, keeping the Scirpus down only in the proximal part of the feedling ground. The zonation of the relatively unpalatable plant in the presence of more palatable ones is paralleled in Britain by the zoning of Carex arenaria and Calluna vulgaris around rabbit burrows (Gillham, 1955). With both light grazing and no grazing, the Scirpus has the competitive advantage of greater height, but its growth habit renders it more susceptible to heavy grazing than are the hemicryptophytic pasture species.
With the advance of summer the more palatable, winter-green, European spp. withered and the cattle grazed the summer-green Stenotaphrum (which consisted mainly of old straw-coloured shoots in winter). They had little adverse effect on this, however, and there was small difference between the buffalo grass sward of the Landing Flat to which they had access and that on the N. face of Lighthouse Hill from which they had been excluded for c. 70 years, except that the latter community was less pure and contained more tall native spp.
In the central valley where the cattle spent much of their “waiting time”, the Stenotaphrum mattress was lower and less dense with a slightly higher proportion of subordinate spp. (compare two areas in the accompanying table). The purity of the sward on the Landing Flat was maintained against the tall invaders seen on Lighthouse Hill by light seasonal grazing, but heavier grazing, as in the Central Valley, suppressed the more resistant dominant sufficiently for smaller plants to appear in the sward.
The sheep had formerly occupied the W. of Burgess Island, where their dung was still in evidence but where native plants were beginning to invade the previously grazed pasture. Cattle and goats seldom penetrated to this end of the island.
Two successions are postulated for the return to bush from the winter and summer pastures with the cessation of grazing.
(a) Overgrazed. Holcus lanatus, Plantago lanceolata, etc.
Medium Grazing. Dactylis glomeratus, Lolium perenne, Bromus catharticus, Lotus spp. etc.
Light Grazing. The above with Scirpus nodosus and Muehlenbeckia complexa.
Cessation of Grazing: Dense Stenotaphrum retaining dominance, being in Later Stage. Phormium colensoi, Cassinia retorta, Arundo conspicua and young Metrosideros excelsa.
Final Stage?: Metrosideros and other shrubs.
Four vegetation phases illustrating this succession are shown in Fig. 5, transects VII-X.
(b) Overgrazed: Low Stenotaphrum secundatum with Dactylis, Holcus, Cirsium vulgare and other alien spp.
Medium-light Grazing: Dense Stenotaphrum almost pure.
Cessation of Grazing: Dense Stenotaphrum retaining dominance, being invaded by Pteridium, Scirpus, Cassinia, Metrosideros and Muehlenbeckia.
Final Stage: Metrosideros and other shrubs.
2. Trampling.
On the broad track through the Stenotaphrum community Poa annua was codominant with the Stenotaphrum and Polycarpon tetraphyllum was frequent. Eighty-six per cent of the 28 spp. recorded were aliens.

| *Poa annua | c.d. | *Cirsium vulgare | r |
| *Stenotaphrum secundatum | c.d. | Cotula coronopifolia | r. |
| *Polycarpon tetraphyllum | f. | *Holcus lanatus | r. |
| *Agrostis tenuis? | o. | *Malva rotundifolia | r. |
| *Coronopus didymus | o. | *Modiola caroliniana | r. |
| Cotula australis | o. | *Plantago lanceolata | r. |
| *Erigeron floribunda | o. | *P. major | r. |
| *Lolium perenne | o. | *Rumex acetosella | r. |
| *Lotus corniculatus | o. | *R. crispus | r. |
| Senecio lautus | o. | *R. obtusifolius | r. |
| *Sporobolus capensis | o. | *Silene anglica | r. |
| *Spergularia rubra | r.-o. | *Stellaria media | r. |
| *Anagallis arvensis | r. | *Trifolium dubium | r. |
| Calystegia tuguriorum | r. | *Vicia saliva | r. |
Where livestock converged on a gateway across the narrow neck of land N. N.E. of the lighthouse the ground was 75% bare, even during the moist winter season. The three natives, Dichondra repens, Disphyma australe and Senecio lautus were the most abundant species in this more maritime environment and only 61% of the 18 spp. recorded were aliens.
Of the 18 spp. growing among the short trampled Stenotaphrum around the water troughs all were aliens.
Species surviving trampling were all of low growth habit and many were hemicryptophytes, those normally having tall inflorescences (e.g., Cirsium, Erigeron and Rumex) producing either stunted ones or none at all.
3. Manuring
Species stimulated to robust growth on the heavily dunged soil around the stockyard were Amaranthus lividus, Chenopodium murale, Malva rotundifolia?, Modiola caroliniana and Phytolacca octandra—all aliens.
A characteristic seedling flora occured on each of the many patches of cow dung along the top of the boulder beach. It had nothing in common with the Muehlenbeckietum of the community as a whole and the seeds had probably arrived with the dung and germinated more or less simultaneously to give an even stand a few cm high Ninety-one per cent were aliens (unless Geranium dissectum be regarded as cosmopolitan) although only 40% of the beach spp. were alien:
| *Agrostis tenuis? | Oxalis corniculata |
| *Geranium dissectum | *Poa annua |
| *Holcus lanatus | *Stellaria media |
| *Lolium perenne | *Vicia sativa |
| *Lotus corniculatus |
VIII. Gull Colonies
Mokohinau was described by Fleming (1946) as the chief breeding place of the red-billed gull (Larus novae-hollandiae) in the North Auckland area apart from the Three Kings Islands. He estimated the 1944 population as consisting of approximately 8,000 birds; Buddle (1947a) estimated the 1945 population as 18,000–20,000 birds, of which 13,000 were breeding.
The gulls were resident on the island from the end of August until March. Thus for about seven months each year certain areas of vegetation were subjected to trampling and disturbance and their floristic composition modified accordingly. During the intervening five months, which coincided with the moister winter growing season, there was considerable regeneration of an annual flora which was largely destroyed when the birds returned in early spring. There was, in addition, more permanent regeneration in vacated areas due to local changes of nesting site from year to year.
For the years 1944 and 1957 nesting colonies are plotted in Fig. 1, and a S. W. coast site occupied in 1936 (Buddle, 1947b) but not necessarily representing

the entire population, is also included. Buddle reported considerable variations in nesting sites between 1944 and 1945, with some of the northern colonies enlarging and coalescing.
The vegetation able to perennate in the gull colonies throughout the breeding season was largely halophytic and Disphyma australe was particularly characteristic, covering large areas up to and above 60 m above sea level on the northern cliffs where the gulls were numerous. This species was equally characteristic of other types of seabird colonies in New Zealand and S. E. Australia (Gillham, 1960a). In many colonies Disphyma formed a continuous mat broken only by circular patches where nests had been built on top of it. The nest material had dispersed by the time the birds returned in the subsequent year and the patches were still largely bare, but tentative colonisation by the following species had occurred:–
| *Bromus catharticus | Rhagodia triandra |
| Chenopodium allani | Senecio lautus |
| Cotula australis | *Sonchus oleraceus |
| *Dactylis glomerata | *Stellaria media |
| Parietaria debilis | Tillaea sieberiana |
Mariscus ustulatus survived well in the gull colonies but Scirpus nodosus was much less conspicuous, although often dominant of the surrounding terrain.
Floristic composition of the gull vegetation was analysed by means of valence squares and transects, and the results are summarised in Fig. 6. The analyses were carried out when the cyclic succession had reached its most advanced state—at the end of the growth period when the birds were returning in the latter part of August to initiate the destructive phase.
The native halophytes, Disphyma australe and Senecio lautus were the most constant species, showing 76% and 74% frequency in 130 valence squares and 86% and 82% frequency in the 50 squares of the two belt transects. Bromus catharticus (44% and 48% frequency) was the most characteristic of the aliens (cf. tern and gannet colonies of New Zealand and Australia, Gillham, 1960a).
Many of the European pasture species appeared to benefit from the enhanced fertility of the gull colonies in the less exposed areas (4–8 in Fig. 6) but the American Buffalo grass seldom occurred in nesting colonies. A lush growth of Parietaria debilis was typical of well manured crevices but was rare away from the gulls on Mokohinau (although growing as a boulder beach species on Little Barrier and a woodland species on Bass Strait islands).
A vacated black-backed gull's nest (Larus dominicanus) in a Metrosideros-Phormium community was occupied by lush Tetragonia trigyna with Asplenium flaccidum, Bromus catharticus, Chenopodium allani, Stellaria media and Trifolium repens.
IX. Petrel Colonies
The grey-faced petrel (Pterodroma macroptera) is the most abundant burrowing bird of the Mokohinau group. No attempt has been made to estimate its numbers, but Buddle (1947a) states that it is well distributed over all the islands, particularly the three western ones. This is the northern mutton bird, and 3,000–3,500 chicks are taken annually by Maoris during the early part of December (Sandager, 1889, and Buddle, 1947a); a large proportion of the catch at present comes from Fanal Island. Burgess Island colonies are mapped in Fig. 1, but no survey was made on the western islands, only those burrows seen at the head of Maori Bay being indicated on the map.
As long as the soil was of sufficient depth and suitable texture for burrowing, the petrels seemed little concerned as to what plants they burrowed among, and the 11 areas investigated were occupied by 11 different plant communities, ranging

Fig. 6.—Left—Percentage frequency analysis of plants in 8 gull colonies in approximate order of decreasing exposure to sea spray. Data from 130 half metre valence squares. (1–8). Right—Percentage cover analysis in gull colonies approximately 30 m and 60 m above sea level. Data from two belt transects (XI and XII) 1 × 25 m. (See Fig. 1 for localities.)
from open-floored bush through closely grazed grassland to dense tussock and scrub.
The petrels seemed undeterred by soil mobility and burrowed in the steep slope of a cliff rubbish tip between the lightkeeprs' houses and the Cauldron, where loose earth was liable to slide down and block the entrances.
In closely grazed pastures to the E. few burrows occured in level areas, due probably to consolidation of the humus-rich loan by the trampling of cattle and goats. (The commercial mutton bird of S.E. Australia (Puffinus tenuirostris) is able to burrow in cattle pasture but has been seen to do so only on sandy soils where the large size of the sand grams ensures large air spaces between and renders the consolidation of the soil to the point where birds cannot burrow impossible. Collapse of burrow roofs due to treading through by cattle causes only temporary

Fig. 7—1—Scirpetum W. of Burgess Island landing. (15 burrows.) 2—Holcus/Bromus pasture E. of Burgess Island Cauldron. (50 burrows.) 3—Metrosideros bush, N.W. Burgess Island. (10 burrows.) 4—Phormium/Myoporum cliff, N. Maori Bay Island. (5 burrows.) (Localities 9–12, Fig. 1.)
damage, the birds reopening or lengthening the burrows unless prevented by adjacent rocks).
In the Mokohinau pastures the burrows occurred chiefly on the slopes, where the surface was “terraced” by more or less horizontal stock tracks. They penetrated the steep or vertical banks—sometimes of bare earth—a little distance below the compressed soil of the track above.w Where they occurred on the flat they generally went beneath boulders where stock had no effect on soil texture.
Where a choice of site is available, mutton birds often prefer to burrow on sloping rather than flat areas because of the ease of taking off, but they did not shun flat areas on Mokohinau where there were stout tussocks, tree roots or boulders to give protection from trampling.
Most of the less modified but few of the more modified areas of Burgess Island had their quota of petrels, in spite of the hazards of getting strung up in the branches of the bush dominants. This distribution suggests that the introduction of stock may have limited the area available to the birds as it has to the dove petrels of Stephens Island, in Cook Strait.
Periodic fires may also have restricted their range, birds not having returned to burrow in the destroyed flax community of Maori Bay Island until several years after the 1932 fire when the flax had grown up again (Anderson, in lit). Burning

of tussock grass rookeries in the season when the birds are not in residence, as practised by the commercial mutton-birders of S.E. Australia, seems not to harm the birds there, however, unless soil depth becomes insufficient for burrowing during the surface erosion which almost inevitably follows the fire.
The 11 types of habitat in which grey-faced petrels were found breeding on Mokohinau were as follows:-
(a)Cliff Rubbish Tip.
No rubbish had been tipped over the cliff at this point for five years, and slips of organic-rich topsoil from above had covered much of the debris of former years. Plant colonisation was occuring but no species had yet assumed dominance. There was no local floristic change in the vicinity of burrow entrances, the whole community being still in the early seral stages associated with disturbed soil near burrows. Sixty-eight per cent of the 28 species recorded were aliens.
(b) Older Rubbish Tip.
This tip had not been used as such for many years, and 30–40 cm of soil overlay the old saucers and tins which the birds were exposing by their burrowing. The whole area had been over-run by a dense cover of *Stenotaphrum secundatum which allowed growth of no subordinate species, and the only floristic difference in the burrow entrances was the presence of Senecio lautus seedlings. This was the only place where petrels burrowed in buffalo grass, and it seemed likely that the burrows had been present when the community was in the earlier successional phase seen in the more recent rubbish tip and had been kept open as the grass grew round them, as vegetation less dense than this was known to hinder the burrowing of birds elsewhere.
(c) Inland Cave
A bird was found incubating an egg on the earth floor of a cave at the junction of the Burgess Island Andesite and Conglomerate in an unusually high light intensity 3 m from the cave entrance. No attempt had been made to burrow. The entrance was c. 1.2 m high, just under 1 m broad and festooned with Blechnum norfolkianum.
(d) Metrosideros Bush.
Burrows beneath the trees of Pohutukawa Gully (N. W. Burgess Island) penetrated mainly beneath tree roots or boulders. Much of the area was bare, but there was a slight increase of plant growth in the fertile soil of the burrow entrances and *Solanum humile and S. nigrum were found only there. Thirteen species were found in 10 entrances, *Dactylis glomerata having a 60% frequency, Tetragonia trigyna and Senecio lautus 40% (valence 3, Fig. 7).
(e) Myoporum-Macropiper Bush.
There was little change of vegetation in the burrow entrances in this type of bush, but the following six species were fairly characteristic.
*Galium aperine, *Solanum spp., *Sonchus oleraceus, *Stellaria media and Parietaria debilis.
(f) Mixed Pasture Community
*Holcus lanatus and *Bromus catharticus were co-dominant of the extensive pasture rookery E. of the Cauldron with *Dactylis glomeratus and Mariscus ustulatus occasional in the W. and locally dominant in the E. Distribution of burrows between stock tracks has been mentioned earlier, and most of the outcropping boulders sheltered two or three burrows. The flora of 50 burrow entrances was listed (valence 2, Fig. 7) and *Dactylis and *Bromus were found to be the most constant species with *Stellaria media third in importance although not a generally distributed pasture species. 65% of the burrow species were aliens.

(g) Scirpus Community
Burrows penetrated beneath Scirpus nodosus clumps W. of the landing, their entrances partially concealed among the dense foliage but often advertised by characteristic coprophiles such as *Solanum and *Sonchus oleraceus. These two, *Dactylis and *Lotus spp. were the most constant in burrow entrances and 78% of 18 species in 15 entrances were aliens (valence 1, Fig. 7).
(h) Mariscus-Pteridium Community
Burrow entrances beneath the Mariscus ustulatus and Pteridium esculentum E. of (f) were deeply shaded and usually bare. The rookery was on a steep, seawardfacing slope, so birds could take off without having to travel long distances through or over the dense plant cover.
(i) Phormium Community
Petrels burrowed beneath Phormium colensoi and Carex clumps on the Maori Bay cliffs. Eighty-seven per cent of the entrance species were alien, although the community as a whole was essentially native (valence 4, Fig. 7).
(j) Myoporum Scrub
Burrows had been dug beneath low, wind-trimmed Myoporum laetum on the cliffs of Maori Bay.
(k) Disphyma Community
Several abortive attempts to burrow had been made in one of the N. coast Disphyma australe swards but all excavations had been abandoned due to insufficient soil depth.
About 500 pairs of white-faced storm petrels (Pelagodroma marina) were recorded on Lizard I. by Buddle, 1947a. These nested close to sea level, whilst shearwaters (Puffinus assimilis and P. gavia) (Turbott, personal communication) burrowed among the roots of Myporum and Mariscus on the same islet.
Acknowledgements
My thanks are due to the Government Marine Department for provision of boat transport and permission to stay at the Mokohinau lighthouse, to the University of New Zealand for a research grant, to the D. S. I. R. Botany Division for the identification of specimens, to Miss. Ann Smith, Messrs. Ivan Anderson and Henare Tohana and Principal Keeper Smith for information, and Mr. Graham Turbott for criticising the manuscript.
References
Buddle, G. A., 1947a. Notes on the Birds of Mokohinau. N.Z. Bird Notes, 2. 4. 69–70.
—— 1947b. Breeding of the Red-billed Gull. N.Z. Bird Notes 2. 4. 71–72.
Fleming, C. A., 1946. Breeding of the Red-billed Gull; a Preliminary Census of the Mokohinau Colony N. Z. Bird Notes 2 27–29.
Fleming, C. A., 1950. The Geology of the Mokohinau Islands, North Auckland Trans. Roy Soc. N. Z 78, 255–268.
Gillham, M. E., 1955. Ecology of the Pembrokeshire Islands. III. Effect of Grazing on the Vegetation. J. Ecol. 43. 1. 172–206.
——, 1960a. Vegetation of Tern and Gannet Colonies in Northern New Zealand. Proc. Roy. Soc. N.Z. (in course of publication).
——, 1960b. Vegetation of Little Brother Island, Cook Strait, in Relation to Spraybearing Winds, Soil Salinity and pH. Proc. Roy. Soc. N.Z. (in course of publication).
Goodman, G. T. and Gillham, M. E., 1953. Ecology of the Pembrokeshire Islands. II. Skokholm, Environment and Vegetation. J. Ecol. 42. 2. 296–327.
Sandager, F., 1889. Observations on the Mokohinau Islands and the Birds which Visit Them. Trans. & Proc. N.Z. Inst. XXII. 286–294.
Mary E. Gillham,
Ph.D., B.Sc.,209 Gunnersbury Park,
Ealing, London, W. 5.,
England.

Riblet Frequency as a Taxonomic Character in New Zealand
Terrestrial Mollusca
[Received by the Editor, July 6, 1959.]
Abstract
Riblet frequency in single populations of Charopa coma (Gray), Fectola tapirina (Hutton), Cavellia biconcava (Pfeiffer), Ptychodon hunuaensis Suter, Allodiscus tullia (Gray), Suteria ide (Gray), and in two widely separated populations of Phenacohelix ponsonbyi (Suter), has been studied to ascertain the extent of variation within post-nuclear whorls and levels of correlation between such whorls (Charopidae and flammulinidae). In all species studied the standard deviation is lowest in the first post-nuclear whorl and rises sharply in the second. With one exception there is a further but often less pronounced rise in the third whorl. Significant correlations between whorls are most frequent in the case of whorls two and three. The second and third post-nuclear whorls appear to be of comparable value in determining population statistics, but there are other factors which favour the use of the former.
Introduction
Riblet orientation, form, definition, and frequency, both in the protoconch and post-nuclear whorls are variable characters of major importance in the systematics of our terrestrial Mollusca. Frequency is commonly employed at the species and sub-species levels (Suter, 1913).
The present investigation was carried out to ascertain whether any general principles apply with regard to the relative variability of riblet frequency in postnuclear whorls. The use of whorls based on post-eclosion growth (especially of the second post-nuclear whorl) has a number of advantages, but before accepting this it seemed desirable to examine riblet frequency variation in representative species of a number of the genera concerned.
Method
Riblet counts in post-nuclear whorls were made on single populations of 3 flammulinid and 4 charopid species belonging to 7 genera. Delimitation of whorls was determined by tracing ribs between sutures rather than by strictly radial means. The selection of the species depended solely on the adequacy of samples available in the author's collection.
Results
The information in respect of each species may be summarized as follows:
Allodiscus tullia (Gray) (Flammulinidaa) Rimutaka Range, 28. 1.40.
| Whorl | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| No. of Observations | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Range in No Riblets | 55–66 | 69–94 | 100–130 |
| Mean | 59.7 | 80.0 | 111.8 |
| Standard Error of Mean | ±0.5 | ±1.3 | ±1.6 |
| Standard Deviation | 2.59 | 6.86 | 8.63 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 4.4% | 8.6% | 7.7% |
| Correlation Coefficients | 1, 2 | −0.130 | NS |
| 1, 3 | +0.067 | NS | |
| 2, 3 | +0.723 | S |

Suteria ide (Gray) (Flammulinidae) Awakino Gorge, July, 1948.
| Whorl | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| No Observations | 14 | 14 | 13 | 11 |
| Range in No Riblets | 26–35 | 31–47 | 43–58 | 55–80 |
| Mean | 30.1 | 37.7 | 48.1 | 66.5 |
| Standard Error of Mean | ±0.7 | ±1.4 | ±1.1 | ±2.0 |
| Standard Deviation | 2.63 | 5.14 | 3.93 | 6.74 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 8.7% | 13.6% | 8.3% | 10.1% |
| Correlation Coefficients | 1, 2 | +0.374 | NS | |
| 1, 3 | +0.038 | NS | ||
| 1, 4 | +0.075 | NS | ||
| 2, 3 | +0.587 | S | ||
| 2, 4 | −0.021 | NS | ||
| 3, 4 | +0.563 | S |
Phenacohelix ponsonbyi (Suter) (Flammulinidae) Sample 1. Ness Valley, Clevedon, 9.7.58.
| Whorl | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| No. Observations | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Range in No. Riblets | 30–43 | 44–59 | 64–85 |
| Mean | 38.4 | 52.5 | 74.4 |
| Standard Error of Mean | ±0.6 | ±0.7 | ±1.1 |
| Standard Deviation | 3.12 | 3.93 | 5.75 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 8.1% | 7.5% | 7.7% |
| Correlation Coefficients | 1, 2 | +0.338 | NS |
| 1, 3 | +0.156 | NS | |
| 2, 3 | +0.581 | S |
Phenacohelix ponsonbyi (Suter) (Flammulinidae) Sample 2. Mangamuka Bridge, 23.9.58.
| Whorl | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| No. Observations | 55 | 43 | 21 |
| Range in No Riblets | 33–47 | 46–65 | 67–100 |
| Mean | 39.8 | 54.7 | 80.5 |
| Standard Error of Mean | ±0.5 | ±0.7 | ±1.5 |
| Standard Deviation | 3.53 | 4.47 | 6.97 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 8.9% | 8.2% | 8.7% |
| Correlation Coefficients | 1, 2 | +0.030 | NS |
| 1, 3 | −0.083 | NS | |
| 2, 3 | +0.526 | S |
Charopa coma (Gray) (Charopidae) Pahiatua, 15.6.58.
| Whorl | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| No. Observations | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Range in No Riblets | 21–29 | 25–39 | 31–49 |
| Mean | 24.4 | 31.2 | 40.1 |
| Standard Error of Mean | ±0.4 | ±0.7 | ±0.8 |
| Standard Deviation | 2.24 | 3.68 | 4.39 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 9.2% | 11.8% | 11.0% |
| Correlation Coefficients | 1, 2 | +0.788 | S |
| 1, 3 | +0.447 | S | |
| 2, 3 | +0.650 | S |
Fectola tapirina (Hutton) (Charopidae) Wilton's Bush, Wellington. 1938.
| Whorl | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| No. Observations | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Range in No. Riblets | 44–59 | 57–82 | 73–110 |
| Mean | 53.5 | 69.7 | 95.8 |
| Standard Error of Mean | ±0.6 | ±1.2 | ±1.6 |
| Standard Deviation | 3.40 | 6.30 | 8.79 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 6.4% | 9.0% | 9.2% |
| Correlation Coefficients | 1, 2 | +0.687 | S |
| 1, 3 | +0.659 | S | |
| 2, 3 | +0.667 | S |

Cavellia biconcava (Pfeiffer) (Charopidae) Tauherenikau Valley, 1938.
| Whorl | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| No. Observations | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Range in No. Riblets | 48–59 | 56–72 | 77–95 |
| Mean | 52.0 | 64.2 | 85.5 |
| Standard Error of Mean | ±0.4 | ±0.7 | ±0.8 |
| Standard Deviation | 2.01 | 3.65 | 4.19 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 3.9% | 5.7% | 4.9% |
| Correlation Coefficients | 1, 2 | +0.508 | S |
| 1, 3 | +0.621 | S | |
| 2, 3 | +0.608 | S |
Ptychodon hunuaensis Suter (Charopidae) Clevedon, 9.7.58.
| Whorl | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| No. Observations | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Range in No. Riblets | 38–50 | 45–63 | 67–106 |
| Mean | 44.0 | 54.4 | 85.4 |
| Standard Error of Mean | ±0.6 | ±0.8 | ±1 9 |
| Standard Deviation | 3.10 | 4.08 | 10.57 |
| Coefficient of Variation | 7.1% | 7.5% | 12.4% |
| Correlation Coefficients | 1, 2 | +0.606 | S |
| 1, 3 | +0.543 | S | |
| 2, 3 | +0.331 | NS |
The information on variation is given in a number of forms. It is seen that the range in counts increases with successive whorls except in the case of Suteria ide which instance is unlikely to be significant. In all cases the standard deviation is lowest in the first post-nuclear whorl and rises sharply in the second. In all except one there is a further but often less-prouounced rise in the third whorl (Fig. 1). In the seven genera studied, significant correlations between whorls occur four times in the cases of whorls 1, 2 and 1, 3 and six times in the case of whorls 2, 3.
Discussion
Riblet frequency is doubtless governed by both inherent qualities and external influences, and just how much each contributes is difficult to assess. In most species the spacing between riblets is not a strictly constant feature although it is often moderately regular. At intervals, from the earliest stages, single spacings or successions of spacings which are wider or narrower than those which follow may occur. A study of the genera which occupy different types of habitat may show that this is reflected in the regularity of riblet spacing. One would expect such genera as Cavellia and Fectola which occur mainly beneath ground materials to show more regularity than is shown by the genera Phenacohelix and Ptychodon which often occupy materials away from ground level, and indeed, this may well be so; but just how much of this variation is inherent and how much is due to the conditions immediately at hand cannot be determined without experiment. These are important considerations in systematics.
Occasionally the number of riblets in the first post-nuclear whorl may equal or exceed the number of riblets in the second whorl in other specimens from the same population. The same may apply in the case of the second and third whorls. Usually, however, there is an increase in the number of riblets in successive whorls. Exceptions to the rule will probably involve specimens which have been injured, or species in which successive whorls show little increase in diameter such as
Phenacharopa novoseelandica (Pfciffer).
The tendency for riblet counts to increase on whorls formed later in the life of the animal is accentuated in many species in old age, and this is a feature which further complicates frequency variations.

Turning now to the present investigation, there are two generalizations in regard to riblet frequency which emerge. These concern the relative stability of the first post-nuclear whorl, and the strong tendency for significant correlation between counts of the second and third post-nuclear whorls.
The general tendency is for a relatively low standard deviation in the first whorl followed by a marked increase in the second, and a further but often less pronounced increase in the third whorl. There are several possible explanations for the apparent stability of the first whorl. Firstly, while the shell is small it is able to utilize niches where there is doubtless greater ecological stability: secondly, it is possible that the first whorl is completed in a relatively shorter period than the other whorls and so is less subject to seasonal changes. It is probable that egg-laying is a seasonal procedure among these small snails. Thirdly, stability in youth may be an inherent character. The true explanation may well lie in a combination of these factors. The characters of this first post-nuclear whorl are important where signifirant differences may be detected, but the characters on which allied species may be

detected and separated are often not evident at this early stage. The increased variability in succeding whorls may be due to the inverse of that stated for the first post-nuclear whorl, that is, the ecological conditions are not so stable, whorls are more time-consuming, and the species is losing the stability associated with youth.
It is possible that in many species the completion of the third post-nuclear whorl signifies maturity but not old age, and that had samples with a larger number of specimens been available and counts made on whorls situated 2½ to 3½ revolutions from the protoconch, then increased variability associated with old age would have been more evident. In Ptychodon hunuaensis there is possibly some evidence of this In this species it would appear that specimens rarely proceed far beyond the third post-nuclear whorl, so that here we have full expression of increasing variability associated with old age. This species besides being the smallest studied is also a fairly robust one which features may contribute to higher survival rates of older individuals.
This aspect may appear to minimize the value of the significant correlations occurring above between whorls two and three, but if the species is to be characterized by the form of the mature individual which most commonly occurs rather than by the occasional old specimen, then the value of the correlations is still real.
In view of this high degree of correlation in frequencies between second and third post-nuclear whorls in species which produce 3 to 4 post-nuclear whorls, there seems to be no reason why the second whorl should not be selected for use in statistical studies, for it does possess certain advantages over other whorls. Where 4 to 5 post-nuclear whorls are usual, the third whorl may possess similar advantages. As shells become older, the riblets on younger portions often become worn away and difficult to count. In older portions of the shells the riblets often become so closely spaced that they present similar difficulties. Most samples of populations contain a fair proportion of younger shells in which the second but not the third whorl is available for counts. Less counting is involved in the second than in the third whorl.
It has been customary in the past to draw riblet frequency data from the socalled “body-whorl”. This is that portion of the shell which runs from the lip back and around to that point exactly adjacent. This procedure introduces a variable which may be eliminated by substitution of frequencies strictly related to the post-nuclear whorl. It is desirable that species definition contain statistics pertaining to all post-nuclear whorls to assist the identification of young specimens.
Acknowledgment
The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Mr. A. C. Glenday, of the Applied Mathematics Laboratory, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, who made the analyses of riblet counts and provided useful suggestions in the presentation of results.
Reference
Suter, H., 1913. “Manual of New Zealand Mollusca.” N.Z. Govt. Printer, Wellington 1120 pp.
R. A. Cumber,
489 Albert Street,
Palmerston North.

Studies on New Zealand Elasmobranchii.—Part X
The Genus Echinorhinus, with an Account of a Second Species,
E. cookei Pietschmann, 1928, from New Zealand Waters*
[Received by Editor, September 14, 1959.]
Abstract
Echinorhinus cookei Pietschmann, 1928, is recorded from a 1980 mm male here designated as neotype E. cookei is uniformly covered with numereous small, bucklerlike dermal denticles, up to 4 mm diam. with strongly indented, angular bases and coarsely ridged spines; in contrast the denticles of E. brucus are sparse, irregularly distributed, up to 15 mm diam if solitary but 35 mm if compound, and have entiremargined bases and finely ridged spines. Three New Zealand juveniles of E. cookei are markedly slender, with one-cusped teeth as in Squalus. The lateral line of E. cookei is an open furrow supported by incomplete, transverse skeletal rings with their free ends projecting as spines; the adult furrow is bridged at irregular intervals by skin. A Californian record of E. brucus is shown to be E. cookei. Previous New Zealand records of E. brucus cannot be confirmed, but E. brucus is known for New Zealand by a mounted skin of a Dunedin specimen in the Otago Museum.
The genus Echinorhinus has been known from New Zealand waters since 1884, with five specimens recorded in the literature as E. spinosus Blainville, 1825, E. mccoyi Whitley, 1931 or E. brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788). Of these E. spinosus and E. mccoyi are currently recognised as synonyms of E. brucus, the cosmopolitan Bramble Shark. Despite these records, only fragmentary Echinorhinus material was held in New Zealand museums, the most complete exhibit being a mounted skin of a specimen about 1,420 mm long in the Otago Museum and labelled “Dunedin. April, 1887”. This specimen is not in the literature and there is no further information on it.
In view of the above it was of considerable interest when two Cook Strait fishermen, Messrs. A. Dellabarca and W. Hickman, of the line-boat “Calabria” brought in a Bramble Shark taken in 40–50 fathoms in Palliser Bay on April 20, 1959. This shark, a male, 1,980 mm long, was obviously referable to Echinorhinus but lacked the large, spine-bearing bucklers, up to 15 mm diameter or more on a specimen of equal size, which, irregularly and rather sparsely distributed over the body, are characteristic of E. brucus. Instead the Palliser Bay shark had a uniform covering of small bucklers, not larger than 4 mm diam. and mostly less, and much more numerous than those of E. brucus. Examination of the literature shows that this shark is identifiable as E. cookei Pietschmann, 1928, a species recorded only from the type taken off Hawaii.
The status of E. cookei has not been clear-cut, apparently because Pietschmann (1928, 1930) did not give his reasons for separating it from E. brucus. Also, Fowler (1941, p. 287) who examined the type of E. cookei, reports that he “cannot find that Echinorhinus cookei is other than a variant of this species” (E. brucus). Bigelow & Schroeder (1948, p. 527) leave the question open, stating that “Final conclusions must await critical comparison of adequate series of specimens”.
[Footnote] * This study has been assisted by a grant from the Research Grants Committee of the University of New Zealand.

The distinction of E. cookei from E. brucus is definite and striking, at least between sub-adult or adult specimens, but so far can be based only on the bucklerlike dermal denticles (Plate 7, Figs. A-D). There appear to be no significant differences in proportional dimensions,* in external morphology, or in details of the teeth. However, the differences in the denticles lie not only in their relative size as mentioned above, though this alone is sufficient, but also in the shape and sculpture of the denticle bases (entire-margined or nearly so, and with rather fine radial ridging in E. brucus, but with strongly indented margins and coarse ridges (Text-fig. 2, E-H) in E. cookei), the presence in E. brucus of compound denticles up to 35 mm long, as a result of fusion of adjacent denticle bases, while such fused denticles are not a feature of E. cookei; and there is the tendency in E. brucus to retain noticeable-sized denticles on the underside of the snout and around the mouth even on large specimens, while in the type of E. cookei and in my specimen this area is virtually smooth, only a few minute denticles being present. For information on the last-mentioned feature in E. brucus I. am indebted to Dr. Denys E. Tucker, who examined five Mediterranean, Eastern North Atlantic and South African specimens, 910 mm to about 2,150 mm long, in the British Museum.
Comparison of my specimen with Pietschmann's (1930, p. 3) account of the type of E. cookei, a male 2,033 mm long and hence comparable to mine, shows close correspondence between them. Agreement in the dermal denticles is confirmed by enlargements from the negatives of the photographs used by Pietschmann in his Plate 1, A. and B; for these enlargements I. am indebted to Dr. Edwin H. Bryan, jun, Bernice P. Bishop Museum. With respect to the proportional dimensions of the type, it should be noted that Pietschmann gives the length of caudal as 5.2 in total length, while in my specimen the caudal is 3.8 if measured from subcaudal origin, and 4.2 if measured from upper caudal. Similarly other given dimensions involving the caudal indicate a shorter tail in the type than in my specimen, though this is not supported by reference to Pietschmann's photographs of the type. It would seem that Pietschmann either used a method of measurement different from that currently employed, or that he failed to make allowance for the undue upturning of the tail of his specimen as shown in his photograph. Some other of Pietschmann's dimensions also call for comment. His distance “from base of pectoral to tip of snout” as 5.2 in head is obviously in error, while “distance of nostrils” as 2.4 in head, and “depth of mouth (distance of middle of rear border from a line connecting both angles of mouth) 4.1 in breadth of mouth” do not match with his very good photograph of the underside of the head where the same dimensions appear to be about 5.0 and 2.8 respectively.
In my specimen these dimensions are 4.0 and 2.3 Unfortunately the type of E. cookei no longer exists, so that no check can be made on its dimensions, but from Pietschmann's account it can be said that other than in these apparently erroneous differences the type and my specimen agree closely in all respects.
The presence of E. cookei in regions as far separated as the tropical North Pacific (Hawaii) and the temperate South Pacific (New Zealand) suggests that it is a wide-ranging species likely to be encountered throughout the temperate and tropical Pacific as a whole, if not outside this ocean as well. This is supported by the recent capture of a 2,126 mm specimen off Peru (information kindly supplied in advance of publication by Miss N. Chirichigno), and also by the record of a Bramble Shark, 1,960 mm long, taken in 50–55 fathoms off California and reported by Hubbs & Clark (1945) as E. brucus, though it is in fact E. cookei. The photographs of
[Footnote] * E. obesus Smith, 1849, long regarded as a synonym of E. brucus, is a much more heavybodied fish than E. cookei (or for that matter E. brucus also) if Smith's figure (Pl. 1) is accurate. It is shown as having large, sparsely distributed bucklers like those of E. brucus.

Figs A-B Echinorhinus cookei Pietschmann, neotype (Dom Mus No. 2744) male, 1,980 mm, New Zealand Fig A, Trunk between pectoral and pelvic fins showing small dermal denticles White areas on trunk are due to damage during capture Fig B, Closeup of denticles from above lateral line on trunk
Photos F. O'Leary, Dominion Museusm
Figs C-D Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre), 1,420 mm long mounted skin in Otago Museum, New Zealand Fig C, Trunk between pectoral and pelvic fins showing large bucklers Note buckler spines projecting from profile of trunk Fig D, Close-up of denticles, mostly below lateral line, showing compound bucklers at left of photogroph
Photos. R. R. Forster, Otago Museum
N. B. The dried skin of Figs. C-D makes the denticles shape and size more obvious than in Figs. A-B, where the specimen is formalin preserved

the Californian specimen in Hubbs & Clark's account indicate a lack of the large bucklers characteristic of E. brucus. This was confirmed through the kindness of Dr. Ernest A. Lachner, who examined the Californian specimen (deposited in the United States National Museum, Cat. No. 130667), and supplied a small representative sample of skin from high on the flank. The sample shows complete agreement in the dermal denticles with my specimen, the bucklers being mostly about 2 mm to 3 mm diam. and having strongly indented bases and prominent radial ridges. Dr. Lachner also reports that there are tiny scattered denticles on the underside of the head and snout, so that these regions are not entirely smooth (though more nearly so than in E. brucus) which is likewise in accord with my specimen. The dimensions of the Californian specimen as given in Hubbs and Clark's account parallel mine except for longer gill-openings, and the preocular length greater than the preoral—in my specimen the anterior margin of the eye is just in front of the level of the mouth. But I. do not regard these differences as warranting specific distinction.
The above-mentioned confusion of E. cookei with E. brucus poses the question of how many other reports of Bramble sharks as E. brucus (or its synonyms E. spinosus and E. mccoyi) are based on E. cookei. The diagnosis of E. brucus in many accounts is not sufficient to distinguish E. cookei. As an example, although Gunther (1870, p. 428) in his generic diagnosis of Echinorhinus gives “skin with scattered large round tubercles”, his diagnosis of E. spinosus is “each tubercle with a small spine in the centre”; the use of the word “small” in this context is likely to cause misinterpretation as to the size of the bucklers as a whole. The same can be said of Jordan & Evermann's (1896) account, where identical wording is employed. The question is unlikely to be answered for many, perhaps most records, unless they are fully descriptive of the denticles, or substantiated by illustrations, specimens, or fragments of specimens showing representative samples of denticles. Consequent on this, of the five New Zealand records of E. brucus, none can with certainty be confirmed as this species. These records are summarised below.
1884. Parker, T. J. (Trans. N. Z. Inst., 16: 280–281). Specimen caught off Dunedin, July, 1883, identified as E. spinosus from mutilated remains (jaws and tail). No description or illustration. (The jaws and tail cannot now be found in the Otago Museum where they were originally deposited.)
1886. Hamilton, A. (Trans. N. Z. Inst., 18: 135). Records, in footnote, specimen of E. spinosus taken at Napier, Hawke's Bay, in September, 1885.
1913. Waite, E. R. (Rec. Cant. Mus., II (1): 17) Identifies from photograph as E. brucus, a 2,567 mm specimen washed ashore at Opotiki, Bay of Plenty. No description or illustration.
1928. Phillipps, W. J. (N.Z. Journ. Sci. & Tech. X. (4): 221–222). 1,575 mm specimen recorded from Cook Strait as E. brucus Describes colour as rich brown with ovate black spots; denticles as circular bony tubercles with a sharp spine in centre.
1946. Phillipps, W. J. (Dom. Mus. Rec. in Zool., I. (2): 19–20). Reports jaws of specimen recently trawled off Hawke's Bay as E. mccoyi.
The black spots on Phillipps' (1928) specimen suggest E. brucus rather than E. cookei which is so far known only as uniformly coloured (some specimens of E. brucus are likewise reputed to lack such spots), while the description of the denticles as “circular bony tubercles” would also point to E. brucus. But these can scarcely be classed as definitive criteria, and in the absence of supporting specimens the presence of E. brucus in New Zealand waters seems to depend on the mounted skin (Pl. 7, C–D) in the Otago Museum which, as mentioned above, has not previously been recorded.

With regard to E. cookei, two occurrences* in New Zealand other than the Palliser Bay specimen described here can be placed on record. The first of these is of a large specimen, reputedly about 4,000 mm (13 feet) long, taken in 35 fathoms off Shag Point, near Mocraki, towards the end of 1953, by Mr. R. Welsh. The photograph I. have of this specimen, which is the only evidence now available, shows clearly a uniform denticulation and absence of large bucklers. The reported length of this specimen appears to be a record for the genus—E. brucus is not known longer than about 3,000 mm—and from the photograph seems substantially correct in comparison with the size of the people surrounding the specimen. The second additional record is based on three juvenile specimens, 445 mm to 472 mm long, held in the collections of the Department of Zoology, Victoria University of Wellington. These juveniles in which the yolk-sac scars are just healed, were trawled in Cook Strait in either 1946 or 1947, and presented to the University by Mr. F. Abernethy. They show the same form of dermal denticles (Text-fig. 3, C) as the adult, but with two sizes of denticles present, of which the smaller are 0.5 mm to 0.8 mm diam and cover the whole body, including the underside of head and snout where they are almost as numerous as elsewhere. The larger denticles are 1.5 mm to 2.0 mm diam. (about half the size of adult E. cookei denticles) and are newly erupted or erupting; these are present mainly on the upper half of the trunk, above the lateral line; their distribution and spacing agree well with the adult. Despite these similarities the identification of the juveniles a E. cookei is made with some degree of caution, for the smallest denticles on the adult E. brucus in the Otago Museum have the same facies as those of my juveniles and hence also of adult E. cookei—i e, they have strongly indented, angular bases and coarse radial ridges (pers. comm. from Dr. R. R. Forster, Director, Otago Museum). Although the denticulation of juvenile E. brucus is not known, it can be inferred from Dr. Forster's observation that the small denticles on his adult are of juvenile from; hence such juvenile denticles will be common to both species, but will mostly be replaced by larger, circular-based denticles in sub-adult E. brucus. On these grounds the identification of my juveniles is necessarily tentative, except that the number, spacing and distribution of their larger denticles falls so closely into line with that of adult E. cookei, without suggesting the sparse and irregular distribution of E. brucus Further support for the belief that the juveniles are E. cookei is provided by Dr. Denys E. Tucker's examination of five specimens of E. brucus in the British Museum He reports (pers. comm). “as we proceed to larger specimens, it becomes evident that the definitive denticulation must be laid down at a relatively early age” His data give the size of large bucklers on a 910 mm male as up to 17 mm diam., while on a 1,690 mm male “the large denticles show no increase in absolute size and are rather more widely spaced”. This means that if my juveniles are E. brucus rather than E. cookei they would, in doubling their length (to reach the length of Tucker's smallest specimen) have to acquire a full array of adult denticles with diameters up to eight times that of their present 2.0 mm denticles. This seems unlikely.
The slenderness of the juveniles compared with the adult E. cookei is striking, especially along the posterior half of the trunk and the peduncle (Text-fig. 3A) where the depth of the body is relatively only two-thirds that of the adult. In other regions, including the head and the tail, the difference is less marked but still obvious. Relative longitudinal proportions are more nearly alike although the juveniles have rather longer heads and tails, as would be expected.
[Footnote] * Since the preparation of this account, another specimen (female, Dom. Mus. No. 2826) comparable in size to the Palliser Bay specimen, has been taken in western Cook strait. It was lined by W. T. Mc Manaway on October 10, 1959.

Differences between the juvenile and adult teeth are also remarkable, though apparently paralleled in E. brucus. The juvenile teeth, both upper and lower, are one-cusped (Text-fig. 3, D-E), the cusps strongly reflexed laterally so as to point almost horizontally. They are closely similar to those of Squalus in appearance but rather wider in relation to their height. The adult teeth are more erect, and have four or five cusps, there being one or two minor cusps on each side of the major cusp (Text-fig. 2, I-J). Behind the upper teeth, inside the mouth, is a prominent maxillary velum, fimbriated along its posterior margin, and with a narrow band of many fleshy papillae immediately internal to the teeth (Text-fig. 2, C). It resembles that of many batoids and is an unusual feature for sharks.
The lateral line of juveniles and adult is open for most of its length, as it is in E. brucus, forming a conspicuous white furrow from above the second gill-opening rearwards. In cross-section the upper edge of the furrow slightly overhangs the lower edge, especially in the adult. Each edge of the furrow is armed with a row of pointed spines, their tips directed rearwards; this also agrees with the condition described for E. brucus in Bigelow & Schroeder (1957, p. 134) Closer examination shows that the spines are not discrete units but are the free ends of regularly placed, incomplete skeletal rings, lying inside transversely across the furrow and supporting its walls (Text-fig. 1, A-C); presumably these rings, which have not previously been described, are derived from dermal denticles. They are unique not only for the Squaloidea but for all other true sharks as well (excluding here the Chimaerae
Text-fig. 1.—Fig. A, semidiagrammatic view of lateral line from trunk of 445 mm juvenile Echinorhinus cookei (Dom. Mus. No. 2792) showing ring-like skeletal elements (SR) with pointed tips bordering the edges of the open furrow Fig. B, skeletal elements of lateral line from same specimen and position as Fig. A, but drawn from dried skin Fig. C, semidiagrammatic view of lateral line from trunk of 1,980 mm Echinorhinus cookei (neotype, Dom. Mus. No. 2774) New Zealand, showing similar features as Fig. A, though skeletal rings (SR) may have bifid tips, the furrow is more nearly closed and is bridged at intervals by skin (BR).

where similar dermal rings are recorded for Chimaera which has an open lateral line). In the juveniles the rings are simple and readily visible; in the adult they frequently have bifid tips and are obscured to some extent by the more nearly approximated edges of the furrow. The adult lateral line differs further from the juvenile in that it is bridged at irregular but fairly close intervals along its length by narrow cross-connections of skin (Text-fig 1, C), still, however, leaving much more of the furrow open than covered. Careful inspection along the whole length of the lateral line suggests that this incomplete bridging is the normal condition. In this respect my interpretation differs from that of Bigelow & Schroeder, who assume that in E. brucus the canal is normally closed, at least as far back as the pelvic fins, but is opened by damage or wear during capture and subsequent handling. Anterior to the second gill-opening the lateral line is completely closed except for a row of pores as is usual in most other sharks and all other squaloids. It is of particular interest that in this forward region the lateral line does not contain skeletal rings. Rings appear to be one kind of functional modification for support of open lateral line canals. In Chlamydoselachus and Notorhynchus, the only other true sharks with open lateral line canals, the edges of the furrow are margined by a row of somewhat overhanging dermal denticles, whose bases, at least in Notorhynchus, and apparently also in Chlamydoselachus (Garman, 1885, p. 7, Pl. 6, Fig. 10) do not extend far into or across the furrow.
Genus Echinorhinus Blainville, 1816
Teeth similar in upper and lower jaws, with 1 cusp in juveniles but 3 to 7 cusps in older specimens, the middle cusp of each tooth much the largest and so strongly oblique that the inner margin of adjacent middle cusps form an almost continuous cutting edge along the jaw; dermal denticles in the form of tubercles or shields, either simple, with central spine, or compound, with two or more spines, distributed uniformly or in groups; caudal without precaudal pits, the axis moderately raised, the fin deeper below the axis than above, its tip pointed without subterminal notch, oral clefts short, restricted to angles of mouth, the preoral cleft not pouched towards midline; lateral line an open furrow along sides of body, its walls supported by incomplete skeletal rings whose free ends project as spines along edges of furrow, bridged at irregular intervals by narrow cross-connections of skin; spiracles minute; origin of first dorsal over bases of pelvics, and far behind midlength of trunk; gill-openings large; (Adapted from Bigelow & Schroeder, 1948, p. 526, 1957, p. 134)
Echinorhinus cookei Pietschman, 1928.
Echinorhinus brucus (not Bonnaterre). Hubbs, C. L. and Clark, F. N., 1945. Calif. Fish and Game 31 (2):64–67.
The type of E. cookei is now lost, having disintegrated following dessication; no fragments are known to have been ratained (pers. comm. from Dr. Edwin H. Bryan, jun., Curator of Collections, Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Hawaii). I. am reluctant to designate a neotype, but in view of the confusion there has been between E. cookei and E. brucus, and the failure of many accounts of E. brucus to provide sufficient detail to exclude E. cookei, a reference specimen is necessary and warranted I thereby designate the 1,980 mm male described below from Cook Strait, New Zealand, as the neotype of E. cookei. The neotype is deposited in the Dominion Museum, Wellington, New Zealand, where it bears the label “Neotype. Echinothinus cookei Pietschmann, male 1,980 mm T.L., from 40–50 fathoms Palliser Bay, April, 1959. Coll. A Dellabarca & W. Hickman. Dom. Mus. No. 2774”
Study Material
(a) Adult: Male, 1,980 mm T. L. (Neotype, Dom. Mus. No. 2774) lined from 40–50 fathoms, Palliser Bay (Cook Strait, New Zealand), Aprial, 1959.
(b) Juveniles: Female, 450 mm T. L., male, 445 mm T. L. (Dom. Mus. No. 2792) and male, 472 mm T. L. trawled from Cook Strait, New Zealand, about 1946 or 1947 and held in the Zoology Department, Victoria University of Wellington.

Text-fig. 2—Echinorhinus cookei Pietschmann, 1,980 mm male (neotype, Dom. Mus. No. 2774) New Zealand. Fig. A, lateral view and insets of transverse sections of snout and peduncle. Fig. B, ventral view of head. Fig. C, maxillary velum (medial half, left side) showing fleshy papillae behind teeth, and fimbriated posterior margin. Fig. D, right nostril. Fig. E, dermal denticles from high on side, halfway along trunk, drawn from dried skin. Fig. F, external view of denticle. Figs. G-H, lateral views of recurved and erect denticles. Figs. I-J, upper and lower teeth, right side. cl, level of cloaca.

Description
| Adult (Neotype Dom. Mus. No. 2774) | Juveniles (Dom. Mus. No. 2792) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,980mm | 472mm | 445mm | |
| Trunk at pectoral origin: Breadth | 13.9 | 12.5 | 14.4 |
| Height | 13.1 | 11.2 | 11.7 |
| Snout length in front of: Outer nostrils | 4.8 | 5.9 | 6.4 |
| Mouth | 7.0 | 9.1 | 9.9 |
| Eye: Horizontal diameter | 1.8 | 3.2 | 3.8 |
| Mouth: Breadth | 9.8 | 12.5 | 12.6 |
| Height | 4.3 | 6.4 | 6.2 |
| Nostrils: Distance between inner ends | 5.3 | 5.7 | 5.8 |
| Preoral clefts: Length | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Gill-opening lengths: First | 2.9 | 3.6 | 4.3 |
| Fifth | 5.7 | 4.9 | 6.3 |
| First dorsal fin: Vertical height | 3.8 | 3.4 | 2.8 |
| Length of base | 6.2 | 3.8 | 3.4 |
| Second dorsal fin: Vertical height | 4.1 | 3.0 | 3.4 |
| Lenght of base | 5.4 | 4.0 | 3.6 |
| Caudal fin: Upper margin | 23.0 | 26.9 | 27.0 |
| Lower anterior margin | 12.6 | 12.9 | 11.7 |
| Pectoral fin: Length anterior margin | 11.7 | 10.8 | 11.5 |
| Breadth | 7.1 | 5.5 | 5.8 |
| Distance from snout to: Eye | 6.6 | 8.5 | 9.2 |
| 1st gill-opening | 20.1 | 22.0 | 23.0 |
| 5th gill-opening | 25.5 | 27.5 | 28.1 |
| Pectoral origin | 26.0 | 28.4 | 29.5 |
| 1st dorsal origin | 57.3 | 58.5 | 59.0 |
| 2nd dorsal origin | 67.2 | 65.4 | 66.0 |
| Pelvic origin | 55.7 | 54.0 | 54.0 |
| Upper caudal origin | 76.4 | 73.0 | 72.0 |
| Interspace between: 1st dorsal base and 2nd dorsal origin | 4.3 | 3.8 | 4.0 |
| 2nd dorsal base and upper caudal | |||
| origin | 4.1 | 2.6 | 2.2 |
| Pelvic base and subcaudal | 7.0 | 6.5 | |
| Distance from origin to origin of: Pectoral and pelivic | 29.3 | 25.4 | 24.7 |
| Pelvic and subcaudal | 18.4 | 16.0 |
(a) Adult (Text-fig. 1, C, Text-fig. 2, A–J, Plate 7, A–B)
Head depressed, small-eyed, snout pointed. trunk stout, sub-cylindrical anteriorly, markedly compressed posteriorly. Dorsal and ventral profiles of trunk almost parallel. Height of trunk at origion of pectorals about one-sixth of its length to subcaudal origin. Length of body measured to cloaca 63.3% of total length. Caudal peduncle strongly compressed and deep, its depth almost twice its width and equal to snout length in front of eye. No precaudal pits or lateral keels on the peduncle.
Dermal denticles in the form of erect or slightly retrorse thorns with prominent radial ridges extending down on to multiangled bases. The perimeter of each base is deeply indented between adjacent radial ridges so that the numerous angles and ridges are strongly defined. Each denticle carries only one thorn which is sharply pointed, and ridged along all or most of its length. All denticles are solitary, adjacent bases never fused though occasionally contiguous. Diameter of denticle bases mostly 2–3 mm or less, infrequently 4 mm.
Denticles obvious over whole of body excepting underside of snout and around mouth (which regions are essentially smooth, though a few minute denticles are present), small areas at axils of fins, and distal margins of fins. Denticles everywhere wide spaced but more or less uniformly distributed. Largest denticles along dorsal surface of trunk, especially above lateral line; towards ventral surface, and on to head and tail, denticles gradually decrease in size. Several sizes of denticles present, particularly on dorsum of trunk, where minute denticles of uniform size are dispersed throughout larger denticles of various sizes.
Lateral line conspicuous from above 2nd gill-opening to tip of tail as a white furrow with closely approximated edges, the upper slightly overhanging the lower. It is crossed at irregular intervals along its length by narrow, thin, membranous bridges, though considerably more of it is open than is covered Inside the furrow and supporting its walls, are numerous, regularly-placed skeletal elements in the form of incomplete rings, presumably derived from

Text-fig. 3.—Echinorhinus cookei, juvenile male 445 mm (Dom. Mus. No. 2792) New Zealand. Fig. A, lateral view and insets of transverse sections of snout and peduncle Fig. B, ventral view of head. Fig. C, dermal denticles and lateral line from halfway along trunk, drawn from dried skin Figs. D-E, upper and lower teeth, right side cl, level of cloaca; sp, spiracle.

dermal denticles. The free ends of these rings are pointed (many are bifurcated also) and project slightly rearwards, forming a fringe or palisade of spines along each edge of the furrow. Anterior to the 2nd gill-opening the lateral line is continued on to the head by a row of lateral line pores.
Head measured to 1st gill-opening 5.0 in total length. Head depressed, flat above and below, and wedge-shaped in profile. Least fleshy interorbital distance 2.0 in head. Snout length measured to eye, 3.0 in head; snout contour bluntly pointed at snout tip; a poorly defined dorsolateral edge along each side of snout from eye to snout tip. Eye small, scarcely longer than high, its horizontal diameter 3.7 in length of snout, its anterior margin just in front of level of mouth. Spiracle minute, placed almost 2½ eye-lengths behind eye. Gill-openings large, nearly vertical, concave, and in a horizontal series anterior to pectoral base. Lengths of gill-openings increasing greatly from 1st to 5th, the 5th almost twice the 1st and 1.4 in the snout length. Interspaces between the gill-openings decreasing rearwards. Nostrils large, transverse, placed two-thirds of distance back from snout tip to mouth. Interspace between nostrils about equal to their distance from snout tip. Each nostril with a large, ovoid, median aperture and a smaller, circular, lateral aperture, the two apertures separated by triangular, nasal flaps. The medial aperture margined in front and behind by a membranous band; the anterior part of this band, which is twice the height of the posterior, is continued laterally to the pointed tip of the rearward-directed, anterior nasal flap. Posterior nasal flap fleshy and internal to the anterior flap. Mouth a high crescent, its height about half its width, and the latter about half the length of the head measured to 1st gill-opening. Preoral clefts short and shallow, only two-thirds the length of the posterior, labial furrow, and the latter about ¼ of distance from angle of mouth to symphysis of lower jaw.
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
Teeth 12 - 10/11 - 11, small, similar in the upper and lower jaws. Each tooth with a subrectangular base about four times as long as high, and carrying a large, laterally-directed major cusp flanked by one or two minor cusps on each side. In the upper teeth the medial margin of the major cusp is convex, and there are two minor cusps on each flank, those on the median flank being directed medially, those on the lateral flank directed laterally. In the lower teeth the major cusp is slightly more erect, its medial margin almost straight, and there is only one minor cusp on the lateral flank, though two on the median. All the cusps are sharply pointed and smooth-edged Bases of adjacent teeth only slightly separated except at symphysis of lower jaw where there is a large median interspace. Teeth at centre of mouth slightly smaller than those midway out, though towards angles of mouth the teeth again decrease in size. One row of functional teeth in each jaw.
Inside the mouth behind the upper teeth is a prominent maxillary velum, parallel to the jaw, some 45 mm deep at the midline, and tapering uniformly on each side as it extends to the angles of the mouth. Posterior edge of velum fimbriated, while anteriorly there is a band of many fleshy papillae occupying about ¼ of the depth of the velum.
Both dorsal fins for back on the trunk, small, sub-equal in size, brush-shaped, their apices and posterior free corners rounded, their margins almost straight. 1st dorsal origin over anterior third of pelvic base, insertion just behind middle of pelvic base. Height of 1st dorsal 1.6 in the length of its base, and just less than height of 2nd dorsal. Posterior free corner of 1st dorsal over insertion of pelvic base, and just anterior to origin of 2nd dorsal Interspace between 1st and 2nd dorsals ⅘ of the 1st dorsal base. Posterior free tip of 2nd dorsal just anterior to epiural origin. Caudal measured from hypural origin 3.8 in total length. Caudal scythe-shaped, without a subterminal notch. Epiural lobe moderately developed, hypural lobe deep. Margin of epiural straight for most of its length, convex distally, length of epiural margin twice that of hypural. Anterior margin of hypural weakly convex, apex broadly rounded, and posterior margin concave. Tip of tail bluntly pointed Pectorals lobate, about 1½ times as long as broad, and with long bases, anterior and posterior margins of pectorals convex, distal margins weakly concave; corners broadly rounded Length of anterior pectoral margin 1.1 in distance from rear edge of eye to 1st gill opening. Pelvics very large, triangular, length of their bases equal to length of anterior pectoral margin. Anterior and distal margins straight, apex broadly rounded, and posterior free tip sharply pointed. Claspers tapered, rather slender, extending little behind the posterior free tip of pelvic.
Colour (fresh). Overall greyish-brown, distal margins of fins black; underside of snout and around mouth white, iris black, outer margin of eyeball iridescent greenish-blue.
(b) Juvenile. (Text-fig. 1, A-B Text-fig. 3, A-E)
Description as for adult male, except as noted below; based mainly on 445 mm male Trunk and peduncle slender; depth of peduncle 2.0 in snout length anterior to eye. Length of body measured to cloaca 59.6% of total length.
Dermal denticles of two sizes, the smaller 0.5 mm to 0.8 mm diam across the base, the larger 1.5 mm to almost 20 mm diam. The smaller denticles are close set, and cover the entire fish except for small areas at axils of fins, along distal margins of fins, and a narrow

band along the lower lip. The larger denticles are present chiefly on the dorsal surface of trunk and head, and are well-spaced but more or less regularly distributed, their greatest concentration being above the lateral line between head and 1st dorsal fin; below the lateral line they are less numerous, as they are on the head and snout, on the peduncle and along the proximal part of the epiural lobe of the caudal. These large denticles are newly erupted or erupting, evidently at a fairly rapid rate for the 472 mm male shows considerably more of them than the slightly smaller 445 mm male.
Lateral line a conspicuous white furrow from the 2nd gill-opening rearwards, where it is completely open, without membranous bridges and with its upper and lower edges more separated than in the adult. The supporting skeletal rings have simple (not bifurcated) ends. Lateral line pores on head and snout very prominent.
Head measured to 1st gill-opening 4.4 in total length. Snout length measured to eye 2.4 in head. Eye large, its horizontal diameter 2.4 in length of snout. Spiracle minute, placed little more than an eye length behind eye. Length of 1st gill-opening 1.4 in length of 5th.
[The section below cannot be correctly rendered as it contains complex formatting. See the image of the page for a more accurate rendering.]
Teeth 11 - 10/11 - 9 in the 445 mm male, 12 - 11/10 - 10 in the 472 mm male, one-cusped and similar in the upper and lower jaws. Each tooth with an ovoid to subrectangular base about twice as long as high, and carrying a sharply-pointed, smooth-edged blade-like cusp. The cusps are enamelled only on their margins, and are so strongly reflexed as to lie horizontal; hence their median margins form a continuous cutting edge.
Dorsal fins with convex anterior margins. First dorsal origin just anterior to middle of pelvic base or over anterior third, insertion over or just anterior to end of pelvic base. Height of first dorsal 1.3 in its base. Posterior free corner of 1st dorsal over middle of posterior (inner) margin of pelvic Caudal measured from hypural origin 3.3 in total length. Distal margins of pectorals straight or slightly convex. Length of anterior pectoral margin equal to distance from rear edge of eye to 2nd gill-opening.
Length of pelvic base 1.4 in length of anterior pectoral margin. Claspers reaching only two-thirds of distance from pelvic insertion to posterior free tip of pelvic.
Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788)
As mentioned above, because of possible confusion between this species and E. cookei, its presence in New Zealand waters cannot be confirmed from any of the five previous records, but instead depends only on the unrecorded mounted skin, 1,420 mm long, in the Otago Museum (Plate 7, C-D). No further data other than its label, “Dunedin, April, 1887”, are available: its condition and probable distortion do not warrant it being used for obtaining dimensions.
The recognition of the Otago Museum specimen as E. brucus rather than E. mccoyi (in which species Phillipps placed his 1946 record of a New Zealand specimen) depends mainly on the recent accounts in Bigelow & Schroeder (1948, p. 527; 1957, p. 135) where they describe sufficient variation in E. brucus to provide for the differences cited by Whitley (1931, p. 311) as the basis for his proposed new subgenus and species E. (Rubusqualus) mccoyi. Phillipps (1946, p. 20) holds that the gill-openings are longer in E. mccoyi than in E. brucus; but these seem subject to considerable variation. Thus while the lengths of the 1st and 5th gillopenings in the type of E. mccoyi are 2.9% and 6.4% of the total length respectively, they are 3.6% and 6.4% in a Mediterranean specimen, and 2.3% and 5.4% in a South African specimen of E. brucus (pers. comm. from Dr. Denys E. Tucker on dimensions of specimens in the British Museum).
The above leaves no grounds on which to separate and Australasian species E. mccoyi from the cosmopolitan species E. brucus. But detailed accounts and dimensions of E. brucus from any localities, including the North Atlantic as well as the Australasian region, are still needed if the currently believed cosmopolitan status of E. brucus is to be assured.
Summary
(i) A. second species of Bramble Shark, Echinorhinus cookei Pietschmann, 1928, is recorded and described from a 1,980 mm male recently caught in Cook Strait, New Zealand. E. cookei has been known only from the type taken off Hawaii, and is generally regarded as synonymous with the cosmopolitan E. brucus.

(ii) E. cookei is not separable from E. brucus in its dimensions, external morphology or teeth, but is strikingly different in its dermal denticles which are numerous, uniformly distributed, small (not more than 4.0 mm basal diam.) and have deeply indented, angular bases and prominently ridged spins. In contrast, the buckler-like denticles of E. brucus are sparse, irregularly distributed, large (up to 15 mm or more basal diam. in solitary denticles but reaching to 35 mm in compound bucklers) with entire-margined bases and finely ridged spines. Adult E. cookei are also almost smooth under the snout and around the mouth, while in E. brucus these areas retain noticeable-sized denticles.
(iii) The Bramble Shark recorded off California by Hubbs & Clark (1945) as E. brucus is shown to be E. cookei. This confusion between the species, due to inadequacies in the earlier accounts of E. brucus, suggests the need for examination of other records of E. brucus. In this respect none of the five records of E. brucus from New Zealand are sufficiently definitive to allow confirmation as to species; but E. brucus is established as a member of the New Zealand fauna by the mounted skin of a Dunedin specimen in the Otago Museum.
(iv) Three juvenile specimens of E. cookei from Cook Strait are also described. These are markedly slender in comparison to the adult, and have one-cusped teeth as in Squalus. Their dermal denticles agree in relative size, spacing and distribution with those of the adult.
(v) The lateral line of juvenile and adult E. cookei is an open furrow from above the 2nd gill-opening rearwards. Its walls are supported by incomplete skeletal rings whose free ends project rearwards as spines along the edges of the furrow. In the adult the furrow is bridged at irregular intervals by narrow cross-connections of skin.
(vi) As the type of E. cookei is no longer in existence, the 1,980 mm male (Dom. Mus No. 2774) from Cook Strait is designated as the neotype of this species.
Acknowledgements
Various people have assisted with this study; some are acknowledged throughout the text, but others I. would like to thank are Dr. R. R. Forster, Otago Museum, for the photographs of E. brucus, and Mr. F. O'Leary, Dominion Museum for those of E. cookei used in this account, those members of the Dominion Museum staff who assisted with the preservation and handling of the New Zealand adult specimen of E. cookei, and lastly Professor L. R. Richardson, Department of Zoology of this University, for continuing encouragement, suggestions and advice.
Literature Cited
Bigelow, H. B., and Schroeder, W. C., 1948. “Fishes of the Western North Atlantic, Part I” Mem. Sears Found. Mar. Research, No. 1, Part 1, pp. 59–576, Text-figs. 6–105.
Bigelow, H. B., and Schroeder, W. C.— 1957. “A Study of the Sharks of the Suborder Squaloidea,” Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 117 (1). 1–150, Pls. 1–4, Figs.
Blainville, H. M. D. DE, 1816. “Prodrome d'une nouvelle distribution systematique du regne animal.” Bull. Sci. Soc. Philomatique, Paris, pp. 105–124.
Blainville, H. M. D. DE 1825 “Vertebres, classe 5, Poissons”. In Viellot, Desmarest,… Faune Francaise… Vol. 1, Part 3, 96 pp., 120 plates.
Bonnaterre, P. J., 1788. “Ichthyologie”, in Tab. Encyc. Method des trois Regnes de la nature Paris lvi + 215 pp., Pls. A, B. + 1–100.
Fowler, H. W., 1941. “The Fishes of the Groups Elasmobranchii, Holocephali, Isospondyli, and Ostariophysi… Contributions to the biology of the Philippine Archipelago and adjacent regions.” U. S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 100, Vol. 13, × + 879 pp., 30 text-figs.

Garman, S., 1885. “Chlamydoselachus anguineus Garm.—a living species of the Cladodont Shark.” Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 12 (1): 1–35, 20 Pls.
Gunther, A., 1870. “Catalogue of the Fishes in the British Museum,” Vol. 8, xxv + 549 pp.
Hamilton, A., 1886. “Note on a large sunfish (Orthagoriscus mola, L) recently captured at Napier, Hawke's Bay.” Trans. N. Z. Inst., 18: 135–136.
Hubbs, C. L., and Clark, F. N., 1945. “Occurrence of the Bramble Shark in California.” Calif. Fish & Game, 31 (0): 64–67, Figs. 16–17.
Jordan, D. S., and Evermann, B. W., 1896. “The Fishes of North and Middle America”.
Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., 47, Part I, lx + 1,240 pp.
Parker, T. J., 1884. “On the Occurrence of the Spinous Shark (Echinorhinus spinosus) in New Zealand waters,” Trans. N. Z. Inst. 16: 280–281.
Phillipps, W. J., 1928 “Sharks of New Zealand; No. 2” N. Z. Journ. Sci. & Tech., × (4): 221–226, Figs.
Phillipps, W. J.— 1946 “Sharks of New Zealand” Dom. Mus. Rec. Zool. 1 (2): 5–20, Figs.
Pietschmann, V., 1928. “Neue Fish-arten aus dem Pacifischen Ozean.” Anz. Akad. Wien., 65. 297–298.
Pietschmann, V.— 1930. “Remarks on Pacific Fishes,” Bull. Bernice P. Bishop Mus., 73: 1–24, 4 Pls.
Smith, A, 1849. “Illustrations of the Zoology of South Africa.” London, Vol. 7, Pisces, 31 Pls.
Waite, E. R., 1913. “Results of an examination of some drawings of New Zealand fishes,”.
Rec. Cant. Mus. II (1): 17–22.
Whitley, G. P., 1931. “New names for Australian fishes.” Australian Zoologist 6 (4): 310–334.
J. A. F. Garrick
M. Sc.,Department of Zoology,
Victoria University of Wellington,
P. O. Box 196,
Wellington, New Zealand.

Ascidians of New Zealand Part XIII-Aseidians of the Cook Strait Region
[Received by Editor, April 10, 1959.]
Summary
The number of ascidians recorded from the Cook Strait region is raised from 12 to 26. In accordance with the known distribution of ascidians in New Zealand waters, an additional 13 species could be expected in the ascidian fauna.
Sluiter's collection (1900) contained 9 species of ascidians. The Mortensen Expedition (1914–1916) added an additional three. The present survey is based on the study of (1) shore collections by G. Knox, L. Gurr, I. Morton, B. Street and the author; (2) dredged material collected by W. H. Dawbin; and (3) material from settling blocks set up in the Wellington Harbour by D. Hurley and P. Ralph. The number of species recorded from this region is now 26. These are listed below together with the known local distribution (A.H., Abel Head; C., Cape Campbell, C.B., Cable Bay, F.P., French Pass, I.B., Island Bay. K., Kaiteriteri; N., Nelson Harbour, P., Porirua; Q.C.S., Queen Charlotte; Sound; T., Takunaui, W., Wellington Harbour; W.B., Woodpecker Bay, West Coast).
| Synoicidae | Locality |
|---|---|
| *Amaroucium benhami Brewin | I. B., C., Q. C. S. |
| *Amaroucium foliaceum (Sluit). | F. P. |
| *Amaroucium phortax f. typica Mich. | F. P. |
| *Amaroucium stelliferum (Sluit). | F. P. |
| Amaroucium thomasi |
